The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Section 1 - The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 July 2020

Edited by

Fanny M. Cheung and

Diane F. Halpern

Show author details

Fanny M. Cheung: Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Diane F. Halpern: Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women , pp. 1 - 80

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561716 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Washington, DC: Author. www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines-archived.pdf Google Scholar

Azar, B. (2010). Are your findings WEIRD? Monitor on Psychology, 41, 11. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Brady, L. M., Fryberg, S. A., & Shoda, Y. (2018). Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 11,406–11,413. doi:10.1073/pnas.1803526115CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cheung, F. M. (1994). Promoting women’s development in Hong Kong. In Committee on Women’s Studies in Asia (Eds.), Women’s studies, women’s lives: Theories and practice in South and Southeast Asia (pp. 59–73). New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M. (2012). Mainstreaming culture in psychology. American Psychologist, 67, 721–730. doi:10.1037/a0029876Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., & Holroyd, E. (Eds.). (2009). Mainstreaming gender in Hong Kong society. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar

Chrisler, J. C., & McHugh, M. C. (2018). Feminist critiques of psychology. In Travis, C. B. & White, J. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women, Vol. 1: History, theory and battlegrounds (pp. 71–89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

CNN (2018). Landmark day for Saudi women as kingdom’s controversial driving ban ends. edition.cnn.com/2018/06/23/middleeast/saudi-women-driving-ban-lifts-intl/index.html Google Scholar

CNN (2019). New Zealand mosque terror attacks. edition.cnn.com/asia/live-news/live-updates-new-zealand-shooting-christchurch-terror-attack-intl/index.html Google Scholar

European Institute for Gender Equality. (2017). Gender Equality Index 2017. http://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/gender-equality-index/about Google Scholar

Green, J. (2016). Transsexual surgery may be covered by Medicare. LGBT Health, 1, 256–258. doi:ccl.idm.oclc.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0076Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J. R., & Wentzel, K. (2007a). Encouraging girls in math and science. Institute for Educational Sciences. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C., Geary, D., Gur, D., Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007b). The science of sex-differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–52. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.xGoogle Scholar

Halpern, D. F., & Cheung, F. M. (2008). Women at the top: Powerful leaders tell us how to combine work and family. Malden, MA: Wiley.CrossRef Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J. S., … Martin, C. L. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333, 1706–1707. doi:10.1126/science.1205031CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halpern, D. F., Straight, C., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64, 336–347. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9891-2Google Scholar

Heinrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 1-75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152XGoogle Scholar

Jones, D. (2010). A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists’ studies. Science, 328, 1627. doi:10.1126/science.328.5986.1627Google Scholar

Marsella, A. J. (2000). Internationalizing the psychology curriculum: Toward new competencies and directions. International Psychology Reporter, 4(3), the APA Division 52 (International Psychology) Newsletter. Reprinted in South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 12, 70–72.Google Scholar

Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012Google Scholar

Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011Google Scholar

Psychology Day at the United Nations. (2019). The 12th Annual Psychology Day at the United Nations, 25 April 2019: “The Time Is Now: Psychological Contributions to Global Gender Equality.” www.unpsychologyday.com/Google Scholar

Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. PNAS 115 (45), 11,401–11,405; published ahead of print November 6, 2018. doi:10.1073/pnas.1721165115CrossRef Google Scholar

Redden, E. (2018). Global attack on gender studies. Inside Higher Ed. www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/12/05/gender-studies-scholars-say-field-coming-under-attack-many-countries-around-globe?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&utm_campaign=71f8faa77a-DNU_WO20181203_NEW_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-71f8faa77a-198511601&mc_cid=71f8faa77a&mc_eid=5734c27a26 Google Scholar

Time (2019). A “620km human chain” – Indian women rally for equality. http://time.com/5491454/620km-human-chain-indian-women-equality/Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E., & Halpern, D. F. (2009). Sex differences in variability for cognitive measures: Do the ends justify the genes? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 612–614.Google Scholar

United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/Google Scholar

United Nations Development Program. (2018). Human development indices and indicators, 2018 statistical updates. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf Google Scholar

World Economic Forum. (2018). The global gender gap report. www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2017). Safely managed drinking water – Thematic report on drinking water 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/safely-managed-drinking-water-JMP-2017-1.pdf Google Scholar

References

Angeloff, T., & Lieber, M. (2012). Equality, did you say? Chinese feminism after 30 years of reforms. China Perspectives, 2012(4), 17–24.Google Scholar

Banerjee, N. K. (1995). “Grassroots empowerment (1975–1990).” (Mimeograph.) New Delhi: Center for Women’s Development Studies. http://www.cwds.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GrassrootEmpowerment.pdf Google Scholar

Basu, M. (2013). The girl whose rape changed a country [documentary]. United States: CNN.Google Scholar

Biggs, S., Phillipson, C., Leach, R., & Money, A. M. (2008). The mature imagination and consumption strategies: Age and generation in the development of a United Kingdom baby boomer identity. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 2(2), 31–59. doi:10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.072231Google Scholar

Bolotin, S. (1982). Voices from the post feminist generation, The New York Times Magazine, October 17. www.nytimes.com/1982/10/17/magazine/voices-from-the-post-feminist-generation.html Google Scholar

Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology (Gender and Psychology). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446279243Google Scholar

Chen, P. (2004). Acting otherwise: The institutionalization of women’s/gender studies in Taiwan’s universities. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203463789Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., & Chung, P. (2009). Central mechanisms: The Equal Opportunities Commission and the Women’s Commission. In Cheung, F. M. & Holroyd, E. (Eds.), Mainstreaming gender in Hong Kong society (pp. 369–400). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar

Chiang, L. H. (1995). Women’s movement, women’s studies. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 1(1), 152–159. doi:10.1080/12259276.1995.11665772Google Scholar

Crouch, B. (2012). Finding a voice in the academy: The history of women’s studies in higher education. Vermont Connection, 33(3), 16–23.Google Scholar

Desai, N., Dube, L., Mazumdar, V., Sharma, K., & Kelkar, G. (1984). Women’s studies and the social sciences: A report from India. Women’s Studies International, 3, 2–6.Google Scholar

Ding, N. (2010). Prostitutes, parasites and the house of state feminism. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 1(2), 305–318. doi:10.1080/14649370050141177CrossRef Google Scholar

DuBois, E. (1997). Harriot Stanton Blatch and the winning of woman suffrage. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fraisse, G. (1995), as quoted in Freedman, J. (2002). Feminisms. New Delhi: Viva Books.Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gillis, S., Howie, G., & Munford, R. (2004). Third wave feminism: A critical exploration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230523173Google Scholar

Glazer-Malbin, N., & Waehrer, H. Y. (1971). Women in a man-made world. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Guha, R. (2013). The past & present of Indian environmentalism. The Hindu, March 27, 2013.Google Scholar

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies 14(3, 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066Google Scholar

Harding, S. (Ed.) (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–440.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1995). “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104(3), 331–349. doi:10.1007/BF01064504Google Scholar

Harding, S. (2003). How standpoint methodology informs philosophy of social science. In Turner, S. P. ad Roth, P. A. (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of the social sciences (pp. 291–310). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470756485.ch12Google Scholar

Hartsock, N. C. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding, (Ed.), Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hegarty, P. (2011). Becoming curious: An invitation to the special issue on queer theory and psychology. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/19419899.2011.536308Google Scholar

Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2010). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

India, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. (1975 ). Towards equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar

Jackson, S. (2016). Women’s studies, gender studies and feminism. Discover Society, 30. discoversociety.org/2016/03/01/womens-studies-gender-studies-and-feminism/Google Scholar

Jaggar, A. M. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. M. Jaggar, and Bordo, S. (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 145–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Kramarae, C., & Spender, D. (1993). The knowledge explosion: Generation of feminist scholarship. London: Harrvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Krishnaraj, M. (1986). Research on women and career: Issues of methodologies. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(43), WS67–WS74.Google Scholar

Krishnaraj, M. (1988) “How has women’s studies been defined?” (Mimeograp.) Workshop on definition of women’s studies. Bombay: Tata Institute of Social Science.Google Scholar

Lim, A. (2015). Transnational feminism and women’s movements in post-1997 Hong Kong: Solidarity beyond the state. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. doi:10.5790/hongkong/9789888139378.001.0001Google Scholar

Liu, L., Karl, R., & Ko, D. (2013). The birth of Chinese feminism: Essential texts in transnational theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, W. (2017). Toward a queer psychology of affect: Restarting from shameful places. Subjectivity, 10(1), 44–62. doi:10.1057/s41286-016-0014-6Google Scholar

Lorde, A. (1980). Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In B. Scott, , Cayleff, S., Donadey, A., & Lara, I. (Eds.), Women in culture: An intersectional anthology for gender and women’s studies (pp. 16–22). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Maynard, M. (1998). Women’s studies. In Jackson, S. and Jones, J. (Eds.), Contemporary feminist theories (pp. 247–258). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Minton, H. L. (1997). Queer theory: Historical roots and implications for psychology. Theory & Psychology, 7(3), 337–353.Google Scholar

Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts, (Eds.), Doing feminist research (pp. 8–18). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2000). From anti-arrack to total prohibition: The women’s movement in Andhra Pradesh, India. Gender, Technology and Development, 4(1), 131–144. doi:10.1177/097185240000400109Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2001). The social costs of globalization: Restructuring developing world economies. Journal of Asian Women’s Studies, 10, 1–14.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2002). The public face of a private domestic violence. International Feminist Journal, 4(3), 342–367. doi:10.1080/1461674022000031535Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2003). Eco-feminism: Making connections between feminism and ecology. The Eastern Ghats, ENVIS, Newsletter, Environment Protection Training and Research Institute, 9(1), 7–8. www.academia.edu/3716746/Eco-Feminism_making_connections_between_Feminism_and_Ecology_Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2004). Engendering university curricula and teaching women’s studies in India – A critical evaluation. In R. Pande (Ed.), The indigenization of women’s studies teaching: The Asian Experience (pp. 52–82). Beijing: Contemporary China Publishing House, 52-82.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2013). Women’s studies: An institutional experience. Women’s Link, 19(2), 2–9.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2015). Indology and the women’s question: Discourses on women’s status-traditional past and continuing modern discourses. Manas, Studies into Asia and Africa. Electronic Journal of the Centre for Eastern Languages and Cultures, 2(1). http://manas.bg/en/tradition-and-modernity-indian-culture/indologiyata-i-zhenskata-problematika-diskursi-vrhu-statuta-na-zhenata Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2018a). Role of women in the early environment movements in India. In Z. M. Bora, and Sivaramakrishnan, M. (Eds.), Narratives of environmental challenges in Brazil and India: Losing nature (pp. 157–175). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Pande, R. (2018b). The forgotten widows of Vrindawan. In R. Pande, and Weide, T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural perspectives on gender and aging (pp. 200–216). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Panikkar, K. N. (1975). Presidential address: Section III. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, thirty-sixth session, Aligarh, (pp. 365–399). www.jstor.org/stable/44138863?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Google Scholar

Phillips, M. (2004). The ascent of woman: A history of the suffragette movement and the ideas behind it. London: Abacus.Google Scholar

Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. New Delhi: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446278901Google Scholar

Plummer, K., Kong, T., & Mahoney, D. (2001). Queering the interview. In Gubrium, Jaber F. & Holstein, James A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & methods (pp. 239–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Pollitt, K. (1995). Reasonable creatures: Essays on women and feminism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Poonacha, V. (2003). Women’s studies in Indian universities: Current concerns. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(26), 2653–2658.Google Scholar

Rattansi, A., & Phoenix, A. (2005). Rethinking youth identities: Modernist and postmodernist frameworks. In Bynner, J., Chisholm, L., & Fyrlong, A. (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot: Ashgate. Reprinted in Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5(2), 97–123.Google Scholar

Rege, S. (1998). Dalit women talk differently – A critique of difference and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.Google Scholar

Reid, C. J. Jr. (2012). The journey to Seneca Falls: Mary Wollstonecraft, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the legal emancipation of women. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 10, 1123.Google Scholar

Richardson, D., Robinson, V., & Campling, J. (Eds.). (1993). Introducing women’s studies: Feminist theory and practice. London: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-22595-8CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosen, R. (2000). The world split open: How the modern women’s movement changed America. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Tharu, S., ＆ Niranjana, T. (1994). Problems for a contemporary theory of gender. Social Scientist, 22(3/4), 93–117. doi:10.2307/3517624Google Scholar

Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Tuchman, G., Daniels, A. K., & Benét, J. W. (1978). Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UNESCO. (1983). Women’s studies and social sciences in Asia: Report of a meeting of experts. New Delhi: Centre for Women’s Development Studies.Google Scholar

United Nations. (1976). Report of the World Conference of the International Women’s Year. New York. www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Mexico/Mexico%20conference%20report%20optimized.pdf Google Scholar

Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (1994). The social construction of heterosexuality. Journal of Gender Studies, 3(3), 307–316. doi:10.1080/09589236.1994.9960578Google Scholar

Wilton, T. (1993). Queer subjects: Lesbians, heterosexual women and the academy. In Kennedy, M., Lubelska, C., & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Making connections: Women’s studies, women’s movements and women’s lives (pp. 167–179). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Woodward, K., & Woodward, S. (2015). Gender studies and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 1. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2015.18Google Scholar

Zeng, J. Y. (2015). Zhongguo nüquan zhuyi sanshi’nian [Chinese feminism for the past 30 years]. theinitium.com/article/20150924-opinion-china-feminism/Google Scholar

References

Anderson, E. L., Steen, E., & Stavropoulos, V. (2017). Internet use and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22, 430–454. doi:10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, S., & Leventhal, T. (2017). Residential mobility and adolescent achievement and behavior: Understanding timing and extent of mobility. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 328–343. doi:10.1111/jora.12288Google Scholar

Barbaro, N., Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Genetic confounding of the relationship between father absence and the age at menarche. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.11.007Google Scholar

Barrett, H. C. (2015). The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berg, L., Rostila, M., Saarela, J., & Hjern, A. (2014). Parental death during childhood and subsequent school performance. Pediatrics, 133, 682–689. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2771Google Scholar

Both, C., Dingemanse, N. J., Drent, P. J., & Tinbergen, J. M. (2005). Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 667–674. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00962.xGoogle Scholar

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2015). Intuitive ontologies and domain specificity. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., pp. 168–180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008. doi:10.1037/a0035661Google Scholar

Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., & Laibson, D. I. (2015). The fourth law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 304–312. doi:10.1177/0963721415580430Google Scholar

Chang, L. (2004). The role of classrooms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691Google Scholar

Chang, L., & Lu, H. J. (2018). Resource and extrinsic risk in defining fast life histories of rural Chinese left-behind children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.003Google Scholar

Chang, L., Lu, H. J., Lansford, J. E., Skinner, A. T., Bornstein, M. H., Steinberg, L., … Tapanya, S. (2019). Environmental harshness and unpredictability, life history, and social and academic behavior of adolescents in nine countries. Developmental Psychology, 55, 890–903. doi:10.1037/dev0000655Google Scholar

Chang, L., Lu, H. J., & Zhu, X. Q. (2017). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers and mothers: The withholding of parental investment by married couples. Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 11, 199–211. doi:10.1037/ebs0000086Google Scholar

Chang, L., Mak, M. C., Li, T., Wu, B. P., Chen, B. B., & Lu, H. J. (2011). Cultural adaptations to environmental variability: An evolutionary account of East–West differences. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 99–129. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9149-0Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Review lecture: Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 236(1285), 339–372. doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0027Google Scholar

Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1990). Selective associations in the observational conditioning of fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 372–389. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.16.4.372Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871/2019). The descent of man. Books on Demand.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. & Trautner, H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. A. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh vs. unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7Google Scholar

Ellison, P. T. (2001). On fertile ground: A natural history of human reproduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ellison, P. T. (2003). Energetics and reproductive effort. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 342–351. doi:10.1002/ajhb.10152Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., Dinh, T., Grebe, N. M., Del Giudice, M., & Thompson, M. E. (2019). Psychological cycle shifts redux: Revisiting a preregistered study examining preferences for muscularity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 501–516.Google Scholar

Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., & Koelling, R. A. (1955). Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science, 122, 157–158. doi:10.1126/science.122.3179.1089Google Scholar

Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 539–579. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.539Google Scholar

Grebe, N. M., Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Thornhill, R. (2013). Women’s luteal-phase sexual proceptivity and the functions of extended sexuality. Psychological Science, 24, 2106–2110. doi:10.1177/0956797613485965Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 91, 277–304. doi:10.2307/2940982Google Scholar

Grøntvedt, T. V., Grebe, N. M., Kennair, L. E. O., & Gangestad, S. W. (2017). Estrogenic and progestogenic effects of hormonal contraceptives in relation to sexual behavior: Insights into extended sexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 283–292. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.006Google Scholar

Hampden-Thompson, G., & Galindo, C. (2015). Family structure instability and the educational persistence of young people in England. British Educational Research Journal, 41, 749–766. doi:10.1002/berj.3179Google Scholar

Hills, T. T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal‐directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30, 3–41. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_50Google Scholar

Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1961). Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 3, 318–356. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80072-7Google Scholar

Jacob, R., & Parkinson, J. (2015). The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: A review. Review of Educational Research, 85, 512–552. doi:10.3102/0034654314561338Google Scholar

Kurvers, R. H., Prins, H. H., van Wieren, S. E., van Oers, K., Nolet, B. A., & Ydenberg, R. C. (2010). The effect of personality on social foraging: Shy barnacle geese scrounge more. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 277, 601–608. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1474Google Scholar

Low, B. S. (2005). Women’s lives there, here, then, now: A review of women’s ecological and demographic constraints cross-culturally. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 64–87. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.011CrossRef Google Scholar

Lu, H. J., Zhu, X., & Chang, L. (2015). Good genes, good providers, good fathers: Economic development involved in how women select a mate. Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 9, 215–228. doi:10.1037/ebs0000048Google Scholar

Marchetti, C., & Drent, P. J. (2000). Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits. Animal Behaviour, 60, 131–140. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1443Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00014-XGoogle Scholar

Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506. doi:10.1126/science.134.3489.1501Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1974). Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies. American Scientist, 62, 650–659.Google Scholar

McLeod, S. (2018). Nature vs. nurture in psychology. Simply Psychology. Online resource. www.simplypsychology.org/naturevsnurture.html Google Scholar

Newson, L., & Richerson, P. J. (2009). Why do people become modern? A Darwinian explanation. Population and Development Review, 35, 117–158.Google Scholar

O’Donahue, W., & Ferguson, K. E. (2001). The psychology of B. F. Skinner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Öhman, A., Fredrikson, M., Hugdahl, K., & Rimmö, P.-A. (1976). The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: Conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 313–337. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.105.4.313Google Scholar

Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peluffo, A. E. (2015). The “genetic program”: Behind the genesis of an influential metaphor. Genetics, 200, 685–696. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.178418Google Scholar

Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005Google Scholar

Reader, S. M. (2015). Causes of individual differences in animal exploration and search. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 451–468. doi:10.1111/tops.12148Google Scholar

Roberts, A., & Soederberg, S. (2012). Gender equality as smart economics? A critique of the 2012 World Development Report. Third World Quarterly, 33, 949–968. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.677310Google Scholar

Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2013). Hormonal predictors of women’s sexual desire in normal menstrual cycles. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 636–645. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.02.013Google Scholar

Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2017). Ovarian hormone fluctuations predict within-cycle shifts in women’s food intake. Hormones and Behavior, 90, 8–14. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.01.009Google Scholar

Seligman, M. E. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(71)80064-3Google Scholar

Shea, N. (2011). Developmental systems theory formulated as a claim about inherited representations. Philosophy of Science, 78, 60–82. doi:10.1086/658110Google Scholar

Sheth, S. A., Abuelem, T., Gale, J. T., & Eskandar, E. N. (2011). Basal ganglia neurons dynamically facilitate exploration during associative learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4878–4885. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3658-10.2011Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tomar, N., & De, R. K. (2014). A brief outline of the immune system. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1184, 3–12. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_1Google Scholar

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.xGoogle Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00084Google Scholar

Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of the genes: A discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O., & Weissing, F. J. (2007) Life-history trade-offs favor the evolution of animal personalities. Nature, 447, 581–584. doi:10.1038/nature05835Google Scholar

Zhu, N., & Chang, L. (2019). Evolved but not fixed: A life history account of gender roles and gender inequality. Frontiers of Psychology, 10, 1709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01709Google Scholar

References

Aksakal, G. S. (2013). Sexual pleasure as a woman’s human right: Experiences from a human rights training programme for women in Turkey. In S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, & Hawkins, K. (Eds.), Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure (pp. 42–57). London: Zen Books.Google Scholar

Alipour, M. (2017). Islamic shari’a law, neotraditionalist Muslim scholars and transgender sex-reassignment surgery: A case study of Ayatollah Khomeini’s and Sheikh al-Tantawi’s fatwas. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18(1), 91–103. doi:10.1080/15532739.2016.1250239Google Scholar

American Psychological Association & National Association of School Psychologists. (2015). Resolution on gender and sexual orientation diversity in children and adolescents in schools. www.apa.org/about/policy/orientation-diversity.aspx Google Scholar

Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C. . . . Brotto, L. A. (2016). Ethical and socio-cultural aspects of sexual function and dysfunction in both sexes. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 591–606. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.021CrossRef Google Scholar

Aubrey, J. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50, 501–514. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023070.87195.07Google Scholar

Bakare-Yusuf, B. (2013). Thinking with pleasure: Danger, sexuality and agency. In S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, & Hawkins, K. (Eds.), Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure (pp. 28–41). London: Zen Books.Google Scholar

Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, L. R. (2005). Women, Islam and modernity: Single women, sexuality and reproductive health in contemporary Indonesia. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203391389Google Scholar

Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Psychological outcome in children with disorders of sex development: Implications for understanding typical development. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17, 1–38.Google Scholar

Blackless, M., Charuvastra, A., Derryck, A., Fausto-Sterling, A., Lauzanne, K., & Lee, E. (2000). How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 151–166. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(200003/04)12:2<151::AID-AJHB1>3.0.CO;2-FGoogle Scholar

Blackridge, P., & Gilhooly, S. (1986). Still sane. Vancouver: Press Gang.Google Scholar

Blair, K. L., Cappell, J., & Pukall, C. F. (2018). Not all orgasms were created equal: Differences in frequency and satisfaction of orgasm experiences by sexual activity in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 55(6), 719–733. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1303437Google Scholar

Blair, K. L., & Pukall, C. F. (2014). Can less be more? Comparing duration vs. frequency of sexual encounters in same-sex and mixed-sex relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(2), 123–136. doi:10.3138/cjhs.2393Google Scholar

Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25. doi:10.1300/J056v08n01_02Google Scholar

Byers, E. S., Demmons, S., & Lawrance, K. A. (1998). Sexual satisfaction within dating relationships: A test of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 257–267. doi:10.1177/0265407598152008Google Scholar

Byers, E. S., & MacNeil, S. (2006). Further validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 53–69. doi:10.1080/00926230500232917Google Scholar

Byers, E. S., & Rehman, U. (2014). Sexual well-being. In Tolman, D. & Diamond, L. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 317–337). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14193-011Google Scholar

Carbado, D. W., Williams Crenshaw, K., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 303–312. doi:10.1017/S1742058X13000349Google Scholar

Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00999.xGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J. N., & Byers, E. S. (2014). Beyond lesbian bed death: Enhancing our understanding of the sexuality of sexual-minority women in relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 893–903. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.795924Google Scholar

Combahee River Collective. (1983). The Combahee River Collective statement. In Smith, B. (Ed.), Home girls: A Black feminist anthology (p. 264). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Conner, R. (1993). Blossom of bone: Reclaiming the connections between homoeroticism and the sacred. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Conron, K. J., Scott, G., Stowell, G. S., & Landers, S. J. (2012). Transgender health in Massachusetts: Results from a household probability sample of adults. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 118–122. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300315Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–168.Google Scholar

Diamond, L. M. (2007). A dynamical systems approach to the development and expression of female same-sex sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 142–161. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00034.xGoogle Scholar

Diamond, L. M., Dickenson, J. A., & Blair, K. L. (2017). Stability of sexual attractions across different timescales: The roles of bisexuality and gender. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 193–204. doi:10.1007/s10508–016-0860-xGoogle Scholar

Diamond, M. (1996). Prenatal predisposition and the clinical management of some pediatric conditions. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 139–147. doi:10.1080/00926239608414652Google Scholar

Diamond, M. (1999). Pediatric management of ambiguous and traumatized genitalia. Journal of Urology, 162, 1021–1028. doi:10.1016/S0022–5347(01)68054-6Google Scholar

Diamond, M. (2008a). Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10 year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 5–14. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.5.Google Scholar

Diamond, M. (2008b). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, M., & Sigmundson, H. K. (1997). Sex reassignment at birth: Long-term review and clinical implications. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 151, 298–304. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170400084015Google Scholar

Flores, A. R., Herman, J. L., Gates, G. J., & Brown, T. N. T. (2016). How many adults identify as transgender in the United States? Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute.Google Scholar

Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual men and women in a US national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288. doi:10.1007/s10508–017-0939-zGoogle Scholar

Freeman, R., Gwada, M., Silverman, E., Kurnick, A., Leonard, N., Ritchie, A., . . . Martinez, B. (2017). Critical Race Theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: A qualitative exploration. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(54), 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12939–017-0549-3Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1953). Three essays on the theory of sexuality (1905). In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 7: (1901-1905): A Case of Hysteria, Three Essays on Sexuality and Other Works (pp. 123–246). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1–44.Google Scholar

Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social origins of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Garcia, J. R., Lloyd, E. A., Wallen, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2014). Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of US singles. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(11), 2645–2652. doi:10.1111/jsm.12669Google Scholar

Gerhard, J. (2000). Revisiting “the myth of the vaginal orgasm”: The female orgasm in American sexual thought and second wave feminism. Feminist Studies, 26(2), 449–476. doi:10.2307/3178545Google Scholar

Geter, A., Sutton, M., & McCree, D. (2018). Social and structural determinants of HIV treatment and care among Black women living with HIV infection: A systematic review: 2005–2016. AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 30(4), 409–416. doi:10.1080/09540121.2018.1426827Google Scholar

Golden, C. (2008). The intersexed and the transgendered: Rethinking sex/gender. In Chrisler, J. C., Golden, C., & Rozee, P. D. (Eds.), Lectures of the psychology of women (4th ed., p. 2015). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Hamedani, A. (2014). The gay people pushed to change their gender. BBC Magazine. www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29832690 Google Scholar

Holmberg, D., & Blair, K.L. (2009). Sexual desire, communication, satisfaction and preferences of men and women in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 46(1), 57–66. doi:10.1080/00224490802645294Google Scholar

Holmberg, D., Blair, K. L., & Phillips, M. (2010). Women’s sexual satisfaction as a predictor of well-being in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47(1), 111. doi:10.1080/00224490902898710Google Scholar

Hoskin, R. A. (2017). Femme theory: Refocusing the intersectional lens. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 38(1), 95–109.Google Scholar

Hoskin, R. A., Blair, K. L., & Jenson, K. (2016). Dignity versus diagnosis: Sexual orientation and gender identity differences in reports of one’s greatest concern about receiving a sexual health exam. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(4), 279–293. doi:10.1080/19419899.2016.1236745Google Scholar

Hughes, I. A., Houk, C., Ahmed, S. F., & Lee, P. A., with LWPES Consensus Group. (2006). Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91(7), 554–562. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.098319Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2018). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1037/amp0000307Google Scholar

Jacobs, S. E., Thomas, W., & Lang, S. (1997). Two spirit people: Native American gender identity, sexuality and spirituality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Joel, D., Tarrasch, R., Berman, Z., Mukamel, M., & Ziv, E. (2014). Queering gender: Studying gender identity in “normative” individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 291–321. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.830640Google Scholar

Jolly, S., Cornwall, A., & Hawkins, K. (2013). Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure. London: Zen Books.Google Scholar

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3Google Scholar

Kauanui, J. K. (2017). Indigenous Hawai‘ian sexuality and the politics of nationalist decolonization. In Barker, J. (Ed.), Critically sovereign: Indigenous gender, sexuality, and feminist studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Laqueur, T. (1990). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.xGoogle Scholar

Lee, P. A., Nordenstrom, A., Houk, C. P., Ahmed, S. F., Aucheus, R., Baratz, A., … Global DSD Updates Consortium. (2016). Global disorders of sexual development update since 2006: Perceptions, approach and care. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 85, 158–180. doi:10.1159/000442975CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lips, H. M. (2006). A new psychology of women: Gender, culture, and ethnicity (3rd ed.). Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar

Lorber, J. (2005). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar

Marrow, J. (1997) Changing positions: Women speak out on sex and desire. Avon, MA: Adams Media.Google Scholar

Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Smylie, L. (2008). Sexual rights: Striking a balance. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 7–24. doi:10.1080/19317610802156996Google Scholar

McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. doi:10.1086/426800Google Scholar

McCormick, N. B. (1994). Sexual salvation: Affirming women’s sexual rights and pleasures. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Mulhall, J., King, R., Glina, S., & Hvidsten, K. (2008). Importance of and satisfaction with sex among men and women worldwide: Results of the global better sex survey. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 788–795.Google Scholar

Murray, S. (2019). Not always in the modoe: The new science of men, sex and relationships. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Mydans, S. (2002). In Pakistan, rape victims are the “criminals.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2002/05/17/world/in-pakistan-rape-victims-are-the-criminals.html Google Scholar

O’Connell, H.E., Hutson, J. M., Anderson, C. R., & Plenter, R. J. (1998). Anatomical relationship between urethra and clitoris. Journal of Urology, 159(6), 1892–1897. doi:10.1016/S0022–5347(01)63188-4Google Scholar

Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, L. F., Byers, E. S., & Mitra, K. (2018). An internet-based survey of sexual and reproductive health education attitudes and experience in India: How much support is there for much-needed comprehensive sex education? Sex Education. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1080/14681811.2018.1506915Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, L. F., & Thompson, A. E. (2013). Sexuality in adolescence. In Tolman, D. & Diamond, L. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology (pp. 433–486). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar

Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 to 2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504Google Scholar

Poasa, K. H., Blanchard, R., & Zucker, K. J. (2004). Birth order in transgendered males from Polynesia: A quantitative study of Samoan fa’afafine. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30, 13–23. doi:10.1080/00926230490247110Google Scholar

Randall, H. E., & Byers, E. S. (2003). What is sex? Students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and unfaithful sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 87–96.Google Scholar

Rehman, U., Fallis, E., & Byers, E. S. (2013). Sexual satisfaction in heterosexual women. In Cataneda, D. (Ed.), An essential handbook of women’s sexuality (Vol. 1, pp. 25–45). Westport, CT: PraegerGoogle Scholar

Reis, E. (2007). Divergence of disorder? The politics of naming intersex. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 535–543. doi:10.1353/pbm.2007.0054Google Scholar

Ruan, F. F., & Bullough, V. L. (1992). Lesbianism in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21(3), 217–226. doi:10.1007/BF01542993Google Scholar

Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., Byers, E. S., & Sierra, J. C. (2015). Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 1028–1041. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.989307Google Scholar

Sharma, J. (2013). Challenging the pleasure versus danger binary: Reflections on sexuality workshops with rural women’s rights activists in North India. In S. Jolly, Cornwall, A., & Hawkins, K. (Eds.), Women, sexuality and the political power of pleasure (pp. 42–57). London: Zen Books.Google Scholar

Silverberg, C., & Odette, F. (2011). Sexuality and access project: Survey summary. http://sexuality-and-access.com Google Scholar

Sinnot, M. (2004). Toms and dees: Transgender identity and female same-sex relationships in Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Striepe, M. I., & Tolman, D. I. (2003). Mom, Dad, I’m straight: The coming out of gender ideologies in adolescent sexual-identity development. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 523–530. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_4Google Scholar

Tate, C. C., Youssef, C. P., & Bettergarcia, J. N. (2014). Integrating the study of trangender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18, 302–312. doi:10.1037/gpr0000019Google Scholar

Tell, S. (2015). Intersex management in the United States and non-Western cultures. Einstein Journal of Biological Medicine, 30, 5–15.Google Scholar

Tiefer, L. (1995) Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Tiefer, L. (2001). Arriving at a “new view” of women’s sexual problems: Background, theory, and activism. In Kachak, E. & Tiefer, L. (Eds.), A new view of women’s sexual problems (pp. 63–98). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar

Tolman, D. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tolman, D. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757. doi:10.1007/s11199–012-0122-xGoogle Scholar

Wekker, G. (1997). Mat-ism and Black lesbianism: Two idealtypical expressions of female homosexuality in Black communities of the diaspora. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 1(1), 11–24; reprinted from Journal of Homosexuality, 24 (1993).Google Scholar

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Women’s place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent–child interaction. In Coates, J. (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (pp. 165–175). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W. J., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(6), 1565–1576. doi:10.1007/s10508–018-1149-zGoogle Scholar

World Health Organization. (2006). Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Wyatt, G. E. (1982). The sexual experience of Afro-American women: A middle-income sample. In Kirkpatrick, M. (Ed.), Women’s sexual experience: Explorations of the dark continent (pp. 17–39). New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-4025-6_2Google Scholar

Wylie, K. (2009). A global survey of sexual behaviours. Journal of Family and Reproductive Health, 3(2), 39–49.Google Scholar

References

Abe, O., Aoki, S., Hayashi, N., Yamada, H., Kunimatsu, A., Mori, H., … Ohtomo, K. (2002). Normal aging in the central nervous system: Quantitative MR diffusion-tensor analysis. Neurobiology of Aging, 23, 433–441. doi:10.1016/S0197–4580(01)00318-9Google Scholar

Aboitiz, F., Scheibel, A. B., Fisher, R. S., & Zaidel, E. (1992). Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Research, 598, 143–153. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)90178-CGoogle Scholar

Allen, J., Damasio, H., & Grabowski, T. (2002). Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human brain: An MRI-volumetric study. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 118, 341–358. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10092Google Scholar

Allen, J. S., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Bruss, J., & Zhang, W. (2003). Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray-white composition of the human cerebrum. Neuroimage, 18, 880–894. doi:10.1016/S1053–8119(03)00034-XGoogle Scholar

Anderson, N. E., Harenski, K. A., Harenski, C. L., Koenigs, M. R., Decety, J., Calhoun, V. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2018). Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample. Human Brain Mapping. doi:10.1002/hbm.24462 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Bava, S., Boucquey, V., Goldenberg, D., Thayer, R. E., Ward, M., Jacobus, J., & Tapert, S. F. (2011). Sex differences in adolescent white matter architecture. Brain Research, 1375, 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.051Google Scholar

Bishop, K. M., & Wahlsten, D. (1997). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Myth or reality? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(5), 581–601. doi:10.1016/S0149–7634(96)00049-8Google Scholar

Biswal, B. B., Mennes, M., Zuo, X. N., Gohel, S., Kelly, C., Smith, S. M., … Milham, M. P. (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 4734-4739. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107Google Scholar

Bluhm, R. L., Osuch, E. A., Lanius, R. A., Boksman, K., Neufeld, R. W., Theberge, J., & Williamson, P. (2008). Default mode network connectivity: Effects of age, sex, and analytic approach. Neuroreport, 19, 887–891. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328300ebbfGoogle Scholar

Brun, C. C., Leporé, N., Luders, E., Chou, Y. Y., Madsen, S. K., Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2009). Sex differences in brain structure in auditory and cingulate regions. Neuroreport, 20, 930–935. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832c5e65Google Scholar

Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 186–198. doi:10.1038/nrn2575Google Scholar

Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 477–484. doi:10.1038/nrn1909Google Scholar

Cahill, L. (2009). Sex differences in human brain structure and function: Relevance to learning and memory. In Pfaff, D. W., Arnold, A. P., Etgen, A. M., Fahrbach, S. E., & Rubin, R. T. (Eds.), Hormones, brain and behavior (2nd ed., pp. 2307–2315). London: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978–008088783-8.00072-3Google Scholar

Chekroud, A. M., Ward, E. J., Rosenberg, M. D., & Holmes, A. J. (2016). Patterns in the human brain mosaic discriminate males from females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(14), E1968. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523888113Google Scholar

Chen, X., Sachdev, P. S., Wen, W., & Anstey, K. J. (2007). Sex differences in regional gray matter in healthy individuals aged 44-48 years: A voxel-based morphometric study. Neuroimage, 36, 691–699. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.063Google Scholar

Cheng, Y., Chou, K. H., Decety, J., Chen, I. Y., Hung, D., Tzeng, O. J., & Lin, C. P. (2009). Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of human mirror-neuron system: A voxel-based morphometric investigation. Neuroscience, 158, 713–720. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.026Google Scholar

Clayden, J. D., Jentschke, S., Munoz, M., Cooper, J. M., Chadwick, M. J., Banks, T., … Vargha-Khadem, F. (2012). Normative development of white matter tracts: similarities and differences in relation to age, gender, and intelligence. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1738–1747. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr243Google Scholar

Courchesne, E., Chisum, H. J., Townsend, J., Cowles, A., Covington, J., Egaas, B., … Press, G. A. (2000). Normal brain development and aging: Quantitative analysis and in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology, 216, 672–682. doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au37672Google Scholar

Davatzikos, C. (2004). Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences. Neuroimage, 23, 17–20. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.010Google Scholar

Davatzikos, C., & Resnick, S. M. (1998). Sex differences in anatomic measures of interhemispheric connectivity: Correlations with cognition in women but not men. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 635–640. doi:10.1093/cercor/8.7.635Google Scholar

de Vries, G. J. (2004). Minireview: Sex differences in adult and developing brains: Compensation, compensation, compensation. Endocrinology, 145, 1063–1068. doi:10.1210/en.2003-1504Google Scholar

Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness, , … Tsuang, M. T. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 490–497. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.490Google Scholar

Gong, G., He, Y., & Evan, A. C. (2011). Brain connectivity: Gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist, 17, 575–591. doi:10.1177/1073858410386492Google Scholar

Gong, G., Rosa-Neto, P., Carbonell, F., Chen, Z. J., He, Y., & Evans, A. C. (2009) Age- and gender-related differences in the cortical anatomical network. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(50), 15684–15693. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2308-09.2009Google Scholar

Good, C. D., Johnsrude, I., Ashburner, J., Henson, R. N., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. (2001). Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: A voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage, 14, 685–700. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0857Google Scholar

Gur, R. C., Gunning-Dixon, F., Bilker, W. B., & Gur, R. E. (2002). Sex differences in temporo-limbic and frontal brain volumes of healthy adults. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 998–1003. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.9.998Google Scholar

Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999). Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: Correlations with cognitive performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 4065-4072. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-10-04065.1999Google Scholar

Haier, R., Jung, R., Yeo, R., Head, K., & Alkire, M. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. Neuroimage, 25, 320–327. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.019Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2017). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Routledge; first published 2012 by Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hänggi, J., Fövenyi, L., Liem, F., Meyer, M., & Jäncke, L. (2014). The hypothesis of neuronal interconnectivity as a function of brain size – a general organization principle of the human connectome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 915. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00915Google Scholar

Herting, M. M., Maxwell, E. C., Irvine, C., & Nagel, B. J. (2012). The impact of sex, puberty, and hormones on white matter microstructure in adolescents. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1979–1992. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr246Google Scholar

Im, K., Lee, J. M., Lee, J., Shin, Y. W., Kim, I. Y., Kwon, J. S., & Kim, S. I. (2006). Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods. Neuroimage, 31(1), 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.042Google Scholar

Jäncke, L., Mérillat, S., Liem, F., & Hänggi, J. (2015). Brain size, sex, and the aging brain. Human Brain Mapping, 36(1), 150–169. doi:10.1002/hbm.22619Google Scholar

Jäncke, L., Staiger, J. F., Schlaug, G., Huang, Y. X., & Steinmetz, H. (1997). The relationship between corpus callosum size and forebrain volume. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 48–56. doi:10.1093/cercor/7.1.48Google Scholar

Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., … Assaf, Y. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(50), 15,468–15,473. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509654112Google Scholar

Kanaan, R. A., Allin, M., Picchioni, M., Barker, G. J., Daly, E., Shergill, S. S., … McGuire, P. K. (2012). Gender differences in white matter microstructure. PLoS One, 7(6), e38272. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038272Google Scholar

Keller, K., & Menon, V. (2009). Gender differences in the functional and structural neuroanatomy of mathematical cognition. Neuroimage, 47(1), 342–352. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.042Google Scholar

Lee, C. E., Danielian, L. E., Thomasson, D., & Baker, E. H. (2009). Normal regional fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient of the brain measured on a 3 T MR scanner. Neuroradiology, 51(1), 3–9. doi:10.1007/s00234–008-0441-3Google Scholar

Luders, E., Gaser, C., Narr, K. L., & Toga, A. W. (2009). Why sex matters: Brain size independent differences in gray matter distributions between men and women. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(45), 14,265-14,270. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2261-09.2009Google Scholar

Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Jancke, L., Steinmetz, H., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Gender differences in cortical complexity. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 799-800. doi:10.1038/nn1277Google Scholar

Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Woods, R. P., Deluca, H., … Toga, A. W. (2006). Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling. Human Brain Mapping, 27(4), 314–324. doi:10.1002/hbm.20187Google Scholar

Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Woods, R. P., Rex, D. E., Jancke, L., … Toga, A. W. (2005). Mapping cortical gray matter in the young adult brain: Effects of gender. Neuroimage, 26, 493-501. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.010Google Scholar

Luders, E., Rex, D. E., Narr, K. L., Woods, R. P., Jancke, L., Thompson, P. M., … Toga, A. W. (2003). Relationships between sulcal asymmetries and corpus callosum size: Gender and handedness effects. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1084-1093. doi:10.1093/cercor/13.10.1084Google Scholar

Luders, E., Steinmetz, H., & Jancke, L. (2002). Brain size and grey matter volume in the healthy human brain. Neuroreport , 13, 2371–2374. doi:10.1097/00001756-200212030-00040Google Scholar

Menzler, K., Belke, M., Wehrmann, E., Krakow, K., Lengler, U., Jansen, A., … Knake, S. (2011). Men and women are different: Diffusion tensor imaging reveals sexual dimorphism in the microstructure of the thalamus, corpus callosum and cingulum. Neuroimage, 54, 2557–2562. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.029Google Scholar

Peters, M., Jancke, L., Staiger, J., Schlaug, G., Huang, Y., & Steinmetz, H. (1998). Unsolved problems in comparing brain sizes in Homo sapiens. Brain and Cognition, 37, 254–285. doi:10.1006/brcg.1998.0983Google Scholar

Ringo, J. (1991). Neuronal interconnection as a function of brain size. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 38, 1–6. doi:10.1159/000114375Google Scholar

Ringo, J., Doty, R. W., Demeter, S., & Simard, P. Y. (1994). Time is of the essence: A conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 331–343. doi:10.1093/cercor/4.4.331Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., … Deary, I. J. (2018). Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5,216 UK Biobank participants. Cerebral Cortex, 28, 2959–2975. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy109Google Scholar

Ruigrok, A. N., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M. C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004Google Scholar

Sacher, J., Neumann, J., Okon-Singer, H., Gotowiec, S., & Villringer, A. (2013). Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: Evidence from neuroimaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 31(3), 366–375. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.007Google Scholar

Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Roalf, D. R., Ruparel, K., Erus, G., Vandekar, S., … Gur, R. C. (2015). Linked sex differences in cognition and functional connectivity in youth. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2383–2394. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu036Google Scholar

Scheinost, D., Finn, E. S., Tokoglu, F., Shen, X., Papademetris, X., Hampson, M., & Constable, R. T. (2015). Sex differences in normal age trajectories of functional brain networks. Human Brain Mapping, 36(4), 1524–1535. doi:10.1002/hbm.22720Google Scholar

Schulte, T., Sullivan, E. V., Muller-Oehring, E. M., Adalsteinsson, E., & Pfefferbaum, A. (2005). Corpus callosal microstructural integrity influences interhemispheric processing: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1384–1392. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi020Google Scholar

Sepehrband, F., Lynch, K. M., Cabeen, R. P., Gonzalez-Zacarias, C., Zhao, L., D’Arcy, M., … Clark, K. A. (2018). Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning. Neuroimage, 172, 217–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.065Google Scholar

Shin, Y. W., Kim, D. J., Ha, T. H., Park, H. J., Moon, W. J., Chung, E. C., … Kwon, J. S. (2005). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroreport, 16, 795–798. doi:10.1097/00001756-200505310-00003Google Scholar

Sowell, E. R., Peterson, B. S., Kan, E., Woods, R. P., Yoshii, J., Bansal, R., … Toga, A. W. (2007). Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age. Cerebral Cortex, 17(7), 1550–1560. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl066Google Scholar

Sullivan, E. V., Rosenbloom, M. J., Desmond, J. E., & Pfefferbaum, A. (2001). Sex differences in corpus callosum size: Relationship to age and intracranial size. Neurobiology of Aging, 22, 603–611. doi:10.1016/S0197–4580(01)00232-9Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Lee, R., Chen, Y., Collinson, S., Thakor, N., Bezerianos, A., & Sim, K. (2015). Progressive gender differences of structural brain networks in healthy adults: A longitudinal, diffusion tensor imaging study. PLoS One, 10(3), e0118857. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118857Google Scholar

Tian, L., Wang, J., Yan, C., & He, Y. (2011). Hemisphere- and gender-related differences in small-world brain networks: A resting-state functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 54(1), 191–202. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.066Google Scholar

Westerhausen, R., Kreuder, F., Dos Santos Sequeira, S., Walter, C., Woerner, W., Wittling, R. A., … Wittling, W. (2004). Effects of handedness and gender on macro- and microstructure of the corpus callosum and its subregions: A combined high-resolution and diffusion-tensor MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 418–426. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.002Google Scholar

Westerhausen, R., Walter, C., Kreuder, F., Wittling, R. A., Schweiger, E., & Wittling, W. (2003). The influence of handedness and gender on the microstructure of the human corpus callosum: A diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 351, 99–102. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2003.07.011Google Scholar

Witelson, S. F., Glezer, I. I., & Kigar, D. L. (1995). Women have greater density of neurons in posterior temporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3418–3428. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03418.1995Google Scholar

Wu, Y. C., Field, A. S., Whalen, P. J., & Alexander, A. L. (2011). Age- and gender-related changes in the normal human brain using hybrid diffusion imaging (HYDI). Neuroimage, 54, 1840–1853. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.067Google Scholar

Yan, C., Gong, G, Wang, J., Wang, D., Liu, D., Zhu, C., … He, Y. (2011). Sex- and brain size-related small-world structural cortical networks in young adults: A DTI tractography study. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 449–458. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq111Google Scholar

Zhang, C., Cahill, N. D., Arbabshirani, M. R., White, T., Baum, S. A., & Michael, A. M. (2016). Sex and age effects of functional connectivity in early adulthood. Brain Connect, 6(9), 700–713. doi:10.1089/brain.2016.0429Google Scholar

References

Agcaoglu, O., Miller, R., Mayer, A. R., Hugdahl, K., & Calhoun, V. D. (2015). Lateralization of resting state networks and relationship to age and gender. NeuroImage, 104, 310–325. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.001Google Scholar

Ahmed, E. I., Zehr, J. L., Schulz, K. M., Lorenz, B. H., DonCarlos, L. L., & Sisk, C. L. (2008). Pubertal hormones modulate the addition of new cells to sexually dimorphic brain regions. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 995–997. doi:10.1038/nn.2178Google Scholar

Allen, E. A., Erhardt, E. B., Eswar, D., William, G., Segall, J. M., Silva, R. F., … Calhoun, V. D. (2011). A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting state networks. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 5, 2. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00002Google Scholar

Allen, L. S., & Gorski, R. A. (1991). Sexual dimorphism of the anterior commissure and massa intermedia of the human brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 312(1), 97–104. doi:10.1002/cne.903120108Google Scholar

Allen, L. S., & Gorski, R. A. (1992). Sexual orientation and the size of the anterior commissure in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89(15), 7199–7202. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.15.7199Google Scholar

Anderson, N. E., Harenski, K. A., Harenski, C. L., Koenigs, M. R., Decety, J., Calhoun, V. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2019). Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample. Human Brain Mapping, 40, 1496–1506. doi:10.1002/hbm.24462Google Scholar

Andreano, J. M., & Cahill, L. (2009). Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning & Memory, 16(4), 248–266. doi:10.1101/lm.918309Google Scholar

Ball, G. F., Balthazart, J., & McCarthy, M. M. (2014). Is it useful to view the brain as a secondary sexual characteristic? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 628–638. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.08.009Google Scholar

Biswal, B. B., Mennes, M., Zuo, X., Gohel, S., Kelly, C., Smith, S. M., … Milham, M. P. (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(10), 4734–4739. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107Google Scholar

Breedlove, S. M. (1992). Sexual dimorphism in the vertebrate nervous system. Journal of Neuroscience, 12(11), 4133–4142. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04133.1992Google Scholar

Breedlove, S. M., & Arnold, A. P. (1983). Hormonal control of a developing neuromuscular system. II. Sensitive periods for the androgen-induced masculinization of the rat spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus. Journal of Neuroscience, 3(2), 424–432. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-02-00424.1983Google Scholar

Brizendine, L. (2010). The male brain. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204Google Scholar

Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475Google Scholar

Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 735–765. doi:10.1037/a0030737Google Scholar

Choi, M., Kim, J., Yeon, H., Choi, J., Park, J., Jun, J., … Chung, S. (2011). Effects of gender and age on anterior commissure volume. Neuroscience Letters, 500(2), 92–94. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.010Google Scholar

Cooke, B. M., Tabibnia, G., & Breedlove, S. M. (1999). A brain sexual dimorphism controlled by adult circulating androgens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(13), 7538–7540. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.13.7538Google Scholar

Coupé, P., Catheline, G., Lanuza, E., & Manjón, J. V. (2017). Towards a unified analysis of brain maturation and aging across the entire lifespan: A MRI analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38(11), 5501–5518. doi:10.1002/hbm.23743Google Scholar

Damle, N. R., Ikuta, T., John, M., Peters, B. D., DeRosse, P., Malhotra, A. K., & Szeszko, P. R. (2017). Relationship among interthalamic adhesion size, thalamic anatomy and neuropsychological functions in healthy volunteers. Brain Structure & Function, 222(5), 2183–2192. doi:10.1007/s00429–016-1334-6Google Scholar

de la Grandmaison, G. L., Clairand, I., & Durigon, M. (2001). Organ weight in 684 adult autopsies: New tables for a caucasoid population. Forensic Science International, 119(2), 149–154. doi:10.1016/S0379–0738(00)00401-1Google Scholar

de Vries, G. J. (2004). Minireview: Sex differences in adult and developing brains: Compensation, compensation, compensation. Endocrinology, 145(3), 1063–1068. doi:10.1210/en.2003-1504Google Scholar

de Vries, G. J., & Södersten, P. (2009). Sex differences in the brain: The relation between structure and function. Hormones and Behavior, 55(5), 589–596. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.03.012Google Scholar

Del Giudice, M., Booth, T., & Irwing, P. (2012). The distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring global sex differences in personality. PloS One, 7(1), e29265. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029265Google Scholar

DeLacoste-Utamsing, C., & Holloway, R. L. (1982). Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science (New York), 216(4553), 1431–1432. doi:10.1126/science.7089533Google Scholar

Demeter, S., Ringo, J. L., & Doty, R. W. (1988). Morphometric analysis of the human corpus callosum and anterior commissure. Human Neurobiology, 6(4), 219–226.Google Scholar

Driesen, N. R., & Raz, N. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness on corpus callosum morphology: A meta-analysis. Psychobiology, 23(3), 240–247.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science (New York), 317(5843), 1344–1347. doi:10.1126/science.1145463Google Scholar

Else-Quest, N. M., Higgins, A., Allison, C., & Morton, L. C. (2012). Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 947–981. doi:10.1037/a0027930Google Scholar

Filipek, P. A., Richelme, C., Kennedy, D. N., & Caviness Jr, V. S. (1994). The young adult human brain: An MRI-based morphometric analysis. Cerebral Cortex, 4(4), 344–360. doi:10.1093/cercor/4.4.344Google Scholar

Filkowski, M. M., Olsen, R. M., Duda, B., Wanger, T. J., & Sabatinelli, D. (2017). Sex differences in emotional perception: Meta analysis of divergent activation. NeuroImage, 147, 925–933. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.016Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2015). Attachment and pairbonding. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.006Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (2012). Are we getting smarter? Rising IQ in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Forstmeier, W. (2011). Women have relatively larger brains than men: A comment on the misuse of general linear models in the study of sexual dimorphism. Anatomical Record, 294(11), 1856–1863. doi:10.1002/ar.21423Google Scholar

Frick, A., Möhring, W., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Development of mental transformation abilities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 536–542. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.011Google Scholar

Frost, J. A., Binder, J. R., Springer, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S. F., Rao, S. M., & Cox, R. W. (1999). Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes: Evidence from functional MRI. Brain, 122(2), 199–208. doi:10.1093/brain/122.2.199Google Scholar

Garcia-Falgueras, A., & Swaab, D. F. (2008). A sex difference in the hypothalamic uncinate nucleus: Relationship to gender identity. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 131(12), 3132–3146. doi:10.1093/brain/awn276Google Scholar

Garcia-Garcia, I., Kube, J., Gaebler, M., Horstmann, A., Villringer, A., & Neumann, J. (2016). Neural processing of negative emotional stimuli and the influence of age, sex and task-related characteristics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 773–793. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.020Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55Google Scholar

Geng, X., Li, G., Lu, Z., Gao, W., Wang, L., Shen, D., … Gilmore, J. H. (2017). Structural and maturational covariance in early childhood brain development. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3), 1795–1807. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw022Google Scholar

Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985a). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42(5), 428–459. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060050026008Google Scholar

Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985b). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: II. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42(6), 521–552. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060060019009Google Scholar

Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985c). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42(7), 634–654. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060070024012Google Scholar

Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Vaituzis, A. C., & Rapoport, J. L. (1997). Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 21(8), 1185–1201. doi:10.1016/S0278–5846(97)00158-9Google Scholar

Giedd, J. N., Vaituzis, A. C., Hamburger, S. D., Lange, N., Rajapakse, J. C., Kaysen, D., … Rapoport, J. L. (1996). Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala, and hippocampus in normal human development: Ages 4–18 years. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 366(2), 223–230. https://doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960304)366:23.0.CO;2-7 Google Scholar

Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness Jr., V. S., … Tsuang, M. T. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11(6), 490–497. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.490Google Scholar

Gong, G., He, Y., & Evans, A. C. (2011). Brain connectivity: Gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist, 17(5), 575–591. doi:10.1177/1073858410386492Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1996). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Grön, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe, M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3(4), 404. doi:10.1038/73980Google Scholar

Guadalupe, T., Zwiers, M. P., Wittfeld, K., Teumer, A., Vasquez, A. A., Hoogman, M., … van Bokhoven, H. (2015). Asymmetry within and around the human planum temporale is sexually dimorphic and influenced by genes involved in steroid hormone receptor activity. Cortex, 62, 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.015Google Scholar

Gur, R. C., Gunning-Dixon, F., Bilker, W. B., & Gur, R. E. (2002). Sex differences in temporo-limbic and frontal brain volumes of healthy adults. Cerebral Cortex, 12(9), 998–1003. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.9.998Google Scholar

Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2016). Sex differences in brain and behavior in adolescence: Findings from the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.035Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hamann, S. (2005). Sex differences in the responses of the human amygdala. Neuroscientist, 11(4), 288–293. doi:10.1177/1073858404271981Google Scholar

Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7(4), 411–416. doi:10.1038/nn1208Google Scholar

Hänggi, J., Buchmann, A., Mondadori, C. R. A., Henke, K., Jäncke, L., & Hock, C. (2010). Sexual dimorphism in the parietal substrate associated with visuospatial cognition independent of general intelligence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), 139–155. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21175Google Scholar

Hänggi, J., Fovenyi, L., Liem, F., Meyer, M., & Jäncke, L. (2014). The hypothesis of neuronal interconnectivity as a function of brain size – A general organization principle of the human connectome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 915. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00915Google Scholar

Highley, J. R., Esiri, M. M., McDonald, B., Roberts, H. C., Walker, M. A., & Crow, T. J. (1999). The size and fiber composition of the anterior commissure with respect to gender and schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 45(9), 1120–1127. doi:10.1016/S0006–3223(98)00323-0Google Scholar

Hiscock, M., Inch, R., Hawryluk, J., Lyon, P. J., & Perachio, N. (1999). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? III. An exhaustive survey of tactile laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 17–28. doi:10.1076/jcen.21.1.17.944Google Scholar

Hiscock, M., Inch, R., Jacek, C., Hiscock-Kalil, C., & Kalil, K. M. (1994). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? I. An exhaustive survey of auditory laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16(3), 423–435. doi:10.1080/01688639408402653Google Scholar

Hiscock, M., Israelian, M., Inch, R., Jacek, C., & Hiscock-Kalil, C. (1995). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? II. an exhaustive survey of visual laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(4), 590–610. doi:10.1080/01688639508405148Google Scholar

Hiscock, M., Perachio, N., & Inch, R. (2001). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? IV. An exhaustive survey of dual-task interference studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 23(2), 137–148. doi:10.1076/jcen.23.2.137.1206Google Scholar

Hoppe, C., Fliessbach, K., Stausberg, S., Stojanovic, J., Trautner, P., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2012). A key role for experimental task performance: Effects of math talent, gender and performance on the neural correlates of mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 78(1), 14–27. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.008Google Scholar

Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., & Ersland, L. (2006). Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: An fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 44(9), 1575–1583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53Google Scholar

Ihnen, S. K. Z., Church, J. A., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2009). Lack of generalizability of sex differences in the fMRI BOLD activity associated with language processing in adults. NeuroImage, 45(3), 1020–1032. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.034Google Scholar

Im, K., Lee, J., Lyttelton, O., Kim, S. H., Evans, A. C., & Kim, S. I. (2008). Brain size and cortical structure in the adult human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(9), 2181–2191. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm244Google Scholar

Jäncke, L., Mérillat, S., Liem, F., & Hänggi, J. (2015). Brain size, sex, and the aging brain. Human Brain Mapping, 36(1), 150–169. doi:10.1002/hbm.22619Google Scholar

Joel, D. (2011). Male or female? Brains are intersex. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 5(57), 1–5. doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00057Google Scholar

Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., … Assaf, Y. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(50), 15468–15473. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509654112Google Scholar

Joel, D., Persico, A., Salhov, M., Berman, Z., Oligschläger, S., Meilijson, I., & Averbuch, A. (2018). Analysis of human brain structure reveals that the brain “types” typical of males are also typical of females, and vice versa. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 399. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00399Google Scholar

Kansaku, K., Yamaura, A., & Kitazawa, S. (2000). Sex differences in lateralization revealed in the posterior language areas. Cerebral Cortex, 10(9), 866–872. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.9.866Google Scholar

Keller, K., & Menon, V. (2009). Gender differences in the functional and structural neuroanatomy of mathematical cognition. NeuroImage, 47(1), 342–352. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.042Google Scholar

Kokras, N., & Dalla, C. (2014). Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders. British Journal of Pharmacology, 171(20), 4595–4619. doi:10.1111/bph.12710Google Scholar

Koscik, T., O’Leary, D., Moser, D. J., Andreasen, N. C., & Nopoulos, P. (2009). Sex differences in parietal lobe morphology: Relationship to mental rotation performance. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 451–459. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.09.004Google Scholar

Kucian, K., von Aster, M., Loenneker, T., Dietrich, T., Mast, F. W., & Martin, E. (2007). Brain activation during mental rotation in school children and adults. Journal of Neural Transmission, 114(5), 675–686. doi:10.1007/s00702–006-0604-5Google Scholar

Lasco, M. S., Jordan, T. J., Edgar, M. A., Petito, C. K., & Byne, W. (2002). A lack of dimorphism of sex or sexual orientation in the human anterior commissure. Brain Research, 936(1–2), 95–98. doi:10.1016/S0006–8993(02)02590-8Google Scholar

Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S., … Giedd, J. N. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage, 36(4), 1065–1073. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.053Google Scholar

Leonard, C. M., Towler, S., Welcome, S., Halderman, L. K., Otto, R., Eckert, M. A., & Chiarello, C. (2008). Size matters: Cerebral volume influences sex differences in neuroanatomy. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2920–2931. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn052Google Scholar

Liu, H., Stufflebeam, S. M., Sepulcre, J., Hedden, T., & Buckner, R. L. (2009). Evidence from intrinsic activity that asymmetry of the human brain is controlled by multiple factors. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(48), 20,499–20,503. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908073106Google Scholar

Lotze, M., Domin, M., Gerlach, F. H., Gaser, C., Lueders, E., Schmidt, C. O., & Neumann, N. (2019). Novel findings from 2,838 adult brains on sex differences in gray matter brain volume. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1671. doi:10.1038/s41598–018-38239-2Google Scholar

Luders, E., Gaser, C., Narr, K. L., & Toga, A. W. (2009). Why sex matters: Brain size independent differences in gray matter distributions between men and women. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(45), 14,265–14,270. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2261-09.2009Google Scholar

Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Zaidel, E., Thompson, P. M., & Toga, A. W. (2006). Gender effects on callosal thickness in scaled and unscaled space. NeuroReport, 17(11), 1103–1106. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000227987.77304.ccGoogle Scholar

Luders, E., Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2014). Why size matters: Differences in brain volume account for apparent sex differences in callosal anatomy: The sexual dimorphism of the corpus callosum. NeuroImage, 84, 820–824. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.040Google Scholar

Lynn, R. (1999). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A developmental theory. Intelligence, 27(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/S0160–2896(99)00009-4Google Scholar

Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94. doi:10.1007/s10648–012-9215-xGoogle Scholar

Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(8), 4398–4403. doi:10.1073/pnas.070039597Google Scholar

Martínez, K., Janssen, J., Pineda-Pardo, J. Á., Carmona, S., Román, F. J., Alemán-Gómez, Y., … Santarnecchi, E. (2017). Individual differences in the dominance of interhemispheric connections predict cognitive ability beyond sex and brain size. NeuroImage, 155, 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.029Google Scholar

Marwha, D., Halari, M., & Eliot, L. (2017). Meta-analysis reveals a lack of sexual dimorphism in human amygdala volume. NeuroImage, 147, 282–294. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.021Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. M. (2015). In Toga, A. W. (Ed.), Brain sex differences. Waltham: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978–0-12-397025-1.00196-2Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. M., Arnold, A. P., Ball, G. F., Blaustein, J. D., & de Vries, G. J. (2012). Sex differences in the brain: The not so inconvenient truth. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(7), 2241–2247. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5372-11.2012Google Scholar

McDowell, M. A., Fryar, C. D., Ogden, C. L., & Flegal, K. M. (2008). Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2003–2006. National Health Statistics Reports, 10, 1–48.Google Scholar

McEwen, B. S., & Milner, T. A. (2017). Understanding the broad influence of sex hormones and sex differences in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 24–39. doi:10.1002/jnr.23809Google Scholar

McGlone, J. (1980). Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: A critical survey. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 3(2), 215. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00004398Google Scholar

Mechelli, A., Friston, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Price, C. J. (2005). Structural covariance in the human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(36), 8303–8310. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0357-05.2005Google Scholar

Metzler-Baddeley, C., Caeyenberghs, K., Foley, S., & Jones, D. K. (2016). Task complexity and location specific changes of cortical thickness in executive and salience networks after working memory training. NeuroImage, 130, 48–62. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.007Google Scholar

Morange-Majoux, F., & Devouche, E. (2014). Social encouragement can influence manual preference in 6 month-old-infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1225. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01225Google Scholar

Ohnishi, T., Matsuda, H., Hirakata, M., & Ugawa, Y. (2006). Navigation ability dependent neural activation in the human brain: An fMRI study. Neuroscience Research, 55(4), 361–369. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2006.04.009Google Scholar

Pakkenberg, B., & Gundersen, H. J. (1997). Neocortical neuron number in humans: Effect of sex and age. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 384(2), 312–320. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970728)384:2<312::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-KGoogle Scholar

Paus, T. (2010). Sex differences in the human brain: A developmental perspective. Progress in Brain Research, 186, 13–28. doi:10.1016/B978–0-444-53630-3.00002-6Google Scholar

Pedersen, P. M., Vinter, K., & Olsen, T. S. (2004). Aphasia after stroke: Type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 17(1), 35–43. doi:10.1159/000073896Google Scholar

Peters, M., Jäncke, L., Staiger, J. F., Schlaug, G., Huang, Y., & Steinmetz, H. (1998). Unsolved problems in comparing brain sizes in Homo sapiens. Brain & Cognition, 37(2), 254–285. doi:10.1006/brcg.1998.0983Google Scholar

Pfannkuche, K. A., Bouma, A., & Groothuis, T. G. G. (2009). Does testosterone affect lateralization of brain and behaviour? A meta-analysis in humans and other animal species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 364(1519), 929–942. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0282Google Scholar

Pietschnig, J., Penke, L., Wicherts, J. M., Zeiler, M., & Voracek, M. (2015). Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 411–432. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.017Google Scholar

Pintzka, C. W. S., Hansen, T. I., Evensmoen, H. R., & Håberg, A. K. (2015). Marked effects of intracranial volume correction methods on sex differences in neuroanatomical structures: A HUNT MRI study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 238. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00238Google Scholar

Plowman, E., Hentz, B., & Ellis, C. (2012). Post-stroke aphasia prognosis: A review of patient-related and stroke-related factors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(3), 689–694. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650.xGoogle Scholar

Potvin, O., Dieumegarde, L., & Duchesne, S. (2018a). Corrigendum to “Normative morphometric data for cerebral cortical areas over the lifetime of the adult human brain’” [NeuroImage 156 (2017) 315–339]. NeuroImage, 183, 996–998. doi:S1053–8119(18)30804-8Google Scholar

Potvin, O., Mouiha, A., Dieumegarde, L., & Duchesne, S. (2018b). Corrigendum to “Normative data for subcortical regional volumes over the lifetime of the adult human brain” [NeuroImage 137 (2016) 9–20]. NeuroImage, 183, 994. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.020Google Scholar

Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2018). Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the national assessment of educational progress (NAEP). American Psychologist, 74, 445–458. doi:10.1037/amp0000356Google Scholar

Ringo, J. L., Doty, R. W., Demeter, S., & Simard, P. Y. (1994). Time is of the essence: A conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cerebral Cortex, 4(4), 331–343. doi:10.1093/cercor/4.4.331Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., … Neilson, E. (2018). Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5216 UK biobank participants. Cerebral Cortex, 28(8), 2959–2975. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy109Google Scholar

Roberts, J. E., & Bell, M. A. (2000). Sex differences on a mental rotation task: Variations in electroencephalogram hemispheric activation between children and college students. Developmental Neuropsychology, 17(2), 199–223. doi:10.1207/S15326942DN1702_04Google Scholar

Roberts, J. E., & Bell, M. A. (2003). Two- and three-dimensional mental rotation tasks lead to different parietal laterality for men and women. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50(3), 235–246. doi:10.1016/S0167–8760(03)00195-8Google Scholar

Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004Google Scholar

Saini, A. (2017). Inferior: How science got women wrong – and the new research that’s rewriting the story. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Sale, M. V., Reid, L. B., Cocchi, L., Pagnozzi, A. M., Rose, S. E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2017). Brain changes following four weeks of unimanual motor training: Evidence from behavior, neural stimulation, cortical thickness, and functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 4773–4787. doi:10.1002/hbm.23710Google Scholar

Schillaci, M. A. (2006). Sexual selection and the evolution of brain size in primates. PLoS One, 1(1), e62. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000062Google Scholar

Schöning, S., Engelien, A., Kugel, H., Schäfer, S., Schiffbauer, H., Zwitserlood, P., … Ohrmann, P. (2007). Functional anatomy of visuo-spatial working memory during mental rotation is influenced by sex, menstrual cycle, and sex steroid hormones. Neuropsychologia, 45(14), 3203–3214. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.011Google Scholar

Sepehrband, F., Lynch, K. M., Cabeen, R. P., Gonzalez-Zacarias, C., Zhao, L., D’arcy, M., … Toga, A. W. (2018). Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning. NeuroImage, 172, 217–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.065Google Scholar

Sergerie, K., Chochol, C., & Armony, J. L. (2008). The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 811–830. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.12.002Google Scholar

Shapiro, L. E., Leonard, C. M., Sessions, C. E., Dewsbury, D. A., & Insel, T. R. (1991). Comparative neuroanatomy of the sexually dimorphic hypothalamus in monogamous and polygamous voles. Brain Research, 541(2), 232–240. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(91)91023-TGoogle Scholar

Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., … Katz, L. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 373(6515), 607–609. doi:10.1038/373607a0Google Scholar

Simerly, R., Swanson, L., Chang, C., & Muramatsu, M. (1990). Distribution of androgen and estrogen receptor mRNA‐containing cells in the rat brain: An in situ hybridization study. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 294(1), 76–95. doi:10.1002/cne.902940107Google Scholar

Sommer, I. E., Aleman, A., Somers, M., Boks, M. P., & Kahn, R. S. (2008). Sex differences in handedness, asymmetry of the planum temporale and functional language lateralization. Brain Research, 1206, 76–88. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.003Google Scholar

Stanyon, R., & Bigoni, F. (2014). Sexual selection and the evolution of behavior, morphology, neuroanatomy and genes in humans and other primates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 579–590. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.001Google Scholar

Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1578–1593. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.011Google Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137–168. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2013.804899Google Scholar

Tan, A., Ma, W., Vira, A., Marwha, D., & Eliot, L. (2016). The human hippocampus is not sexually-dimorphic: Meta-analysis of structural MRI volumes. NeuroImage, 124(Pt A), 350–366. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.050Google Scholar

Thompson, A. E., & Voyer, D. (2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 28(7), 1164–1195. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.875889Google Scholar

Tomasi, D., & Volkow, N. D. (2012). Gender differences in brain functional connectivity density. Human Brain Mapping, 33(4), 849–860. doi:10.1002/hbm.21252Google Scholar

Tunç, B., Solmaz, B., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Calkins, M. E., … Verma, R. (2016). Establishing a link between sex-related differences in the structural connectome and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 371(1688). doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0111Google Scholar

van Putten, M. J., Olbrich, S., & Arns, M. (2018). Predicting sex from brain rhythms with deep learning. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 3069. doi:10.1038/s41598–018-21495-7Google Scholar

Verde, P., Piccardi, L., Bianchini, F., Guariglia, C., Carrozzo, P., Morgagni, F., & Boccia, M. (2015). Gender differences in navigational memory: Pilots vs. nonpilots. Aerospace Medicine & Human Performance, 86(2), 103–111. doi:10.3357/AMHP.4024.2015Google Scholar

Verde, P., Piccardi, L., Bianchini, F., Trivelloni, P., Guariglia, C., & Tomao, E. (2013). Gender effects on mental rotation in pilots vs. nonpilots. Aviation, Space & Environmental Medicine, 84(7), 726–729. doi:10.3357/ASEM.3466.2013Google Scholar

Voevodskaya, O., Simmons, A., Nordenskjöld, R., Kullberg, J., Ahlström, H., Lind, L., … Westman, E. (2014). The effects of intracranial volume adjustment approaches on multiple regional MRI volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 264. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00264Google Scholar

Voyer, D. (1996). On the magnitude of laterality effects and sex differences in functional lateralities. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 1(1), 51–84. doi:10.1080/713754209Google Scholar

Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250Google Scholar

Wager, T. D., Phan, K. L., Liberzon, I., & Taylor, S. F. (2003). Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: A meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 19(3), 513–531. doi:10.1016/S1053–8119(03)00078-8Google Scholar

Wallentin, M. (2009). Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review. Brain and Language, 108(3), 175–183. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.001Google Scholar

Watila, M. M., & Balarabe, S. A. (2015). Factors predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 352(1–2), 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.020Google Scholar

Wei, W., Chen, C., Dong, Q., & Zhou, X. (2016). Sex differences in gray matter volume of the right anterior hippocampus explain sex differences in three-dimensional mental rotation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 580. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00580Google Scholar

Weiss, E., Siedentopf, C., Hofer, A., Deisenhammer, E., Hoptman, M., Kremser, C., … Delazer, M. (2003). Sex differences in brain activation pattern during a visuospatial cognitive task: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neuroscience Letters, 344(3), 169–172. doi:10.1016/S0304–3940(03)00406-3Google Scholar

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55–123). London: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978–0-12-394281-4.00002-7Google Scholar

Zacks, J. M. (2008). Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(1), 1–19. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20013Google Scholar

Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70, 10–20. doi:10.1037/a0038208Google Scholar

Zubiaurre-Elorza, L., Junque, C., Gómez-Gil, E., Segovia, S., Carrillo, B., Rametti, G., & Guillamon, A. (2013). Cortical thickness in untreated transsexuals. Cerebral Cortex, 23(12), 2855–2862. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs267Google Scholar

Book contents

Section 1 - The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Summary

Access options

References

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Book contents

Section 1 - The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Summary

Access options

References

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Suggested Readings

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive