Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T17:15:12.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Interactions Within and Across Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

Manfred Elsig
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Bernard Hoekman
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Joost Pauwelyn
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Assessing the World Trade Organization
Fit for Purpose?
, pp. 319 - 420
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred. 2015a. ‘Are the Contents of International Treaties Copied-and-Pasted? Unique Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred. 2015b. ‘Dispute Settlement Provisions in PTAs: New Data and New Concepts’. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Christian and Rittberger, Berthold. 2013. ‘The Legalization of Dispute Resolution in Mercosur’. Journal of Politics in Latin America 5(3): 97132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Scott and Bergstrand, Jeffrey. 2007. ‘Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade?Journal of International Economics 71(1): 7295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2006. ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’. The World Economy 29(11): 14511518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish and Panagariya, Arvind. (eds.). 1996. The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc. 2007. ‘Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade’. International Organization 61(4): 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Paul, Corley, Pamela C. and Hanmer, Jesse. 2013. ‘The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Corley, Paul, Collins, Pamela and Calvin, Bryan. 2011. ‘Lower Court Influence on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content’. Journal of Politics 73(1): 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, Sieber-Gasser, Charlotte and Wermelinger, Gabriela. 2015. ‘The Dialectical Relationship of Preferential and Multilateral Trade Agreements’. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 465496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, Andreas, Baccini, Leonardo and Elsig, Manfred. 2014. ‘The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Database’. Review of International Organization 9(3): 353375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Adam. 2015. ‘A Brief Assessment of Supreme Court Opinion Language’. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2574451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros and Sapir, André. 2009. Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements. Brussels: Bruegel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Martin. 2011. ‘Services Commitments in Preferential Trade Agreements: An Expanded Dataset’. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, T.N. 1998. ‘Regionalism and the WTO: Is Nondiscrimination Passé?’ In The WTO as an International Organization, edited by Krueger, Anne. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 329352.Google Scholar
Valdés, Raymundo and McCann, Maegan. 2014. ‘Intellectual Property Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Revision and Update’. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2014–14.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Andriamananjara, Soamiely. 2002. ‘On the Size and Number of Preferential Trading Arrangements’. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 11(3): 279295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2012. ‘Sequencing Asian Regionalism: Theory and Lessons from Europe’. Journal of Economic Integration 27 (1): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Robert-Nicoud, F. 2007. ‘A Simple Model of the Juggernaut Effect of Trade Liberalisation’. CEPR Discussion Papers 6607.Google Scholar
Bidwell, Percy W. 1943. ‘Controlling Trade after the War’. Foreign Affairs 21 (2): 296311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidwell, Percy W. 1944. A Postwar Commercial Policy for the United States’. American Economic Review 34 (1): 340353.Google Scholar
Chase, Kerry. 2006. ‘Multilateralism Compromised: The Mysterious Origins of GATT Article XXIV’. World Trade Review 5 (1): 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Maggie X. and Mattoo, Aaditya. 2008. ‘Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade?Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique 41 (3): 838863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curzon, Gerard. 1965. Multilateral Commercial Diplomacy; the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and its Impact on National Commercial Policies and Techniques. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Dür, Andreas. 2010. Protection for Exporters: Power and Discrimination in Transatlantic Relations, 1930–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Felbermayr, Gabriel, Heid, Benedikt, Larch, Mario and Yalcin, Erdal. 2014. ‘Macroeconomic potentials of transatlantic free trade: A high resolution perspective for Europe and the world’. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fergusson, Ian F., McMinimy, Mark A. and Williams, Brock R. 2013. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Negotiations and Issues for Congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, Report R42694.Google Scholar
Francois, Joseph, Manchin, Miriam, Norberg, Hanna, Pindyuk, Olga and Tomberger, Patrick. 2013. Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment – An Economic Assessment. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
GATT 1986. ‘Article XXVIII;3 Notification in Response to Actions by the European Economic Community Under Article XXIV Schedule XX T United States’. GATT Document L/5997, 26 May 1986.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Gowa, Joanne. 2002. ‘US National Power and the Post-War Trading Regime’. World Trade Review 1 (2): 153170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamanaka, Shintaro. 2014. ‘Trans-Pacific Partnership versus Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting’. Working Paper on Regional Economic Integration, No. 146, Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard. (ed.). 2015. The Global Trade Slowdown: A New Normal? A VoxEU.org eBook. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR Press).Google Scholar
Hull, Cordell. 1948. The Memoirs of Cordell Hull. 2 vols. Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas. 2012. Trade Policy Disaster: Lessons from the 1930s. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Sykes, Alan O. 2008. The Genesis of the GATT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1991. ‘Is Bilateralism Bad?’ In International Trade and Trade Policy, edited by Helpman, Elhanan and Razin, Assaf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1993. ‘Bilateralism versus Multilateralism: Analytical Notes.’ In New Dimensions in Regional Integration, edited by Panagariya, Arvind and de Melo, Jaime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2015. ‘TPP at the NABE.’ http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/11/tpp-at-the-nabe/, accessed 26 November 2015.Google Scholar
Loke, Wai-Heng and Winters, L. Alan. 2012. ‘Why Is Open Regionalism Not Always Good?Journal of Economic Integration 27: 437465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas F. 1996. ‘USA, the EEC, and the GATT: The Road Not Taken’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17: 533.Google Scholar
Mathis, James H. 2002. Regional Trade Agreements in the GATT/WTO: Article XXIV and the Internal Trade Requirement. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. 2011. ‘Always Look at the Bright Side of Non-delivery: WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements, Yesterday and Today’. World Trade Review 10 (3): 375387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. 2015. ‘Dealing with PTAs in the WTO: Falling Through the Cracks between “Judicialization” and “Legalization”’. World Trade Review 14 (S1): S107S121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, James. 1988. ‘A Proposal for an International Commercial Union’. In The Collected Papers of James Meade, Volume 3: International Economics, edited by Howson, Susan, 2735. London: Unwin–Hyman.Google Scholar
Petri, Peter A. and Plummer, Michael G. 2012. ‘The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: Policy Implications’. Peterson Institute for International Economics: Policy Brief No. PB12-16.Google Scholar
Sapir, André. 1995. ‘Trade Liberalization and the Harmonization of Social Policies: Lessons from European Integration’. CEPR Discussion Papers No. 1114.Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey J. (ed.). 1989. Free Trade Areas and US Trade Policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey J. 2014. ‘Asia-Pacific Economic Integration: Projecting the Path Forward’. www.iie.com/publications/papers/schott201404APEC-FTAPP.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schwob, Claude. 2009. The Intellectual Origins of WTO: Hull’s and Bidwell’s views on Organizing the International Trade. Strasbourg: Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS (No. 2009–32).Google Scholar
Toye, Richard. 2012. ‘The International Trade Organization’. In The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization, edited by Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin and Stern, Robert M., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 85101.Google Scholar
USTR. 2008. ‘United States to Join Sectoral Negotiations with Four Asia-Pacific Countries’. USTR News 4 February 2008.Google Scholar
USTR. 2015. ‘State-Owned Enterprises: Chapter Summary’. TPP Full Text. Washington, DC: USTR.Google Scholar
Van Rompuy, Herman. 2013. ‘Remarks by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy on the Occasion of the Launch of the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership’. European Commission Press Release EUCO 143/13.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clair. 1949. A Charter for World Trade. New York: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. Alan. 1999. ‘Regionalism versus multilateralism’. In Market Integration, Regionalism and the Global Economy, edited by Baldwin, Richard, Cohen, Daniel, Sapir, André and Venables, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 749.Google Scholar
WTO. 2011. World Trade Report 2011 – The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, Frederick M. 2000. ‘Distributed Governance at the WTO-WIPO: An Evolving Model for Open-Architecture Integrated Governance’. Journal of International Economic Law 3(1): 6381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, Keohane, Robert, Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. ‘The Concept of Legalization’. International Organization 54(3): 401419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, Snidal, Duncan, Genschel, Philipp and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.). 2014. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 1999. ‘Goods, Games and Institutions’. International Political Science Review 20(4): 393409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 2002. ‘Goods, Games, and Institutions: A Reply’. International Political Science Review 23(4): 402410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 2003. ‘Comment on “Common Goods, Matrix Games and Institutional Response”’. European Journal of International Relations 9(3): 475478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, José E. 2001. ‘How Not to Link: Institutional Conundrums of an Expanded Trade Regime’. Widener Law Symposium Journal 7: 120.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2008. ‘The Globalization of Health and Safety Standards: Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the SPS Agreement of the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’. Law and Contemporary Problems 71: 218255.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2009. ‘The Politics of Food Safety in the Age of Global Trade: The Codex Alimentarius Commission in the SPS-Agreement of the WTO’. RWJF Scholars in Health Policy Research Program.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. ‘Triangulating the World Trade Organization’. American Journal of International Law 96(1): 2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosbey, Aaron. 2000. ‘A Forced Evolution? The Codex Alimentarius Commission, Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle’. IISD Paper, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Dawson, Richard. 1995. ‘The Role of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in Setting Food Standards and the SPS Agreement Implementation’. Food Control 6(5): 261265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel. 2007. All Politics Is Global. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey. 2001. ‘The WTO in Transition: Of Constituents, Competence and Coherence’. George Washington International Law Review 33: 9791013.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2010a. ‘European Union Trade Policy after Enlargement: Larger Crowds, Shifting Priorities and Informal Decision-Making’. Journal of European Public Policy 17(6): 781798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2010b. ‘The World Trade Organization at Work: Performance in a Member-Driven Milieu’. Review of International Organizations 5(3): 345363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2011. ‘Principal-Agent Theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex Agency and “Missing Delegation”’. European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 495517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2015. ‘Orchestration on a Tight Leash: State Oversight of the WTO’. In International Organizations as Orchestrators, edited by Abbott, Kenneth, Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan and Zangl, Bernhad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary and Starr, Harvey. 2003. Necessary Conditions. Theory, Methodology, and Applications. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. ‘Introduction: Legalization and World Politics’. International Organization 54(3): 401419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Christoph B. 2006. ‘The New UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO’. Journal of International Economic Law 9(3): 553574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew. 2004. ‘Global Governance and the WTO’. Harvard International Law Journal 45: 303351.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst. 1980. ‘Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes’. World Politics 32(2): 357405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter. 1992. ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’. International Organization 46(1): 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren and Jacoby, Wade. 2006. ‘How Agents Matter’. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David, Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David, Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael (eds.). 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Clair. 2006. ‘Power, Linkage and Accommodation: The WTO as an International Actor and Its Influence on Other Actors and Regimes’. Berkeley Journal of International Law 24(1): 79128.Google Scholar
Kim, Moonhawk. 2012. ‘Disguised Protectionism and Linkages to the GATT/WTO’. World Politics 64(3): 426475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’. International Organization 55(4): 761799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1991. ‘Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier’. World Politics 43(3): 336–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livermore, Michael. 2006. ‘Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius’. New York University Law Review 81: 766801.Google Scholar
Matthews, Duncan. 2002. Globalising Intellectual Property Rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew and Sheargold, Elizabeth. 2009. ‘GATT Art. XV: Exchange Arrangements’. In Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, Volume 5, edited by Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Stoll, Peter-Tobias. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 353365.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine and Elveren, Dilek. 2008. ‘The Making of an International Convention: Culture and Free Trade in a Global Era’. Review of International Studies 34(4): 735753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael. 2003. ‘Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and Wold Bank Environmental Reform’. International Organization 57(2): 241276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2005. ‘The UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity, and the WTO: Diversity in International Law-Making?ASIL Insights 9 (35), 15 November.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2010. ‘The Dog That Barked But Didn’t Bite: 15 Years of Intellectual Property Disputes at the WTO’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(2): 389429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. and Wouters, Jan (eds.). 2012. Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark. 1997. ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community’. International Organization 51(1): 99134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David. 2004. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58(2): 277309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Susan. 2003. Private Power, Public Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Pollack, Mark. 2010. ‘Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance’. Minnesota Law Review 94: 706799.Google Scholar
Siegel, Deborah. 2002. ‘Legal Aspects of IMF/WTO Relationship: The Fund’s Articles of the Agreement and the WTO Agreements’. American Journal of International Law 96(3): 561599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverglade, Bruce. 2000. ‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Weakening Food Safety Regulations to Facilitate Trade?Food and Drug Law Journal 55: 517524.Google ScholarPubMed
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. ‘Governing the Global Economy through Government Networks’. In Role of Law in International Politics, edited by Byers, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177205.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Smythe. 2009. ‘In Whose Interests? Transparency and Accountability in the Global Governance of Food: Agribusiness, the Codex Alimentarius, and the World Trade Organization’. In Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance, edited by Clapp, Jennifer and Fuchs, Doris. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 93123.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur. 1982. ‘Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World’. International Organization 36(2): 299324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Terence. 1999. The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History, 1986–1992. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vaubel, Roland. 2006. ‘Principal-Agent Problems in International Organizations’. Review of International Organizations 1(2): 125138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winham, Gilbert. 2003. ‘International Regime Conflict in Trade and Environment: The Biosafety Protocol and the WTO’. World Trade Review 2(2): 131155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winickoff, David and Bushey, Douglas. 2010. ‘Science and Power in Global Food Regulation’. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(3): 356381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. 1996. Agreement between the WTO and the IMF and the World Bank. Geneva: WT/L/194Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2001. Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. Geneva: WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2004. Doha Work Programme. Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004. Geneva: WT/L/579.Google Scholar

References

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W. 2010. ‘The World Trade Organization: Theory and Practice’. Annual Reviews of Economics 2: 223256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baracat, Elías A., Finger, J. Michael, Thorne, Raúl León and Nogués, Julio J. 2013. Sustaining Trade Reform: Institutional Lessons from Argentina and Peru. Washington, DC: World Bank (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15794).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baracat, Elías A., Finger, J. Michael, Thorne, Raúl León and Nogués, Julio J. 2015. ‘Trade Reform and Institution Building: Peru and Argentina under the WTO’. World Trade Review 14 (4): 579615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad. 2004. ‘How Different Are Safeguards from Antidumping? Evidence from US Trade Policies Toward Steel’. Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel. 1968, ‘Social Institutions’. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 14, 409429. New York: Macmillan and the Free Press.Google Scholar
Finger, J. Michael. 2012. ‘Flexibilities, Rules and Trade Remedies in the GATT/WTO System’. In The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization, edited by Daunton, Martin, Narlikar, Amrita and Stern, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 418440.Google Scholar
Finger, J. Michael and Murray, Tracy. 1993. ‘Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Enforcement in the United States’. In Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt, edited by Finger, J. Michael. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 241254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, J. Michael and Nogués, Julio. 2006. Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin America Trade Liberalization. Washington, DC: Palgrave Macmillan and World Bank.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton. 1937. ‘Institution’. In Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 8. New York: Macmillan, 8489.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1998. ‘The Approach of Institutional Economics’. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 166192.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. 2011. Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System (reissue). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. 2002. The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Lawrence B. 1959. ‘United States Imports and the Tariff’. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 49: 542551.Google Scholar
North, Douglas C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David. 2003. ‘Robert E. Hudec – A Practitioner’s Appreciation’. Journal of World Trade Law 37(4): 703717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald H. 2006. ‘What Are Trade Agreements For? Two Conflicting Stories Told by Economists, with a Lesson for Lawyers’. Journal of International Economic Law 9(4): 951988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald H. 2015. ‘Explaining Trade Agreements: The Practitioners’ Story and the Standard Model’. World Trade Review 14(3): 391417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US International Trade Commission. 2001. ‘Steel’. USITC Pub. 3479, Inv. No. TA-201–73, December.Google Scholar
United States Trade Representative. 2003. Statement by USTR Zoellick on Termination of Steel Safeguards. Press Release. 12 December 2003.Google Scholar
von Clausewitz, Carl. 1989. On War, Vol. 1. Edited and translated by Howard, Michael Eliot and Paret, Peter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (originally published in German in 1832).Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 2000. ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock’. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2015a. Report to the TPRB from the Director-General on Trade-Related Developments. WT/TPR/OV/W/9. 3 July 2015.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2015b. Report (2015) of the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. G/L/1133, G/SCM/146. 29 October 2015.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2015c. Report (2015) of the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices. G/L/1134, G/ADP/22. 30 October 2015.Google Scholar
Zedillo, Ernesto. 2007. ‘Introduction’. In Global Trade and Poor Nations: The Poverty Impact and Policy Implications of Liberalization, edited by Hoekman, Bernard and Olarreaga, Marcelo. Washington, DC: Brookings, 18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×