Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-06T08:06:27.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Embryos for IVF

from Section 5 - Embryo Selection and Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2019

Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Anthony Rutherford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
David K. Gardner
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Handyside, AH, Kontogianni, EH, Hardy, K, Winston, RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344(6268): 768–70.Google Scholar
Munné, S, Dailey, T, Sultan, KM, Grifo, J, Cohen, J. The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Human Reprod 1995;10: 1015–21 .Google Scholar
Verlinsky, Y, Cieslak, J, Freidine, M et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Mol. Hum Reprod. 1995;10: 1923–27.Google Scholar
Harper, J., Coonen, E., De Rycke, M. et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium steering committee. Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25: 821–23.Google Scholar
Harton, G, Magli, C, Lundin, Kersti et al. JC ESHRE PGD consortium/embryology special interest group-best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Human Reproduction 2010;26:4146.Google Scholar
De Rycke, M, Belva, F, Goossens, V et al.ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011. Hum Reprod 2015;30: 1763–89 .Google Scholar
Gianaroli, L, Magli, MC, Pomante, A et al. Blastocentesis: a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2014 December;102(6): 1692–9.Google Scholar
Ruangvutilert, P, Delhanty, JDA, Rodeck, C, Harper, JC. Relative efficiency of FISH on metaphase and interphase nuclei from non-mosaic trisomic or triploid fibroblast cultures. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2000;20: 159–62.Google Scholar
Rubio, C, Giménez, C, Fernández, E et al. Spanish interest group in preimplantation genetics, Spanish society for the study of the biology of reproduction. The importance of good practice in preimplantation genetic screening: critical viewpoints. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 2045–47 .Google Scholar
Rubio, C, Bellver, J, Rodrigo, L et al. Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: two randomized trials. Fertil Steril. 2013;99: 1400–07 .Google Scholar
Forman, EJ, Hong, KH, Ferry, KM et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:100–07.Google Scholar
Scott, RT Jr, Upham, KM, Forman, EJ et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:697703.Google Scholar
Vera-Rodríguez, M, Michel, CE, Mercader, A et al. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2016;105: 1047–55 .Google Scholar
Ruttanajit, T, Chanchamroen, S, Cram, DS et al.Detection and quantitation of chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts using copy number variation sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36: 154–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio, C, Bellver, J, Rodrigo, L et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107: 1122–29 .Google Scholar
Mastenbroek, S, Twisk, M, van der Veen, F, Repping, S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17: 454–66.Google Scholar
Musters, AM, Repping, S, Korevaar, JC et al. Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review of the best available evidence. Fertil Steril. 2011;95: 2153–57 .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blockeel, C, Schutyser, V, De Vos, A et al. Prospectively randomized controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17: 848–54.Google Scholar
Garcia-Herrero, S, Rodrigo, L, Mateu, E et al. Medecine therapeutique/Medecine de la reproduction, gyn_ecologie et endocrinologie. John Libbey Eurotext, 2014;14: 112–19.Google Scholar
Rodrigo, L, Mateu, E, Mercader, A et al. New tools for embryo selection: comprehensive chromosome screening by array comparative genomic hybridization. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:517125.Google Scholar
Coates, A, Hesla, JS, Hurliman, A et al. Use of suboptimal sperm increases the risk of aneuploidy of the sex chromosomes in preimplantation blastocyst embryos. Fertil Steril. 2015;104: 866–72.Google Scholar
Al-Asmar, N, Peinado, V, Vera, M et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos from couples with a previous aneuploid miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2012;98: 145–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Z, Liu, J, Collins, GS et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 2012;5:24.Google Scholar
Ravichandran, K, McCaffrey, C, Grifo, J et al.Mitochondrial DNA quantification as a tool for embryo viability assessment: retrospective analysis of data from single euploid blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod. 2017;32: 1282–92 .Google Scholar
Treff, NR, Zhan, Y, Tao, X et al. Levels of trophectoderm mitochondrial DNA do not predict the reproductive potential of sibling embryos. Hum Reprod. 2017;32: 954–62.Google Scholar
Feichtinger, M, Vaccari, E, Carli, L et al. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; pii: S1472-6483(17)30147–5.Google Scholar
Victor, AR, Brake, AJ, Tyndall, JC et al. Accurate quantitation of mitochondrial DNA reveals uniform levels in human blastocysts irrespective of ploidy, age, or implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:3442.Google Scholar
Liu, W, Liu, J, Du, H et al. Non-invasive pre-implantation aneuploidy screening and diagnosis of beta thalassemia IVSII654 mutation using spent embryo culture medium. Ann Med. 2017;49: 319–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebhart, MB, Hines, RS, Penman, A, Holland, AC. How do patient perceived determinants influence the decision-making process to accept or decline preimplantation genetic screening? Fertil Steril 2016;105: 188–93.Google Scholar
Hens, K, Dondorp, W, Handyside, AH et al. Dynamics and ethics of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing. A review of the challenges. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19: 366–75.Google Scholar
Greco, E, Minasi, MG, Fiorentino, F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med.2015;373:2089–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, J, Jackson, E, Sermon, K et al.(2017). Adjunts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for ‘add-on’ interventions? Human Reproduction, 2: 485–91.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×