Book contents
- Fetal Therapy
- Fetal Therapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Section 1: General Principles
- Chapter 1 The Rationale for Fetal Therapy
- Chapter 2 A Fetal Origin of Adult Disease
- Chapter 3 Human Embryology: Molecular Mechanisms of Embryonic Disease
- Chapter 4 Human Genetics and Fetal Disease: Assessment of the Fetal Genome
- Chapter 5 Interventions in Pregnancy to Reduce Risk of Stillbirth
- Chapter 6 Fetal Therapy Choices: Uncertain and Emotional Decisions and the Doctor’s Role in Parental Decision-Making
- Chapter 7 The Ethics of Consent for Fetal Therapy
- Chapter 8 Open Fetal Surgery: Is There Still a Role?
- Chapter 9 The Artificial Womb
- Section 2: Fetal Disease: Pathogenesis and Treatment
- Section III: The Future
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - The Ethics of Consent for Fetal Therapy
from Section 1: - General Principles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2019
Book contents
- Fetal Therapy
- Fetal Therapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Section 1: General Principles
- Chapter 1 The Rationale for Fetal Therapy
- Chapter 2 A Fetal Origin of Adult Disease
- Chapter 3 Human Embryology: Molecular Mechanisms of Embryonic Disease
- Chapter 4 Human Genetics and Fetal Disease: Assessment of the Fetal Genome
- Chapter 5 Interventions in Pregnancy to Reduce Risk of Stillbirth
- Chapter 6 Fetal Therapy Choices: Uncertain and Emotional Decisions and the Doctor’s Role in Parental Decision-Making
- Chapter 7 The Ethics of Consent for Fetal Therapy
- Chapter 8 Open Fetal Surgery: Is There Still a Role?
- Chapter 9 The Artificial Womb
- Section 2: Fetal Disease: Pathogenesis and Treatment
- Section III: The Future
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, we will discuss the ethics of consent for fetal therapy. The latter term refers to a very broad field, ranging from open surgery to pharmacotherapy, from experimental procedures to accepted treatment, and from interventions aimed at saving fetuses from in utero or perinatal death to treatments with a rationale of improving long-term health outcomes. Because the fetus can only be treated via the body of the pregnant woman, fetal therapy is always a form of ‘maternal-fetal medicine’ and cannot be performed without her informed consent (or that of her representative). However, what makes informed consent for fetal therapy special is that, unlike in other medical contexts, the consenting (or non-consenting) person not only decides for herself, but also for the fetus who may or may not survive and/or for the future child who may or may not benefit. As a consequence, consent for fetal therapy is inevitably asked and given in the context of ideas about the responsibility of the pregnant woman as an expectant mother, a responsibility that, rightly or wrongly, is either assumed by her from within or ascribed to her from without.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fetal TherapyScientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits, pp. 69 - 76Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Manson, NC, O’Neill, O. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faden, RR, Beauchamp, TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Elwyn, GA, Durand, MA, Song, J, Aarts, J, Barr, PJ, Berger, Z, et al. A three-talk model for shared-decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017; 359: j4891.Google Scholar
Sandman, L, Munthe, C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal. 2010; 18: 60–84.Google Scholar
Emanuel, EJ, Emanuel, LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992; 267: 2221–6.Google Scholar
Sheppard, MK. Vulnerability, therapeutic misconception and informed consent: is there a need for special treatment of pregnant women in fetus-regarding clinical trials? J Med Ethics. 2016; 42: 127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smajdor, A. Ethical challenges in fetal surgery. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37: 88–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blizzard, D. A trying experience: fetoscopy and maternal decision making. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 48: 562–73.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. Treatments and trials for the fetal patient: imposing the burdens of enthusiasm? In Schmitz, D, Clarke, A, Dondorp, W, eds., The Fetus as a Patient: A Contested Concept and Its Normative Implications. London: Routledge, 2018. p. 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS. The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care. 2002; 40: V55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horng, S, Grady, C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism. IRB. 2003; 25: 11–16.Google Scholar
Helmreich, RJ, Hundley, V, Norman, A, Ighedosa, A, Chow, E. Research in pregnant women: the challenges of informed consent. Nurs Womens Health. 2007; 11: 576–85.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Maternal-fetal intervention and fetal care centers. Pediatrics. 2011; 128: e473–8.Google Scholar
Lyerly, AD, Little, MO, Faden, RR. A critique of the ‘fetus as patient’. Am J Bioeth. 2008; 8: 42–4; discussion W4–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casper, MJ. The Making of the Unborn Patient. A Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dondorp, W, De Wert, G. Ethical issues in maternal-fetal medicine. In Rodeck, CH, Whittle, MJ, eds., Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice, 3rd Edition. London: Elsevier, 2019, p. 139–148.Google Scholar
McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Callahan, JC, Knight, JW. Women, fetuses, medicine, and the law. In Bequaert Holmes, H, Purdy, L, eds., Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992, pp. 224–239.Google Scholar
Murray, TH. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient. Clin Perinatol. 1987; 14: 329–43.Google Scholar
Savulescu, J. Future people, involuntary medical treatment in pregnancy and the duty of easy rescue. Utilitas. 2007; 19: 1–20.Google Scholar
Care for the Unborn Child. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Fetal Therapy. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, 2009.Google Scholar
Reitsma, AM, Moreno, JD. Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier? J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: 792–801.Google Scholar
Antiel, RM, Flake, AW. Responsible surgical innovation and research in maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 22: 423–7.Google Scholar
De Koning, TJ, Klomp, LW, Van Oppen, AC, Beemer, FA, Dorland, L, van den Berg, I, Berger, R. Prenatal and early postnatal treatment in 3-phosphoglycerate-dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet. 2004; 364: 2221–2.Google Scholar
Liley, AW. The development of the idea of fetal transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 111: 302–4.Google Scholar
Harrison, MR. The University of California at San Francisco Fetal Treatment Center: a personal perspective. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004; 19: 513–24.Google Scholar
Lyerly, AD, Mahowald, MB. Maternal-fetal surgery: the fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise. Health Care Anal. 2001; 9: 151–65.Google Scholar
Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, Brock, JW 3rd, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 993–1004.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, HCML, Deprest, J, Van den Berg, PP. When referring physicians and researchers disagree on equipoise: the TOTAL trial experience. Prenatal Diag. 2011; 31: 589–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verweij, EJ. Ethics of involving pregnant women in fetal therapy trials. In Schmitz, D, Clarke, A, Dondorp, W, eds., The Fetus as a Patient: A Contested Concept and its Normative Implications. London: Routledge, 2018, p. 133–43.Google Scholar
Deprest, J, Toelen, J, Debyser, Z, Rodrigues, C, Devlieger, R, De Catte, L, Lewi, L, Van Mieghem, T, Naulaers, G, Vandevelde, M, Claus, F, Dierickx, K. The fetal patient – ethical aspects of fetal therapy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011; 3: 221–7.Google Scholar
Westgren, M, Götherström, C. Stem cell transplantation before birth – a realistic option for treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta? Prenatal Diag. 2015; 35: 827–32.Google Scholar
Götherström, C, Hermerén, G, Johansson, M, Sahlin, N-E, Westgren, M. Stem cells and fetal therapy: is it a reality? Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2017; 27: 166–7.Google Scholar
Strong, C. Abortion decisions as inclusion and exclusion criteria in research involving pregnant women and fetuses. J Med Ethics. 2012; 38: 43–7.Google Scholar
Lindenburg, IT, Van Kamp, IL, Oepkes, D. Intrauterine blood transfusion: current indications and associated risks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014; 36: 263–71.Google Scholar
Grethel, EJ, Wagner, AJ, Clifton, MS, Cortes, RA, Farmer, DL, Harrison, MR, Nobuhara, KK, Lee, H. Fetal intervention for mass lesions and hydrops improves outcome: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2007; 42: 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A. Diagnosis and Management of Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 58: 611–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebb, J, Dar, P, Rosner, M, Evans, MI. Long-term neurologic outcomes after common fetal interventions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: e1–9.Google Scholar
Antiel, RM. Ethical challenges in the new world of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40: 227–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Ethics. Committee Opinion No. 664: refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: e175–82.Google Scholar
Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2006, p. 276.Google Scholar
Bianchi, DW. From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges. Nat Med. 2012; 18: 1041–51.Google Scholar
Guedj, F, Bianchi, DW, Delabar, JM. Prenatal treatment of Down syndrome: a reality? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 26: 92–103.Google Scholar
De Wert, G, Dondorp, W, Bianchi, DW. Fetal therapy for Down syndrome: an ethical exploration. Prenatal Diag. 2017; 37: 1–7.Google Scholar