Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-rpk4r Total loading time: 1.913 Render date: 2022-06-28T12:17:51.114Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Chapter 7 - The Ethics of Consent for Fetal Therapy

from Section 1: - General Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we will discuss the ethics of consent for fetal therapy. The latter term refers to a very broad field, ranging from open surgery to pharmacotherapy, from experimental procedures to accepted treatment, and from interventions aimed at saving fetuses from in utero or perinatal death to treatments with a rationale of improving long-term health outcomes. Because the fetus can only be treated via the body of the pregnant woman, fetal therapy is always a form of ‘maternal-fetal medicine’ and cannot be performed without her informed consent (or that of her representative). However, what makes informed consent for fetal therapy special is that, unlike in other medical contexts, the consenting (or non-consenting) person not only decides for herself, but also for the fetus who may or may not survive and/or for the future child who may or may not benefit. As a consequence, consent for fetal therapy is inevitably asked and given in the context of ideas about the responsibility of the pregnant woman as an expectant mother, a responsibility that, rightly or wrongly, is either assumed by her from within or ascribed to her from without.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 69 - 76
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Manson, NC, O’Neill, O. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faden, RR, Beauchamp, TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Elwyn, GA, Durand, MA, Song, J, Aarts, J, Barr, PJ, Berger, Z, et al. A three-talk model for shared-decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017; 359: j4891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandman, L, Munthe, C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal. 2010; 18: 6084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emanuel, EJ, Emanuel, LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992; 267: 2221–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheppard, MK. Vulnerability, therapeutic misconception and informed consent: is there a need for special treatment of pregnant women in fetus-regarding clinical trials? J Med Ethics. 2016; 42: 127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smajdor, A. Ethical challenges in fetal surgery. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37: 8891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blizzard, D. A trying experience: fetoscopy and maternal decision making. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 48: 562–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, A. Treatments and trials for the fetal patient: imposing the burdens of enthusiasm? In Schmitz, D, Clarke, A, Dondorp, W, eds., The Fetus as a Patient: A Contested Concept and Its Normative Implications. London: Routledge, 2018. p. 117132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS. The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care. 2002; 40: V55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horng, S, Grady, C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism. IRB. 2003; 25: 1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helmreich, RJ, Hundley, V, Norman, A, Ighedosa, A, Chow, E. Research in pregnant women: the challenges of informed consent. Nurs Womens Health. 2007; 11: 576–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Maternal-fetal intervention and fetal care centers. Pediatrics. 2011; 128: e473–8.
Lyerly, AD, Little, MO, Faden, RR. A critique of the ‘fetus as patient’. Am J Bioeth. 2008; 8: 42–4; discussion W4–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casper, MJ. The Making of the Unborn Patient. A Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dondorp, W, De Wert, G. Ethical issues in maternal-fetal medicine. In Rodeck, CH, Whittle, MJ, eds., Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice, 3rd Edition. London: Elsevier, 2019, p. 139148.Google Scholar
McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Callahan, JC, Knight, JW. Women, fetuses, medicine, and the law. In Bequaert Holmes, H, Purdy, L, eds., Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992, pp. 224239.Google Scholar
Murray, TH. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient. Clin Perinatol. 1987; 14: 329–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savulescu, J. Future people, involuntary medical treatment in pregnancy and the duty of easy rescue. Utilitas. 2007; 19: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Care for the Unborn Child. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Fetal Therapy. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, 2009.
Reitsma, AM, Moreno, JD. Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier? J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: 792801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antiel, RM, Flake, AW. Responsible surgical innovation and research in maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 22: 423–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Koning, TJ, Klomp, LW, Van Oppen, AC, Beemer, FA, Dorland, L, van den Berg, I, Berger, R. Prenatal and early postnatal treatment in 3-phosphoglycerate-dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet. 2004; 364: 2221–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liley, AW. The development of the idea of fetal transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 111: 302–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, MR. The University of California at San Francisco Fetal Treatment Center: a personal perspective. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004; 19: 513–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyerly, AD, Mahowald, MB. Maternal-fetal surgery: the fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise. Health Care Anal. 2001; 9: 151–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, Brock, JW 3rd, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 9931004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, HCML, Deprest, J, Van den Berg, PP. When referring physicians and researchers disagree on equipoise: the TOTAL trial experience. Prenatal Diag. 2011; 31: 589–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verweij, EJ. Ethics of involving pregnant women in fetal therapy trials. In Schmitz, D, Clarke, A, Dondorp, W, eds., The Fetus as a Patient: A Contested Concept and its Normative Implications. London: Routledge, 2018, p. 133–43.Google Scholar
Deprest, J, Toelen, J, Debyser, Z, Rodrigues, C, Devlieger, R, De Catte, L, Lewi, L, Van Mieghem, T, Naulaers, G, Vandevelde, M, Claus, F, Dierickx, K. The fetal patient – ethical aspects of fetal therapy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011; 3: 221–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Westgren, M, Götherström, C. Stem cell transplantation before birth – a realistic option for treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta? Prenatal Diag. 2015; 35: 827–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Götherström, C, Hermerén, G, Johansson, M, Sahlin, N-E, Westgren, M. Stem cells and fetal therapy: is it a reality? Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2017; 27: 166–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, C. Abortion decisions as inclusion and exclusion criteria in research involving pregnant women and fetuses. J Med Ethics. 2012; 38: 43–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindenburg, IT, Van Kamp, IL, Oepkes, D. Intrauterine blood transfusion: current indications and associated risks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014; 36: 263–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grethel, EJ, Wagner, AJ, Clifton, MS, Cortes, RA, Farmer, DL, Harrison, MR, Nobuhara, KK, Lee, H. Fetal intervention for mass lesions and hydrops improves outcome: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2007; 42: 117–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, A. Diagnosis and Management of Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 58: 611–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebb, J, Dar, P, Rosner, M, Evans, MI. Long-term neurologic outcomes after common fetal interventions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: e1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antiel, RM. Ethical challenges in the new world of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40: 227–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Ethics. Committee Opinion No. 664: refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: e175–82.
Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2006, p. 276.
Bianchi, DW. From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges. Nat Med. 2012; 18: 1041–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guedj, F, Bianchi, DW, Delabar, JM. Prenatal treatment of Down syndrome: a reality? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 26: 92103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Wert, G, Dondorp, W, Bianchi, DW. Fetal therapy for Down syndrome: an ethical exploration. Prenatal Diag. 2017; 37: 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×