Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred. 2015a. ‘Are the Contents of International Treaties Copied-and-Pasted? Unique Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred. 2015b. ‘Dispute Settlement Provisions in PTAs: New Data and New Concepts’. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319–352.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13–24.Google Scholar

Arnold, Christian and Rittberger, Berthold. 2013. ‘The Legalization of Dispute Resolution in Mercosur’. Journal of Politics in Latin America 5(3): 97–132.Google Scholar

Baier, Scott and Bergstrand, Jeffrey. 2007. ‘Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade?’ Journal of International Economics 71(1): 72–95.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard. 2006. ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’. The World Economy 29(11): 1451–1518.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish and Panagariya, Arvind. (eds.). 1996. The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar

Busch, Marc. 2007. ‘Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade’. International Organization 61(4): 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Paul, Corley, Pamela C. and Hanmer, Jesse. 2013. ‘The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Corley, Paul, Collins, Pamela and Calvin, Bryan. 2011. ‘Lower Court Influence on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content’. Journal of Politics 73(1): 31–44.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, Sieber-Gasser, Charlotte and Wermelinger, Gabriela. 2015. ‘The Dialectical Relationship of Preferential and Multilateral Trade Agreements’. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dür, Andreas, Baccini, Leonardo and Elsig, Manfred. 2014. ‘The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Database’. Review of International Organization 9(3): 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Adam. 2015. ‘A Brief Assessment of Supreme Court Opinion Language’. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2574451.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros and Sapir, André. 2009. Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements. Brussels: Bruegel.Google Scholar

Roy, Martin. 2011. ‘Services Commitments in Preferential Trade Agreements: An Expanded Dataset’. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011–18.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, T.N. 1998. ‘Regionalism and the WTO: Is Nondiscrimination Passé?’ In The WTO as an International Organization, edited by Krueger, Anne. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 329–352.Google Scholar

Valdés, Raymundo and McCann, Maegan. 2014. ‘Intellectual Property Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Revision and Update’. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2014–14.Google Scholar

Andriamananjara, Soamiely. 2002. ‘On the Size and Number of Preferential Trading Arrangements’. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 11(3): 279–295.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard. 2012. ‘Sequencing Asian Regionalism: Theory and Lessons from Europe’. Journal of Economic Integration 27 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard and Robert-Nicoud, F. 2007. ‘A Simple Model of the Juggernaut Effect of Trade Liberalisation’. CEPR Discussion Papers 6607.Google Scholar

Bidwell, Percy W. 1943. ‘Controlling Trade after the War’. Foreign Affairs 21 (2): 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bidwell, Percy W. 1944. A Postwar Commercial Policy for the United States’. American Economic Review 34 (1): 340–353.Google Scholar

Chase, Kerry. 2006. ‘Multilateralism Compromised: The Mysterious Origins of GATT Article XXIV’. World Trade Review 5 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Maggie X. and Mattoo, Aaditya. 2008. ‘Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade?’ Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique 41 (3): 838–863.Google Scholar

Curzon, Gerard. 1965. Multilateral Commercial Diplomacy; the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and its Impact on National Commercial Policies and Techniques. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar

Dür, Andreas. 2010. Protection for Exporters: Power and Discrimination in Transatlantic Relations, 1930–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Felbermayr, Gabriel, Heid, Benedikt, Larch, Mario and Yalcin, Erdal. 2014. ‘Macroeconomic potentials of transatlantic free trade: A high resolution perspective for Europe and the world’. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5019.Google Scholar

Fergusson, Ian F., McMinimy, Mark A. and Williams, Brock R. 2013. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Negotiations and Issues for Congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, Report R42694.Google Scholar

Francois, Joseph, Manchin, Miriam, Norberg, Hanna, Pindyuk, Olga and Tomberger, Patrick. 2013. Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment – An Economic Assessment. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar

GATT 1986. ‘Article XXVIII;3 Notification in Response to Actions by the European Economic Community Under Article XXIV Schedule XX T United States’. GATT Document L/5997, 26 May 1986.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith and Gowa, Joanne. 2002. ‘US National Power and the Post-War Trading Regime’. World Trade Review 1 (2): 153–170.Google Scholar

Hamanaka, Shintaro. 2014. ‘Trans-Pacific Partnership versus Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting’. Working Paper on Regional Economic Integration, No. 146, Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard. (ed.). 2015. The Global Trade Slowdown: A New Normal? A VoxEU.org eBook. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR Press).Google Scholar

Hull, Cordell. 1948. The Memoirs of Cordell Hull. 2 vols. Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas. 2012. Trade Policy Disaster: Lessons from the 1930s. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Sykes, Alan O. 2008. The Genesis of the GATT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul. 1991. ‘Is Bilateralism Bad?’ In International Trade and Trade Policy, edited by Helpman, Elhanan and Razin, Assaf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul. 1993. ‘Bilateralism versus Multilateralism: Analytical Notes.’ In New Dimensions in Regional Integration, edited by Panagariya, Arvind and de Melo, Jaime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul. 2015. ‘TPP at the NABE.’ http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/11/tpp-at-the-nabe/, accessed 26 November 2015.Google Scholar

Loke, Wai-Heng and Winters, L. Alan. 2012. ‘Why Is Open Regionalism Not Always Good?’ Journal of Economic Integration 27: 437–465.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F. 1996. ‘USA, the EEC, and the GATT: The Road Not Taken’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17: 533.Google Scholar

Mathis, James H. 2002. Regional Trade Agreements in the GATT/WTO: Article XXIV and the Internal Trade Requirement. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. 2011. ‘Always Look at the Bright Side of Non-delivery: WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements, Yesterday and Today’. World Trade Review 10 (3): 375–387.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. 2015. ‘Dealing with PTAs in the WTO: Falling Through the Cracks between “Judicialization” and “Legalization”’. World Trade Review 14 (S1): S107–S121.Google Scholar

Meade, James. 1988. ‘A Proposal for an International Commercial Union’. In The Collected Papers of James Meade, Volume 3: International Economics, edited by Howson, Susan, 27–35. London: Unwin–Hyman.Google Scholar

Petri, Peter A. and Plummer, Michael G. 2012. ‘The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: Policy Implications’. Peterson Institute for International Economics: Policy Brief No. PB12-16.Google Scholar

Sapir, André. 1995. ‘Trade Liberalization and the Harmonization of Social Policies: Lessons from European Integration’. CEPR Discussion Papers No. 1114.Google Scholar

Schott, Jeffrey J. (ed.). 1989. Free Trade Areas and US Trade Policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Schott, Jeffrey J. 2014. ‘Asia-Pacific Economic Integration: Projecting the Path Forward’. www.iie.com/publications/papers/schott201404APEC-FTAPP.pdfGoogle Scholar

Schwob, Claude. 2009. The Intellectual Origins of WTO: Hull’s and Bidwell’s views on Organizing the International Trade. Strasbourg: Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS (No. 2009–32).Google Scholar

Toye, Richard. 2012. ‘The International Trade Organization’. In The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization, edited by Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin and Stern, Robert M., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 85–101.Google Scholar

USTR. 2008. ‘United States to Join Sectoral Negotiations with Four Asia-Pacific Countries’. USTR News 4 February 2008.Google Scholar

USTR. 2015. ‘State-Owned Enterprises: Chapter Summary’. TPP Full Text. Washington, DC: USTR.Google Scholar

Van Rompuy, Herman. 2013. ‘Remarks by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy on the Occasion of the Launch of the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership’. European Commission Press Release EUCO 143/13.Google Scholar

Wilcox, Clair. 1949. A Charter for World Trade. New York: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winters, L. Alan. 1999. ‘Regionalism versus multilateralism’. In Market Integration, Regionalism and the Global Economy, edited by Baldwin, Richard, Cohen, Daniel, Sapir, André and Venables, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–49.Google Scholar

WTO. 2011. World Trade Report 2011 – The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick M. 2000. ‘Distributed Governance at the WTO-WIPO: An Evolving Model for Open-Architecture Integrated Governance’. Journal of International Economic Law 3(1): 63–81.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth, Keohane, Robert, Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. ‘The Concept of Legalization’. International Organization 54(3): 401–419.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth, Snidal, Duncan, Genschel, Philipp and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.). 2014. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 1999. ‘Goods, Games and Institutions’. International Political Science Review 20(4): 393–409.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 2002. ‘Goods, Games, and Institutions: A Reply’. International Political Science Review 23(4): 402–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 2003. ‘Comment on “Common Goods, Matrix Games and Institutional Response”’. European Journal of International Relations 9(3): 475–478.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13–24.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. 2001. ‘How Not to Link: Institutional Conundrums of an Expanded Trade Regime’. Widener Law Symposium Journal 7: 1–20.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Büthe, Tim. 2008. ‘The Globalization of Health and Safety Standards: Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the SPS Agreement of the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’. Law and Contemporary Problems 71: 218–255.Google Scholar

Büthe, Tim. 2009. ‘The Politics of Food Safety in the Age of Global Trade: The Codex Alimentarius Commission in the SPS-Agreement of the WTO’. RWJF Scholars in Health Policy Research Program.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. ‘Triangulating the World Trade Organization’. American Journal of International Law 96(1): 28–55.Google Scholar

Cosbey, Aaron. 2000. ‘A Forced Evolution? The Codex Alimentarius Commission, Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle’. IISD Paper, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

Dawson, Richard. 1995. ‘The Role of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in Setting Food Standards and the SPS Agreement Implementation’. Food Control 6(5): 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drezner, Daniel. 2007. All Politics Is Global. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey. 2001. ‘The WTO in Transition: Of Constituents, Competence and Coherence’. George Washington International Law Review 33: 979–1013.Google Scholar

Elsig, Manfred. 2010a. ‘European Union Trade Policy after Enlargement: Larger Crowds, Shifting Priorities and Informal Decision-Making’. Journal of European Public Policy 17(6): 781–798.Google Scholar

Elsig, Manfred. 2010b. ‘The World Trade Organization at Work: Performance in a Member-Driven Milieu’. Review of International Organizations 5(3): 345–363.Google Scholar

Elsig, Manfred. 2011. ‘Principal-Agent Theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex Agency and “Missing Delegation”’. European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 495–517.Google Scholar

Elsig, Manfred. 2015. ‘Orchestration on a Tight Leash: State Oversight of the WTO’. In International Organizations as Orchestrators, edited by Abbott, Kenneth, Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan and Zangl, Bernhad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–87.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary and Starr, Harvey. 2003. Necessary Conditions. Theory, Methodology, and Applications. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. ‘Introduction: Legalization and World Politics’. International Organization 54(3): 401–419.Google Scholar

Graber, Christoph B. 2006. ‘The New UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO’. Journal of International Economic Law 9(3): 553–574.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew. 2004. ‘Global Governance and the WTO’. Harvard International Law Journal 45: 303–351.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst. 1980. ‘Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes’. World Politics 32(2): 357–405.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter. 1992. ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’. International Organization 46(1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, Darren and Jacoby, Wade. 2006. ‘How Agents Matter’. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David, Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David, Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael (eds.). 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, Clair. 2006. ‘Power, Linkage and Accommodation: The WTO as an International Actor and Its Influence on Other Actors and Regimes’. Berkeley Journal of International Law 24(1): 79–128.Google Scholar

Kim, Moonhawk. 2012. ‘Disguised Protectionism and Linkages to the GATT/WTO’. World Politics 64(3): 426–475.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’. International Organization 55(4): 761–799.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen. 1991. ‘Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier’. World Politics 43(3): 336–66.Google Scholar

Livermore, Michael. 2006. ‘Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius’. New York University Law Review 81: 766–801.Google Scholar

Matthews, Duncan. 2002. Globalising Intellectual Property Rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew and Sheargold, Elizabeth. 2009. ‘GATT Art. XV: Exchange Arrangements’. In Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, Volume 5, edited by Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Stoll, Peter-Tobias. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 353–365.Google Scholar

Moghadam, Valentine and Elveren, Dilek. 2008. ‘The Making of an International Convention: Culture and Free Trade in a Global Era’. Review of International Studies 34(4): 735–753.Google Scholar

Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael. 2003. ‘Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and Wold Bank Environmental Reform’. International Organization 57(2): 241–276.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. 2005. ‘The UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity, and the WTO: Diversity in International Law-Making?’ ASIL Insights 9 (35), 15 November.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. 2010. ‘The Dog That Barked But Didn’t Bite: 15 Years of Intellectual Property Disputes at the WTO’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(2): 389–429.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. and Wouters, Jan (eds.). 2012. Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark. 1997. ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community’. International Organization 51(1): 99–134.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David. 2004. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58(2): 277–309.Google Scholar

Sell, Susan. 2003. Private Power, Public Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory and Pollack, Mark. 2010. ‘Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance’. Minnesota Law Review 94: 706–799.Google Scholar

Siegel, Deborah. 2002. ‘Legal Aspects of IMF/WTO Relationship: The Fund’s Articles of the Agreement and the WTO Agreements’. American Journal of International Law 96(3): 561–599.Google Scholar

Silverglade, Bruce. 2000. ‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Weakening Food Safety Regulations to Facilitate Trade?’ Food and Drug Law Journal 55: 517–524.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. ‘Governing the Global Economy through Government Networks’. In Role of Law in International Politics, edited by Byers, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177–205.Google Scholar

Elizabeth, Smythe. 2009. ‘In Whose Interests? Transparency and Accountability in the Global Governance of Food: Agribusiness, the Codex Alimentarius, and the World Trade Organization’. In Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance, edited by Clapp, Jennifer and Fuchs, Doris. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 93–123.Google Scholar

Stein, Arthur. 1982. ‘Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World’. International Organization 36(2): 299–324.Google Scholar

Stewart, Terence. 1999. The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History, 1986–1992. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vaubel, Roland. 2006. ‘Principal-Agent Problems in International Organizations’. Review of International Organizations 1(2): 125–138.Google Scholar

Winham, Gilbert. 2003. ‘International Regime Conflict in Trade and Environment: The Biosafety Protocol and the WTO’. World Trade Review 2(2): 131–155.Google Scholar

Winickoff, David and Bushey, Douglas. 2010. ‘Science and Power in Global Food Regulation’. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(3): 356–381.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization. 1996. Agreement between the WTO and the IMF and the World Bank. Geneva: WT/L/194Google Scholar

World Trade Organization. 2001. Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. Geneva: WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization. 2004. Doha Work Programme. Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004. Geneva: WT/L/579.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W. 2010. ‘The World Trade Organization: Theory and Practice’. Annual Reviews of Economics 2: 223–256.Google Scholar

Baracat, Elías A., Finger, J. Michael, Thorne, Raúl León and Nogués, Julio J. 2013. Sustaining Trade Reform: Institutional Lessons from Argentina and Peru. Washington, DC: World Bank (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15794).Google Scholar

Baracat, Elías A., Finger, J. Michael, Thorne, Raúl León and Nogués, Julio J. 2015. ‘Trade Reform and Institution Building: Peru and Argentina under the WTO’. World Trade Review 14 (4): 579–615.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad. 2004. ‘How Different Are Safeguards from Antidumping? Evidence from US Trade Policies Toward Steel’. Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel. 1968, ‘Social Institutions’. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 14, 409–429. New York: Macmillan and the Free Press.Google Scholar

Finger, J. Michael. 2012. ‘Flexibilities, Rules and Trade Remedies in the GATT/WTO System’. In The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization, edited by Daunton, Martin, Narlikar, Amrita and Stern, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 418–440.Google Scholar

Finger, J. Michael and Murray, Tracy. 1993. ‘Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Enforcement in the United States’. In Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt, edited by Finger, J. Michael. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 241–254.Google Scholar

Finger, J. Michael and Nogués, Julio. 2006. Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin America Trade Liberalization. Washington, DC: Palgrave Macmillan and World Bank.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Walton. 1937. ‘Institution’. In Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 8. New York: Macmillan, 84–89.Google Scholar

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1998. ‘The Approach of Institutional Economics’. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 166–192.Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E. 2011. Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System (reissue). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. 2002. The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krauss, Lawrence B. 1959. ‘United States Imports and the Tariff’. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 49: 542–551.Google Scholar

North, Douglas C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Palmeter, David. 2003. ‘Robert E. Hudec – A Practitioner’s Appreciation’. Journal of World Trade Law 37(4): 703–717.Google Scholar

Regan, Donald H. 2006. ‘What Are Trade Agreements For? Two Conflicting Stories Told by Economists, with a Lesson for Lawyers’. Journal of International Economic Law 9(4): 951–988.Google Scholar

Regan, Donald H. 2015. ‘Explaining Trade Agreements: The Practitioners’ Story and the Standard Model’. World Trade Review 14(3): 391–417.Google Scholar

US International Trade Commission. 2001. ‘Steel’. USITC Pub. 3479, Inv. No. TA-201–73, December.Google Scholar

United States Trade Representative. 2003. Statement by USTR Zoellick on Termination of Steel Safeguards. Press Release. 12 December 2003.Google Scholar

von Clausewitz, Carl. 1989. On War, Vol. 1. Edited and translated by Howard, Michael Eliot and Paret, Peter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (originally published in German in 1832).Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 2000. ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock’. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595–613.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization. 2015a. Report to the TPRB from the Director-General on Trade-Related Developments. WT/TPR/OV/W/9. 3 July 2015.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization. 2015b. Report (2015) of the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. G/L/1133, G/SCM/146. 29 October 2015.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization. 2015c. Report (2015) of the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices. G/L/1134, G/ADP/22. 30 October 2015.Google Scholar

Zedillo, Ernesto. 2007. ‘Introduction’. In Global Trade and Poor Nations: The Poverty Impact and Policy Implications of Liberalization, edited by Hoekman, Bernard and Olarreaga, Marcelo. Washington, DC: Brookings, 1–8.Google Scholar