Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-4x6s7 Total loading time: 1.908 Render date: 2022-01-29T14:06:53.765Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Part VI - Compliance and Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andenaes, Johannes. 1974. Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Anwar, Shamina, and Loughran, Thomas A.. 2011. “Testing a Bayesian Learning Theory of Deterrence among Serious Juvenile Offenders.” Criminology 49: 667–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apel, Robert. 2013. “Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime: Implications for Criminal Deterrence.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 29: 67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apel, Robert, Pogarsky, Greg, and Bates, Leigh. 2009. “The Sanctions-Perceptions Link in a Model of School-Based Deterrence.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25: 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare. [1764] 1986. On Crimes and Punishment. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76: 169217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Jeff T., and Scholz, John T.. 1991a. “Beyond Deterrence: Behavior Decision Theory and Tax Compliance.” Law and Society Review 25: 821–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Jeff T., and Scholz, John T.. 1991b. “Boundary Effects of Vague Risk Information on Taxpayer Decisions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 360–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhami, Sanjit. 2016. Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel. 1961. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L., Hall, L., and Wreford, S.. 2008. “Education-Related Parenting Contracts Evaluation” (Research Report DCSFRR030). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, TNS Social.Google Scholar
Frederick, Shane. 2005. “Cognitive Reflection and Decision-Making.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4): 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geerken, Michael R., and Gove, Walter R.. 1975. “Deterrence: Some Theoretical Considerations.” Law & Society Review 9: 497513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Jack P. 1975. Crime Punishment and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang. 2011. “Heuristic Decision-Making.” Annual Review of Psychology 62: 451–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, S. B., Shah, A. K., Guryan, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., and Pollack, H. A.. 2017. “Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(1): 154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herman, Sherman, and Pogarsky, Greg. in press. “Morality, Acute Conformity, and Offender Decision Making.” Justice Quarterly.Google Scholar
Iwry, J., and Kleiman, M. A.. 2017. “A Nudge toward Temperance: User-Set Consumption Limits as an Element of Cannabis Policy.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=3166307 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3166307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Frederick, Shane. 2005. “A Model of Heuristic Judgment.” In Holyoak, K. J. and Morrison, R. G. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 267–93. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Frederick, Shane. 2002. “Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment.” In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., and Kahneman, D. (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, 4981. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laub, John H. 2004. “The Life Course of Criminology in the United States: The American Society of Criminology 2003 Presidential Address.” Criminology 42(1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1690. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Thomas Basset.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, Thomas A., Paternoster, Ray, Piquero, Alex R., and Pogarsky, Greg. 2011a. “On Ambiguity in Perceptions of Risk: Implications for Decision-Making and Deterrence.” Criminology 49: 1029–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, Thomas A., Piquero, Alex, Fagan, Jeffrey, and Mulvey, Edward. 2011b. “Deterring Serious and Chronic Offenders: Research Findings and Policy Thoughts from the Pathways to Desistance Study.” In Dowd, N. (ed.), Justice for Kids: Keeping Kids out of the Juvenile Justice System. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S. 1998. “Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century.” Crime and Justice 23: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternoster, Raymond, and Pogarsky, Greg. 2009. “Rational Choice, Agency, and Thoughtfully Reflective Decision Making: The Short and Long-Term Consequences of Making Good Choices.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25: 103–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Justin T. 2019. “Using Behavioral Economics to Advance Deterrence Research and Improve Crime Policy: Some Illustrative Experiments.” Crime and Delinquency 64(12): 1636–59.Google Scholar
Pickett, Justin T., and Bushway, Shawn. 2015. “Dispositional Sources of Sanction Perceptions: Emotionality, Cognitive Style, Intolerance of Ambiguity, and Self Efficacy.” Law and Human Behavior 39(6): 624–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piquero, Alex, Paternoster, Ray, Pogarsky, Greg, and Loughran, Thomas A.. 2011. “Elaborating the Individual Difference Component of Deterrence Theory.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogarsky, Greg. 2009. “Deterrence and Decision-Making: Research Questions and Theoretical Refinements.” In Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., and Hall, G. P. (eds.), Handbook on Crime and Deviance. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Pogarsky, Greg, and Herman, Shaina. 2019. “Nudging and the Choice Architecture of Offending Decisions.” Criminology & Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745–9133.12470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogarsky, Greg, Piquero, Alex R., and Paternoster, Ray. 2004. “Modeling Change in Perceptions about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 20: 343–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogarsky, Greg, Roche, Sean Patrick, and Pickett, Justin T.. 2017. “Heuristics and Biases, Rational Choice and Sanction Perceptions.” Criminology 55: 85111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogarsky, Greg, Roche, Sean Patrick, and Pickett, Justin T.. 2018. “Offender Decision Making in Criminology: Contributions from Behavioral Economics.” Annual Review of Criminology 1: 379400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1712–78] 1974. The Essential Rousseau: The Social Contract, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Discourse on the Arts and Sciences, The Creed of a Savoyard Priest. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., 1990. “Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence.” In Michael Tonry and Norval Morris (eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 12, 1–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1990. “Invariants of Human Behavior.” Annual Review of Psychology 41: 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa L., Peters, Ellen, and MacGregor, Donald G.. 2007. “The Affect Heuristic.” European Journal of Operational Research 177: 1333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, Mark C., and Warr, Mark. 1993. “A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30: 123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. 1994. Quasi Rational Economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. 2015. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kyle, and Loughran, Thomas A.. 2015. “Rational Choice and Prospect Theory.” In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, eds. Bruinsma, Gerben and David, Weisburd. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kyle J., Hamilton, Benjamin C., and Loughran, Thomas A.. 2018. “Testing the Transitivity of Reported Risk Perceptions: Evidence of Coherent Arbitrariness.” Criminology 56: 5986 (published online in 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12154).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tittle, Charles R. 1980. Sanctions and Social Deviance. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gelder, Jean-Louis, de Vries, Reinout E., and van der Plight, Joop. 2009. “Evaluating a Dual Process Model of Risk: Affect and Cognition as Determinants of Risky Choice.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 22: 4561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Theodore, Paternoster, Ray, and Loughran, Tom. 2017. “Direct and Indirect Experiential Effects in an Updating Model of Deterrence: A Research Note.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 54(1): 6377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. 1980. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences.” American Psychologist 35(2): 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allingham, Michael G., and Sandmo, Agnar. 1972. “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 1 (3–4): 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James. 1991. “A Perspective on the Experimental Analysis of Taxpayer Reporting.” Accounting Review 66 (3): 577–93.Google Scholar
Alm, James, McClelland, Gary H., and Schulze, William D.. 1992. “Why Do People Pay Taxes?Journal of Public Economics 48 (1): 2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, James, Kirchler, Erich, and Muehlbacher, Stephan. 2012. “Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation.” Economic Analysis & Policy 42 (2): 133–51.Google Scholar
Andreoni, James, Erard, Brian, and Feinstein, Jonathan. 1998. “Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (2): 818–60.Google Scholar
Arkes, Hal R., Joyner, Cynthia A., Pezzo, Mark V., Nash, Jane Gradwohl, Siegel-Jacobs, Karen, and Stone, Eric. 1994. “The Psychology of Windfall Gains.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59 (3): 331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Michele, Corazzini, Luca, and Seri, Raffaello. 2014. “Reference Dependent Preferences, Hedonic Adaptation and Tax Evasion: Does the Tax Burden Matter?Journal of Economic Psychology 40 (0): 103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boylan, Scott J., and Sprinkle, Geoffrey B. 2001. “Experimental Evidence on the Relation between Tax Rates and Compliance: The Effect of Earned vs. Endowed Income.” Journal of the American Taxation Association 23 (1): 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühren, Christoph, and Kundt, Thorben C.. 2016. “Does the Level of Work Effort Influence Tax Evasion? Experimental Evidence.” Review of Economics 65 (2): 137–58.Google Scholar
Copeland, Phyllis V., and Cuccia, Andrew D.. 2002. “Multiple Determinants of Framing Referents in Tax Reporting and Compliance.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88 (1): 499526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhami, Sanjit, and Al-Nowaihi, Ali. 2007. “Why Do People Pay Taxes? Prospect Theory versus Expected Utility Theory.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64 (1): 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggan, Michael. 2016. “Thinking Tax: Mental [Tax] Accounting and Voluntary Compliance.” Paper presented at 12th International Conference on Tax Administration, Sydney, Australia, March 31–April 1.Google Scholar
Durham, Yvonne, Manly, Tracy S., and Ritsema, Christina. 2014. “The Effects of Income Source, Context, and Income Level on Tax Compliance Decisions in a Dynamic Experiment.” Journal of Economic Psychology 40 (0): 220–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engström, Per, Nordblom, Katarina, Ohlsson, Henry, and Persson, Annika. 2015. “Tax Compliance and Loss Aversion.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7 (4): 132–64.Google Scholar
Fischer, Carol M., Wartick, Martha, and Mark, Melvin M.. 1992. “Detection Probability and Taxpayer Compliance: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Accounting Literature 11: 146.Google Scholar
Fochmann, Martin, and Wolf, Nadja. 2019. “Framing and Salience Effects in Tax Evasion Decisions – An Experiment on Underreporting and Overdeducting.” Journal of Economic Psychology 72: 260–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Craig R., and Poldrack, Russell A.. 2009. “Chapter 11 – Prospect Theory and the Brain.” In Neuroeconomics, edited by Glimcher, Paul W., Camerer, Colin F., Fehr, Ernst, and Poldrack, Russell A., 145–73. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hertwig, Ralph, Barron, Greg, Weber, Elke U., and Erev, Ido. 2004. “Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice.” Psychological Science 15 (8): 534–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Internal Revenue Service. 2016. Data Book, 2015 (Publication 55B). Washington, DC. www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/15databk.pdf.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, Erich. 2007. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, Erich, and Maciejovsky, Boris. 2001. “Tax Compliance within the Context of Gain and Loss Situations, Expected and Current Asset Position, and Profession.” Journal of Economic Psychology 22 (2): 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, Erich, Muehlbacher, Stephan, Hoelzl, Erik, and Webley, P.. 2009. “Effort and Aspirations in Tax Evasion: Experimental Evidence.” Applied Psychology: An International Review 58 (3): 488507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, Erich, Muehlbacher, Stephan, Kastlunger, Barbara, and Wahl, Ingrid. 2010. “Why Pay Taxes? A Review of Tax Compliance Decisions.” In Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance, edited by Alm, James, Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, and Torgler, Benno, 1531. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George, and Issacharoff, Samuel. 1994. “Source Dependence in the Valuation of Objects.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7 (3): 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, Harwood, Gordon B., and Larkins, Ernest R.. 1992. “Withholding Position and Income Tax Compliance: Some Experimental Evidence.” Public Finance Review 20 (2): 152–74.Google Scholar
Mason, Robert, and Calvin, Lyle D.. 1978. “Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion.” Law & Society Review 13: 7389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittone, Luigi. 2006. “Dynamic Behaviour in Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach.” Journal of Socio-economics 35 (5): 813–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlbacher, Stephan, and Kirchler, Erich. 2008. “Arbeitsaufwand, Anspruchsniveau Und Steuerehrlichkeit.” Zeitschrift Für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie 52 (2): 9196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlbacher, Stephan, and Kirchler, Erich. 2013. “Mental Accounting of Self-Employed Taxpayers: On the Mental Segregation of the Net Income and the Tax Due.” FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 69 (4): 412–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlbacher, Stephan, Kirchler, Erich, Hoelzl, Erik, Ashby, J., Berti, C., Job, J., Kemp, S., Peterlik, R. U., Roland-Levy, C., and Waldherr, K.. 2008. “Hard-Earned Income and Tax Compliance: A Survey in Eight Nations.” European Psychologist 13 (4): 298304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlbacher, Stephan, Hartl, Barbara, and Kirchler, Erich. 2017. “Mental Accounting and Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence for the Effect of Mental Segregation of Tax Due and Revenue on Compliance.” Public Finance Review 45 (1): 118–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Hanskje, Huber, Laura Rosendahl, Van Praag, Mirjam, and Goslinga, Sjoerd. 2019. “The Effect of a Tax Training Program on Tax Compliance and Business Outcomes of Starting Entrepreneurs: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Applying Experimental Methods to Advance Entrepreneurship Research 34 (2): 261–83.Google Scholar
Olsen, Jerome, Kasper, Matthias, Kogler, Christoph, Muehlbacher, Stephan, and Kirchler, Erich. 2019. “Mental Accounting of Income Tax and Value Added Tax among Self-Employed Business Owners.” Journal of Economic Psychology 70 (January): 125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piolatto, Amedeo, and Rablen, Matthew D.. 2017. “Prospect Theory and Tax Evasion: A Reconsideration of the Yitzhaki Puzzle.” Theory and Decision 82 (4): 543–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schepanski, Albert, and Shearer, Teri. 1995. “A Prospect Theory Account of the Income Tax Withholding Phenomenon.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 (2): 174–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, Michael W., and Hero, Rodney E.. 1985. “Tax Evasion and Heuristics: A Research Note.” Journal of Public Economics 26 (2): 263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, Thirukodikaval N. 1973. “Tax Evasion: A Model.” Journal of Public Economics 2 (4): 339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. 1985. “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.” Marketing Science 4 (3): 199217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. 1999. “Mental Accounting Matters.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 (3): 183206.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard H., and Johnson, E. J.. 1990. “Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice.” Management Science 36 (6): 643–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oskar. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yaniv, Gideon. 1999. “Tax Compliance and Advance Tax Payments: A Prospect Theory Analysis.” National Tax Journal 52 (4): 753–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yitzhaki, Shlomo. 1974. “A Note on Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 3: 201–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeelenberg, M., and van Dijk, E.. 1997. “A Reverse Sunk Cost Effect in Risky Decision Making: Sometimes We Have Too Much Invested to Gamble.” Journal of Economic Psychology 18 (6): 677–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, Sumit, Chomsisengphet, Souphala, Mahoney, Neale, and Stroebel, Johannes. 2014. ‘Regulating Consumer Financial Products: Evidence from Credit Cards’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(1): 111–64.Google Scholar
Allcott, Hunt. 2011. ‘Social Norms and Energy Conservation.’ Journal of public Economics 95(9–10): 1082–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, Hunt, and Rogers, Todd. 2014. ‘The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation’. American Economic Review 104(10): 3003–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, Moty, Ariely, Dan, Ayal, Shahar, Cryder, Cynthia E., and Rick, Scott I.. 2011. ‘Winning the Battle but Losing the War: The Psychology of Debt Management’. Journal of Marketing Research 48(SPL): S38S50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araña, Jorge E., and León, Carmelo J.. 2013. ‘Can Defaults Save the Climate? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Carbon Offsetting Programs’. Environmental and Resource Economics 54(4): 613–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Barak. 2012. ‘Deterrence and Moral Persuasion Effects on Corporate Tax Compliance: Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial’. Criminology 50(1): 2769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arno, Anneliese, and Thomas, Steve. 2016. ‘The Efficacy of Nudge Theory Strategies in Influencing Adult Dietary Behaviour: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis’. BMC public health 16(1): 676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asensio, Omar I., and Delmas, Magali A.. 2015. ‘Nonprice Incentives and Energy Conservation’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(6): E510E515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benartzi, Shlomo, Beshears, John, Milkman, Katherine L., Sunstein, Cass R., Thaler, Richard H., Shankar, Maya, Tucker-Ray, Will, Congdon, William J., and Galing, Steven. 2017. ‘Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?Psychological science 28(8): 1041–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenthal, Marsha, Christian, Charles W., and Slemrod, Joel. 2001. ‘Do Normative Appeals Affect Tax Compliance? Evidence from a Controlled Experiment in Minnesota.’ National Tax Journal. 54. 10.17310/ntj.2001.1.06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, Kristina Maria, Cappelen, Alexander W., Sorensen, Erik, and Tungodden, Bertil. 2017. ‘You’ve Got Mail: A Randomised Field Experiment on Tax Evasion’. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3033775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, Alec, Ferraro, Paul J., List, John A., Metcalfe, Robert D., Price, Michael K., and Rundhammer, Florian. 2017. ‘Do the Effects of Social Nudges Persist? Theory and Evidence from 38 Natural Field Experiments.’ National Bureau of Economic Research No. w23277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronchetti, Erin Todd, Dee, Thomas S., Huffman, David B., and Magenheim, Ellen. 2011. ‘When a Nudge Isn’t Enough: Defaults and Saving among Low-Income Tax Filers’, National Bureau of Economic Research No. w16887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Hendrik, Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena, Klement, Katharina, Luistro, Marijane Jonsson, and Rahali, Bilel. 2018. ‘Can Nudges Be Transparent and yet Effective?Journal of Economic Psychology 65(2018): 4159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, Tamara, Collins, Clare, Rollo, Megan E., McCaffrey, Tracy A., de Vlieger, Nienke, van der Bend, Daphne, Truby, Helen, and Perez-Cueto, Federico J. A.. 2016. ‘Nudging Consumers towards Healthier Choices: A Systematic Review of Positional Influences on Food Choice’. British Journal of Nutrition 115(12): 252–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadena, Ximena, and Schoar, Antoinette. 2011. ‘Remembering to Pay? Reminders vs. Financial Incentives for Loan Payments’. National Bureau of Economic Research No. w17020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castleman, Benjamin L., and Page, Lindsay C.. 2015. ‘Summer Nudging: Can Personalized Text Messages and Peer Mentor Outreach Increase College Going among Low-Income High School Graduates?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 115(2015): 144–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chivers, Ben, and Barnes, Geoffrey. 2018. ‘Sorry, Wrong Number: Tracking Court Attendance Targeting through Testing a “Nudge” Text’. Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing 2(1–2): 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., Reno, Raymond R., and Kallgren, Carl A. 1990. ‘A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(6): 1015–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., Kallgren, Carl A., and Reno, Raymond R.. 1991. ‘A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior’ in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24, edited by Berekowitz, L., 201–34. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cumberbatch, Jonathan R., and Barnes, Geoffrey C.. 2018. ‘This Nudge Was Not Enough: A Randomised Trial of Text Message Reminders of Court Dates to Victims and Witnesses’. Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing 2(1–2): 3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinner, Isaac, Johnson, Eric J., Goldstein, Daniel G., and Liu, Kaiya. 2011. ‘Partitioning Default Effects: Why People Choose Not to Choose’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17(4): 332.Google ScholarPubMed
Fellner, Gerlinde, Sausgruber, Rupert, and Traxler, Christian. 2013. ‘Testing Enforcement Strategies in the Field: Threat, Moral Appeal and Social Information’. Journal of the European Economic Association 11(3): 634–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch. 1982. ‘Debiasing’ in Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, edited by Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul and Tversky, Amos, 422–44. Harvard, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hallsworth, Michael. 2014. ‘The Use of Field Experiments to Increase Tax Compliance’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30(4): 658–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, Michael, Berry, Dan, Sanders, Michael, Sallis, Anna, King, Dominic, Vlaev, Ivo, and Darzi, Ara. 2015. ‘Stating Appointment Costs in SMS Reminders Reduces Missed Hospital Appointments: Findings from Two Randomised Controlled Trials’. PloS one 10(9): e0137306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallsworth, Michael, List, John A., Metcalfe, Robert D., and Vlaev, Ivo. 2017. ‘The Behavioralist as Tax Collector: Using Natural Field Experiments to Enhance Tax Compliance’. Journal of Public Economics 148: 1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, David, Fong, Geoffrey T., Borland, Ron, Cummings, K. Michael, McNeill, Ann, and Driezen, Pete. 2007. ‘Text and Graphic Warnings on Cigarette Packages: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Study’. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32(3): 202–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haugh, Todd. 2017. ‘Nudging Corporate Compliance’. American Business Law Journal 54(4): 683741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachimowicz, Jon M., Duncan, Shannon, Weber, Elke U., and Johnson, Eric J.. 2019. ‘When and Why Defaults Influence Decisions: A Meta-analysis of Default Effects’. Behavioural Public Policy 3(2): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Peter. 2018. How Far to Nudge? Assessing Behavioural Public Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eric J., and Goldstein, Daniel. 2003. ‘Do Defaults Save Lives?Science 302(5649): 1338–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Eric J., Häubl, Gerald, and Keinan, Anat. 2007. ‘Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(3): 461.Google ScholarPubMed
Jolls, Christine, Sunstein, Cass R., and Thaler, Richard. 1998. ‘A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics’. Stanford Law Review 50(5): 14711550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlan, Dean, Morten, Melanie, and Zinman, Jonathan. 2012. ‘A Personal Touch: Text Messaging for Loan Repayment.’ National Bureau of Economic Research No. w17952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettle, Stewart, Hernandez, Marco, Ruda, Simon, and Sanders, Michael. 2016. ‘Behavioral Interventions in Tax Compliance: Evidence from Guatemala’. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killingsworth, Scott. 2017. ‘Behavioral Ethics: From Nudges to Norms’. www.bclplaw.com/images/content/8/9/v2/89927/2017–01-jan-feb-ethikos-killingsworth.pdf.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell B., and Ulen, Thomas S.. 2000. ‘Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics’. California Law Review 88(4): 10511144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroese, Floor M., Marchiori, David R., and de Ridder, Denise T. D.. 2015. ‘Nudging Healthy Food Choices: A Field Experiment at the Train Station’. Journal of Public Health 38(2): e133e137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lourenço, Joana Sousa, Ciriolo, Emanuele, Almeida, Sara Rafael, and Dessart, Francois J.. 2016. ‘Behavioural Insights Applied to Policy – Country Overviews 2016’. No. JRC100547. Joint Research Centre (Seville site).Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George, Bryce, Cindy, Hagmann, David, and Rajpal, Sachin. 2015. ‘Warning: You Are About to Be Nudged’. Behavioral Science & Policy 1(1): 3542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrian, Brigitte C., and Shea, Dennis F.. 2001. ‘The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401 (k) Participation and Savings Behavior’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4): 1149–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Craig R. M., Liersch, Michael J., and Finkelstein, Stacey R.. 2006. ‘Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults’. Psychological Science 17(5): 414–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meeker, Daniella, Knight, Tara K., Friedberg, Mark W., Linder, Jeffrey A., Goldstein, Noah J., Fox, Craig R., Rothfeld, Alan, Diaz, Guillermo, and Doctor, Jason N.. 2014. ‘Nudging Guideline-Concordant Antibiotic Prescribing: A Randomized Clinical Trial’. JAMA internal medicine 174(3): 425–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meeker, Daniella, Linder, Jeffrey A., Fox, Craig R., Friedberg, Mark W., Persell, Stephen D., Goldstein, Noah J., Knight, Tara K., Hay, Joel W., and Doctor, Jason N.. 2016. ‘Effect of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing among Primary Care Practices: A Randomized Clinical Trial’. Jama 315(6): 562–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD. 2017. ‘Use of Behavioural Insights in Consumer Policy’. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 36. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c2203c35-en.Google Scholar
Oreopoulos, Philip, and Petronijevic, Uros. 2019. ‘The Remarkable Unresponsiveness of College Students to Nudging and What We Can Learn from It’. National Bureau of Economic Research No. w26059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pärnamets, Philip, Johansson, Petter, Hall, Lars, Balkenius, Christian, Spivey, Michael J., and Richardson, Daniel C.. 2015. ‘Biasing Moral Decisions by Exploiting the Dynamics of Eye Gaze’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(13): 4170–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paunov, Yavor, Wänke, Michaela, and Vogel, Tobias. 2018. ‘Transparency Effects on Policy Compliance: Disclosing How Defaults Work Can Enhance Their Effectiveness’. Behavioural Public Policy. doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peth, Denise, Mußhoff, Oliver, Funke, Katja, and Hirschauer, Norbert. 2018. ‘Nudging Farmers to Comply with Water Protection Rules: Experimental Evidence from Germany’. Ecological economics 152(2018): 310–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebonato, Riccardo. 2012. Taking Liberties: A Critical Examination of Libertarian Paternalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 89248.Google Scholar
Reisch, L. A., and Sunstein, C. R.. 2016. ‘Do Europeans Like Nudges?Judgement and Decision Making 11(4): 310–25.Google Scholar
Robotham, Dan, Satkunanathan, Safarina, Reynolds, John, Stahl, Daniel, and Wykes, Til. 2016. ‘Using Digital Notifications to Improve Attendance in Clinic: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis’. BMJ Open 6(10): e012116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozin, Paul, Scott, Sydney E., Dingley, Megan, Urbanek, Joanna K., Jiang, Hong, and Kaltenbach, Mark. 2011. ‘Nudge to Nobesity I: Minor Changes in Accessibility Decrease Food Intake’. Judgment and Decision Making 6(4): 323–32.Google Scholar
Sacarny, Adam, Yokum, David, Finkelstein, Amy, and Agrawal, Shantanu. 2016. ‘Medicare Letters to Curb Overprescribing of Controlled Substances Had No Detectable Effect on Providers’. Health Affairs 35(3): 471–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, Lisa L., Mazar, Nina, Gino, Francesca, Ariely, Dan, and Bazerman, Max H.. 2012. ‘Signing at the Beginning Makes Ethics Salient and Decreases Dishonest Self-Reports in Comparison to Signing at the End’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(38): 15197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Antonio, and John, Peter. 2017. ‘Social Norms Don’t Always Work: An Experiment to Encourage More Efficient Fees Collection for Students’. PLoS One 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177354.Google ScholarPubMed
Slemrod, Joel. 2016. ‘Tax Compliance and Enforcement: New Research and Its Policy Implications’. Ross School of Business Working Paper No. 1302, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffel, Mary, Williams, Elanor F., and Pogacar, Ruth. 2016. ‘Ethically Deployed Defaults: Transparency and Consumer Protection through Disclosure and Preference Articulation’. Journal of Marketing Research 53(5): 865–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1997. ‘Behavioral Analysis of Law’. University of Chicago Law Review 64(4): 1175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2015. Choosing Not to Choose: Understanding the Value of Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2016. ‘The Council of Psychological Advisers’. Annual Review of Psychology 67: 713–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, Cass R. 2017. ‘Nudges that Fail’. Behavioural Public Policy 1(1): 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Thaler, Richard H.. 2003. ‘Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron’. University of Chicago Law Review 70(4): 11591202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., Reisch, Lucia A., and Rauber, Julius. 2018. ‘A Worldwide Consensus on Nudging? Not Quite, but Almost’. Regulation & Governance 12(1): 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szaszi, Barnabas, Palinkas, Anna, Palfi, Bence, Szollosi, Aba, and Aczel, Balazs. 2018. ‘A Systematic Scoping Review of the Choice Architecture Movement: Toward Understanding When and Why Nudges Work’. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 31(3): 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, David, Doctor, Jason N., Persell, Stephen D., Friedberg, Mark W., Meeker, Daniella, Friesema, Elisha M., Goldstein, Noah J., Linder, Jeffrey A., and Fox, Craig R.. 2015. ‘Nudging Physician Prescription Decisions by Partitioning the Order Set: Results of a Vignette-Based Study’. Journal of General Internal Medicine 30(3): 298304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, Richard H., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2003. ‘Libertarian Paternalism’. American Economic Review 93(2): 175–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard H., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, ch. 5. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Torgler, Benno. 2013. ‘A Field Experiment in Moral Suasion and Tax Compliance Focusing on Underdeclaration and Overdeduction’. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 69(4): 393411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wansink, Brian. 2016. Slim by Design: Mindless Eating Solutions for Everyday Life. New York/London etc.: Hay House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Elke U., and Johnson, Eric J.. 2011. ‘Query Theory: Knowing What We Want by Arguing with Ourselves’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(2): 91–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, Adel, Alharthi, Hana, Khaldi, Ohoud Al, Alnaimi, Fatima, Alsubaie, Nujood, and Alfariss, Nada. 2014. ‘Effectiveness of Text Message Reminders on Nonattendance of Outpatient Clinic Appointments in Three Different Specialties: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Saudi Hospital’. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 9(1): 23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×