Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-58z7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-06T15:45:26.485Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

71 - Classical Genres: Epic, Tragedy, Comedy, Satire

from Part VIII - High Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2019

Bruce R. Smith
University of Southern California
Katherine Rowe
Smith College, Massachusetts
Ton Hoenselaars
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Akiko Kusunoki
Tokyo Woman’s Christian University, Japan
Andrew Murphy
Trinity College Dublin
Aimara da Cunha Resende
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Sources cited

Blair, Ann M. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven: Yale UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Burrow, Colin. “Roman Satire in the Sixteenth Century.” The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Ed. Freudenburk, Kirk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 243–60.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie. The Resources of Kind: Genre-Theory in the Renaissance. Berkeley: U of California P, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crew, Jonathan. “God or the Good Physician: The Rational Playwright in The Comedy of Errors.Genre 15.1–2 (spring–summer 1982): 203–23.Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Brighton: Harvester, 1984.Google Scholar
Doran, Madeleine. Endeavors of Art: A Study of Form in Elizabethan Drama. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1964.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, ed. The Forms of Power and the Power of Forms in the Renaissance. Spec. issue of Genre 15 (1982).Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.Google Scholar
James, Heather. “The Poet’s Toys: Christopher Marlowe and the Liberties of Erotic Elegy.” Modern Language Quarterly 67.1 (2006): 103–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Heather. “Shakespeare and Classicism.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s Poetry. Ed. Cheney, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 202–20.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. “Italian Epic Theory.” The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Vol. 3: The Renaissance. Ed. Norton, Glyn P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 205–15.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar. Poetices Libri Septem. Lyons: 1561.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. An Apology for Poetry. Ed. Shepherd, Geoffrey.). Rev. and expanded by Maslen, R. W.. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Snyder, Susan. The Comic Matrix of Shakespeare’s Tragedies: Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Othello, and King Lear. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Stubbes, Philip. Anatomy of Abuses. London: 1583.Google Scholar
Tennenhouse, Leonard. Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare’s Genres. London: Routledge, 1986.Google Scholar

Further reading

Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1944.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon. Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition. New Haven: Yale UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Danson, Lawrence. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Genres. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Hulse, Clark. Metamorphic Verse: The Elizabethan Minor Epic. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles, and Taylor, A. B., ed. Shakespeare and the Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miola, Robert S. Shakespeare and Classical Comedy: The Influence of Plautus and Terence. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, R. K. Classical Mythology in Shakespeare. New York: Henry Holt, 1903.Google Scholar
Velz, J. W. Shakespeare and the Classical Tradition: A Critical Guide to Commentary, 1660–1960. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1968.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats