Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-5sfl8 Total loading time: 1.006 Render date: 2022-12-07T08:09:27.403Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Part II - Court Reform on Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2019

Rosann Greenspan
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Hadar Aviram
Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Jonathan Simon
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice
Studies Inspired by the Work of Malcolm Feeley
, pp. 95 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

21 U.S.C. § 360d (1938).Google Scholar
New York University. 2018. News Release. “Do Less Harm: E-Cigarettes a Safer Option than Smoking.” January 11, 2018. www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2018/january/do-less-harm–e-cigarettes-a-safer-option-than-smoking.html.Google Scholar
Baojiang, Li. 2010. “Effects of Increasing Tobacco Taxes on Government Revenue and Consumption in China.” Acta Tabacaria Sinica 16 (5): 8288.Google Scholar
Benedict, Carol. 2011. Golden-Silk Smoke: A History of Tobacco in China, 1550–2010. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Alan. 2009. The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Business Wire. 2018. “Global E-Cigarette Market Analysis and Forecast 2018–2023 – Market is Forecasted to Attain a Value of $48 Billion – ResearchAndMarkets.com.” www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180306005861/en/Global-E-Cigarette-Market-Analysis-Forecast-2018–2023.Google Scholar
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. 2018. “JUUL and Youth: Rising E-Cigarette Popularity.” www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/factsheets/0394.pdf.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2018. “Youth and Tobacco Use.” www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/youth_data/tobacco_use/index.htm.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2017. “Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.” August 25, 2017, 66 (33): 892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffee, B. W., Watkins, S. L., and Glantz., S. A. 2018. “Electronic Cigarette Use and Progression from Experimentation to Established Smoking.” Pediatrics 141(4): e20173594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craver, Richard. 2015. “Blu Chips Away at Vuse’s Share.” Winston-Salem Journal, July 27, 2015. www.journalnow.com/business/business_news/local/blu-chips-away-at-vuse-s-share/article_64e74e38-34b2-11e5-9115-f74b51fccb68.html.Google Scholar
“Deeming Tobacco Products to Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Regulations on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products,” 79 Fed. Reg. 23141 (April 25, 2014).Google Scholar
Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC Text with EEA relevance. Title III, Electronic Cigarettes And Herbal Products For Smoking, Article 20, Electronic Cigarettes.Google Scholar
“Executory Order and Reasons for a Tobacco Manufacturing Monopoly (Tabako seizō sembai seido riyū oyobi shikō junjo).” Quoted in 1991 Tabako Sembai-shi [A History of the Tobacco Monopoly] 6th edn., vol. 1 (Tokyo: Nihon Tabako Sangyō K.K. Shashi Hensan-shitsu). Translated and discussed in Levin, Mark. 1997. “Smoke Around the Rising Sun: An American Look at Tobacco Regulation in Japan.Stanford Journal of Law and Policy 8 (1): 99124.Google Scholar
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Public Law 111–31 (H.R. 1256) (June 22, 2009).Google Scholar
Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1966, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1331–1340 (2012).Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1992 [1979]. The Process Is the Punishment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Feldman, Eric. 2014. “Layers of Law: The Case of E-Cigarettes.” Florida International University Law Review 10 (1): 111–23.Google Scholar
Feldman, Eric A. and Yue, Chai. 2016. “E-Cigarette Regulation in China: The Road Ahead.” University of Pennsylvania Asian Law Review 11 (3): 409–38.Google Scholar
Fullerton, Larry and Alvarez, Megan. 2012. “Convergence in International Merger Control.” Antitrust 26 (2): 2025.Google Scholar
Funatogawa, Ikuko, Funatogawa, Takashi, and Yano, Eiji. 2013. “Trends in Smoking and Lung Cancer Mortality in Japan, by Birth Cohort, 1949–2010.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 91 (5): 332–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glynn, Thomas J. 2014. “E-cigarettes and the Future of Tobacco Control.” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 64 (3): 164–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Halliday, Terence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. 2016. Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hong, Yu. 2014. “The Change of China Tobacco Control Policy: An Advocacy Coalition Framework-based Analysis.” Chinese Journal of Health Policy 7 (3): 2026.Google Scholar
Honjo, Kaori and Kawachi, Ichiro. 2000. “Effects of Market Liberalization on Smoking in Japan.” BMJ Tobacco Control 9 (2): 193200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Naoki and Anderson, Gerard F.. 2012. “In Japan, All-Payer Rate Setting Under Tight Government Control Has Proved to Be an E0 ffective Approach to Containing Costs.” Health Affairs 31 (5): 1049–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JTI. 2014. “JTI Acquires Leading E-cigarette Brand E-lites.” JTI, June 11, 2014. www.jti.com/our-views/newsroom/jti-acquires-leading-e-cigarette-brand-e-lites.Google Scholar
JTI. 2015. “JT Acquires Logic, the Leading Independent US e-Cigarette.” PR Newswire, April 30, 2015. www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jt-acquires-logic-the-leading-independent-us-e-cigarette-company-501787281.html.Google Scholar
Juan, Shan. “E-cigarette Controls Considered for Safety.” China Daily, January 7, 2015. www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015–01/07/content_19255939.htm.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2003. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. D., Awopegba, A., and De León, E.. 2017. “Global Approaches to Regulating Electronic Cigarettes.BMJ Tobacco Control 26, 440–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Kluger, Richard. 1997. Ashes to Ashes: America’s Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
KPMG. 2015. “2015 KPMG Global Tax Rate Survey.” Last modified October 25, 2015. https://home.kpmg.com/cn/en/home/insights/2015/10/global-tax-rate-survey.html.Google Scholar
Lempert, Lauren K., Grana, Rachel, and Glantz, Stanton A.. 2014. “The Importance of Product Definitions in US E-Cigarette Laws and Regulations.BMJ Tobacco Control, 18. https://doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014–051913.Google ScholarPubMed
Levin, Mark. 1997. “Smoke Around the Rising Sun: An American Look at Tobacco Regulation in Japan.” Stanford Journal of Law and Policy 8 (1): 99124.Google Scholar
Levin, Myron. 2014. “Tobacco Industry Batting a Thousand with Federal Judge, While FDA Strikes Out.” Fair Warning, September 3, 2014. www.fairwarning.org/2014/09/fda-batting-o-3-federal-judge/.Google Scholar
Li, Cheng. 2012. The Political Mapping of China’s Tobacco Industry and Anti-Smoking Campaign. Washington DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Linos, Katerina. 2013. The Democratic Foundations of Policy Diffusion: How Health, Family and Employment Laws Spread Across Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lv, Jun, Meng, Su, Hong, Zhiheng, Zhang, Ting, Huang, Xuemei, Wang, Bo, and Liming, Li. 2011. “Implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in mainland China.” BMJ Tobacco Control, 16. http://doi:10.1136/tc.2010.040352.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, And rew. 2014. “The Chinese Government is Getting Rich Selling Cigarettes.” Bloomberg Businessweek, December 12, 2014. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014–12-12/the-chinese-government-is-getting-rich-selling-cigarettes#p1.Google Scholar
McNeill, A. et al. 2018. Evidence Review of E-cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products 2018: A Report Commissioned by Public Health England. London: Public Health England.Google Scholar
Mincer, Jilian. 2015. “E-cigarette Usage Surges in Past Year: Reuters/Ipsos Poll.” Reuters, June 10, 2015. www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ecigarette-poll-analysis/e-cigarette-usage-surges-in-past-year-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN0OQ0CA20150610.Google Scholar
Mistic E Cigs. 2015. “What Does VTM Mean?” December 4, 2015. http://blog.misticecigs.com/what-does-vtm-mean.Google Scholar
NACS. 2013. “E-Cigarette Sales to Exceed Traditional Cigarettes by 2021.” September 17, 2013. www.convenience.org/Media/Daily/Pages/ND0917134.aspx#.WnIVkainF3g.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24952.Google Scholar
National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2017. “Electronic Cigarettes (E-cigarettes).” Drug Facts. Last modified June 2017. www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/electronic-cigarettes-e-cigarettes.Google Scholar
People. 2014. “E-cigarette Experience Two Days of Ice.” September 2, 2014. http://scitech.people.com.cn/n/2014/0902/c1007-25585378.html.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert L. 1991–1992. “A Sociolegal History of the Tobacco Tort Litigation.” Stanford Law Review 44: 853–78.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert L. 2001. “The Tobacco Litigation: A Tentative Assessment.” DePaul Law Review 55 (2): 331–58.Google Scholar
Rothacher, Albrecht. 1989. Japan’s Agro-Food Sector: The Politics and Economics of Excess Protection. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, F. M. 1997. “Competition Policy Convergence: Where Next?Empirica 24 (1): 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2006. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism.” International Organization 60 (4): 781810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everywhere, Smoking, Inc. v. Food & Drug Admin., 680 F. Supp. 2d 62 (D.D.C. 2010).Google Scholar
Solomon, Brian. 2014. “Reynolds, Lorillard Dump Blu E-Cigarettes in $27 Billion Merger.” Forbes, July 15, 2014. www.forbes.com/sites/briansolomon/2014/07/15/reynolds-lorillard-dump-blu-e-cigarettes-in-27-billion-merger/#2975be341699.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. 2013. “Judge Has Record of Wrestling with Thorny Issues, and the U.S. Government.” New York Times, December 16, 2013. www.nytimes.com/2013/12/17/us/politics/judge-has-never-let-presidents-off-easy-on-pornography-terrorism-or-surveillance.html?_r=1Google Scholar
The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2015. “The Shifting Landscape of Healthcare in Asia-Pacific: A Look at Australia, China, India, Japan, and South Korea,” The Economist. www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/The%20shifting%20landscape%20of%20healthcare%20in%20Asia-Pacific_Oct%205_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Control, Tobacco. 2013. “The Tobacco Endgame.” BMJ Tobacco Control 22 (May): i1-i60.Google Scholar
United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 1964. Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee of the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Food and Drug Administration. 2011. “Letter to Stakeholders: Regulation of E-Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products.” April 25, 2011.Google Scholar
United States Food and Drug Administration. 2014. “Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Proposed Rule).” 79 Fed. Reg. 23141 (April 25, 2014).Google Scholar
United States Food and Drug Administration. 2017. “Vaporizers, E-Cigarettes, and Other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).” Last modified December 20, 2017. www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/ProductsIngredientsComponents/ucm456610.htm.Google Scholar
United States Food and Drug Administration. 2018. “Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act: An Overview.” Last modified January 17, 2018. www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/RulesRegulationsGuidance/ucm246129.htm.Google Scholar
United States Food and Drug Administration. 2018. “Milestones in U.S. Food and Drug Law History.” Last modified January 3, 2018. www.fda.gov/aboutfda/whatwedo/history/forgshistory/evolvingpowers/ucm2007256.htm.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2003. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. May 21, 2003. https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IX-4&chapter=9&lang=en.Google Scholar
USDA and FAS. 2000. “China Tobacco and Tobacco Products Update 2000.” GAIN Report #CH0044, Dec. 11, 2000.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. n.d. “Details on Focal Point for Tobacco Control, Tobacco Control Unit and National Coordinating Mechanism for Tobacco Control. World Health Organization.” Accessed February 2, 2018. http://apps.who.int/fctc/implementation/database/sites/implementation/scripts/src/tabulardata.php?indicator=5214&region=6.Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization. n.d. “Other IP Treaties.” Accessed January 24, 2018. www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/other_treaties/parties.jsp?treaty_id=231&group_id=22.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. n.d. “Understanding the WTO: The Organization Members and Observers.” Accessed January 24, 2018. www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm.Google Scholar

References

Abramson, Jeffrey. 1994. We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Adler, Stephan J. 1994. The Jury: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kent and Johnson, David T.. 2010. “Japan’s New Criminal Trials: Origins, Operations, and Implications.” In New Courts in Asia, edited by Harding, rew and Nicholson, Penelope (Pip), 371–90. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kent and Nolan, Mark. 2004. “Lay Participation in the Japanese Justice System: A Few Preliminary Thoughts Regarding the Lay Assessor System (saiban-in seido) from Domestic Historical and International Psychological Perspectives.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 37 (4): 935–92.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S.. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” The American Political Science Review 56: 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1988. “On the Pursuit of the Ideal.” New York Review of Books. Vol. 35, No. 4 (March 17, 1988), www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1988/mar/17/on-the-pursuit-of-the-ideal/.Google Scholar
Burns, Robert P. 1999. A Theory of the Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Robert P. 2009. The Death of the American Trial. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. 1909 [2013]. “The Twelve Men,” in Tremendous Trifles. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1983. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm and Miyazawa, Setsuo, eds. 2002. The Japanese Adversary System in Context: Controversies and Comparisons. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2008. “Justice System Reform in Japan.” Unpublished paper, available at www.reds.msh-paris.fr/communication/docs/foote.pdf.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2010. “Policymaking by the Japanese Judiciary in the Criminal Justice Field.” Hoshakaigaku 72: 645.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2013. “The Trials and Tribulations of Japan’s Law Schools and Bar Exam System.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 36: 369458.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2002. The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2004. “Nihon ni okeru Shiho Seido Kaikaku: Keisatsu no Shozai to Sono Juyosei” [Justice System Reform in Japan: Where Are the Police and Why It Matters]. Horitsu Jiho 76: 815.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2015. “Policing in Japan.” In The Sage Handbook of Modern Japanese Studies, edited by Babb, James, 222–43. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Justice System Reform Council. 2001. “Recommendations of the Justice System Reform Council: For A Justice System to Support Japan in the 21st Century.” Accessed April 2, 2017. http://japan.kantei.go.jp/policy/sihou/singikai/990612_e.html.Google Scholar
Kalven Jr., Harry and Zeisel, Hans. 1966. The American Jury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. 1978. “Torture and Plea Bargaining.” University of Chicago Law Review 46: 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Mark and Tice, Virginia. 2009. “Japan’s New Citizen Judges: How Secrecy Imperils Judicial Reform.” The Asia-Pacific Journal 7 (19): 117. Accessed at www.japanfocus.org/-Virginia-Tice/3141.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 1991. “Administrative Controls of Japanese Judges.” In Law and the Technology in the Pacific Community, edited by Philip, S. C. Lewis, 263–81. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 1992. Policing in Japan: A Study on Making Crime. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2007. “Law Reform, Lawyers, and Access to Justice.” In Japanese Business Law, edited by McAlinn, Gerald Paul, 3989. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo, Chan, Kay-Wah, and Lee, Ilhyung. 2008. “The Reform of Legal Education in East Asia.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4: 333–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2013. “Successes, Failures, and Remaining Issues of the Justice System Reform in Japan: An Introduction to the Symposium Issue.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 36: 313–48.Google Scholar
Mori, Hono. 2013. Shiho Kenryoku no Uchimaku. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho.Google Scholar
Packer, Herbert L. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark J. and Rasmusen, Eric B.. 2003. Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark J. and Rasmusen, Eric B.. 2015. “Lowering the Bar to Raise the Bar: Licensing Difficulty and Attorney Quality in Japan.” Journal of Japanese Studies 41: 113–42.Google Scholar
Saegusa, Mayumi. 2009. “Why the Japanese Law School System Was Established: Co-optation as a Defensive Tactic in the Face of Global Pressures.” Law & Social Inquiry 34: 365–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeki, Masahiko. 2010. “Victim Participation in Criminal Trials in Japan.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 38: 149–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segi, Hiroshi. 2014. Zetsubo no Saibansho. Tokyo: Kodansha Shinsho.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Taku. 2013. Shikei Haishi Nempo [The Death Penalty Annual]. Tokyo: Impakuto.Google Scholar
Shinomiya, Satoru. 2013. “Saibanin Saiban: Saibanin Seido wa Keiji Jitsumu o Dono yo ni Kaete Iru ka.” Unpublished paper, Kokugakuin University School of Law, Tokyo, March, 113.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Japan. 2012. Saibanin Saiban Jisshi Jokyo no Kensho Hokokusho. Tokyo: Saikosaibansho Jimusokyoku. 1122.Google Scholar
Takano, Takashi. 2009. “Nihon no Kensatsu wa Hetare na no ka”, in Keiji Saiban o Kangaeru: Takano . June 14 and June 23.Google Scholar
Takeda, Masahiro. 2014. “Saibanin Seido Kaishi kara 5nen: Kensatsu wa Taisho Jiken o Shincho ni Kiso: Saibanin Kohosha no Jitairitsu, 60% Koeru.” Journalism (Fall): 136–43.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil and Hans, Valerie P.. 2007. American Juries: The Verdict. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Yomiuri Shimbun Shakaibu. 2013. Shikei: Kyukoku no Batsu no Shinjitsu. Tokyo: Chuokoron-Shinsha.Google Scholar

References

Ashworth, And rew, Zedner, Lucia, and Tomlin, Patrick eds. 2013. Prevention and the Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2007. ‘The Cosmopolitan Condition: Why Methodological Nationalism Fails’. Theory, Culture and Society 24 (7–8): 286–90.Google Scholar
Black, Donald. 1976. The Behaviour of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Abraham S. 1967. ‘The Practice of Law as Confidence Game: Organizational Cooptation of a Profession’. Law & Society Review 1 (1): 1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Sabino. 2001. ‘L’esplosione del diritto. Il sistema giuridico italiano dal 1975 al 2000’. Sociologia del Diritto XXVIII/I: 5566.Google Scholar
Cavadino, Michael and Dignan., John 2006. Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Church, Thomas. 1982. Examining Local Legal Culture – Practitioner Attitudes in Four Criminal Courts. NIJ.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1979. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1983. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1992. ‘Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors’. Law and Social Inquiry 17 (4): 745–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1997. ‘Comparative Criminal Law for Criminologists: Comparing for What Purpose?’ In Comparing Legal Cultures, edited by Nelken, David, 93104. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 2013. ‘Preface’. In Malcolm Feeley, Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 2014. ‘The Unconvincing Case against Private Prisons’. Indiana Law Journal 89 (4): 1401–36.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. and Levine, Kay. 2001. ‘Assaults on the Adversarial Process: Rethinking American Criminal Justice’. Punishment & Society 3 (4): 537–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm and Rubin, Ed. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm and Simon, Jonathan. 1994. ‘Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law’. In The Futures of Criminology, edited by Nelken, David, 173201. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Field, Stewart and Nelken., David 2007. ‘Early Intervention and the Cultures of Youth Justice: A Comparison of Italy and Wales’. In European Ways of Law, edited by Gessner, Volkmar and Nelken, David, 349–74. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, Luigi. 1990 [2011]. Diritto e Ragione: Teoria del garantismo penale. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, Liugi. 1993. ‘Note critiche ed autocritiche intorno alla discussione su Diritto e Ragione’. In Le Ragioni del Garantismo. Discutendo con Luigi Ferrajoli, edited by Gianformaggio, Letizia, 459520. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
Garland, Brett, Hogan, Nancy, Wodahl, Eric, Hass, Aida, Stohr, Mary K and Lambert., Eric 2014. ‘Decarceration and its Possible Effects on Inmates, Staff, and Communities’. Punishment & Society 16: 448–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David. 2000. The Culture of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. ‘Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture’. In The Interpretation of Culture, edited by Geertz, Clifford. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terry, Karpik, Lucien and Feeley, Malcom. 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Hammergren, Linn. 2007. Envisioning Reform: Improving Judicial Performance in Latin America. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2015. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law: Novel Entanglements of Law and Technology. Cheltenham: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2001. Adversarial Legalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. 2008. The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinson, Robert. 1974. ‘What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’. The Public Interest 2254.Google Scholar
Melossi, Dario. 1994. ‘The Economy of Illegalities’. In The Futures of Criminology, edited by Nelken, David, 202–19. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Melossi, Dario, Sozzo, Massimo and Sparks, Richard, eds. 2011. Travels of the Criminal Question: Cultural Embeddedness and Diffusion. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1993. ‘Le giustificazioni della pena ed i diritti dell’imputato’. In Le ragioni del garantismo: Discutendo con Luigi Ferrajoli, edited by Gianformaggio, Letizia, 275307. Giappicheli: Torino.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1996. ‘Judicial Politics and Corruption in Italy’. In The Corruption of Politics and the Politics of Corruption: special issue of the Journal of Law and Society, edited by Nelken, David and Levi, Michael, 95113.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2000. ‘Telling Difference: Of Crime and Criminal Justice in Italy’. In Contrasting Criminal Justice, edited by Nelken, David, 233–64. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2001. ‘Can Law Learn from Social Science?’ Israel Law Review 2–3: 120.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003a. ‘Beyond Compare? Criticising the American Way of Law’. Law and Social Inquiry 28 (3): 181213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, David. 2003b. ‘Legitimate Suspicion? Berlusconi and the Judges’. In The Second Berlusconi Government: Politics in Italy, edited by Segatti, Paulo and Blondel, Jan, 112–28. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2004. ‘Using the Concept of Legal Culture’. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29: 128.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2009. ‘Comparative Criminal Justice: Beyond Ethnocentricism and Relativism’. European Journal of Criminology 6 (4): 291311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, David. 2010. Comparative Criminal Justice: Making Sense of Difference. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2011. ‘Using Legal Culture: Prospects and Problems’. In Journal of Comparative Law, special issue, edited by Nelken, David, 14 (2): 139.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2012. ‘Comparative Criminal Justice’. In Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th edn.), edited by Mike, Maguire, Rod, Morgan and Reiner, Robert, 138–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2014. ‘Can Prosecutors Be Too Independent? An Italian Case-Study’. In European Penology?, edited by Daems, Tom, Snacken, Sonja, van der vyl Smit, Dirk, 241–61. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2015. ‘Foil Comparisons or Foiled Comparisons? Learning from Italian Juvenile Justice’. European Journal of Criminology 12: 519–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, David. 2016. ‘From Pains-Taking to Pains-Giving Comparisons’. International Journal of Law in Context 12 (4): 390403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, David. 2016. ‘Comparative Legal Research and Legal Culture: Facts, Approaches and Values’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarzotti, Claudio. 2007. Processi de selezione del crimine. Procure della republica e organizzazione giudiziaria. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., Gottfredson, Denise, MacKenzie, Doris, John, Eck, Reuter, Peter and Bushway., Shawn 1998. Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising, a Report to the United States Congress. NIJ.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 2006. Governing through Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Twining, William. 2005. ‘Have Concepts, Will Travel’. International Journal of Law in Context 1 (4): 427–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, Richard. 2005. A World View of Criminal Justice. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Waquant, Loic. 2009a. Prisons of Poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Waquant, Loic. 2009b. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Tony and Maruna., Shadd 2007. Rehabilitation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitman, Jim Q. 2005. Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Alexander, M. 2010. The New Jim Crow. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Allen, F. 1981. The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy and Social Purpose. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Aviram, H. 2015. Cheap on Crime: Recession-Era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, S. 2002. The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, V. 2013. “Nordic Exceptionalism Revisited: Explaining the Paradox of a Janus-Faced Penal Regime.” Theoretical Criminology, 17 (1): 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. 1963. Outsiders. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, K. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bordt, R. L. and Musheno, M. C.. 1988. “Bureaucratic Co-Optation of Informal Dispute Processing: Social Control as an Effect of Inmate Grievance Policy.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25 (1): 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calavita, K. and Jenness, V.. 2015. Appealing to Justice: Prisoner Grievances, Rights, and Carceral Logic. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chantraine, G. 2010. “French Prisons of Yesteryear and Today.” Punishment & Society 12 (1): 2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliquennois, G. 2013. “Which Penology for Decision Making in French Prisons?Punishment & Society 15 (5): 468–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloward, R. A., Cressey, D. R., Grosser, G. H., McCleery, R., Ohlin, L. E., Sykes, G. M., and Messinger, S. L.. 1960. Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 1979. “The Punitive City: Notes on the Dispersal of Social Control.” Crime, Law and Social Change 4 (3): 339–63.Google Scholar
Conover, T. 2001. Newjack: Guarding Sing Sing. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Cressey, D. R. 1961. Introduction to The Prison: Studies in Institutional Organization and Change, edited by Cressey, D. R., 112. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Cummins, E. 1994. The Rise and Fall of California’s Radical Prison Movement. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review. 48 (2): 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donziger, S. R. 1996. The Real War on Crime: The Report of the National Criminal Justice Commission. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Dumm, T. 1987. Democracy and Punishment: Disciplinary Origins of the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1969 [1900]. “Two Laws of Penal Evolution.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 38 (1): 3261.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1984 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (6): 1531–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, W. N. and Sauder, M.. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M. and Rubin, E.. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. 1983. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. and Simon, J.. 1992. “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications.” Criminology 30 (4): 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. A. 2006. “Shopfloor Cultures: The Idioculture of Production in Operational Meteorology.” The Sociological Quarterly 47 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foulke, W. (1846–1852). Notebooks concerning prisons and prisoners. Box 7, William Parker Foulke Papers. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Garland, D. 1985. Punishment and Welfare. Brookfield: Gower.Google Scholar
Goffman, I. 1961. Asylums. Garden City: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, P., Page, J., and Phelps, M.. 2015. “The Long Struggle: An Agonistic Perspective on Penal Development.” Theoretical Criminology 19 (3): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grattet, R. and Jenness, V.. 2005. “The Reconstitution of Law in Local Settings: Agency Discretion, Ambiguity, and a Surplus of Law in the Policing of Hate Crime.” Law & Society Review 39 (4): 893942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guetzkow, J. and Schoon, E.. 2015. “If You Build It, They Will Fill It: The Consequences of Prison Overcrowding Litigation.” Law & Society Review 49 (2): 401–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah-Moffat, K. and Klassen, A.. 2015. “Normalizing Exceptions: Solitary Confinement and the Micro-Politics of Risk/Need in Canada.” In Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration and Solitary Confinement, edited by Reiter, K. and Koenig, A., 135–55. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heimer, C. A. 1999. “Competing Institutions: Law, Medicine, and Family in Neonatal Intensive Care.” Law & Society Review 33 (1): 1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, A. J. 1992. The Rise of the Penitentiary: Prisons and Punishment in Early America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ibsen, A. Z. 2013. “Ruling by Favors: Prison Guards’ Informal Exercise of Institutional Control.”Law & Social Inquiry 38 (2): 342–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, J. 1980. Prisons in Turmoil. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Irwin, J. 1985. The Jail: Managing the Underclass in American Society. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, J. 2005. The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. B. 1977. Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kruttschnitt, C. and Gartner, R.. 2005. Marking Time in the Golden State: Women’s Imprisonment in California. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerman, A. E. and Page, J.. 2012. “The State of the Job: An Embedded Work Role Perspective on Prison Officer Attitudes.” Punishment & Society 14 (5): 503–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucken, K. 1998. “Contemporary Penal Trends: Modern or Postmodern?British Journal of Criminology 38 (1): 106–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. 1998. “Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting, and Parole Agent Identity.” Law & Society Review 32 (4): 839–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. 2010. Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Martinson, R. 1974. “What Works? Questions and Answers About Prison Reform.” The Public Interest 35: 2254.Google Scholar
Masur, L. P. 1989. Rites of Execution: Capital Punishment and the Transformation of American Culture, 1776–1865. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, S. and Musheno, M.. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, R. M. 2008. The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meranze, M. 1996. Laboratories of Virtue: Punishment, Revolution, and Authority in Philadelphia, 1760–1835. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B.. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, J. 2011. The Toughest Beat: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officers Union in California. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennsylvania 1835. Report of the Joint Committee of the Legislature of Pennsylvania Relative to the Eastern State Penitentiary at Philadelphia (Mar. 26, 1835). Harrisburg: Welsh and Patterson.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania 1850. The Twenty-First Annual Report of the Inspectors of the Eastern State Penitentiary of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: Edmond Barrington and George D. Haswell.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 1991. “A Society of Organizations.” Theory and Society 20 (6): 725–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piacentini, L. 2004. “Penal Identities in Russian Prison Colonies.” Punishment & Society 6 (2): 131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisciotta, A. 1994. Benevolent Repression: Social Control and the American Reformatory-Prison Movement. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. 2008. “Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess: Part I: The Nature and Roots of Scandinavian Exceptionalism.” British Journal of Criminology 48 (2): 119–37.Google Scholar
Rafter, N. 1985. Partial Justice: Women in State Prisons, 1800–1935. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. A. 2012a. “The Most Restrictive Alternative: A Litigation History of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons, 1960–2006.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 57: 71124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, K. A. 2012b. “Parole, Snitch, or Die: California’s Supermax Prisons and Prisoners, 1997– 2007.” Punishment & Society 14 (5): 530–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, K. A. 2014. “The Pelican Bay Hunger Strike: Resistance Within the Structural Constraints of a U.S. Supermax Prison.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (3): 579611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, D. J. 1971. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rothman, D. J. 1980. Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rothman, D. J. 1998. “Perfecting the Prison: United States, 1789–1865.” In Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in Western Society, edited by Morris, N. and Rothman, D. J., 111–30. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2013. “Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2015. “A Neo-Institutional Account of Prison Diffusion.” Law & Society Review 49 (2): 365–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2017a. “The Consequences of Prisoners’ Micro-Resistance.” Law & Social Inquiry 42 (1): 138–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2017b. “Resistance As Agency? Incorporating the Structural Determinants of Prisoner Behaviour.” British Journal of Criminology 57 (3): 644–63.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2016. “Penal Change as Penal Layering: A Case Study of Proto-Prison Adoption and Capital Punishment Reduction, 1785–1822.” Punishment & Society 18 (4): 420–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusche, G. and Kirchheimer, O. 1939. Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapers, H. 2008. A Preventable Death. Office of the Correctional Investigator. www.oci-bec.gc.ca/cnt/rpt/pdf/oth-aut/oth-aut20080620-eng.pdf (last accessed: January 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Sauder, M. and Espeland, W. N.. 2009. “The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 74 (1): 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, H. 2010. “Mass Incarceration and the Paradox of Prison Conditions Litigation.” Law & Society Review 44 (3–4): 731–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. W. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5th edn. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 2007. Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 2014. Mass Incarceration on Trial. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. H. 1965. “The Sociology of Law in America: Overview and Trends.” Social Problems 13 (1): 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spierenburg, P. 1991. The Prison Experience: Disciplinary Institutions and Their Inmates in Early Modern Europe. New Brunswick: Rutgers.Google Scholar
Sykes, G. M. 1958. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. 2001. “Deadly Symbiosis: When Ghetto and Prison Meet and Mesh.” Punishment & Society 3 (1): 95133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1968 [1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Whitman, J. Q. 2003. Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zald, M. N. 1965. “Organizational Control Structures in Five Correctional Institutions.” In Social Welfare Institutions: A Sociological Reader, edited by Zald, M. N., 451–65. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Zimring, F., Kamin, S., and Hawkins, G.. 2001. Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You’re Out in California. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Arnot, Margaret L. 2000. “Understanding Women Committing Newborn Child Murder in Victorian England.” In Everyday Violence in Britain, 1850–1950: Gender and Class, edited by D’Cruze, Shani, 5569. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Constance B. 1984. “Desperate Women and Compassionate Courts.” University of Toronto Law Journal 34: 447–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behlmer, George K. 1979. “Deadly Motherhood: Infanticide and Medical Opinion in Mid- Victorian England.” Journal of History of Medicine 34: 403–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Behlmer, George K. 1982. Child Abuse and Moral Reform in England, 1870–1908. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Julia. 2006. The Excellent Doctor Blackwell: The Life of the First Female Physician. Stroud: The History Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Karen M. 2013. “‘A Fine Mixture of Pity and Justice: The Criminal Justice Response to Infanticide in Ireland, 1922–1949.” Law and History Review 31: 793841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, Carolyn A. 1991. The Unwritten Law: Criminal Justice in Victorian Kent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cretney, Stephen. 2003. Family Law in the Twentieth Century: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demme, Catherine. 1978. “Infanticide: The Worth of an Infant Under Law.” Medical History 22: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 2018. Crime without Punishment: Aspects of the History of Homicide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. and Havemann, William F.. 2013. “The Rise and Fall of the Unwritten Law: Sex, Patriarchy, and Vigilante Justice in the American Courts.” Buffalo Law Review 61: 9971056.Google Scholar
Gartner, Rosemary and Bill, McCarthy. 2006. “Killing One’s Children: Maternal Infanticide and the Dark Figure of Homicide.” In Gender and Crime: Patterns of Victimization and Offending, edited by Heimer, Karen and Kruttschnitt, Candace, 91114. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, Ann R. 1989. “‘Sin of the Age’: Infanticide and Illegitimacy in Victorian London.” Victorian Studies 32: 319–37.Google Scholar
Higgs, Edward. 1983. “Domestic Servants and Households in Victorian England.” Social History 8: 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, Edward. 1986. Domestic Servants and Households in Rochdale, 1851–1871. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffer, Peter C. and Hull, N. E. H.. 1981. Murdering Mothers: Infanticide in England and New England, 1558–1803. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Pamela. 1975. The Rise and Fall of the Victorian Servant. Dublin: Gill & Company.Google Scholar
Huggett, Frank E. 1977. Life Below Stairs: Domestic Servants in England from Victorian Times. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Jackson, Mark. 1996. New-Born Child Murder: Women, Illegitimacy and the Courts in Eighteenth-Century England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Mark, ed. 2002. Infanticide: Historical Perspectives on Child Murder and Concealment, 1550–2000. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, Marthe. 2005. A Home for Foundlings. Toronto: Tundra Books.Google Scholar
Jones, Miriam. 2003. “Fracture Narratives of Infanticide in the Crime and Execution Broadside in Britain, 1780–1850.” In Writing British Infanticide: Child-Murder, Gender, and Print, 1722–1859, edited by Thorn, Jennifer, 112–42. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Langer, William L. 1974. “Infanticide: A Historical Survey.” History of Childhood Quarterly 1: 353–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Lethbridge, Lucy. 2013. Servants: A Downstairs History of Britain from the Nineteenth Century to Modern Times. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Lita Linzer and Isser, Natalie K.. 2000. Endangered Children: Neonaticide, Infanticide, and Filicide. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marland, Hilary. 2002. “Getting Away with Murder? Puerperal Insanity, Infanticide and the Defense Plea.” In Infanticide: Historical Perspectives on Child Murder and Concealment, 1550–2000, edited by Jackson, Mark, 168–92. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
May, Trevor. 1998. The Victorian Domestic Servant. London: Shire Publications.Google Scholar
McClure, Ruth K. 1981. Coram’s Children: The London Foundling Hospital in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Josephine. 2003. Child Murder and British Culture, 1720–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Cheryl L. and Oberman, Michelle. 2001. Mothers Who Kill Their Children. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Oberman, Michelle. 2003. “Understanding Infanticide in Context: Mothers Who Kill, 1870–1930 and Today.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 92: 707–38.Google Scholar
Oberman, Michelle, and Meyer, Cheryl L.. 2008. When Mothers Kill: Interviews from Prison. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, Philip J. 1970. “Murder of the Newborn: A Psychiatric Review of Neoanticide.” American Journal of Psychiatry 126: 1414–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Lionel. 1986. The Massacre of the Innocents: Infanticide in Britain, 1800–1939. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryznar, Margaret. 2013. “A Crime of Its Own? A Proposal for Achieving Greater Sentencing Consistency in Neonaticide and Infanticide Cases.” University of San Francisco Law Review 47: 459–83.Google Scholar
Sauer, R. 1978. “Infanticide and Abortion in Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Population Studies 32: 8193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, Ian. 2014. Sex, Crime and Literature in Victorian England. Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Tony. 1999. “The Sad Subject of Infanticide: Law, Medicine, and Child Murder, 1860–1938.” Social & Legal Studies 8: 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, Lisa. 2005. Bastards and Foundlings: Illegitimacy in Eighteenth-Century England. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar