Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-6mft8 Total loading time: 1.637 Render date: 2021-10-21T12:44:17.224Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

30 - Shaming and Compliance

from Part IV - Legitimacy and Social Norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Abstract: Naming and shaming offenders is often considered an effective strategy to improve compliance. Shaming exposes an offender to condemnation by a community of stakeholders. The threat of negative publicity, reputational damage and social disapproval is perceived as a sanction, and can in theory be more powerful than a formal legal sanction. This chapter asks to what extent naming and shaming can improve compliance. It takes stock of extant empirical evidence on the effect of shaming policies on regulatory compliance and identifies conditions for shaming to affect compliance. The complex relationship between ‘naming and shaming’ and compliance makes it difficult to predict and control the various effects of shaming sanctions. The chapter concludes that the unpredictability of effects makes ‘naming and shaming’ a risky tool for regulators. A theory about naming and shaming should differentiate among types of offender, shaming agent and social context.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, S., Murphy, K. and Bates, L. (2015). ‘What Drives Compliance? The Effect of Deterrence and Shame Emotions on Young Drivers’ Compliance with Road Laws’. Policing and Society: 115. 10.1080/10439463.2015.1115502.Google Scholar
Ayres, and Braithwaite, (1992). Responsive Regulation. Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Osford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bavorova, M., Fietz, A. and Hirschauer, N. (2017). ‘Does Disclosure of Food Inspections Affect Business Compliance? The Case of Berlin, Germany’. British Food Journal 119(1): 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campa, P. (2018). ‘Press and Leaks: Do Newspapers Reduce Toxic Emissions?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 91(C): 184202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carberry, E., Engelen, P. and Van Essen, M. (2018). ‘Which Firms Get Punished for Unethical Behavior? Explaining Variation in Stock Market Reactions to Corporate Misconduct’. Business Ethics Quarterly 28(2): 119–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisneros, E., Zhou, S. L. and Börner, J. (2015). ‘Naming and Shaming for Conservation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon’. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coontz, D. (2015). ‘Beyond First Blush: The Utility of Shame as a Master Emotion in Criminal Sentencing’. Michigan State Law Review 2015: 415–54.Google Scholar
Cortez, N. (2011). ‘Adverse Publicity by Administrative Agencies in the Internet Era’. Brigham Young University Law Review 2011(5): 13711454.Google Scholar
Cortez, N. (2018). ‘Regulation by Database’. University of Colorado Law Review 89(1): 191.Google Scholar
Dwenger, N., and Treber, L. (2018). ‘Shaming for Tax Enforcement: Evidence from a New Policy’. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP13194. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3254229.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. (1994). Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, W., Abel, R. and Sarat, A. (1980). ‘The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …’. Law & Society Review 15(3/4): 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fombrun, C., and Van Riel, C. (1997). ‘The Reputational Landscape’. Corporate Reputational Review 1(1–2): 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalan, S. (2007). ‘Shame Sanctions and Excessive CEO Pay’. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 32: 141.Google Scholar
Harris, N. (2001). ‘Part II. Shaming and Shame: Regulating Drink Driving’. In Ahmed, E., Harris, N., Braithwaite, J., and Braithwaite, V. (eds.), Shame Management through Reintegration. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 71207.Google Scholar
Harris, N. (2017). ‘Shame in Regulatory Settings’. In Drahos, P. (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications. Acton ACT, Australia: ANU Press, 5976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, N., and Maruna, S. (2006). ‘Shame, Shaming and Restorative Justice: A Critical Appraisal’. In Johnstone, G. and Van Ness, D. (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 452–62.Google Scholar
Iaccobucci, E. (2014). ‘On the Interaction between Legal and Reputational Sanctions’. Journal of Legal Studies 43: 189207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquet, J. (2016). Is Shame Necessary? New Uses for an Old Tool. Vintage.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2020). ‘Regulation by Shaming: Deterrence Effects of Publicizing Violations of Workplace Safety and Health Laws’. American Economic Review 110(6): 18661904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2006). ‘What’s Really Wrong with Shaming Sanctions’, Texas Law Review 84: 2075–.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., and Posner, E. A. (1999). ‘Shaming White-Collar Criminals: A Proposal for Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’. Journal of Law & Economics 42(1): 365–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, D. R. (1998). ‘The Judicial and Judicious Use of Shame Penalties’. Crime & Delinquency 44(2): 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, J. M. (2012). ‘Does Reputation Work to Discipline Corporate Misconduct?’ In Pollock, T. G. and Barnett, M. L. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 361–82.Google Scholar
Kelley, M. S., Fukushima, M., Spivak, A. L. and Payne, D. (2009). ‘Deterrence Theory and the Role of Shame in Projected Offending of College Students against a Ban on Alcohol’. Journal of Drug Education 39(4): 419–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi, M. (2002). ‘Suite Justice or Sweet Charity? Some Explorations of Shaming and Incapacitating Business Fraudsters’. Punishment & Society 4(2): 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, H. B. (1971). ‘Shame and Guilt in Neurosis’. Psychoanalytic Review 58(3): 419–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahon, J. F. (2002). ‘Corporate Reputation: A Research Agenda Using Strategy and Stakeholder Literature’. Business & Society 41: 415–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkai, T., and Braithwaite, J. (1994). ‘Reintegrative Shaming and Compliance with Regulatory Standards’. Criminology 32: 361–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlinden, A. (2007). The Shaming of Sexual Offenders: Risk, Retribution and Reintegration. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Murphy, K., and Harris, N. (2007). ‘Shaming, Shame and Recidivism: A Test of Reintegrative Shaming Theory in the White-Collar Crime Context’. British Journal of Criminology 47(6): 900–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD Tax Administration (2017). Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Perez-Truglia, R., and Troiano, U. (2018). ‘Shaming Tax Delinquents’. February 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2558115 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2558115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parella, K. (2018). ‘Reputational Regulation’. Duke Law Journal 67(5): 944–79.Google Scholar
Parker, C. (2006). ‘The Compliance Trap: The Moral Message in Responsive Regulatory Enforcement’. Law & Society Review 40(3): 591622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronson, J. (2015). So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Roulet, T. J. (2018). ‘Sins for Some, Virtues for Others: Media Coverage of Investment Banks’ Misconduct and Adherence to Professional Norms during the Financial Crisis’. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718799404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheff, T. J. (2003). ‘Shame in Self and Society’. Symbolic Interaction 26(2): 239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarcz, D. (2003). ‘Shame, Stigma, and Crime: Evaluating the Efficacy of Shaming Sanctions in Criminal Law’. Harvard Law Review 116: 2186.Google Scholar
Shapira, R. (2016). ‘Reputation through Litigation: How the Legal System Shapes Behavior by Producing Information’. Washington Law Review 91: 11931251.Google Scholar
Slemrod, J. B., Thoresen, T. and Bo, E. (2013). ‘Taxes on the Internet: Deterrence Effects of Public Disclosure’. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4107. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2220132.Google Scholar
Svensson, R., Weerman, F. M., Pauwels, L. J. R., Bruinsma, G. J. N. and Bernasco, W. (2013). ‘Moral Emotions and Offending: Do Feelings of Anticipated Shame and Guilt Mediate the Effect of Socialization on Offending?’. European Journal of Criminology 10(1): 2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P., and Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and Guilt. New York: Guildford Publications.Google Scholar
Yadin, S. (2019). ‘Regulatory Shaming’. Lewis & Clark Environmental Law Review 49: 2019.Google Scholar
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M., Reger, R. and Shapiro, D. (2012). ‘Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following Wrongdoing’. Academy of Management Journal 55: 10791101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Erp, J. G. (2010). ‘Regulatory Disclosure of Offending Companies in the Dutch Financial Market: Consumer Protection or Enforcement Publicity?’. Law & Policy, 32: 407–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Erp, J. G. (2011). ‘Naming without Shaming: The Publication of Sanctions in the Dutch Financial Market’. Regulation and Governance 5(3): 287308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×