Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7c2ld Total loading time: 0.93 Render date: 2021-11-27T09:13:12.669Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Part IV - Persons and Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2021

Stefan Grundmann
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Hans-W. Micklitz
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Moritz Renner
Affiliation:
Universität Mannheim, Germany
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
New Private Law Theory
A Pluralist Approach
, pp. 339 - 434
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Demogue, R, ‘La notion de sujet de droit’ (1909) 8 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 611–55, (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N, Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, N, ‘Zivilrechtstheorie, Sozialwissenschaft und Verbraucherschutz’ (1974) 7(8) Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 187–94, (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D, ‘Three globalisations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000’, in Trubek, D. M. and Santos, A (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O, ‘The paradox of access justice, and its application to mandatory arbitration’ (2016) 83 The University of Chicago Law Review 1755–817Google Scholar
von Gierke, Otto, Die Genossenschaftstheorie und die deutsche Rechtsprechung (Hildesheim: Olms, 1887), pp. 603672 (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’, 4 Economica, 386405(1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berle, Adolf A. and Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan, 1947 (1932))Google Scholar
Grossman, Sanford D. and Hart, Oliver D., ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, 94 Journal of Political Economy 691719 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael and Meckling, William, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, 3 Journal of Financial Economics 305–60 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saleilles, Raymond, De la personnalité juridique (Paris: Rousseau, 1910)Google Scholar
Berle, Adolf / Means, Gardiner, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York / Chicago / Washington: Commerce Clearing House Publishing, 1932) ( book II, chapter 8, and book III, chapter 1)Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael / Meckling, William, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, 3 Journal of Financial Economics 305–60 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen / Demsetz, Harold, ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, 62 The American Economic Review 777–95 (1972)Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold, ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, 57 The American Economic Review 347–59 (1967)Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene, ‘Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work’, 25 Journal of Finance 383417 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene, ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’, 88 Journal of Political Economy 288307 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walgenbach, Peter, ‘Neoinstitutionalistische Ansätze in der Organisationstheorie’, in A. Kieser / M. Ebers (eds.), Organisationstheorien (8th ed., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2019), pp.300–50Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, MA / London: Harvard University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Manne, Henry, ‘Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control’, 73 Journal of Political Economy 110–20 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen / Demsetz, Harold, ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, 62 The American Economic Review 777–95 (1972)Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko, Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (Cambridge MA / London: MIT Press, 2001) (especially chapter 11)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Sanford / Hart, Oliver, ‘One Share/One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control’, 20 Journal of Financial Economics 175202 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H, ‘The Transformation of Europe, 8 Yale Law Journal 2403–83 (1991)Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D, ‘An introduction to varieties of capitalism’, in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D, ‘Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility’ (2005) 47(4) California Management Review 1945Google Scholar
Bohle, D and Greskovits, B, ‘Varieties of capitalism and capitalism “tout court’ (2009) 50(3) European Journal of Sociology 355–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammer, S, Jackson, G and Matten, D, ‘Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance’ (2012) 10(1) Socio-Economic Review 328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroll, A. B. and Shabana, K. M., ‘The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice’ (2010) 12(1) International Journal of Management Reviews 85105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Kang, N, and Moon, J, ‘The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility’ (2011) 40(4) Economy and Society 640–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinderman, D, ‘Corporate social responsibility in the EU, 1993–2013: institutional ambiguity, economic crises, business legitimacy and bureaucratic politics’ (2013) 51(4) Journal of Common Market Studies 701–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nölke, A, ’Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: the analytical contribution of comparative capitalism’ (2016) 14(1) Socio-Economic Review 141–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×