Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vh8gq Total loading time: 1.041 Render date: 2022-09-26T13:05:42.680Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Book contents

Chapter 2 - Epidural Analgesia Maintenance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

Tauqeer Husain
Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey
Roshan Fernando
Womens Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Scott Segal
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Obstetric Anesthesiology
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
, pp. 6 - 9
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Lyons, GR, Kocarev, MG, Wilson, RC, et al. A comparison of minimum local anesthetic volumes and doses of epidural bupivacaine (0.125% w/v and 0.25% w/v) for analgesia in labor. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:412–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, SH, Carvalho, B. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:921–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sultan, P, Murphy, C, Halpern, S, Carvalho, B. The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes: a meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 2013; 60:840–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, A, Fernando, R. Maternal ambulation during labor. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24:268–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loubert, C, Hinova, A, Fernando, R. Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia 2011; 66:191212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, LE, Chang, DH. Cardiotoxicity with modern local anaesthetics: is there a safer choice? Drugs 2001; 61:333–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, MC. Are combined spinal-epidural catheters reliable? Int J Obstet Anesth 2000; 9:36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beilin, Y, Zahn, J, Bernstein, HH, et al. Treatment of incomplete analgesia after placement of an epidural catheter and administration of local anesthetic for women in labor. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:1502–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beilin, Y, Bernstein, HH, Zucker-Pinchoff, B. The optimal distance that a multiorifice epidural catheter should be threaded into the epidural space. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:301–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Segal, S, Eappen, S, Datta, S. Superiority of multi-orifice over single-orifice epidural catheters for labor analgesia and cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9:109–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, Q. Epidural catheter tip position and distribution of injectate evaluated by computed tomography. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:964–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fegley, AJ, Lerman, J, Wissler, R. Epidural multiorifice catheters function as single-orifice catheters: an in vitro study. Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1079–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, TW, Shapiro, T, Glass, B, Foster-Payne, D, Oriol, NE. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:919–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capogna, G, Camorcia, M, Stirparo, S, Farcomeni, A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg 2011; 113:826–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capogna, G, Stirparo, S. Techniques for the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013; 26:261–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, CA, McCarthy, RJ, Hewlett, B. The effect of manipulation of the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and injection volume on total drug use for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:904–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, RB, Allen, TK, Habib, AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2013; 116:133–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sia, ATH, Leo, S, Ocampo, CE. A randomised comparison of variable-frequency automated mandatory boluses with a basal infusion for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. Anaesthesia 2013; 68:267–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats