Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T19:26:16.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - The Individuality of Odor Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2009

Robyn Hudson
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70228, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México D.F., Mexico
Hans Distel
Affiliation:
Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestrasse 31, D-80336 München, Germany
Catherine Rouby
Affiliation:
Université Lyon I
Benoist Schaal
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Danièle Dubois
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Rémi Gervais
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
A. Holley
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access

Summary

Odors Are Cognitive Constructs

The central argument of this chapter is that odors are the products of plastic nervous systems and that to adequately understand how olfactory stimuli influence physiology and behavior it is necessary to understand how experience shapes the way odorants are received and processed. Fundamental to the argument is the conceptual distinction between odorants and odors (Hudson, 1999). Odorants are molecules, entities of the external world objectively definable in terms of physicochemical characteristics and capable of being interpreted by particular nervous systems to yield the perceptions we call odors. Odors are the subjective products – constructs, if you like – of individual nervous systems and thus potentially are open to the many modulating influences of what might broadly be thought of as “mind.” They are among the phenomena that drive behavioral, physiological, and psychological functioning and thus are phenomena that we need to understand.

Following from that, we shall not be able to provide a proper account of olfactory function without considering the role of individual experience in shaping it. Indeed, increasing numbers of studies are suggesting that learning significantly influences aspects of olfactory function as diverse as the evocation of memories and associations, hedonic judgment, the early acquisition of preferences, and the ability to perceive and discriminate odors (Engen, 1991), as reviewed by Ayabe-Kanamura et al. (1998); see also the chapters in Sections 2 and 3 of this volume.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

, Ayabe-Kanamura S, , Schicker I, , Laska M, , Hudson R, , Distel H, , Kobayakawa T, & , Saito S (1998). Differences in the Perception of Everyday Odors – A Japanese-German Cross-Cultural Study. Chemical Senses 23:31–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Bozza T C & , Kauer J S (1998). Odorant Response Properties of Convergent Olfactory Receptor Neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 63:175–87Google Scholar
, Brennan P A & , Keverne E B (1997). Neural Mechanisms of Mammalian Olfactory Learning. Progress in Neurobiology 51:457–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Buck L B & , Axel R (1991). A Novel Multigene Family May Encode Odorant Receptors: A Molecular Basis for Odor Recognition. Cell 65:175–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder R G & Schab F R (1995). Imagery for Odors. In: Memory for Odors, ed. R G Crowder & F R Schab, pp. 93–107. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
, Distel H, , Ayabe-Kanamura S, , Schicker I, , Martínez-Gómez M, , Kobayakawa T, , Saito S, & , Hudson R (1999). Perception of Everyday Odors – Correlation between Intensity, Familiarity and Strength of Hedonic Judgement. Chemical Senses 24:191–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Distel H & , Hudson R (2001). Odor Judgements Are Influenced by the Subject's Knowledge of the Odor Source. Chemical Senses 26:247–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Duchamp-Viret P, , Chaput M A, & , Duchamp A (1999). Odor Response Properties of Rat Olfactory Receptor Neurons. Science 284:2171–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engen T (1991). Odor Sensation and Memory. New York: Praeger
, Glusman G, , Clifton S, , Roe B, & , Lancet D (1996). Sequence Analysis in the Olfactory Receptor Gene Cluster on Human Chromosome 17: Recombinatorial Events Affecting Receptor Diversity. Genomics 37:147–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Hudson R (1993). Olfactory Imprinting. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 3:548–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Hudson R (1999). From Molecule to Mind: The Role of Experience in Shaping Olfactory Function. Journal of Comparative Physiology 185:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Hudson R & , Distel H (1987). Regional Autonomy in the Peripheral Processing of Odor Signals in Newborn Rabbits. Brain Research 421:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson R & Distel H (1995). On the Nature and Action of the Rabbit Nipple-Search Pheromone: A Review. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. VII. Advances in the Biosciences, ed. R Apfelbach, D Müller-Schwarze, K Reuter, & E Weiler, pp. 223–32. Oxford: Pergamon
, Hudson R & , Distel H (1998). Induced Peripheral Sensitivity in the Developing Vertebrate Olfactory System. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855:109–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson R, Bacheralier J, Doupe A J, Fanselow M S, Kuhl P K, Menzel R, Morris M G, Rudy J W, & Squire L R (1998). What Does Behavior Tell Us about the Relationship between Development and Learning? In: Mechanistic Relationships between Development and Learning. Dahlem Workshop Report, ed. T J Carew, R Menzel, & C J Shatz, pp. 75–92. Chichester: Wiley
, Krautwurst D, , Yau K W, & , Reed R R (1998). Identification of Ligands for Olfactory Receptors by Functional Expression of a Receptor Library. Cell 95:917–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Laing D G (1982). Characterisation of Human Behaviour during Odour Perception. Perception 11:221–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Laing D G (1983). Natural Sniffing Gives Optimum Perception for Humans. Perception 12:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Laing D G (1985). Optimum Perception of Odor Intensity by Humans. Physiology and Behavior 34:569–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing D G, Cain W S, McBride R I, & Ache B W (ed.) (1989). Perception of Complex Smells and Tastes. New York: Academic Press
, Lancet D, , Gross-Isseroff R, , Margalit T, , Seidemann E, & , Ben-Arie N (1993). Olfaction: From Signal Transduction and Termination to Human Genome Mapping. Chemical Senses 18:217–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Lu X C & , Slotnick B (1998). Olfaction in Rats with Extensive Lesions of the Olfactory Bulbs: Implications for Odor Coding. Neuroscience 84:849–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maarse H (1991). Volatile Compounds in Foods and Beverages. New York: Marcel Dekker
, Mori K (1995). Relation of Chemical Structure to Specificity of Response in Olfactory Glomeruli. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 5:467–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Nevitt G A, , Dittman A D, , Quinn T P, & , Moody W J (1994). Evidence for a Peripheral Olfactory Memory in Imprinted Salmon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91:4288–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ressler K J, , Sullivan S L, & , Buck L B (1993). A Zonal Organization of Odorant Receptor Gene Expression in the Olfactory Epithelium. Cell 73:597–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ressler K J, , Sullivan S L, & , Buck L B (1994). Information Coding in the Olfactory System: Evidence for a Stereotyped and Highly Organized Epitope Map in the Olfactory Bulb. Cell 79:1245–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sato T, , Hirono J, , Tonoike M, & , Takebayashi M (1994). Tuning Specificities to Aliphatic Odorants in Mouse Olfactory Receptor Neurons and Their Local Distribution. Journal of Neurophysiology 72:2980–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Semke E, , Distel H, & , Hudson R (1995). Specific Enhancement of Olfactory Receptor Sensitivity Associated with Foetal Learning of Food Odours in the Rabbit. Naturwissenschaften 82:148–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sicard G (1986). Electrophysiological Recordings from Olfactory Receptor Cells in Adult Mice. Brain Research 397:405–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sicard G & , Holley A (1984). Receptor Cell Responses to Odorants: Similarities and Differences among Odors. Brain Research 292:283–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Strotmann J, , Konzelmann S, & , Breer H (1996). Laminar Segregation of Odorant Receptor Expression in the Olfactory Epithelium. Cell and Tissue Research 284:347–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberg J G (1983). Pheromones and Reproduction in Mammals. New York: Academic Press
, Vassar R, , Ngai J, & , Axel R (1994). Spatial Segregation of Odorant Receptor Expression in the Mammalian Olfactory Epithelium. Cell 74:309–18Google Scholar
, Wang H W, , Wysocki C J, & , Gold G H (1993). Induction of Olfactory Receptor Sensitivity in Mice. Science 260:998–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Zhao H, , Ivic L, , Otaki J M, , Hashimoto M, , Mikoshiba K, & , Firestein S (1998). Functional Expression of a Mammalian Odorant Receptor. Science 279:237–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Individuality of Odor Perception
    • By Robyn Hudson, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70228, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México D.F., Mexico, Hans Distel, Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestrasse 31, D-80336 München, Germany
  • Edited by Catherine Rouby, Université Lyon I, Benoist Schaal, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Danièle Dubois, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Rémi Gervais, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, A. Holley, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition
  • Online publication: 21 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Individuality of Odor Perception
    • By Robyn Hudson, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70228, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México D.F., Mexico, Hans Distel, Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestrasse 31, D-80336 München, Germany
  • Edited by Catherine Rouby, Université Lyon I, Benoist Schaal, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Danièle Dubois, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Rémi Gervais, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, A. Holley, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition
  • Online publication: 21 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Individuality of Odor Perception
    • By Robyn Hudson, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70228, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México D.F., Mexico, Hans Distel, Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestrasse 31, D-80336 München, Germany
  • Edited by Catherine Rouby, Université Lyon I, Benoist Schaal, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Danièle Dubois, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Rémi Gervais, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, A. Holley, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition
  • Online publication: 21 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.034
Available formats
×