Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-2bkkj Total loading time: 1.228 Render date: 2022-09-26T13:56:52.545Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Book contents

Chapter 10a - Consent Considerations in Maternity: A US Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

Tauqeer Husain
Affiliation:
Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey
Roshan Fernando
Affiliation:
Womens Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Scott Segal
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Anesthesiology
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
, pp. 46 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broaddus, B, Chandrasekhar, S Informed consent in obstetric anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2011; 112(4):912–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Informed consent (ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439). Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:401–8.
Berkowitz, R. Should refusal to undergo a cesarean delivery be a criminal offense?. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104(6):1220–21; and
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG). Maternal decision making, ethics, and the law (ACOG Committee Opinion No. 321). Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(5 Pt 1):1127–37.
Blinderman, CD, Krakauer, EL, Solomon, MZ. Time to revise the approach to determining cardiopulmonary resuscitation status. JAMA 2012; 307:917–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynaecology, FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health, 2006. Available at www.FIGO.org.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×