Gestational Surrogacy, Ethics, and the Family

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316282618.003

Chapter 3 - Gestational Surrogacy, Ethics, and the Family

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2016

Stuart John Oultram ,

Caroline Jones and

Lucy Frith

Edited by

E. Scott Sills

Show author details

E. Scott Sills: Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Genetics, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy
International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues
, pp. 17 - 24

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282618.003[Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook

References

Krimmel, H. Surrogate motherhood arrangements from the perspective of the child. In Alpern, K., ed., The Ethics of Reproductive Technology (Oxford University Press, 1992).

Brazier, M., Campbell, A., & Golombok, S. Surrogacy: review for health ministers of current arrangements for payments and regulations (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office [HMSO], 1998); available online at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/±/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsLegislation/DH_4009697 (accessed March 16, 2015).

Tieu, M. Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers. Journal of Medical Ethics 2009; 35: 171–5.

Wilkson, S. Bodies for Sale: Ethics and Exploitation in the Human Body (London: Routledge, 2003).

Golombok, S., MacCallum, F., Lycett, E., Murry, C., & Jadva, V. Surrogacy: the experience of the commissioning couple. Human Reproduction 2003; 18: 6.

Golombok, S., Murry, C., Jadva, V., MacCallum, F., & Lycett, E. Families created through surrogacy arrangements: parent-child relationship on the 1st year of life. Developmental Psychology 2004; 40: 3.

Liu, A. Artificial Reproduction and Reproductive Rights (London: Dartmouth Publishing, 1991).

Freeman, T. Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioethics Review 2015; 33(1):45–6.

Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine 2012; 19(4): 769–89.

Golombok, S. Parenting (London: Routledge, 2000).

McCandless, J., & Sheldon, S. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (2008) and the tenacity of the sexual family form. Modern Law Review 2010; 72(2):175–207.

Jones, C. The (im)possible parents in law. In Lind, C., Keating, H., and Bridgeman, J., eds., Taking Responsibility, Law and the Changing Family (Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2008).

B v. C & D (Surrogacy: Adoption) [2015] EWFC 17; Re Z (A Child) (Surrogate Father: Parental Order) [2015] EWFC 73, [2015] 1 Weekly Law Reports 4993.

Section 33, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008 (London: HMSO, 2009). Available online at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents; accessed May 1, 2015.

Section 35, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008; read in conjunction with section 38(2) of the same act.

Section 42, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008; read in conjunction with section 45(2) of the same act.

Sections 36 and 43, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Legal issues around surrogacy. Available online at: www.hfea.gov.uk/1424.html; accessed April 30, 2014.

Section 54, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.

Section 54(6), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008, but see also section 54(7), as applied in D and L (Surrogacy) [2012] EWHC 2631 (Fam.).

www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/certificates/most_customers_want_to_know.asp#Adoptions; accessed May 30, 2015.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, What you can find out about your donor or donor-conceived genetic siblings. Available online at: www.hfea.gov.uk/112.html; accessed May 30, 2015.

www.donorconceivedregister.org.uk/about-us.html; accessed May 30, 2015.

Blyth, E. Parental orders and identity registration: one country three systems. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2010; 32(4):345–2.

Biggs, H., & Jones, C. Tourism: a matter of life and death in the United Kingdom. In Cohen, I. G., ed., The Globalization of Health Care: Legal and Ethical Issues (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 164–81.

Kandel, R. F. Which came first: the mother or the egg? A kinship solution to gestational surrogacy. Rutgers Law Review 1994; 47:165–239.

Jonas, M. Choosing between claims: allocating parental responsibility in surrogacy disputes. In Häyry, M., Takala, T., & Herissone-Kelly, P., eds., Bioethics and Social Reality (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005).

Rae, S. The Ethics of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood: Brave New Families (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 1994).

Kolers, A., & Bayne, T. Are you my mommy? On the genetic basis of parenthood. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2001; 18(3):273–85.

Trusted, J. Gifts of gametes: reflections about surrogacy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1986; 3(1):123–6.

Wallbank, J. Too many mothers? Surrogacy, kinship, and the welfare of the child. Medical Law Review 2002; 10:271–94.

Oultram, S. One mum too few: maternal status in host surrogate motherhood arrangements. Journal of Medical Ethics 2015; 41:470–3.

Sections 35(2) and 42(2), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.

Re X and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam.), [16] per Hedley J (at that time, ss. 28(2) and (8) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 1990 were the relevant legislative provisions); available online at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37/section/28; accessed May 25, 2015.

Sections 56 and 58, Family Law Act of 1986.

Section 54(6) and (7), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008; applied in R and S v. T [2015] EWFC 22; Re D and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2012] EWHC 2631 (Fam.).

For a historical account of the legal consequences of marriage, see Cretney, S. Family Law in the Twentieth Century: A History (Oxford University Press, 2004).

Herring, J. Relational autonomy and family law. In Wallbank, J., Choudhry, S., & Herring, J., eds., Rights, Gender and Family Law (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2010).

Re X and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam.), [15], per Hedley J.

Re D (A Child) (Surrogacy) [2014] UKHC 2121 (Fam.), [15]–[18], per Moylan J.

Re X and Another (Children) (Parental Order: Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam.), [13], emphasis added.

Re G (Parental Orders) [2014] EWHC 1561 (Fam.).

AB and CD v. CT [2015] EWFC 12.

See, for example, A v. C [1985] FLR 445; Re P [1987] 2 FLR 421; Re MW [1995] 2 FLR 759; C and C v. GS [1996] SCLR 837; Re N (A Child) [2007] EWCA Civ. 1053, [2008] 1 FLR 198; Re TT (Surrogacy) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam.); Re M (A Child), also known as H v. S [2015] EWFC 36; see also ref. 2 at 3.6.

Biggs, H., & Jones, C. Legally vulnerable: what is vulnerability and who is vulnerable? In Freeman, M., Hawkes, S., & Bennett, B., eds., Law and Global Health (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 133–48.

Section 54(3), Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 2008.

J v. G [2013] EWHC 1432 (Fam.), [29], per Theis J.

JP v. LP [2014] EWHC 595 (Fam.).

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.).

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.), [54].

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.), [55].

Section 1(2), Adoption and Children Act of 2002.

Re X [2014] EWHC 3135 (Fam.), [65].