Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
6 - Rhetoric
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
Summary
Introduces rhetoric, discussing how the long history of the study of rhetoric from Plato to the present day has developed tools that can be used to understand contemporary readings and uses of sacred texts, specifically as a part of political speech.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Analysing Religious Discourse , pp. 91 - 108Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
6.5 References
A complaint regarding Jefferson Sessions. (2018, July 18). http://s3.amazonaws.com/Website_Properties/news-media/documents/A_Complaint_regarding_Jefferson_Sessions.pdf.Google Scholar
Baake, K. (2019, May 17). Oil Is a Gift from God. Are We Squandering It? ChristianityToday.com. Accessed December 17, 2019. www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/june/fossil-fuels-oil-stewardship-climate-change.html.Google Scholar
Banks, A. J. (2011). Digital Griots: African American Rhetoric in a Multimedia Age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, S., & Boyle, C. (eds.). (2017). Rhetoric, through Everyday Things. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Biesecker, B. A., & Lucaites, J. L. (2009). Rhetoric, Materiality, & Politics. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1970). The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, P. B. (2017, May 15). “Those are our Eiffel Towers, our pyramids”: Why Standing Rock is about much more than oil. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/science/2017/may/15/those-are-our-eiffel-towers-our-pyramids-why-standing-rock-is-about-much-more-than-oil.Google Scholar
Cedillo, C. (2015). Habitual gender: Rhetorical androgyny in Franciscan texts. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 31(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
Colton, J. S., & Holmes, S. (2018). Rhetoric, Technology, and the Virtues. Salt Lake City: Utah State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–67.Google Scholar
DePalma, M.-J., & Ringer, J. M. (2015). Charting prospects and possibilities for scholarship on religious rhetorics. In DePalma, M.-J. & Ringer, J. M. (eds.), Mapping Christian Rhetorics: Connecting Conversations, Charting New Territories (pp. 262–87). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edbauer-Rice, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 5–24.Google Scholar
Fredlund, K. (2016). Forget the master’s tools, we will build our own house: The woman’s era as a rhetorical forum for the invention of African American womanhood. Peitho, 18(2), 67–98.Google Scholar
Gonzales, L. (2018). Sites of Translation: What Multilinguals Can Teach Us about Digital Writing and Rhetoric. Grand Rapids: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gries, L. E. (2015). Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. Salt Lake City: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, A. M. (2007). Wampum as hypertext: An American Indian intellectual tradition of multimedia theory and practice. Studies in American Indian Literatures, 19(4), 77–100.Google Scholar
Hayhoe, K. (2019, October 31). I’m a Climate Scientist Who Believes in God. Hear Me Out. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2019/10/31/opinion/sunday/climate-change-evangelical-christian.html.Google Scholar
Hutchings, T., & McKenzie, J. (2016). Materiality and the Study of Religion: The Stuff of the Sacred. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, B. (2015). Defining religious rhetoric: Scope and consequence. In DePalma, M.-J. & Ringer, J. M. (eds.), Mapping Christian Rhetorics: Connecting Conversations, Charting New Territories (pp. 17–30). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jarratt, S. (1998). Rereading the sophists: Classical rhetoric refigured. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.Google Scholar
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, B. (2018). Activity theory, actor-network theory, and culture in the twenty-first century. In Rice, R. & St, K.. Amant (eds.), Thinking Globally, Composing Locally: Rethinking Online Writing in the Age of the Global Internet (pp. 182–203). Salt Lake City: Utah State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2018). Religious Talk Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. (2002). Rhetorics of survivance: How American Indians use writing. College Composition and Communication 53(3), 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, K. (2005). Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Reyman, J. (2018). The rhetorical agency of algorithms. In Hess, A. & Davisson, A. (eds.), Theorizing Digital Rhetoric (pp. 112–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rickert, T. (2013). Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronald, K., & Ritchie, J. (2006). Introduction. In Ronald, K. & Ritchie, J. (eds.), Teaching Rhetorica: Theory, Pedagogy, practice (pp. 1–12). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.Google Scholar
Sackey, D. J., Boyle, C., Xiong, M. N., Ríos, G. R., Arola, K. L., & Barnett, S. (2019). Perspectives on cultural and posthumanist rhetorics. Rhetoric Review, 38(4), 375–401.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J. C. (Producer), & Fendelman, J. (Director). (2018). Man on Fire. New Day Films.Google Scholar
Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1999). Rhetoric and Ethic: The Politics of Biblical Studies. Grand Rapids: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Segal, J. Z. (2008). Health and the Rhetoric of Medicine. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Sessions, Jeff. (2018). Attorney General Sessions Addresses Recent Criticisms of Zero Tolerance By Church Leaders. The United States Department of Justice. www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-sessions-addresses-recent-criticisms-zero-tolerance-church-leadersGoogle Scholar
Soerens, M., & Yang, J. (2018). Welcoming the Stranger: Justice, Compassion & Truth in the Immigration Debate. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press Books.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar