Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T06:40:47.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Environmental and Natural Resource Challenges in the Twenty-First Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2021

Robert G. Woodmansee
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
John C. Moore
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Dennis S. Ojima
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Laurie Richards
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Get access

Summary

National and international agencies and organizations have published reports outlining critical natural resource, environmental, and societal challenges facing global inhabitants. These reports include the UN Sustainability Goals, Future Earth, Global Land Project, and the Resilience Alliance. Recognizing many of the topics listed in these reports are broad and aspirational, the authors of this chapter have disaggregated many topics into research and management challenges for which the systems ecology paradigm is well suited. Disaggregation is based on challenges at different spatial hierarchical scales: organisms/populations; ecological sites; landscapes; small regions/watersheds; regions/nations; continents; and the globe. Emphasis is placed on research needs at landscape and larger hierarchical levels. Biophysical knowledge acquired during the past 50 years about organism/population and ecological site levels is available now to better manage ecosystems and natural resources. However, research blending the ecosystem knowledge base with behavioral, learning, organizational, and marketing sciences is vitally needed to affect management practice change at scales where people manage land and waters. The goal is to engage managers, policy makers, thought leaders, and concerned citizens to resolve critical problems and adopt best management practices to meet current and future environmental challenges (e.g., provision of ecosystem services and climate change effects on ecosystem).

Type
Chapter
Information
Natural Resource Management Reimagined
Using the Systems Ecology Paradigm
, pp. 36 - 65
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, J. S., and Galvin, K. A. (1990). Future directions of ecosystem science. BioScience, 40(9), 640–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Future Earth (2015). Future Earth 2025 Vision. www.futureearth.org/sites/default/files/future-earth_10-year-vision_web.pdf (accessed June 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Global Land Project (GLP) (2005). Science Plan and Implementation Strategy IGBP Report No. 53/IHDP Report No. 19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm. 64pp. www.igbp.net/download/18.1b8ae20512db692f2a680006384/1376383121392/report_53-GLP.pdf.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, I., From, T., and Boerma, D. (2014). Ecosystem services provided by livestock species and breeds, with special consideration to the small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists. Background Study Paper No. 66 Rev. 1. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome. www.fao.org/3/a-at598e.pdf; see also www.fao.org/3/a-i6482e.pdf.Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M., Griffith, R., Ryan, P., et al. (2014). Applying resilience thinking to natural resource management through a “planning-by-doing” framework. Society and Natural Resources, 27, 299314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. (2016a). Editorial overview – Transformations and co-design: Co-designing research projects on social transformations to sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, vviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. (2016b). Can science on transformation transform science? Lessons from co-design. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 106–15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. (2010). Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Ojima, D. S., and Corell, R. W. (2009). Managing grassland ecosystems under global environmental change: Developing strategies to meet challenges and opportunities of global change. In Farming with Grass: Achieving Sustainable Mixed Agricultural Landscape, ed. Franzluebbers, A. J.. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society, 146–55.Google Scholar
O’Neill, R. V. (1988). Hierarchy theory and global change. In Scales and Global Change: Spatial and Temporal Variability in Biospheric and Geospheric Processes, ed. Rosswall, T., Woodmansee, R. G., and Risser, P. G.. SCOPE Series 38. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2945.Google Scholar
Resilience Alliance (2018). Resilience Alliance. www.resalliance.org (accessed June 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Tabara, J., and Chabay, I. (2013). Coupling human information and knowledge systems with social–ecological systems change: Reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability. Environmental Science and Policy, 28, 7181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDG) (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform Our World. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/# (accessed June 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Walker, B., and Salt, D. (2006). Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Weathers, K. C., Groffman, P. M., Van Dolah, E., et al. (2016). Frontiers in ecosystem ecology from a community perspective: The future is boundless and bright. Ecosystems, 19, 753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021–016–9967–0.Google Scholar
Weichselgartner, J., and Kasperson, R. (2010). Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 266–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, E. (2017). Historical range of variability. Oxford Bibliographies. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199363445/obo-9780199363445–0001.xml (accessed June 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Woodmansee, R. G. (1990). Biogeochemical cycles and ecological hierarchies. In Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective, ed. Zonneveld, I. S. and Forman, R. R. T.. New York: Springer, 5771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×