Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7mfl8 Total loading time: 0.657 Render date: 2021-12-05T08:15:58.491Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Zsuzsanna Fagyal
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Douglas Kibbee
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Frederic Jenkins
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
French
A Linguistic Introduction
, pp. 312 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Française, Académie (1704) Observations de l'Académie Françoise sur les remarques de M. de Vaugelas, Paris: Jean-Baptiste Coignard.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Paul (ed.) (1965) Le Voyage de Charlemagne à Jérusalem et à Constantinople, Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Ägren, John (1973) Étude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de la conversation radiophonique: fréquences et facteurs, Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard A., Farmer, Ann K., and Harnish, Robert M. (1997) ‘Pragmatics: The Study of Language Use and Communication’, in Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. London, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, pp. 343–393.Google Scholar
Alaoui, Khalid (2003) ‘Petite histoire de la néologie: approche conceptuelle et idéologique (XVIe–XIXe siècle)’, in Jean-François, Sablayrolles (ed.) L'innovation lexicale, Paris: Honoré Champion, pp. 149–180.Google Scholar
Aleong, S. (1984) ‘Naissance et diffusion du suffixe (o)thon dans le lexique québécois’, Cahiers de Lexicologie 45: pp. 130–138.Google Scholar
Anzorge, Isabelle (1995) ‘La variante topolectale. Problèmes posés dans le cadre exolingue du Togo’, in Michel, Francard and Danièle, Latin (eds.), Le régionalisme lexical, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, pp. 101–109.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel (2001) Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel and Jamin, Michael (2002) ‘Le français des banlieues: uniformity and discontinuity in the French of the Hexagon’, in Salhi, K. (ed.), French in and out of France: Language Policies, Intercultural Antagonisms and Dialogues, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 107–136.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel and Smith, Alan (2002) ‘The Influence of Linguistic and Social Factors on the Recent Decline of French ne’, Journal of French Language Studies 12(1): pp. 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William J. (1981) ‘The Loss of the Negative Particle ne in French: a Syntactic Change in Progress’, Language 57: pp. 674–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William J. (1991) ‘When Does Variation Indicate Linguistic Change in Progress?’, Journal of French Language Studies 1(1): pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William J. (1992) ‘The Variable Use of on versus tu/vous for Indefinite Reference in Spoken French’, Journal of French Language Studies, 2(2): pp. 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William J. (2001) ‘Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: s'agit-il d'un changement en cours?’, Journal of French Language Studies 11(1): pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ATILF: ‘Analyse et Traitment Informatique de la Langue Française’, on-line dictionary at http://atilf.atilf.fr/tlf.htm
Austin, John L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy (2004) Sociolinguistic Variation in Seventeenth-Century France. Methodology and Case Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azra, Jean-Luc and Cheneau, Véronique (1994) ‘Language Games and Phonological Theory: Verlan and the Syllabic Structure of French’, Journal of French Language Studies, 4(2): pp. 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent and Harnish, Robert M. (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Bakos, Ferenc (1955) ‘Contributions à l’étude des formules de politesse en ancien français', Acta Linguistica Hungarica 5: pp. 296–367.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1954) ‘Indexical Expressions’, Mind 63: pp. 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudino, Claudie (2001) Politique de la langue et difference sexuelle. La politisation du genre des noms de métier, Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L. M. (2003) ‘The Adverbial Formation in -mente in Vulgar and Late Latin. A Problem in Grammaticalization’, in Heikki, Solin, Martti, Leiwo, and Halla-aho, Hilla (eds.) Latin vulgaire – Latin Tardif VI. Actes du VIe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Hildesheim, Zurich, New York: Olms-Weidmann, pp. 439–457.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (2001) Morphological Productivity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Robert (1995) Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate (2002) Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benguerel, A.-P. and Cowan, Helen A. (1974) ‘Coarticulation of Upper Lip Protrusion in French’, Phonetica 30: pp. 41–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benveniste, Emile (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Berger, Roger and Brasseur, Annette (eds.) (2004) Les séquences de Sainte Eulalie, Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Blampain, Daniel (ed.) (1997) Le français en Belgique: une langue, une communauté, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire and Jeanjean, Colette (1987) Le français parlé: Transcription et édition, Paris: Didier érudition.Google Scholar
Blanchet, Philippe (1995) La Pragmatique: d'Austin à Goffman, Paris: Bertrand-Lacoste.Google Scholar
Blondeau, Hélène (2001) ‘Real-Time Changes in the Paradigm of Personal Pronouns in Montreal French’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4): pp. 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondin, Jean-Noël (1823) Manuel de la pureté du langage, Paris: Chez l'auteur.Google Scholar
Boë, Louis-Jean, Heim, Jean-Louis, Honda, Kiyoshi, and Maeda, Shinji (2002) ‘The Potential Neanderthal Vowel Space was as Large as that of Modern HumansJournal of Phonetics 30: pp. 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothorel, André, Simon, P., Wioland, F., and Zerling, J.-P. (1986) Cinéradiographie des voyelles et consonnes du français, Strasbourg: Institut de Phonétique de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Bourciez, E. J. and Bourciez, Jean (1978) Phonétique Française, étude historique, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, Bénédicte (1999) How Language Comes to Children: From Birth to Two Years, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brault, Grégoire (2004) ‘Pour une typologie des emplois de là-bas’, Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 27(1): pp. 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, P. Catherine and Goldstein, Louis (1986) ‘Towards an Articulatory Phonology’, Phonology Yearbook 3: pp. 219–252.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. (1986) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Rebecca and Jun, Sun-Ah (2002) ‘Intonational Phonology and the Domain of French Liaison’, Paper presented at the First Joint Meeting of the ASA and IFA, Cancun (Mexico): Mexican Institute of Acoustics, manuscript.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert (1960) ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’, in Thomas, A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, Cambridge, (MA): MIT Press, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
Brunet, Etienne (2003) http://www.eduscol.education.fr/DO102/liste-mots-frequents.htm
Brunot, Ferdinand (1891) La doctrine de Malherbe d'après son commentaire sur Desportes, Paris: G. Masson.Google Scholar
Brunot, Ferdinand (1966) Histoire de la langue française, Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Bryan, Anne-Marie (1972) ‘Le “tu” et le “vous”’, The French Review 45: pp. 1007–1010.Google Scholar
Bustin-Lekeu, Francine (1973) ‘Tutoiement et vouvoiement chez les lycéens français’, The French Review 46: pp. 773–782.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2001) Phonology and Language Use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Catherine and Foulkes, Paul (2004) ‘The “Mobile Phone” Effect on Vowel FormantsThe International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(1): pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
calliope (1989) La parole et son traitement automatique, Paris: Masson.
Carroll, Raymonde (1987) Cultural Misunderstandings: The French–American Experience, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carton, Fernand (1995) ‘La prononciation du français’, in Gérald, Antoine and Robert, Martin (eds.) Histoire de la langue française 1914–1945, Paris: CNRS-Éditions, pp. 27–59.Google Scholar
Carton, Fernand (1999) ‘L’épithèse vocalique en français contemporain: étude phonétique', Faits de langue 13: pp. 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casagrande, Jean (1984) The Sound System of French, Washington D. C: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Catach, Nina (2001) Histoire de l'orthographe française, Paris: Slatkine-Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Cervoni, Jean (1992) L'énonciation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Chansou, Michel (2003) L'aménagement lexical en France pendant la période contemporaine (1950–1994). Étude de sociolexicologie, Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Charette, Monik (1991) Conditions on Phonological Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. (1986) The Acquisition of Romance with Special Reference to French, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Carlson, T. B. (1982) ‘Hearers and Speech Acts’, Language 58: pp. 332–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Abigail (1990) ‘Phonetic and Phonological Rules of Nasalization’, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Commission générale de terminologie et de néologie (2000) Répertoire terminologique, Paris: Éditions des journaux officiels.
Coquillon, A., Di Cristo, A., and Piterman, M. (2000) ‘Marseillais et Toulousains gèrent-ils différemment leurs pieds? Caractéristiques prosodiques du schwa dans les parlers méridionaux’, Actes des ⅫIèmes Journées d'Etudes sur la Parole, Aussois, pp. 89–92.Google Scholar
Corbin, Danielle (1987) Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique, Tübingen: Max Neimeyer.Google Scholar
Corneau, Caroline (2000) ‘An EPG Study of Palatalization in French: Cross-dialect and Inter-subject Variation’, Language Variation and Change 12(1): pp. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan (1996) Variability in Spoken French. A Sociological Study of Interrogation and Negation, Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Coveney, Aidan (1998) ‘Awareness of Linguistic Constraints on Variable ne Omission’, Journal of French Language Studies 8(2): pp. 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan (2001) The Sounds of Contemporary French. Articulation and Diversity, Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Coveney, Aidan (2003) ‘Anything you Can Do, tu Can Do Better: tu and vous as Substitutes for Indefinite on in French’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: pp. 164–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan (2004) ‘The Alternation Between l'on and on in Spoken French’, Journal of French Language Studies 14(2): pp. 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan (1986) Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crysmann, Berthold (2003) ‘Clitic Climbing Revisited’, in Kim, Y.-B. and Wechsler, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG, Stanford: CSLI, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine (1995) Cognition and Representation in Linguistic Theory. Texts selected, edited, and introduced by Michel Liddle; translated with the assistance of John T. Stonham, Current issues in linguistic theory, 112, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dal, Georgette (ed.) (2003) ‘La productivité morphologique en questions et en expérimentations’, Langue Française 140.Google Scholar
Déan-Laporte, (1975) Les contes manceaux. Récits et monologues en patois du Maine, Le Mans: Éditions de la Société Littéraire du Maine.Google Scholar
Cat, Cécile (2000) ‘Towards a Unified Analysis of French Floating Quantifiers’, Journal of French Language Studies 10(1): pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dees, Anthonij (1980) Atlas des formes et des constructions des chartes françaises du 13e siècle, Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth (2000) ‘Vers une nouvelle approche de la structure prosodique’, Langue Française 126: pp. 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth (2001) ‘Prosodie des clitiques en français’, in Claude, Muller, Paulo, Carvalho, Labrune, L., Lambert, F., and Ploog, K. (eds.) Clitiques et cliticisation, Actes du colloque de Bordeaux, octobre 1998, Paris: Honoré Champion, pp. 227–249.Google Scholar
Délégation générale à la langue française (1994) Dictionnaire des termes officiels, Paris: Direction des journaux officiels.
Dell, François (1973) Les règles et les sons: Introduction à la phonologie générative, Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Demolin, Didier (2001) ‘Some Phonetic and Phonological Observations Concerning /R/ in Belgian French’, Etudes and Travaux, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 4: pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
Deshaies, Denise (1985) ‘Références personnelles et types de discours en situation d'entrevue’, in Léon, P. R. and Perron, P.. (eds.), Le Dialogue, Ottawa: Didier, pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
Dickey, Elizabeth (2002) Latin Forms of Address: from Plautus to Apuleius, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert (1999) ‘Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: première partie’, Journal of French Language Studies 9(2): pp. 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert (2000) ‘Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: deuxième partie’, Journal of French Language Studies 10(1): pp. 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert and Hirst, Daniel (1998) Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dionne, Narcisse-Eutrope (1912) Une dispute grammaticale en 1842. Le G.-V. Demers vs. le G.-V. Maguire, Québec: Laflamme and Proulx.Google Scholar
Di Vito, Nadine (1997) Patterns Across Spoken and Written French, Boston-New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane (2002) ‘L'exemplarité de “par exemple”. Un cas de pragmaticalisation en français québécois’, Journal of French Language Studies 12: pp. 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Jacques [Sylvius] (1531) In linguam gallicam IsagΩge, Paris: Robert Estienne.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jean (1962) Étude sur la dérivation suffixale en français moderne et contemporain, Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jean (1971) Dictionnaire du français contemporain, Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jean and Dubois-Charlier, Françoise (1999) La derivation suffixale en français, Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald (1980) Les mots du discours, Paris: Les éditions du Minuit.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion (1651) Liberté de la langue françoise dans se pureté, Paris: Denys Becnet.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1998) ‘Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender and Power All Live’, in Coates, J. (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 448–494.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino (2001) Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester: St Jerome's Press.Google Scholar
Encrevé, Pierre (1988) La Liaison avec et sans enchaînement, Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Espinal, Teresa M. (1991) ‘The Representation of Disjunct Constituents’, Language 67(4): pp. 726–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estienne, Henri (1565) Traicte de la conformité du langage françois avec le grec, Genève: H. Estienne.Google Scholar
Étiemble, René (1964) Parlez-vous franglais?Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Ewert, Alfred (1933) The French Language, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (1998) ‘Le retour du e final en français parisien: changement phonétique conditionné par la prosodie’, in Englebert, A., Pierrard, M., Rosier, L., and Raemdonck, D. (eds.) (2000) Vivacité et diversité de la variation linguistique, Vol. III, Tübigen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 151–160.Google Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2002) ‘Prosodic Boundaries in the Vicinity of Utterance-medial Parentheticals in French, Probus 14(1): pp. 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2004) ‘Action des médias et interactions entre jeunes dans une banlieue ouvrière de Paris: Remarques sur l'innovation lexicale’, in Thierry, Bulot (ed.) Les Parlers jeunes, le parler des jeunes, Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 41–60.Google Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna and Moisset, Christine (1999) ‘Sound Change and Articulatory Release: Where and Why are High Vowels Devoiced in Parisian French?’, Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Science, San Francisco, vol. 1, pp. 309–312.Google Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna, Nguyen, Noël, and Boula de Mareüil, Philippe (2002) ‘From dilation to Coarticulation: Is There Vowel Harmony in French?’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 32(1): pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Falkin, April (1988) ‘Dialogue Analysis Beyond the Sentence Unit: A Comparison of Huis Clos and Spontaneous Conversation’, Language and Style 21(2): pp. 203–255.Google Scholar
Faral, Edmond (1951) ‘Quelques remarques sur le Miracle de Théophile de Rutebeuf’, Romania 52: pp. 191–192.Google Scholar
Fay, Percival B. (1920) The Use of tu and vous in Molière, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, T. G. (1975) La morphologie du futur en moyen français, Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Féraud, Jean-François (1787) Dictionnaire critique de la langue française, Marseille: Jean Mossy.Google Scholar
Flaitz, Jeffra (1988) The Ideology of English: French Perceptions of English as a World Language, Berlin, NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, Iván (1989) ‘Le français change de visage’, Revue Romane 24(2): pp. 225–254.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile and Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth (2004) ‘“Fais_en à Fez_en avril”: étude comparative de la liaison et de l'enchaînement’, XXVe Journées d'Etude sur la Parole, Fes (Maroc), pp. 221–224.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien (1919 [1968]) Petite syntaxe de l'ancien français, Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Fournier, Nathalie (1998) Grammaire du français classique, Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine (ed.) (1997) La place du sujet en français contemporain, Louvain: Duculot.Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise (1992) Le français populaire, Deuxième édition corrigée, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gadet, Francoise (1997) Le français ordinaire, Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rosalyn and Greene, Marion A. (1958) A Brief Description of Middle French Syntax, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, Penelope (1991) ‘Ni tu ni vous: principes et paradoxes dans l'emploi des pronoms d'allocution en français contemporain’, Journal of French Language Studies, 1(2): pp. 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garmadi, Juliette (1981) La sociolinguistique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules and Edmont, Edouard (1902–1920) Atlas: linguistique de la France, Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Girard, Gabriel (1736) Synonymes françois, leurs significations et le choix quil en faut faire pour parler avec justesse, Paris: Laurent d'Houry.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1967) Interaction Ritual, Pantheon: New York.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mathew (2003) ‘Collecting Phonetic Data on Endangered Languages’, Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp. 207–210.Google Scholar
Goudailler, Jean-Pierre (1997) Comment tu tchatches!Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Grammont, Maurice (1939) Traité de phonétique, Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia (1996) Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, Philadelphia: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice (1968) Précis de grammaire française, Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice (1969) Le bon usage. Grammaire française avec des remarques sur la langue française d'aujourd'hui, 9th ed., Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice (1980) Le bon usage, 11th ed., Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Paul, Grice H. (1957) ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review 66: pp. 667–688.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul, H. (1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’, in Peter, Cole and Jerry, Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Speech Acts, Vol. III, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Grimes, Barbara F. and Pittman, Richard S. (ed.) (1996) Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 13th edition, Dallas (TX): Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Halle, P. A., Boysson-Bardies, B. and Vihman, Marylin M. (1991) ‘Beginnings of Prosodic Organization: Intonation and Duration Patterns of Disyllables Produced by Japanese and French Infants’, Language and Speech 34(4): pp. 299–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambye, Philippe and Michel, Francard (2004). ‘Le français dans la Communauté Wallonie-Bruxelles. Une variété en voie d'autonomisation?’, Journal of French Language Studies 14(1): pp. 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Anita (1994) ‘Etude du E caduc-stabilisation en cours et variations lexicalesJournal of French Language Studies 4(1): pp. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Anita (2001) ‘Lexical Diffusion as a Factor of Phonetic Change: The Case of Modern French Nasal Vowels’, Language Variation and Change 13(2): pp. 209–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Anita and Mosegaard, H. Maj-Britt (2003) ‘Le schwa prépausal et l'interaction’, in Anita Hansen and Mosegaard, H. M.-B. (eds.), Structures linguistiques et interactionnelles dans le français parlé, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 89–109.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin and Vincent, Nigel (1988) The Romance Languages, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauber, Rose Marie (Sister) (1938) The Late Latin Vocabulary of the Moralia of Saint Gregory the Great: A Morphological and Semasiological Study, Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Haverling, Gerd (1998) ‘On the ‘illogical’ vos in Late Latin Epistolography’, in Louis, Callebat (ed.) Latin vulgaire, latin tardif IV. Actes du 4e colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Caen, 2–5 septembre 1994, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms-Weidmann, pp. 337–353.Google Scholar
Herman, József (1989) ‘Accusativus cum infinitivo et subordonnée à quod, quia en latin tardif – nouvelles remarques sur un vieux problème’, in Gualtiero, Calboli (ed.) Subordination and Other Topics in Latin. Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1–5 April 1985, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 33–153.Google Scholar
Herman, József (2000) Vulgar Latin, translated by Wright, Roger, University Park (PA): Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hollerbach, Wolf (1994) The Syntax of Contemporary French, Lanham (MD): University Press of America.Google Scholar
Jacob, Daniel (1998) ‘À propos de la périphrase habeo + participe parfait passif’, in Louis, Callebat (ed.) Latin vulgaire, latin tardif IV. Actes du 4e colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Caen, 2–5 septembre 1994, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms-Weidmann, pp. 367–381.Google Scholar
Jeanneret, Thérèse (1999) La coénonciation en français: Approches discursive, conversationnelle et syntaxique, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. Atkinson (ed.) (1924) La Chanson de Roland, Boston: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael A. (1996) Foundations of French Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joran, Théodore (1928) Les manquements à la langue française. Tournures et locutions vicieuses méthodiquement classées et redressées. 3e édition. Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Jourda, Pierre (ed.) (1965) Conteurs français du XVIe siècle, Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléaide.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Fougeron, Cécile (1995) ‘The Accentual Phrase and the Prosodic Structure of French’, Proceedings of the ICPhS of Stockholm, vol. 2, pp. 722–725.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Fougeron, Cécile (2000) ‘A Phonological Model of French Intonation’, in Botinis, A. (ed.) Intonation: Analysis, Modeling and Technology, Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 209–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Fougeron, Cécile (2002) ‘Realizations of Accentual Phrase in French Intonation’, Probus 14(1): pp. 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Keith E. (1981) Syntax and Affixation. The Evolution of MENTE in Latin and Romance, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassai, Ilona (2001) ‘Fiziológiai ritmus a fonológiában?’ [Physiological rhythm in phonology?] in Bakró-Nagy, M., Kiss, E. K., and Bánréti, Z. (eds.), Ujabb tanulmányok a strukturális magyar nyelvtan és a nyelvtörténet körébol, Budapest: Osiris, pp. 344–354.Google Scholar
Keane, Mark T. and Costello, Fintan J. (1997) ‘Where do “Soccer Moms” Come From?: Cognitive Constraints on Noun–Noun Compounding in English’, in Tony Veale (ed.), Proceedings of MIND II, http://www.cs.ucd.ie/staff/fcostello/home/papers/CostelloKeane97b.pdf
Kennedy, Elspeth (1972) ‘The use of Tu and Vous in the First Part of the Old French Prose Lancelot’, in Barnett, F. J., Crow, A. D., Robson, C. A., Rothwell, W., and Ullmann, S. (eds.), History and Structure of French. Essays in Honour of Professor T. B. W. Reid, Totowa (NJ): Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 135–149.Google Scholar
Kibbee, Douglas (1995) ‘Assertion/atténuation, subjectivité/objectivité en anglais et en français: ‘seem’/‘sembler”, in Michel, Ballard (ed.), Relations discursives et traduction, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
King, Ruth and Nadasdy, Terry (1999) ‘The Expression of Evidentiality in French–English Bilingual DiscourseLanguage in Society 28(3): pp. 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, Georges (1990) La sémantique du prototype. Catégories et sens lexical, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Knecht, Paul and Rubattel, Christophe (1984) ‘A propos de la dimension sociolinguistique du français en Suisse romande’, Le Français moderne, 52(2): pp. 138–150.Google Scholar
Laberge, Suzanne and Sankoff, Gillian (1979) ‘Anything you can do’, in Sankoff, G. (ed.) The Social Life of Language, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 271–293.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2001) Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lacheret-Dujour, Anne and Beaugendre, Frédérique (1999) La Prosodie du français, Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (ed.) (1999) The Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian (1996) The Sounds of the World's Languages, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (2003) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E. (1967) ‘The Use of tu and vous as Forms of Address in French Canada, a Pilot Study’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6: pp. 614–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landick, Marie (1995) ‘The Mid-Vowels in Figures: Hard Facts’, The French Review 69(1): pp. 88–102.Google Scholar
Landick, Marie (2004) Enquête sur la prononciation du français de référence, Collection Espaces Discursifs, Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Langlois, Ernest (ed.) (1965) Le couronnement de Louis, Chanson de geste du Ⅻ siècle, Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoff N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne (1990) Le nom: droit et histoire, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gal, Étienne (1932) Cent manières d'accommoder le français, Paris: Nouvelle librairie française.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Alise and Martin-Berthet, Françoise (2000) Introduction à la lexicologie. Sémantique et morphologie, Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Gun (1959) ‘L'emploi moderne de l'adverbe français tellement, comparé à celui du si et du tant d'intensité’, Lund: CWK Gleerup.
Lennig, Matthew (1978) ‘Acoustic Measurement of Linguistic Change: the Modern Paris Vowel System’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Léon, Pierre (1973) ‘Réflexions idiomatologiques sur l'accent en tant que métaphore sociolinguistique’, The French Review 46, pp. 783–789.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre (1992) Phonétisme et prononciation du français, Paris: Nathan Université.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre (1993) Précis de phonostylistique: parole et expressivité, Paris: Nathan Université.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre and Carton, Fernand (1983) Les accents des français, Paris: Hachette. http://accentsdefrance.free.fr/Google Scholar
Lepoutre, David (1997) Coeur de banlieue: codes, rites, et langages, Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Philip and Crelin, E. S. (1971) ‘On the Speech of Neanderthal Man’, Linguistic Inquiry 2: pp. 203–222.Google Scholar
Littré, Émile (1878) Dictionnaire de la langue française, Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. Anthony (2004) A Sociolinguistic History of Parisian French, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, Pascal (1997) Le Langage: textes choisis et présentés, Paris: GF Flammarion.Google Scholar
Luzzati, Daniel (1982) ‘Ben appui du discours’, Le Français Moderne 50: pp. 193–207.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Fraser (1939) Les relations de l'Angleterre et de la France d'après le vocabulaire, Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian (1984) Patterns of Sounds, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malderez, Isabelle (1991) ‘Tendance de neutralisation des oppositions entre voyelles nasales dans la parole des jeunes gens d'Ile-de-France’, in Actes du Ⅻème Congrès international des sciences phonétiques: 19–24 aoÛt 1991 Aix-en-Provence, France, Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, vol. 2, pp. 174–177.Google Scholar
Malécot, André and Paul, Lindsay (1976) ‘The Neutralization of /æ̃/ – ε̃/ in French’, Phonetica 33(1): pp. 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maley, Catherine A. (1974) The Pronouns of Address in Modern Standard French, University (MS): Romance Monographs, Inc.Google Scholar
Mamavi, Gina, Depecker, Loïc, and Chansou, Michel (1997) La mesure des mots: cinq études d'implantation terminologique, Rouen: Publications de l'Université de Rouen.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane (1979) Histoire de la langue française aux XIVe et XVe siècles, Paris: Bordas.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane (1999) Le français en diachronie, Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Marguérite, Navarre (ca.1546 [1999]) Heptaméron, Édition critique par Renja Salminen, Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Martin, Elizabeth (2006) Marketing Identities Through Language: English and Global Imagery in French Advertising, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James G. and Bunnell, Timothy H. (1981) ‘Perception of Anticipatory Coarticulation Effects’, Journal of Acoustical Society of America 69: pp. 559–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, Pierre (2002) ‘Le système vocalique du français du Québec: de l'acoustique à la phonologie’, La Linguistique 38(2): pp. 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martineau, France and Mougeon, Raymond (2003) ‘A sociolinguistic study of the Origins of ne Deletion in European and Quebec French’. Language 79(1): pp. 118–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André (1969) ‘De l’économie des formes du verbe en français parlé', in Le français sans fard, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 91–120.Google Scholar
Martinon, Philippe (1927) Comment on parle en français, La langue parlée correcte comparée avec la langue littéraire et la langue familière,Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Marty, Fernand (1975) Elements for Self-Instruction in French, Champaign (IL): Audio-Visual Publications.Google Scholar
Marty, Fernand (2001) ‘Les signaux morphologiques du français parlé’, Le Français Moderne 69(2): pp. 211–240.Google Scholar
McCool, George J. (1994) ‘Teaching the Formation of Questions: Lessons from New French’, Modern Language Journal 78: pp. 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meigret, Louis (1550) Tretté de la grammère françoeze, Paris: Chrestien Wechel.Google Scholar
Merle, Pierre (2000) Argot, verlan et tchatches, Paris: Les Essentiels de Milan.Google Scholar
Mettas, Odette (1979) La prononciation parisienne: Aspects phonique d'un sociolecte parisien (du Faubourg Saint-Germain à la Muette), Paris: Conseil International de la Langue Française et Laboratoire des Langues et Civilisations à Tradition Orale du CNRS.Google Scholar
Miller, Jessica S. and Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2005) ‘Phonetic Cues to Common and Special Cases of Liaison: Looking for a Prosodic Domain’, in Gess, Randall S. and Rubin, Edward J. (eds.) (2005) Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics (LSRL)Salt Lake City, Utah, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 179–196.Google Scholar
Miller, Philippe A. and Sag, Ivan A. (1997) ‘French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15(5): pp. 573–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sarah (2003) Gender and Politeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Leslie (1985) Authority in Language. Investigating standard English, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moisset, Christine (1996) ‘The Status of h-aspiré in French Today’, in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 3(1): pp. 223–236.Google Scholar
Moisset, Christine (2000) ‘Variable Liaison in Parisian French’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Molinelli, Piera (1989) ‘Double Negation from Latin to Italian’, in Gualtiero, Balboli (ed.) Subordination and Other Topics in Latin. Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1–5 April 1985, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 611–633.Google Scholar
Molinier, Christian and Françoise, Levrier (2000) Grammaire des adverbes, Description des formes en -ment, Genève-Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Montagu, Julie (2004) ‘Les sons sous-jacents aux voyelles nasales en français parisien’, in Actes des XXVe Journées d'Etudes sur la Parole, Fes (Maroc), Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, pp. 385–388.Google Scholar
Montreuil, Jean-Pierre (2002) ‘Vestigial Feet in French’, in Proceedings of the 2002 Texas Linguistic Society Conference on Stress in Optimality Theory, The University of Texas at Austin, http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/∼tls/2002tls/Jean-Pierre_Montreuil.pdfGoogle Scholar
Moreau, Marie-Louise (1986) ‘Les séquences préformées: entre les combinaisons libres et les idiomatismes. Le cas de la négation avec ou sans ne’, Le Français Moderne 54: pp. 137–160.Google Scholar
Morel, Mary-Annick and Danon-Boileau, Laurent (1998) Grammaire de l'intonation: L'exemple du français, Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Morford, Janet (1997) ‘Social Indexicality in French Pronominal Address’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1): pp. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles (1994) ‘Quelques réflexions sur la formation des voyelles nasales en français’, Communication and Cognition 27: pp. 27–110.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko (2001) The Ecology of Language Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Claude (1984) ‘L'association négative’, Langue française 62: pp. 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene (1986) Prosodic Phonology, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Noël and Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (in press) ‘Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French’, Journal of Phonetics.Google Scholar
Noailly, Michèle (1990) Le substantif épithète, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Nunn, H. P. V. (1963) An Introduction to the Study of Ecclesiastical Latin, third edition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nye, Edward (2000) Literary and Linguistic Theories in Eighteenth-Century France. From Nuances to Impertinence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyembwe, Ntita (1995) Le français au Zaïre ou le français zaïrois. Considérations lexicales, in Francard, M. and Latin, D. (eds.) Le régionalisme lexical, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, pp. 111–118.Google Scholar
Nyrop, Kristoffer (1914) Grammaire historique de la langue française, Copenhague: Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Office de la langue française (1986) Titres et fonctions au féminin: essai d'orientation de l'usage, Quebec: Office de la langue française.
Olcott, George N. (1898) Studies in the Word Formation of the Latin Inscriptions. Substantives and Adjectives. With Special Reference to the Latin Sermo Vulgaris, Rome: Sallustian Typography.Google Scholar
Oukada, Larbi (1982) ‘On On’, The French Review, 56(1): pp. 93–105.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, Jehan (1530) Lesclarcissment de la langue Francoyse, London: R. Pynson.Google Scholar
Papen, Robert and Rottet, Kevin (1997) ‘A Structural Sketch of the Cajun French Spoken in Lafourche and Terrebonne Parishes’, in Albert, Valdman (ed.) French and Creole in Louisiana, New York: Plenum, pp. 71–108.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-François (2000) ‘Nasal Vowels as Two Segments: Evidence from Borrowings’, Language 76(2): pp. 324–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquier, Estienne (1596) Les recherches de la France, Paris: G. de Luyne.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert (2004) ‘Tu ou vous?’, Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 114: pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Peterson, Axel (1929) Le passage populaire des noms de personne à l'état de noms communs dans les langues romanes et particulièrement en français. Étude de sémantique, Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckereri Aktiebolag.Google Scholar
PHONO (1998). ‘Principales caractéristiques phonétiques du français québécois’, web page maintained by the Phonetics Laboratory of Laval University, Québec: http://www.ciral.ulaval.ca/phonetique/phono/
Picone, Michael D. (1996) Anglicisms, Neologisms and Dynamic French, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, Concarneau (1835) Dictionnaire critique et raisonné du langage vicieux ou réputé vicieux, Paris: A. André.Google Scholar
Plénat, Marc (1985) ‘Morphologie du largonji des loucherbem’, Langages 78: pp. 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, Claude (1995) ‘Les variantes topolectales du lexique français: Propositions de classement à partir d'exemples québécois’, in Francard, M. and Latin, D. (eds.) Le régionalisme lexical, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, pp. 13–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöll, Bernhard (2001) ‘Français de référence et pluralité identitaire: un antagonisme inconciliable?’, in Francard, M., Géron, G., and Wilmet, R. (eds.) Le français de référence. Constructions et appropriations d'un concept, Louvain:VALIBEL, Vol. 2, pp. 141–151.Google Scholar
Pooley, Timothy (1996) Chtimi: The Urban Vernaculars of Northern France, Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred K. (1934) From Latin to Modern French with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Phonology and Morphology, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca (1997) Linguistic Change in French, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Post, Brechtje (2000) ‘Pitch accents, Liaison and the Phonological Phrase in French’, Probus 12: pp. 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Glanville (1993) ‘Pas (point) Without ne in Interrogative Clauses’, Journal of French Language Studies 3: pp. 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Joseph Edward (1998) ‘Motivations for Pronominal alteros-affixation in Proto-Romance and the Development of vous autres in French’, unpublished MA thesis, University of South Carolina.
Priss, Uta (1996) ‘Classification of Meronymy by Methods of Relational Concept Analysis’, Online Proceedings of the 1996 Midwest Artificial Intelligence Conference, Bloomington (IN): Indiana University.Google Scholar
Pruvost, Jean (2003) ‘La traque des mots “néologisme” et “néologie” dans les dictionnaires monolingues monovolumaires français de la fin du XVIIIe s. jusqu'au début du XⅪe s.’, in Jean-François, Sablayrolles (ed.) L'innovation lexicale, Paris: Honoré Champion, pp. 181–205.Google Scholar
Rézeav, Pierre (2001) Dictionnaire des régionalismes de France: géographie et histoire d'un patrimoine linguistique, Bruxelles: De Boeck/Duculot.Google Scholar
Riallanu, Annie (1988) ‘Review of Encrevé, Pierre, “Liaison avec et sans enchaînement: Phonologie multidimensionelle et usage du français”’. Language 66: pp. 134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rialland, Annie (1994) ‘The Phonology and Phonetics of Extrasyllabicity in French’, in Patricia Keating, A. (ed.) Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Vol.3, pp.136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richelet, Pierre (1680) Dictionnaire françois: contenant les mots et les choses, plusieurs nouvelles remarques sur la langue françoise: ses expressions propres, figurées & burlesques, la prononciation des mots difficiles, le genre de noms, le régime des verbes, avec les termes les plus connus des arts & des sciences: le tout tiré de l'usage et des bons auteurs de la langue françoise,Genève: J.-H. Widerhold.Google Scholar
Rigault, André (1971) La grammaire du français parlé, Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Rigault, Lucien (1888) Dictionnaire d'argot moderne, Paris: P. Ollendorff.Google Scholar
Roques, Mario (ed.) (1970) Les Romans de Chrétien de Troyes, édités d'après la copie de Guiot (Bibl. Nat., fr. 794), I Érec et Énide, Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy (1995) ‘Geneva School’, in schuren, Jef Ver, Ostman, Jan-Ola, Blommaert, Jan, and Bulcaen, Chris (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 319–323.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Auchlin, Antoine, Rubattel, Christian, and Schelling, Marianne (1985) L'articulation du discours en français contemporain, Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rouquier, Magali (2003) ‘La sequence est-ce dans les interrogatives en qui/que en ancien et en moyen français’, Journal of French Language Studies 13: pp. 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rychner, Jean (ed.) (1967) Les XV. Joies de Mariage, Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992) Lectures on Conversation, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, Blondeau, Hélène, and Charity, Anne (2001) ‘Individual Roles in a Real-time Change: Montreal (r→R) 1947–1995’, Etudes and Travaux, Université Libre de Bruxelles 4: pp. 141–157.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian and Vincent, Dianne (1977) ‘L'emploi productif du ne dans le français parlé à Montréal’, Le Français Moderne 45: pp. 243–256.Google Scholar
Sauger-Préneuf, François (1843) Des locutions vicieuses, les plus répandues dans la société, considérées sous le rapport de la Syntaxe et de la Prononciation, avec leur correction, d'après le Dictionnaire de l'Academie, 3e édition, Limoges: Martial Ardant frères.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987) Discourse Markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliebitz, Victor (1886) Die Person der Anrede in der französischen Sprache, Breslau: Jungfer.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ronald, and Scollon, Suzanne W. (1995) Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scullen, Mary Ellen (1997) French Prosodic Morphology: A Unified Account, Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Searle, John (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John (1975) ‘Indirect Speech Acts’, in Peter, Cole and Jerry, Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Seguin, Jean-Pierre (1972) La langue française au XVIIIe siècle, Paris, Bruxelles, Montréal: Bordas.Google Scholar
Seguin, Jean-Pierre, Bouverot, D., Caron, Philippe, Fournier, Nathalie, and Landy-Houillon, Isabelle (1990) ‘Les marqueurs du mauvais usage dans le Dictionaire critique de la langue française de l'abbé Jean-François Féraud’, Lexique, 9: pp. 129–151.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth (1978) ‘The French Foot: On the Status of French Mute e’, Studies in French Linguistics 1: pp. 141–150.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth (1986) ‘On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology’, Phonology Yearbook, 3: pp. 371–405.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria (1992) Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Signol, Christian (1984) Les cailloux bleus, Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
Silverman, David and Sacks, Harvey (1998) Social Science and Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Singy, Pascal (1996) L'Image du français en Suisse Romande: Une enquête sociolinguistique en Pays de Vaud, Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Smedley-Weill, Anette and Geoffroy-Poisson, Simone (2001). ‘Les assemblées d’états et la mise en forme du droit. Comparaisons et analyses formelles des coutumes rédigées et réformées d'Auxerre, de Sens et de Touraine', Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques 26 pp. 13–92.Google Scholar
Smith, Caroline (2003) ‘Vowel Devoicing in Contemporary French’, Journal of French Linguistic Studies 13(2): pp. 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deidre (1986) ‘Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: pp. 697–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1999) ‘Lexical Conservatism in French Adjectival Liaison’, Formal Perspectives in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 28th LSRL, University Park: Pennsylvania State University, pp. 243–270.Google Scholar
Streicher, Jeanne (1936) Commentaires sur les remarques de Vaugelas par La Mothe le Vayer, Scipion Dupleix, Ménage, Bouhours, Conrart, Chapeliain, Patru, Thomas Corneille, Cassagne, Andry de Boisregard et l'Académie Française. Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Andersen, Gisle, and Hasund, Kristine I. (2002) Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1990) You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Teibeiriené, Nijole R. (2004) ‘Les particularités morphosyntaxiques du français québécois’, Kalbotyra 54(3): pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Temple, Martine (1996) Pour une sémantique des mots construits, Villeneuve d'Ascq: Les Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Thibault, Linda and Ouellet, Marise (1996) ‘Tonal Distinctions Between Emphatic Stress and Pretonic Lengthening in Quebec French’, 4th International Conference of Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), vol. 2, pp. 638–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Johannes (1987). La formation des mots en français moderne, translated by Clas, André, Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Thiesse, Anne-Marie (1991) Écrire la France. Le mouvement littéraire régionaliste de langue française entre la Belle Époque et la Libération, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles (1881–1883) De la prononciation française depuis le commencement du XVIe siècle, d'après les témoignages des grammairiens, Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael J. (1996) Total Speech: An Integrational Linguistic Approach to Language, Durham, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Touratier, Christian (1998) ‘Le mot, unité linguistique?Langues et Langage 7: pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1987) The Sounds of French, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1996) ‘French Liaison and Elision Revisited: A Unified Account within Optimality Theory’, in Claudia, Parodi, Carlos, Quicoli, Mario, Saltarelli, and Maria-Louisa, Zubizarreta (eds.) Aspects of Romance Linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 433–455.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. (1996) A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology, London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nicholas (1939[1969]). Principles of Phonology, translated by Baltaxe, Christiane, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Truchot, Claude (1990) L'anglais dans le monde contemporain, Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
Université du Québec French language examination criteria for entrance into the Université du Québec en Outaouais (http://www.uqo.ca//etudiants-actuels/guichet-etudiant/guide-francais.asp).
Väänänen, Veikko (1981) Introduction au latin vulgaire. Troisième edition revue et augmentée, Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Valdman, Albert (1993) Bien entendu! Introduction à la prononciation française, Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Valdman, Albert and Iskrova, Iskra (2003) ‘A New Look at Nasalization in Haitian Creole’, in Plag, Ingo (ed.) The Phonology and Morphology of Creole Languages, Tübigen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghe, , Christian, L. (1976) La phonostylistique du français, The Hague, Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Giles, Vaudelin (1713) Nouvelle Manière d'écrire comme on parle en France, Paris: Veuve Jean Cot.Google Scholar
Vaugelas, Claude Favre (1647[1934]) Remarques sur la langue françoise. Introduction, bibliographie, index par Jeanne Streicher, Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane (1995) ‘Remarques sur par exemple en français québécois’, Le Français Moderne 63: pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane (2001) ‘Remarques sur le tutoiement et le vouvoiement en français parlé au Québec’, in Actes du colloque “La journée du Québec”, Copenhague: Institut d'études romanes, Université de Copenhague, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. (1984) The Pronunciation of Canadian French, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. (2001) French Sound Structure, Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Walter, Henriette (1977) La phonologie du français, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Walter, Henriette (1983) ‘La nasal vélaire /ŋ/: un phonème du français?’, Langue française 60: pp. 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Henriette (1994) ‘Variétés actuelles des voyelles nasales du français’, Communication and Cognition 27: pp. 223–235.Google Scholar
Walter, Henriette (2002) ‘La dynamique phonologique peut-elle dépendre de la dynamique lexicale?’, La Linguistique, 38(2): pp. 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Keith (1997) ‘French Complement Clitic Sequences: A Template Approach’, Journal of French Language Studies 7(1): pp. 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna (1980) Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language, Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna (1996) Semantics, Primes and Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wionet, Chantal (2004) ‘Les marques d'usage dans la première édition du Dictionnaire de l'Académie Française (1694)’, contribution à une histoire des marques d'usage, Cahiers de Lexicologie, 84(1): 55–67.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, Edward (1995) ‘Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21: pp. 449–468.Google ScholarPubMed
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (2002) ‘Register and Prosodic Variation, a Cross Language Comparison’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: pp. 1495–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaguello, Marina (1991) ‘Les géminées de M. Rocard’, in En écoutant parler la langue, Paris: Seuil, pp. 64–70.Google Scholar
Zeliqzon, L. (ed.) (1986) La famille ridicule, Comédie messine en vers patois, Metz: Verlag der Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Zink, Gaston (1986 [1991]) Phonétique historique du français (3rd edn.), Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Zink, Gaston (1992) Morphologie du français médiéval, 2e édition mise a jour, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar