Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-cx6qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-07T19:46:09.291Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Section 1 - The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2020

Edited by
Fanny M. Cheung  and
Diane F. Halpern
Fanny M. Cheung
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Diane F. Halpern
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women , pp. 1 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Washington, DC: Author. www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines-archived.pdfGoogle Scholar
Azar, B. (2010). Are your findings WEIRD? Monitor on Psychology, 41, 11. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Brady, L. M., Fryberg, S. A., & Shoda, Y. (2018). Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 11,406–11,413. doi:10.1073/pnas.1803526115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M. (1994). Promoting women’s development in Hong Kong. In Committee on Women’s Studies in Asia (Eds.), Women’s studies, women’s lives: Theories and practice in South and Southeast Asia (pp. 59–73). New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M. (2012). Mainstreaming culture in psychology. American Psychologist, 67, 721–730. doi:10.1037/a0029876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., & Holroyd, E. (Eds.). (2009). Mainstreaming gender in Hong Kong society. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Chrisler, J. C., & McHugh, M. C. (2018). Feminist critiques of psychology. In Travis, C. B. & White, J. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women, Vol. 1: History, theory and battlegrounds (pp. 71–89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CNN (2018). Landmark day for Saudi women as kingdom’s controversial driving ban ends. edition.cnn.com/2018/06/23/middleeast/saudi-women-driving-ban-lifts-intl/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
CNN (2019). New Zealand mosque terror attacks. edition.cnn.com/asia/live-news/live-updates-new-zealand-shooting-christchurch-terror-attack-intl/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2017). Gender Equality Index 2017. http://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/gender-equality-index/aboutGoogle Scholar
Green, J. (2016). Transsexual surgery may be covered by Medicare. LGBT Health, 1, 256–258. doi:ccl.idm.oclc.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J. R., & Wentzel, K. (2007a). Encouraging girls in math and science. Institute for Educational Sciences. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C., Geary, D., Gur, D., Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007b). The science of sex-differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–52. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. F., & Cheung, F. M. (2008). Women at the top: Powerful leaders tell us how to combine work and family. Malden, MA: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J. S., … Martin, C. L. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333, 1706–1707. doi:10.1126/science.1205031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. F., Straight, C., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64, 336–347. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9891-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 1-75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152XGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. (2010). A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists’ studies. Science, 328, 1627. doi:10.1126/science.328.5986.1627CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsella, A. J. (2000). Internationalizing the psychology curriculum: Toward new competencies and directions. International Psychology Reporter, 4(3), the APA Division 52 (International Psychology) Newsletter. Reprinted in South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 12, 70–72.Google Scholar
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Psychology Day at the United Nations. (2019). The 12th Annual Psychology Day at the United Nations, 25 April 2019: “The Time Is Now: Psychological Contributions to Global Gender Equality.” www.unpsychologyday.com/Google Scholar
Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. PNAS 115 (45), 11,401–11,405; published ahead of print November 6, 2018. doi:10.1073/pnas.1721165115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redden, E. (2018). Global attack on gender studies. Inside Higher Ed. www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/12/05/gender-studies-scholars-say-field-coming-under-attack-many-countries-around-globe?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&utm_campaign=71f8faa77a-DNU_WO20181203_NEW_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-71f8faa77a-198511601&mc_cid=71f8faa77a&mc_eid=5734c27a26Google Scholar
Time (2019). A “620km human chain” – Indian women rally for equality. http://time.com/5491454/620km-human-chain-indian-women-equality/Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., & Halpern, D. F. (2009). Sex differences in variability for cognitive measures: Do the ends justify the genes? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 612–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program. (2018). Human development indices and indicators, 2018 statistical updates. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2018). The global gender gap report. www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. (2017). Safely managed drinking water – Thematic report on drinking water 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/safely-managed-drinking-water-JMP-2017-1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Suggested Readings

Rekha Pande is the Head and founding member of the Centre for Women’s Studies and a Professor and former Head of the Department of History at the University of Hyderabad, India. She was also the founding member of the Center for Women’s Studies at Maulana Azad National Urdu University. She chaired the 12th Women’s World Congress in India, 2014. She has been a visiting Professor at University of London, University of Bristol, University of Buffalo, Maison de Research, Paris, and University of Artois. Her work is in the interdisciplinary area of history and women’s studies. She has published eighteen books and over a hundred papers and chapters in national and international journals, proceedings and books. She has been the editor of International Feminist Journal of Politics (IFJP) and Foreign Policy Analysis. Pande was born in northern India in the Himalayan region of the present state of Uttrakhand. As her father was an Indian Army officer who was posted every three years, she grew up in different states of India. During the early stage of her career, she spent summer and winter vacations visiting her husband who is a scientist working in Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Uganda. She now spends her summers visiting her children who have settled in the United States.

Wen Liu is Assistant Professor of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at University at Albany, State University of New York. Liu is currently working on a book titled Assembling Asian American: Psychological technologies and queer subjectivities, where she draws from queer theory, affect, and diasporic postcolonial studies to examine how psychology as a scientific discipline has created Asian Americanness as a measurable, biocultural population through a Eurocentric gaze. Her research has been published in internationally recognized journals such as Feminism & Psychology, Subjectivity, American Quarterly, and Journal of Asian American Studies. She is currently co-editing a special issue on “Feminisms and decolonizing psychology” for the journal Feminism & Psychology.  Liu was born in Taipei, Taiwan, and moved to the USA when she was 16 where she studied and stayed on for her career. She still strongly considers herself as a Taiwanese person politically, and identifies as a queer person of color.

Hsunhui Tseng is Assistant Professor in the Gender Studies Programme at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include globalization, marriage and family, transnational migration and human trafficking, student mobility, gender, class and race, identity politics, Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia. She is working on a manuscript tentatively titled Stratified foreign bodies: Commodified transnational marriage and the brokerage industry in Taiwan. Her works appear in journals such as Asian Anthropology, Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Cultural Review, and Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences. The courses she teaches at CUHK cover feminist methodology, gendered migration in Asia, family and society, and the intersectionality of gender, sexuality, and race throughout the world. Tseng was born in Taiwan where she attended her undergraduate studies and then went to the United States where she obtained her master’s and PhD degrees at the University of Washington, Seattle. She is currently a single mother working in Hong Kong.

Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, S. (1987) (Ed.). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, R., & Botts, T. F. (2018). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (5th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

References

Angeloff, T., & Lieber, M. (2012). Equality, did you say? Chinese feminism after 30 years of reforms. China Perspectives, 2012(4), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, N. K. (1995). “Grassroots empowerment (1975–1990).” (Mimeograph.) New Delhi: Center for Women’s Development Studies. http://www.cwds.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GrassrootEmpowerment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Basu, M. (2013). The girl whose rape changed a country [documentary]. United States: CNN.Google Scholar
Biggs, S., Phillipson, C., Leach, R., & Money, A. M. (2008). The mature imagination and consumption strategies: Age and generation in the development of a United Kingdom baby boomer identity. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 2(2), 31–59. doi:10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.072231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolotin, S. (1982). Voices from the post feminist generation, The New York Times Magazine, October 17. www.nytimes.com/1982/10/17/magazine/voices-from-the-post-feminist-generation.htmlGoogle Scholar
Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology (Gender and Psychology). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446279243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P. (2004). Acting otherwise: The institutionalization of women’s/gender studies in Taiwan’s universities. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203463789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., & Chung, P. (2009). Central mechanisms: The Equal Opportunities Commission and the Women’s Commission. In Cheung, F. M. & Holroyd, E. (Eds.), Mainstreaming gender in Hong Kong society (pp. 369–400). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Chiang, L. H. (1995). Women’s movement, women’s studies. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 1(1), 152–159. doi:10.1080/12259276.1995.11665772Google Scholar
Crouch, B. (2012). Finding a voice in the academy: The history of women’s studies in higher education. Vermont Connection, 33(3), 16–23.Google Scholar
Desai, N., Dube, L., Mazumdar, V., Sharma, K., & Kelkar, G. (1984). Women’s studies and the social sciences: A report from India. Women’s Studies International, 3, 2–6.Google Scholar
Ding, N. (2010). Prostitutes, parasites and the house of state feminism. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 1(2), 305–318. doi:10.1080/14649370050141177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, E. (1997). Harriot Stanton Blatch and the winning of woman suffrage. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fraisse, G. (1995), as quoted in Freedman, J. (2002). Feminisms. New Delhi: Viva Books.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillis, S., Howie, G., & Munford, R. (2004). Third wave feminism: A critical exploration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230523173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer-Malbin, N., & Waehrer, H. Y. (1971). Women in a man-made world. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Guha, R. (2013). The past & present of Indian environmentalism.  The Hindu, March 27, 2013.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies 14(3, 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, S. (Ed.) (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–440.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1995). “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104(3), 331–349. doi:10.1007/BF01064504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, S. (2003). How standpoint methodology informs philosophy of social science. In Turner, S. P. ad Roth, P. A. (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of the social sciences (pp. 291–310). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470756485.ch12Google Scholar
Hartsock, N. C. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding, (Ed.), Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. (2011). Becoming curious: An invitation to the special issue on queer theory and psychology. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/19419899.2011.536308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2010). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
India, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. (1975 ). Towards equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. (2016). Women’s studies, gender studies and feminism. Discover Society, 30. discoversociety.org/2016/03/01/womens-studies-gender-studies-and-feminism/Google Scholar
Jaggar, A. M. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. M. Jaggar, and Bordo, S. (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 145–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kramarae, C., & Spender, D. (1993). The knowledge explosion: Generation of feminist scholarship. London: Harrvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Krishnaraj, M. (1986). Research on women and career: Issues of methodologies. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(43), WS67–WS74.Google Scholar
Krishnaraj, M. (1988) “How has women’s studies been defined?” (Mimeograp.)  Workshop on definition of women’s studies. Bombay: Tata Institute of Social Science.Google Scholar
Lim, A. (2015). Transnational feminism and women’s movements in post-1997 Hong Kong: Solidarity beyond the state. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. doi:10.5790/hongkong/9789888139378.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., Karl, R., & Ko, D. (2013).  The birth of Chinese feminism: Essential texts in transnational theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, W. (2017). Toward a queer psychology of affect: Restarting from shameful places. Subjectivity, 10(1), 44–62. doi:10.1057/s41286-016-0014-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorde, A. (1980). Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In B. Scott, , Cayleff, S., Donadey, A., & Lara, I. (Eds.), Women in culture: An intersectional anthology for gender and women’s studies (pp. 16–22). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, M. (1998). Women’s studies. In Jackson, S. and Jones, J. (Eds.), Contemporary feminist theories (pp. 247–258). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Minton, H. L. (1997). Queer theory: Historical roots and implications for psychology. Theory & Psychology, 7(3), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts, (Eds.), Doing feminist research (pp. 8–18). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2000). From anti-arrack to total prohibition: The women’s movement in Andhra Pradesh, India. Gender, Technology and Development, 4(1), 131–144. doi:10.1177/097185240000400109Google ScholarPubMed
Pande, R. (2001). The social costs of globalization: Restructuring developing world economies. Journal of Asian Women’s Studies, 10, 1–14.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2002). The public face of a private domestic violence. International Feminist Journal, 4(3), 342–367.  doi:10.1080/1461674022000031535Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2003). Eco-feminism: Making connections between feminism and ecology. The Eastern Ghats, ENVIS, Newsletter, Environment Protection Training and Research Institute, 9(1), 7–8. www.academia.edu/3716746/Eco-Feminism_making_connections_between_Feminism_and_Ecology_Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2004). Engendering university curricula and teaching women’s studies in India – A critical evaluation. In R. Pande (Ed.), The indigenization of women’s studies teaching: The Asian Experience (pp. 52–82). Beijing: Contemporary China Publishing House, 52-82.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2013). Women’s studies: An institutional experience. Women’s Link, 19(2), 2–9.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2015). Indology and the women’s question: Discourses on women’s status-traditional past and continuing modern discourses. Manas, Studies into Asia and Africa. Electronic Journal of the Centre for Eastern Languages and Cultures, 2(1). http://manas.bg/en/tradition-and-modernity-indian-culture/indologiyata-i-zhenskata-problematika-diskursi-vrhu-statuta-na-zhenataGoogle Scholar
Pande, R. (2018a). Role of women in the early environment movements in India. In Z. M. Bora, and Sivaramakrishnan, M. (Eds.), Narratives of environmental challenges in Brazil and India: Losing nature (pp. 157–175). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Pande, R. (2018b). The forgotten widows of Vrindawan. In R. Pande, and Weide, T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural perspectives on gender and aging (pp. 200–216). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panikkar,  K. N. (1975). Presidential address: Section III. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, thirty-sixth session, Aligarh, (pp. 365–399). www.jstor.org/stable/44138863?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. (2004). The ascent of woman: A history of the suffragette movement and the ideas behind it. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. New Delhi: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446278901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, K., Kong, T., & Mahoney, D. (2001). Queering the interview. In Gubrium, Jaber F. & Holstein, James A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & methods (pp. 239–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pollitt, K. (1995). Reasonable creatures: Essays on women and feminism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Poonacha, V. (2003). Women’s studies in Indian universities: Current concerns. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(26), 2653–2658.Google Scholar
Rattansi, A., & Phoenix, A. (2005). Rethinking youth identities: Modernist and postmodernist frameworks. In Bynner, J., Chisholm, L., & Fyrlong, A. (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot: Ashgate. Reprinted in Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5(2), 97–123.Google Scholar
Rege, S. (1998). Dalit women talk differently – A critique of difference and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.Google Scholar
Reid, C. J. Jr. (2012). The journey to Seneca Falls: Mary Wollstonecraft, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the legal emancipation of women. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 10, 1123.Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Robinson, V., & Campling, J. (Eds.).  (1993). Introducing women’s studies: Feminist theory and practice. London: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-22595-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R. (2000). The world split open: How the modern women’s movement changed America. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Tharu, S., ＆ Niranjana, T. (1994). Problems for a contemporary theory of gender. Social Scientist, 22(3/4), 93–117. doi:10.2307/3517624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tuchman, G., Daniels, A. K., & Benét, J. W. (1978). Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (1983). Women’s studies and social sciences in Asia: Report of a meeting of experts. New Delhi: Centre for Women’s Development Studies.Google Scholar
United Nations. (1976). Report of the World Conference of the International Women’s Year. New York. www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Mexico/Mexico%20conference%20report%20optimized.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (1994). The social construction of heterosexuality. Journal of Gender Studies, 3(3), 307–316. doi:10.1080/09589236.1994.9960578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilton, T. (1993). Queer subjects: Lesbians, heterosexual women and the academy. In Kennedy, M., Lubelska, C., & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Making connections: Women’s studies, women’s movements and women’s lives (pp. 167–179). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Woodward, K., & Woodward, S. (2015). Gender studies and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 1. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2015.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, J. Y. (2015). Zhongguo nüquan zhuyi sanshi’nian [Chinese feminism for the past 30 years]. theinitium.com/article/20150924-opinion-china-feminism/Google Scholar

Suggested Readings

Steven Gangestad is Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the University of New Mexico. He received his BA from Stanford University and his PhD from University of Minnesota. His research covers topics in evolutionary behavioral science, primarily on processes that affect human romantic relationships, which he has largely explored through frameworks inspired by evolutionary biology. He has published over 130 refereed journal articles with 26,500 citations, h-Index = 70, Google Scholar. He is currently Associate Editor of Psychological Science.

Lei Chang is Chair Professor of Psychology and Head of Department of Psychology, University of Macau. Born in China, Chang received his BA from Hebei University and his PhD from University of Southern California. He has previously taught at the University of Central Florida and the Chinese University of Hong Kong. He conducts research in the areas of evolutionary psychology, including cultural evolution, life history, and mating research, and developmental psychology focusing on parenting, and child and adolescent social development. He has published over 200 refereed journal articles (70% in English outlets) with over 16,000 citations, h-Index = 54, by Google Scholar.

Barrett, H. C. (2015). The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhaber, D. (2012). The nature–nurture debates: Bridging the gap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1974). Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies. American Scientist, 62, 650–659.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (2016). The blank slate (2002/2016). New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via nurture: Genes, experience, and what makes us human. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, E. L., Steen, E., & Stavropoulos, V. (2017). Internet use and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22, 430–454. doi:10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S., & Leventhal, T. (2017). Residential mobility and adolescent achievement and behavior: Understanding timing and extent of mobility. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 328–343. doi:10.1111/jora.12288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbaro, N., Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Genetic confounding of the relationship between father absence and the age at menarche. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, H. C. (2015). The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, L., Rostila, M., Saarela, J., & Hjern, A. (2014). Parental death during childhood and subsequent school performance. Pediatrics, 133, 682–689. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Both, C., Dingemanse, N. J., Drent, P. J., & Tinbergen, J. M. (2005). Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 667–674. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00962.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2015). Intuitive ontologies and domain specificity. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., pp. 168–180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008. doi:10.1037/a0035661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., & Laibson, D. I. (2015). The fourth law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 304–312. doi:10.1177/0963721415580430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, L. (2004). The role of classrooms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L., & Lu, H. J. (2018). Resource and extrinsic risk in defining fast life histories of rural Chinese left-behind children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L., Lu, H. J., Lansford, J. E., Skinner, A. T., Bornstein, M. H., Steinberg, L., … Tapanya, S. (2019). Environmental harshness and unpredictability, life history, and social and academic behavior of adolescents in nine countries. Developmental Psychology, 55, 890–903. doi:10.1037/dev0000655CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, L., Lu, H. J., & Zhu, X. Q. (2017). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers and mothers: The withholding of parental investment by married couples. Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 11, 199–211. doi:10.1037/ebs0000086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L., Mak, M. C., Li, T., Wu, B. P., Chen, B. B., & Lu, H. J. (2011). Cultural adaptations to environmental variability: An evolutionary account of East–West differences. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 99–129. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9149-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Review lecture: Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 236(1285), 339–372. doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0027Google Scholar
Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1990). Selective associations in the observational conditioning of fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 372–389. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.16.4.372Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1871/2019). The descent of man. Books on Demand.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. & Trautner, H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. A. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh vs. unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, P. T. (2001). On fertile ground: A natural history of human reproduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellison, P. T. (2003). Energetics and reproductive effort. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 342–351. doi:10.1002/ajhb.10152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W., Dinh, T., Grebe, N. M., Del Giudice, M., & Thompson, M. E. (2019). Psychological cycle shifts redux: Revisiting a preregistered study examining preferences for muscularity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., & Koelling, R. A. (1955). Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science, 122, 157–158. doi:10.1126/science.122.3179.1089Google ScholarPubMed
Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 539–579. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grebe, N. M., Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Thornhill, R. (2013). Women’s luteal-phase sexual proceptivity and the functions of extended sexuality. Psychological Science, 24, 2106–2110. doi:10.1177/0956797613485965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 91, 277–304. doi:10.2307/2940982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grøntvedt, T. V., Grebe, N. M., Kennair, L. E. O., & Gangestad, S. W. (2017). Estrogenic and progestogenic effects of hormonal contraceptives in relation to sexual behavior: Insights into extended sexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 283–292. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampden-Thompson, G., & Galindo, C. (2015). Family structure instability and the educational persistence of young people in England. British Educational Research Journal, 41, 749–766. doi:10.1002/berj.3179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, T. T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal‐directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30, 3–41. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1961). Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 3, 318–356. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80072-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, R., & Parkinson, J. (2015). The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: A review. Review of Educational Research, 85, 512–552. doi:10.3102/0034654314561338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurvers, R. H., Prins, H. H., van Wieren, S. E., van Oers, K., Nolet, B. A., & Ydenberg, R. C. (2010). The effect of personality on social foraging: Shy barnacle geese scrounge more. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 277, 601–608. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, B. S. (2005). Women’s lives there, here, then, now: A review of women’s ecological and demographic constraints cross-culturally. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 64–87. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, H. J., Zhu, X., & Chang, L. (2015). Good genes, good providers, good fathers: Economic development involved in how women select a mate. Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 9, 215–228. doi:10.1037/ebs0000048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, C., & Drent, P. J. (2000). Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits. Animal Behaviour, 60, 131–140. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marlowe, F. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00014-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506. doi:10.1126/science.134.3489.1501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. (1974). Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies. American Scientist, 62, 650–659.Google ScholarPubMed
McLeod, S. (2018). Nature vs. nurture in psychology. Simply Psychology. Online resource. www.simplypsychology.org/naturevsnurture.htmlGoogle Scholar
Newson, L., & Richerson, P. J. (2009). Why do people become modern? A Darwinian explanation. Population and Development Review, 35, 117–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donahue, W., & Ferguson, K. E. (2001). The psychology of B. F. Skinner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Öhman, A., Fredrikson, M., Hugdahl, K., & Rimmö, P.-A. (1976). The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: Conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 313–337. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.105.4.313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peluffo, A. E. (2015). The “genetic program”: Behind the genesis of an influential metaphor. Genetics, 200, 685–696. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.178418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reader, S. M. (2015). Causes of individual differences in animal exploration and search. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 451–468. doi:10.1111/tops.12148CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, A., & Soederberg, S. (2012). Gender equality as smart economics? A critique of the 2012 World Development Report. Third World Quarterly, 33, 949–968. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.677310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2013). Hormonal predictors of women’s sexual desire in normal menstrual cycles. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 636–645. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2017). Ovarian hormone fluctuations predict within-cycle shifts in women’s food intake. Hormones and Behavior, 90, 8–14. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.01.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seligman, M. E. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(71)80064-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, N. (2011). Developmental systems theory formulated as a claim about inherited representations. Philosophy of Science, 78, 60–82. doi:10.1086/658110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheth, S. A., Abuelem, T., Gale, J. T., & Eskandar, E. N. (2011). Basal ganglia neurons dynamically facilitate exploration during associative learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4878–4885. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3658-10.2011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomar, N., & De, R. K. (2014). A brief outline of the immune system. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1184, 3–12. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of the genes: A discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O., & Weissing, F. J. (2007) Life-history trade-offs favor the evolution of animal personalities. Nature, 447, 581–584. doi:10.1038/nature05835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, N., & Chang, L. (2019). Evolved but not fixed: A life history account of gender roles and gender inequality. Frontiers of Psychology, 10, 1709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01709CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Suggested Readings

E. Sandra Byers is Professor and Chair in the Department of Psychology at University of New Brunswick in Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada and a Research Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. She is the author or co-author of more than 180 journal articles and book chapters, mostly on aspects of human sexuality, as well as of a popular textbook on human sexuality. Byers is a past president of the International Academy of Sex Research and the Canadian Sex Research Forum, a fellow of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality and the Canadian Psychological Association, and is on the editorial boards of a number of scholarly journals. She has won numerous awards including the Donald O. Hebb Award for Distinguished Contribution to Psychology as a Profession from the Canadian Psychological Association in 2010, the Kinsey Award for outstanding contributions to the field of sex research, sex therapy, or sexology from the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality in 2013, and the Outstanding Contribution Award from the Canadian Sex Research Forum. She is also a licensed clinical psychologist with a part-time private practice primarily focused on the treatment of sexual concerns and problems.

Karen L. Blair is an Assistant Professor of Psychology and has affiliations with St. Francis Xavier, Acadia and Trent Universities in Nova Scotia and Ontario, Canada, is founder of KLB Research and president of LGBTQ Psychology Canada. Blair studies the role that social support for relationships plays in the development, maintenance, and dissolution of relationships, sexuality in same-sex relationships, LGBTQ psychology, Holocaust education, and the connections between relationships, social prejudices, and health. More information about her work can be found on her website: www.drkarenblair.com. Blair grew up in Winnipeg, Canada and has lived in Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Utah (United States). She attended University of Guelph, Acadia, and Queen’s University in Canada with a postdoc at the University of Utah. Blair taught English in Thailand, and has spent significant amounts of time in Prague, Czech Republic. She has international collaborations in the United States, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Turkey, and New Zealand. Blair currently lives in Peterborough, ON with her wife, who is also an academic, and their three dogs.

Brotto, L. A. (2018). Better sex through mindfulness: How women can cultivate desire. Vancouver: Greystone Books.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2018). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/amp0000307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, E., & Tiefer, L. (Eds.). (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. doi:10.1007/s10508–015-0490-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2010). Defining sexual health. Report. www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/sexual_health/sh_definitions/en/Google Scholar

References

Aksakal, G. S. (2013). Sexual pleasure as a woman’s human right: Experiences from a human rights training programme for women in Turkey. In S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, & Hawkins, K. (Eds.), Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure (pp. 42–57). London: Zen Books.Google Scholar
Alipour, M. (2017). Islamic shari’a law, neotraditionalist Muslim scholars and transgender sex-reassignment surgery: A case study of Ayatollah Khomeini’s and Sheikh al-Tantawi’s fatwas. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18(1), 91–103. doi:10.1080/15532739.2016.1250239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association & National Association of School Psychologists. (2015). Resolution on gender and sexual orientation diversity in children and adolescents in schools. www.apa.org/about/policy/orientation-diversity.aspxGoogle Scholar
Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C. . . . Brotto, L. A. (2016). Ethical and socio-cultural aspects of sexual function and dysfunction in both sexes. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 591–606. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubrey, J. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50, 501–514. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023070.87195.07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakare-Yusuf, B. (2013). Thinking with pleasure: Danger, sexuality and agency. In S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, & Hawkins, K. (Eds.), Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure (pp. 28–41). London: Zen Books.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, L. R. (2005). Women, Islam and modernity: Single women, sexuality and reproductive health in contemporary Indonesia. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203391389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Psychological outcome in children with disorders of sex development: Implications for understanding typical development. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17, 1–38.Google Scholar
Blackless, M., Charuvastra, A., Derryck, A., Fausto-Sterling, A., Lauzanne, K., & Lee, E. (2000). How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 151–166. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(200003/04)12:2<151::AID-AJHB1>3.0.CO;2-F3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackridge, P., & Gilhooly, S. (1986). Still sane. Vancouver: Press Gang.Google Scholar
Blair, K. L., Cappell, J., & Pukall, C. F. (2018). Not all orgasms were created equal: Differences in frequency and satisfaction of orgasm experiences by sexual activity in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 55(6), 719–733. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1303437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, K. L., & Pukall, C. F. (2014). Can less be more? Comparing duration vs. frequency of sexual encounters in same-sex and mixed-sex relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(2), 123–136. doi:10.3138/cjhs.2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25. doi:10.1300/J056v08n01_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, E. S., Demmons, S., & Lawrance, K. A. (1998). Sexual satisfaction within dating relationships: A test of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 257–267. doi:10.1177/0265407598152008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, E. S., & MacNeil, S. (2006). Further validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 53–69. doi:10.1080/00926230500232917CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, E. S., & Rehman, U. (2014). Sexual well-being. In Tolman, D. & Diamond, L. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 317–337). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14193-011Google Scholar
Carbado, D. W., Williams Crenshaw, K., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 303–312. doi:10.1017/S1742058X13000349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00999.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. N., & Byers, E. S. (2014). Beyond lesbian bed death: Enhancing our understanding of the sexuality of sexual-minority women in relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 893–903. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.795924CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combahee River Collective. (1983). The Combahee River Collective statement. In Smith, B. (Ed.), Home girls: A Black feminist anthology (p. 264). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Conner, R. (1993). Blossom of bone: Reclaiming the connections between homoeroticism and the sacred. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Conron, K. J., Scott, G., Stowell, G. S., & Landers, S. J. (2012). Transgender health in Massachusetts: Results from a household probability sample of adults. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 118–122. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–168.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2007). A dynamical systems approach to the development and expression of female same-sex sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 142–161. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00034.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, L. M., Dickenson, J. A., & Blair, K. L. (2017). Stability of sexual attractions across different timescales: The roles of bisexuality and gender. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 193–204. doi:10.1007/s10508–016-0860-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, M. (1996). Prenatal predisposition and the clinical management of some pediatric conditions. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 139–147. doi:10.1080/00926239608414652CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, M. (1999). Pediatric management of ambiguous and traumatized genitalia. Journal of Urology, 162, 1021–1028. doi:10.1016/S0022–5347(01)68054-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, M. (2008a). Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10 year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 5–14. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, M. (2008b). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, M., & Sigmundson, H. K. (1997). Sex reassignment at birth: Long-term review and clinical implications. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 151, 298–304. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170400084015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flores, A. R., Herman, J. L., Gates, G. J., & Brown, T. N. T. (2016). How many adults identify as transgender in the United States? Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute.Google Scholar
Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual men and women in a US national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288. doi:10.1007/s10508–017-0939-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R., Gwada, M., Silverman, E., Kurnick, A., Leonard, N., Ritchie, A., . . . Martinez, B. (2017). Critical Race Theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: A qualitative exploration. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(54), 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12939–017-0549-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freud, S. (1953). Three essays on the theory of sexuality (1905). In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 7: (1901-1905): A Case of Hysteria, Three Essays on Sexuality and Other Works (pp. 123–246). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1–44.Google Scholar
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social origins of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. R., Lloyd, E. A., Wallen, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2014). Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of US singles. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(11), 2645–2652. doi:10.1111/jsm.12669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhard, J. (2000). Revisiting “the myth of the vaginal orgasm”: The female orgasm in American sexual thought and second wave feminism. Feminist Studies, 26(2), 449–476. doi:10.2307/3178545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geter, A., Sutton, M., & McCree, D. (2018). Social and structural determinants of HIV treatment and care among Black women living with HIV infection: A systematic review: 2005–2016. AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 30(4), 409–416. doi:10.1080/09540121.2018.1426827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golden, C. (2008). The intersexed and the transgendered: Rethinking sex/gender. In Chrisler, J. C., Golden, C., & Rozee, P. D. (Eds.), Lectures of the psychology of women (4th ed., p. 2015). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hamedani, A. (2014). The gay people pushed to change their gender. BBC Magazine. www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29832690Google Scholar
Holmberg, D., & Blair, K.L. (2009). Sexual desire, communication, satisfaction and preferences of men and women in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 46(1), 57–66. doi:10.1080/00224490802645294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmberg, D., Blair, K. L., & Phillips, M. (2010). Women’s sexual satisfaction as a predictor of well-being in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47(1), 111. doi:10.1080/00224490902898710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoskin, R. A. (2017). Femme theory: Refocusing the intersectional lens. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 38(1), 95–109.Google Scholar
Hoskin, R. A., Blair, K. L., & Jenson, K. (2016). Dignity versus diagnosis: Sexual orientation and gender identity differences in reports of one’s greatest concern about receiving a sexual health exam. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(4), 279–293. doi:10.1080/19419899.2016.1236745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, I. A., Houk, C., Ahmed, S. F., & Lee, P. A., with LWPES Consensus Group. (2006). Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91(7), 554–562. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.098319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2018). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1037/amp0000307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, S. E., Thomas, W., & Lang, S. (1997). Two spirit people: Native American gender identity, sexuality and spirituality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joel, D., Tarrasch, R., Berman, Z., Mukamel, M., & Ziv, E. (2014). Queering gender: Studying gender identity in “normative” individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 291–321. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.830640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, S., Cornwall, A., & Hawkins, K. (2013). Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure. London: Zen Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauanui, J. K. (2017). Indigenous Hawai‘ian sexuality and the politics of nationalist decolonization. In Barker, J. (Ed.), Critically sovereign: Indigenous gender, sexuality, and feminist studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Laqueur, T. (1990). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. A., Nordenstrom, A., Houk, C. P., Ahmed, S. F., Aucheus, R., Baratz, A., … Global DSD Updates Consortium. (2016). Global disorders of sexual development update since 2006: Perceptions, approach and care. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 85, 158–180. doi:10.1159/000442975CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lips, H. M. (2006). A new psychology of women: Gender, culture, and ethnicity (3rd ed.). Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Lorber, J. (2005). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Marrow, J. (1997) Changing positions: Women speak out on sex and desire. Avon, MA: Adams Media.Google Scholar
Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Smylie, L. (2008). Sexual rights: Striking a balance. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 7–24. doi:10.1080/19317610802156996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. doi:10.1086/426800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, N. B. (1994). Sexual salvation: Affirming women’s sexual rights and pleasures. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mulhall, J., King, R., Glina, S., & Hvidsten, K. (2008). Importance of and satisfaction with sex among men and women worldwide: Results of the global better sex survey.  Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 788–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S. (2019). Not always in the modoe: The new science of men, sex and relationships. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mydans, S. (2002). In Pakistan, rape victims are the “criminals.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2002/05/17/world/in-pakistan-rape-victims-are-the-criminals.htmlGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, H.E., Hutson, J. M., Anderson, C. R., & Plenter, R. J. (1998). Anatomical relationship between urethra and clitoris. Journal of Urology, 159(6), 1892–1897. doi:10.1016/S0022–5347(01)63188-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Sullivan, L. F., Byers, E. S., & Mitra, K. (2018). An internet-based survey of sexual and reproductive health education attitudes and experience in India: How much support is there for much-needed comprehensive sex education? Sex Education. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1080/14681811.2018.1506915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, L. F., & Thompson, A. E. (2013).  Sexuality in adolescence. In Tolman, D. & Diamond, L. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology (pp. 433–486). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 to 2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poasa, K. H., Blanchard, R., & Zucker, K. J. (2004). Birth order in transgendered males from Polynesia: A quantitative study of Samoan fa’afafine. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30, 13–23. doi:10.1080/00926230490247110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, H. E., & Byers, E. S. (2003). What is sex? Students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and unfaithful sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 87–96.Google Scholar
Rehman, U., Fallis, E., & Byers, E. S. (2013). Sexual satisfaction in heterosexual women. In Cataneda, D. (Ed.), An essential handbook of women’s sexuality (Vol. 1, pp. 25–45). Westport, CT: PraegerGoogle Scholar
Reis, E. (2007). Divergence of disorder? The politics of naming intersex. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 535–543. doi:10.1353/pbm.2007.0054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruan, F. F., & Bullough, V. L. (1992). Lesbianism in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21(3), 217–226. doi:10.1007/BF01542993CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., Byers, E. S., & Sierra, J. C. (2015). Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 1028–1041. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.989307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, J. (2013). Challenging the pleasure versus danger binary: Reflections on sexuality workshops with rural women’s rights activists in North India. In S. Jolly, Cornwall, A., & Hawkins, K. (Eds.), Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure (pp. 42–57). London: Zen Books.Google Scholar
Silverberg, C., & Odette, F. (2011). Sexuality and access project: Survey summary. http://sexuality-and-access.comGoogle Scholar
Sinnot, M. (2004). Toms and dees: Transgender identity and female same-sex relationships in Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striepe, M. I., & Tolman, D. I. (2003). Mom, Dad, I’m straight: The coming out of gender ideologies in adolescent sexual-identity development. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 523–530. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tate, C. C., Youssef, C. P., & Bettergarcia, J. N. (2014). Integrating the study of trangender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18, 302–312. doi:10.1037/gpr0000019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tell, S. (2015). Intersex management in the United States and non-Western cultures. Einstein Journal of Biological Medicine, 30, 5–15.Google Scholar
Tiefer, L. (1995) Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Tiefer, L. (2001). Arriving at a “new view” of women’s sexual problems: Background, theory, and activism. In Kachak, E. & Tiefer, L. (Eds.), A new view of women’s sexual problems (pp. 63–98). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, D. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, D. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757. doi:10.1007/s11199–012-0122-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wekker, G. (1997). Mat-ism and Black lesbianism: Two idealtypical expressions of female homosexuality in Black communities of the diaspora. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 1(1), 11–24; reprinted from Journal of Homosexuality, 24 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Women’s place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent–child interaction. In Coates, J. (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (pp. 165–175). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W. J., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(6), 1565–1576. doi:10.1007/s10508–018-1149-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2006). Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Wyatt, G. E. (1982). The sexual experience of Afro-American women: A middle-income sample. In Kirkpatrick, M. (Ed.), Women’s sexual experience: Explorations of the dark continent (pp. 17–39). New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-4025-6_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, K. (2009). A global survey of sexual behaviours. Journal of Family and Reproductive Health, 3(2), 39–49.Google Scholar

Suggested Readings

Anna Grabowska was born and grew up in Poland when it was a Communist country. Living in a country behind the “iron curtain” made it very difficult to have access to international scientific publications and to establish contacts with other scientific groups in the West. The Solidarity breakthrough and then the accession of Poland to the European Union opened new opportunities for her professional and personal development. In the 1980s, she obtained six months of postdoctoral training in Padua (Italy). Grabowska is Professor of Psychology at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, and Professor Emerita of Biology at the Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, where she led the Psychophysiology Laboratory until 2018. In 2016 she was elected a member of the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences. From 1998 to 2004 she was a Professor of Psychology at Jagiellonian University, Krakow. She served on the executive committee of the European Brain and Behaviour Society (1994–1997, 2000–2003) and in 2010 she co-chaired the Mid-Year Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society in Krakow. Her expertise is in understanding the neural networks underlying cognitive function in humans, hemispheric asymmetry, and sex differences. Her research focuses on brain dysfunction (including dyslexia), combining behavioral, cognitive, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological (ERP) approaches. She has three children and six grandchildren. She enjoys her hobbies: skiing, Argentine tango, and gardening.

Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 477–484. doi:10.1038/nrn1909CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, K. P., Mazure, C. M., & Staley, J. K. (2007). Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biological Psychiatry, 62(8), 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabowska, A. (2017). Sex on the brain: Are gender-dependent structural and functional differences associated with behavior? Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 200–212. doi:10.1002/jnr.23953CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., … Verma, R. (2014). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 823–828. doi:10.1073/pnas.1316909110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, C. M., Towler, S., Welcome, S., Halderman, L. K., Otto, R., Eckert, M. A., & Chiarello, C. (2008). Size matters: Cerebral volume influences sex differences in neuroanatomy. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2920–2931. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunç, B., Solmaz, B., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Calkins, M. E., … Verma, R. (2016). Establishing a link between sex-related differences in the structural connectome and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 371(1688), 20150111. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C., Dougherty, C. C., Baum, S. A., White, T., & Michael, A. M. (2018). Functional connectivity predicts gender: Evidence for gender differences in resting brain connectivity. Human Brain Mapping, 39(4), 1765–1776. doi:10.1002/hbm.23950CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Abe, O., Aoki, S., Hayashi, N., Yamada, H., Kunimatsu, A., Mori, H., … Ohtomo, K. (2002). Normal aging in the central nervous system: Quantitative MR diffusion-tensor analysis. Neurobiology of Aging, 23, 433–441. doi:10.1016/S0197–4580(01)00318-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aboitiz, F., Scheibel, A. B., Fisher, R. S., & Zaidel, E. (1992). Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Research, 598, 143–153. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)90178-CCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J., Damasio, H., & Grabowski, T. (2002). Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human brain: An MRI-volumetric study. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 118, 341–358. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. S., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Bruss, J., & Zhang, W. (2003). Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray-white composition of the human cerebrum. Neuroimage, 18, 880–894. doi:10.1016/S1053–8119(03)00034-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, N. E., Harenski, K. A., Harenski, C. L., Koenigs, M. R., Decety, J., Calhoun, V. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2018). Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample. Human Brain Mapping. doi:10.1002/hbm.24462 [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bava, S., Boucquey, V., Goldenberg, D., Thayer, R. E., Ward, M., Jacobus, J., & Tapert, S. F. (2011). Sex differences in adolescent white matter architecture. Brain Research, 1375, 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.051CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, K. M., & Wahlsten, D. (1997). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Myth or reality? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(5), 581–601. doi:10.1016/S0149–7634(96)00049-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biswal, B. B., Mennes, M., Zuo, X. N., Gohel, S., Kelly, C., Smith, S. M., … Milham, M. P. (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 4734-4739. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluhm, R. L., Osuch, E. A., Lanius, R. A., Boksman, K., Neufeld, R. W., Theberge, J., & Williamson, P. (2008). Default mode network connectivity: Effects of age, sex, and analytic approach. Neuroreport, 19, 887–891. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328300ebbfCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brun, C. C., Leporé, N., Luders, E., Chou, Y. Y., Madsen, S. K., Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2009). Sex differences in brain structure in auditory and cingulate regions. Neuroreport, 20, 930–935. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832c5e65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 186–198. doi:10.1038/nrn2575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 477–484. doi:10.1038/nrn1909CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, L. (2009). Sex differences in human brain structure and function: Relevance to learning and memory. In Pfaff, D. W., Arnold, A. P., Etgen, A. M., Fahrbach, S. E., & Rubin, R. T. (Eds.), Hormones, brain and behavior (2nd ed., pp. 2307–2315). London: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978–008088783-8.00072-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chekroud, A. M., Ward, E. J., Rosenberg, M. D., & Holmes, A. J. (2016). Patterns in the human brain mosaic discriminate males from females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(14), E1968. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523888113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Sachdev, P. S., Wen, W., & Anstey, K. J. (2007). Sex differences in regional gray matter in healthy individuals aged 44-48 years: A voxel-based morphometric study. Neuroimage, 36, 691–699. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, Y., Chou, K. H., Decety, J., Chen, I. Y., Hung, D., Tzeng, O. J., & Lin, C. P. (2009). Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of human mirror-neuron system: A voxel-based morphometric investigation. Neuroscience, 158, 713–720. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayden, J. D., Jentschke, S., Munoz, M., Cooper, J. M., Chadwick, M. J., Banks, T., … Vargha-Khadem, F. (2012). Normative development of white matter tracts: similarities and differences in relation to age, gender, and intelligence. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1738–1747. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, K. P., Mazure, C. M., & Staley, J. K. (2007). Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biological Psychiatry, 62(8), 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courchesne, E., Chisum, H. J., Townsend, J., Cowles, A., Covington, J., Egaas, B., … Press, G. A. (2000). Normal brain development and aging: Quantitative analysis and in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology, 216, 672–682. doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au37672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davatzikos, C. (2004). Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences. Neuroimage, 23, 17–20. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davatzikos, C., & Resnick, S. M. (1998). Sex differences in anatomic measures of interhemispheric connectivity: Correlations with cognition in women but not men. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 635–640. doi:10.1093/cercor/8.7.635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, G. J. (2004). Minireview: Sex differences in adult and developing brains: Compensation, compensation, compensation. Endocrinology, 145, 1063–1068. doi:10.1210/en.2003-1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness, , … Tsuang, M. T. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 490–497. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gong, G., He, Y., & Evan, A. C. (2011). Brain connectivity: Gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist, 17, 575–591. doi:10.1177/1073858410386492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gong, G., Rosa-Neto, P., Carbonell, F., Chen, Z. J., He, Y., & Evans, A. C. (2009) Age- and gender-related differences in the cortical anatomical network. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(50), 15684–15693. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2308-09.2009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Good, C. D., Johnsrude, I., Ashburner, J., Henson, R. N., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. (2001). Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: A voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage, 14, 685–700. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0857CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabowska, A. (2017). Sex on the brain: Are gender-dependent structural and functional differences associated with behavior? Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 200–212. doi:10.1002/jnr.23953CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, R. C., Gunning-Dixon, F., Bilker, W. B., & Gur, R. E. (2002). Sex differences in temporo-limbic and frontal brain volumes of healthy adults. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 998–1003. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.9.998CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999). Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: Correlations with cognitive performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 4065-4072. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-10-04065.1999CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haier, R., Jung, R., Yeo, R., Head, K., & Alkire, M. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. Neuroimage, 25, 320–327. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. F. (2017). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Routledge; first published 2012 by Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hänggi, J., Fövenyi, L., Liem, F., Meyer, M., & Jäncke, L. (2014). The hypothesis of neuronal interconnectivity as a function of brain size – a general organization principle of the human connectome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 915. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herting, M. M., Maxwell, E. C., Irvine, C., & Nagel, B. J. (2012). The impact of sex, puberty, and hormones on white matter microstructure in adolescents. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1979–1992. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Im, K., Lee, J. M., Lee, J., Shin, Y. W., Kim, I. Y., Kwon, J. S., & Kim, S. I. (2006). Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods. Neuroimage, 31(1), 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., … Verma, R. (2014). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 823–828. doi:10.1073/pnas.1316909110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jäncke, L., Mérillat, S., Liem, F., & Hänggi, J. (2015). Brain size, sex, and the aging brain. Human Brain Mapping, 36(1), 150–169. doi:10.1002/hbm.22619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jäncke, L., Staiger, J. F., Schlaug, G., Huang, Y. X., & Steinmetz, H. (1997). The relationship between corpus callosum size and forebrain volume. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 48–56. doi:10.1093/cercor/7.1.48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., … Assaf, Y. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(50), 15,468–15,473. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509654112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanaan, R. A., Allin, M., Picchioni, M., Barker, G. J., Daly, E., Shergill, S. S., … McGuire, P. K. (2012). Gender differences in white matter microstructure. PLoS One, 7(6), e38272. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, K., & Menon, V. (2009). Gender differences in the functional and structural neuroanatomy of mathematical cognition. Neuroimage, 47(1), 342–352. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C. E., Danielian, L. E., Thomasson, D., & Baker, E. H. (2009). Normal regional fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient of the brain measured on a 3 T MR scanner. Neuroradiology, 51(1), 3–9. doi:10.1007/s00234–008-0441-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, C. M., Towler, S., Welcome, S., Halderman, L. K., Otto, R., Eckert, M. A., & Chiarello, C. (2008). Size matters: Cerebral volume influences sex differences in neuroanatomy. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2920–2931. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luders, E., Gaser, C., Narr, K. L., & Toga, A. W. (2009). Why sex matters: Brain size independent differences in gray matter distributions between men and women. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(45), 14,265-14,270. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2261-09.2009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Jancke, L., Steinmetz, H., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Gender differences in cortical complexity. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 799-800. doi:10.1038/nn1277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Woods, R. P., Deluca, H., … Toga, A. W. (2006). Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling. Human Brain Mapping, 27(4), 314–324. doi:10.1002/hbm.20187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Woods, R. P., Rex, D. E., Jancke, L., … Toga, A. W. (2005). Mapping cortical gray matter in the young adult brain: Effects of gender. Neuroimage, 26, 493-501. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luders, E., Rex, D. E., Narr, K. L., Woods, R. P., Jancke, L., Thompson, P. M., … Toga, A. W. (2003). Relationships between sulcal asymmetries and corpus callosum size: Gender and handedness effects. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1084-1093. doi:10.1093/cercor/13.10.1084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luders, E., Steinmetz, H., & Jancke, L. (2002). Brain size and grey matter volume in the healthy human brain. Neuroreport , 13, 2371–2374. doi:10.1097/00001756-200212030-00040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menzler, K., Belke, M., Wehrmann, E., Krakow, K., Lengler, U., Jansen, A., … Knake, S. (2011). Men and women are different: Diffusion tensor imaging reveals sexual dimorphism in the microstructure of the thalamus, corpus callosum and cingulum. Neuroimage, 54, 2557–2562. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.029CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, M., Jancke, L., Staiger, J., Schlaug, G., Huang, Y., & Steinmetz, H. (1998). Unsolved problems in comparing brain sizes in Homo sapiens. Brain and Cognition, 37, 254–285. doi:10.1006/brcg.1998.0983CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringo, J. (1991). Neuronal interconnection as a function of brain size. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 38, 1–6. doi:10.1159/000114375CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringo, J., Doty, R. W., Demeter, S., & Simard, P. Y. (1994). Time is of the essence: A conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 331–343. doi:10.1093/cercor/4.4.331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., … Deary, I. J. (2018). Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5,216 UK Biobank participants. Cerebral Cortex, 28, 2959–2975. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruigrok, A. N., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M. C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacher, J., Neumann, J., Okon-Singer, H., Gotowiec, S., & Villringer, A. (2013). Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: Evidence from neuroimaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 31(3), 366–375. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Roalf, D. R., Ruparel, K., Erus, G., Vandekar, S., … Gur, R. C. (2015). Linked sex differences in cognition and functional connectivity in youth. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2383–2394. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheinost, D., Finn, E. S., Tokoglu, F., Shen, X., Papademetris, X., Hampson, M., & Constable, R. T. (2015). Sex differences in normal age trajectories of functional brain networks. Human Brain Mapping, 36(4), 1524–1535. doi:10.1002/hbm.22720CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulte, T., Sullivan, E. V., Muller-Oehring, E. M., Adalsteinsson, E., & Pfefferbaum, A. (2005). Corpus callosal microstructural integrity influences interhemispheric processing: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1384–1392. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepehrband, F., Lynch, K. M., Cabeen, R. P., Gonzalez-Zacarias, C., Zhao, L., D’Arcy, M., … Clark, K. A. (2018). Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning. Neuroimage, 172, 217–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.065CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, Y. W., Kim, D. J., Ha, T. H., Park, H. J., Moon, W. J., Chung, E. C., … Kwon, J. S. (2005). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroreport, 16, 795–798. doi:10.1097/00001756-200505310-00003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sowell, E. R., Peterson, B. S., Kan, E., Woods, R. P., Yoshii, J., Bansal, R., … Toga, A. W. (2007). Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age. Cerebral Cortex, 17(7), 1550–1560. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, E. V., Rosenbloom, M. J., Desmond, J. E., & Pfefferbaum, A. (2001). Sex differences in corpus callosum size: Relationship to age and intracranial size. Neurobiology of Aging, 22, 603–611. doi:10.1016/S0197–4580(01)00232-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y., Lee, R., Chen, Y., Collinson, S., Thakor, N., Bezerianos, A., & Sim, K. (2015). Progressive gender differences of structural brain networks in healthy adults: A longitudinal, diffusion tensor imaging study. PLoS One, 10(3), e0118857. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118857CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, L., Wang, J., Yan, C., & He, Y. (2011). Hemisphere- and gender-related differences in small-world brain networks: A resting-state functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 54(1), 191–202. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunç, B., Solmaz, B., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Calkins, M. E., … Verma, R. (2016). Establishing a link between sex-related differences in the structural connectome and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 371(1688). doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0111Google ScholarPubMed
Westerhausen, R., Kreuder, F., Dos Santos Sequeira, S., Walter, C., Woerner, W., Wittling, R. A., … Wittling, W. (2004). Effects of handedness and gender on macro- and microstructure of the corpus callosum and its subregions: A combined high-resolution and diffusion-tensor MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 418–426. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerhausen, R., Walter, C., Kreuder, F., Wittling, R. A., Schweiger, E., & Wittling, W. (2003). The influence of handedness and gender on the microstructure of the human corpus callosum: A diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 351, 99–102. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2003.07.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witelson, S. F., Glezer, I. I., & Kigar, D. L. (1995). Women have greater density of neurons in posterior temporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3418–3428. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03418.1995CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y. C., Field, A. S., Whalen, P. J., & Alexander, A. L. (2011). Age- and gender-related changes in the normal human brain using hybrid diffusion imaging (HYDI). Neuroimage, 54, 1840–1853. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, C., Gong, G, Wang, J., Wang, D., Liu, D., Zhu, C., … He, Y. (2011). Sex- and brain size-related small-world structural cortical networks in young adults: A DTI tractography study. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 449–458. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C., Cahill, N. D., Arbabshirani, M. R., White, T., Baum, S. A., & Michael, A. M. (2016). Sex and age effects of functional connectivity in early adulthood. Brain Connect, 6(9), 700–713. doi:10.1089/brain.2016.0429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C., Dougherty, C. C., Baum, S. A., White, T., & Michael, A. M. (2018). Functional connectivity predicts gender: Evidence for gender differences in resting brain connectivity. Human Brain Mapping, 39(4), 1765–1776. doi:10.1002/hbm.23950CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Suggested Readings

Lise Eliot is Professor of Neuroscience at the Chicago Medical School of Rosalind Franklin University.  Her research addresses brain and gender development, especially the role of neuroplasticity in shaping neural circuitry and behavior. She is the author of two books:  What’s going on in there? How the brain and mind develop in the first five years of life (1999) and Pink brain, blue brain: How small differences grow into troublesome gaps (2009). A Chicago native, Eliot received an AB degree magna cum laude in History and Science from Harvard University and a PhD in Cellular Physiology and Biophysics from Columbia University, and she completed a postdoctoral fellowship in the Division of Neuroscience at Baylor College of Medicine.

David, S. P., Naudet, F., Laude, J., Radua, J., Fusar-Poli, P., Chu, I., … Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Potential reporting bias in neuroimaging studies of sex differences. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6082. doi:10.1038/s41598–018-23976-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliot, L. (2009).  Pink brain, blue brain: How small differences grow into troublesome gaps – and what we can do about it. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Eliot, L. (2011). The trouble with sex differences. Neuron, 72(6), 895–898. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jäncke, L. (2018). Sex/gender differences in cognition, neurophysiology, and neuroanatomy [version 1; referees: 3 approved]. F1000Research 7(F1000 Faculty Rev), 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rippon, G. (2019). The gendered brain. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Rippon, G., Jordan-Young, R., Kaiser, A., & Fine, C. (2014). Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: Key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 650. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. S., Junger, J., Derntl, B., & Habel, U. (2015). The transsexual brain – A review of findings on the neural basis of transsexualism. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 59, 251–266. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Agcaoglu, O., Miller, R., Mayer, A. R., Hugdahl, K., & Calhoun, V. D. (2015). Lateralization of resting state networks and relationship to age and gender. NeuroImage, 104, 310–325. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, E. I., Zehr, J. L., Schulz, K. M., Lorenz, B. H., DonCarlos, L. L., & Sisk, C. L. (2008). Pubertal hormones modulate the addition of new cells to sexually dimorphic brain regions. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 995–997. doi:10.1038/nn.2178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, E. A., Erhardt, E. B., Eswar, D., William, G., Segall, J. M., Silva, R. F., … Calhoun, V. D. (2011). A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting state networks. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 5, 2. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, L. S., & Gorski, R. A. (1991). Sexual dimorphism of the anterior commissure and massa intermedia of the human brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 312(1), 97–104. doi:10.1002/cne.903120108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, L. S., & Gorski, R. A. (1992). Sexual orientation and the size of the anterior commissure in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89(15), 7199–7202. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.15.7199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, N. E., Harenski, K. A., Harenski, C. L., Koenigs, M. R., Decety, J., Calhoun, V. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2019). Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample. Human Brain Mapping, 40, 1496–1506. doi:10.1002/hbm.24462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreano, J. M., & Cahill, L. (2009). Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning & Memory, 16(4), 248–266. doi:10.1101/lm.918309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, G. F., Balthazart, J., & McCarthy, M. M. (2014). Is it useful to view the brain as a secondary sexual characteristic? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 628–638. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.08.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, K. M., & Wahlsten, D. (1997). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Myth or reality? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(5), 581–601. doi:10.1016/S0149–7634(96)00049-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biswal, B. B., Mennes, M., Zuo, X., Gohel, S., Kelly, C., Smith, S. M., … Milham, M. P. (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(10), 4734–4739. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breedlove, S. M. (1992). Sexual dimorphism in the vertebrate nervous system. Journal of Neuroscience, 12(11), 4133–4142. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04133.1992CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breedlove, S. M., & Arnold, A. P. (1983). Hormonal control of a developing neuromuscular system. II. Sensitive periods for the androgen-induced masculinization of the rat spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus. Journal of Neuroscience, 3(2), 424–432. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-02-00424.1983Google ScholarPubMed
Brizendine, L. (2010). The male brain. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 735–765. doi:10.1037/a0030737CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, M., Kim, J., Yeon, H., Choi, J., Park, J., Jun, J., … Chung, S. (2011). Effects of gender and age on anterior commissure volume. Neuroscience Letters, 500(2), 92–94. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, B. M., Tabibnia, G., & Breedlove, S. M. (1999). A brain sexual dimorphism controlled by adult circulating androgens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(13), 7538–7540. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.13.7538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, K. P., Mazure, C. M., & Staley, J. K. (2007). Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biological Psychiatry, 62(8), 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coupé, P., Catheline, G., Lanuza, E., & Manjón, J. V. (2017). Towards a unified analysis of brain maturation and aging across the entire lifespan: A MRI analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38(11), 5501–5518. doi:10.1002/hbm.23743CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damle, N. R., Ikuta, T., John, M., Peters, B. D., DeRosse, P., Malhotra, A. K., & Szeszko, P. R. (2017). Relationship among interthalamic adhesion size, thalamic anatomy and neuropsychological functions in healthy volunteers. Brain Structure & Function, 222(5), 2183–2192. doi:10.1007/s00429–016-1334-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, S. P., Naudet, F., Laude, J., Radua, J., Fusar-Poli, P., Chu, I., … Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Potential reporting bias in neuroimaging studies of sex differences. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6082. doi:10.1038/s41598–018-23976-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de la Grandmaison, G. L., Clairand, I., & Durigon, M. (2001). Organ weight in 684 adult autopsies: New tables for a caucasoid population. Forensic Science International, 119(2), 149–154. doi:10.1016/S0379–0738(00)00401-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vries, G. J. (2004). Minireview: Sex differences in adult and developing brains: Compensation, compensation, compensation. Endocrinology, 145(3), 1063–1068. doi:10.1210/en.2003-1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, G. J., & Södersten, P. (2009). Sex differences in the brain: The relation between structure and function. Hormones and Behavior, 55(5), 589–596. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.03.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M., Booth, T., & Irwing, P. (2012). The distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring global sex differences in personality. PloS One, 7(1), e29265. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLacoste-Utamsing, C., & Holloway, R. L. (1982). Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science (New York), 216(4553), 1431–1432. doi:10.1126/science.7089533CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demeter, S., Ringo, J. L., & Doty, R. W. (1988). Morphometric analysis of the human corpus callosum and anterior commissure. Human Neurobiology, 6(4), 219–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Driesen, N. R., & Raz, N. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness on corpus callosum morphology: A meta-analysis. Psychobiology, 23(3), 240–247.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science (New York), 317(5843), 1344–1347. doi:10.1126/science.1145463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Else-Quest, N. M., Higgins, A., Allison, C., & Morton, L. C. (2012). Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 947–981. doi:10.1037/a0027930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filipek, P. A., Richelme, C., Kennedy, D. N., & Caviness Jr, V. S. (1994). The young adult human brain: An MRI-based morphometric analysis. Cerebral Cortex, 4(4), 344–360. doi:10.1093/cercor/4.4.344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filkowski, M. M., Olsen, R. M., Duda, B., Wanger, T. J., & Sabatinelli, D. (2017). Sex differences in emotional perception: Meta analysis of divergent activation. NeuroImage, 147, 925–933. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2015). Attachment and pairbonding. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (2012). Are we getting smarter? Rising IQ in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forstmeier, W. (2011). Women have relatively larger brains than men: A comment on the misuse of general linear models in the study of sexual dimorphism. Anatomical Record, 294(11), 1856–1863. doi:10.1002/ar.21423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, A., Möhring, W., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Development of mental transformation abilities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 536–542. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, J. A., Binder, J. R., Springer, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S. F., Rao, S. M., & Cox, R. W. (1999). Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes: Evidence from functional MRI. Brain, 122(2), 199–208. doi:10.1093/brain/122.2.199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Falgueras, A., & Swaab, D. F. (2008). A sex difference in the hypothalamic uncinate nucleus: Relationship to gender identity. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 131(12), 3132–3146. doi:10.1093/brain/awn276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Garcia, I., Kube, J., Gaebler, M., Horstmann, A., Villringer, A., & Neumann, J. (2016). Neural processing of negative emotional stimuli and the influence of age, sex and task-related characteristics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 773–793. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geng, X., Li, G., Lu, Z., Gao, W., Wang, L., Shen, D., … Gilmore, J. H. (2017). Structural and maturational covariance in early childhood brain development. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3), 1795–1807. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw022Google ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985a). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42(5), 428–459. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060050026008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985b). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: II. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42(6), 521–552. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060060019009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985c). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42(7), 634–654. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060070024012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Vaituzis, A. C., & Rapoport, J. L. (1997). Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 21(8), 1185–1201. doi:10.1016/S0278–5846(97)00158-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giedd, J. N., Vaituzis, A. C., Hamburger, S. D., Lange, N., Rajapakse, J. C., Kaysen, D., … Rapoport, J. L. (1996). Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala, and hippocampus in normal human development: Ages 4–18 years. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 366(2), 223–230. https://doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960304)366:23.0.CO;2-73.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness Jr., V. S., … Tsuang, M. T. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11(6), 490–497. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gong, G., He, Y., & Evans, A. C. (2011). Brain connectivity: Gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist, 17(5), 575–591. doi:10.1177/1073858410386492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J. (1996). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Grön, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe, M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3(4), 404. doi:10.1038/73980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guadalupe, T., Zwiers, M. P., Wittfeld, K., Teumer, A., Vasquez, A. A., Hoogman, M., … van Bokhoven, H. (2015). Asymmetry within and around the human planum temporale is sexually dimorphic and influenced by genes involved in steroid hormone receptor activity. Cortex, 62, 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, R. C., Gunning-Dixon, F., Bilker, W. B., & Gur, R. E. (2002). Sex differences in temporo-limbic and frontal brain volumes of healthy adults. Cerebral Cortex, 12(9), 998–1003. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.9.998CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2016). Sex differences in brain and behavior in adolescence: Findings from the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hamann, S. (2005). Sex differences in the responses of the human amygdala. Neuroscientist, 11(4), 288–293. doi:10.1177/1073858404271981CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7(4), 411–416. doi:10.1038/nn1208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hänggi, J., Buchmann, A., Mondadori, C. R. A., Henke, K., Jäncke, L., & Hock, C. (2010). Sexual dimorphism in the parietal substrate associated with visuospatial cognition independent of general intelligence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), 139–155. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hänggi, J., Fovenyi, L., Liem, F., Meyer, M., & Jäncke, L. (2014). The hypothesis of neuronal interconnectivity as a function of brain size – A general organization principle of the human connectome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 915. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highley, J. R., Esiri, M. M., McDonald, B., Roberts, H. C., Walker, M. A., & Crow, T. J. (1999). The size and fiber composition of the anterior commissure with respect to gender and schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 45(9), 1120–1127. doi:10.1016/S0006–3223(98)00323-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscock, M., Inch, R., Hawryluk, J., Lyon, P. J., & Perachio, N. (1999). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? III. An exhaustive survey of tactile laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 17–28. doi:10.1076/jcen.21.1.17.944Google Scholar
Hiscock, M., Inch, R., Jacek, C., Hiscock-Kalil, C., & Kalil, K. M. (1994). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? I. An exhaustive survey of auditory laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16(3), 423–435. doi:10.1080/01688639408402653Google Scholar
Hiscock, M., Israelian, M., Inch, R., Jacek, C., & Hiscock-Kalil, C. (1995). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? II. an exhaustive survey of visual laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(4), 590–610. doi:10.1080/01688639508405148Google Scholar
Hiscock, M., Perachio, N., & Inch, R. (2001). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? IV. An exhaustive survey of dual-task interference studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 23(2), 137–148. doi:10.1076/jcen.23.2.137.1206Google Scholar
Hoppe, C., Fliessbach, K., Stausberg, S., Stojanovic, J., Trautner, P., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2012). A key role for experimental task performance: Effects of math talent, gender and performance on the neural correlates of mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 78(1), 14–27. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., & Ersland, L. (2006). Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: An fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 44(9), 1575–1583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53CrossRefGoogle Scholar