Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-lx7sf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-03T21:52:21.531Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

1 - Cooperation and Conflict in International Relations

from Part I - Broad Insights from Political Science to Molecular Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Walter Wilczynski
Georgia State University
Sarah F. Brosnan
Georgia State University
Get access


The most fundamental questions in international relations are: “Why do states go to war?” “How can interstate conflict be prevented or ameliorated?,” and “What are the pathways to greater international cooperation?” In considering these questions, the dominant paradigm in international relations, political realism, emphasizes the enduring propensity for conflict among self-interested states seeking their security in an “anarchic” international environment, that is, one where there is no central authority to protect states from each other or to guarantee their security. Hence, international cooperation is thought to be rare, fleeting, and tenuous – limited by enforcement problems and each state’s preference for larger relative gains in any potential bargain because of its systemic vulnerability (Morgenthau, 1949; Waltz, 1979). At the extreme, states find themselves in a security condition of mutual distrust that resembles a prisoner’s dilemma game. (See Box 3.1 in Chapter 3 for a description of various games.) Maintaining an equilibrium in the international system through a balance of power and limited cooperation are all that can be hoped for; a situation where war, large-scale violent conflict, is natural and merely “diplomacy by other means” (von Clausewitz, 1989). This is not to argue that international relations are in a constant state of war, rather that they exist within the shadow of war as a final arbiter.

Cooperation and Conflict
The Interaction of Opposites in Shaping Social Behavior
, pp. 7 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alleyne, R. (2012) Famous reconciliations sealed with a handshake. [online] Available at: [Accessed October 23, 2018].Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1989) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (2006) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarPubMed
Azar, E. (1991) Protracted social conflict: Theory and practice in the Middle East. Journal of Palestinian Studies, 8(1): 4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds. (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. S., and Stam, A. C. (1996) The duration of interstate wars, 1816–1985. American Political Science Review, 90(2): 239257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahm, E. (2009) What is a truth commission and why does it matter? Peace and Conflict Review, 3(2): 114.Google Scholar
Cederman, L. E., Gleditsch, K. S., and Buhaug, H. (2013) Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Clausewitz, C. (1989) On War, indexed edition. Trans. Michael Eliot Howard and Peter Paret. Reprint edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, P., and Hoeffler, A. (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4): 563595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., and Soderbom, M. (2001) On the Duration of Civil War. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2681. The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. J., and Harrington, A., eds. (2002) Visions of Compassion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Waal, F. (1989) Peacemaking among Primates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. W. (1997) Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D. (2004) Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others? Journal of Peace Research, 41(3): 275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J. D., and Laitin, D. D. (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1): 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 3(6): 167191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrikson, R. (1989) Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651/1979) Leviathan. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2): 167214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, M. (2006) The “New War” in Iraq. Theoria, 53(109): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1983) Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Moral Practice. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Keen, D. (1998) The economic functions of violence in civil wars. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies. Adelphi Paper, 320: 119–150.Google Scholar
Lebow, R. N. (2010) Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, W., and Brecke, P. (2003) War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. G. 2013. Major Episodes of Political Violence (MEPV) and Conflict Regions, 1946–2012. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. (1949) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Onuf, N. G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and Its Causes. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Smith, H. (1979) Treaty impact still unknown. New York Times, March 17, p. A1.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1992) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walter, B. F. (2009) Bargaining failures and civil war. Annual Review of Political Science, 12: 243261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2): 391425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2011) World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats