Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-n7x5d Total loading time: 0.65 Render date: 2021-11-29T14:31:41.160Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

9 - Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Stephen Pihlaja
Newman University
Get access


Looks at media, and the ways that technology in the recent past has changed how people talk about religious belief in and practice, and the consequences of those changes on how people think, believe, and act.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5. Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010). Localizing the Global on the Participatory Web: The Handbook of Language and Globalization (pp. 201–31). Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para fines específicos (AELFE), 4, 319.Google Scholar
Bruce, T. (2017). New technologies, continuing ideologies: Online reader comments as a support for media perspectives of minority religions. Discourse, Context & Media.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Zazie, Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 6389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P, & Kopytowska, M. (2018). Religion, Language, and the Human Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creese, A. (2008). Linguistic ethnography. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2, 229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J., & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, T. (2017). Creating Church Online: Ritual, Community and New Media. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manovich, L (2001). Post-media aesthetics. In Kinder, Marsha & McPherson, Tara (eds.), Transmedia Frictions: The Digital, the Arts, and the Humanities (pp. 3444). Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2018). Religious Talk Online: The Evangelical Discourse of Muslims, Christians, and Atheists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2021). Talk about Faith: How Debate and Conversation Shape Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A., & Lytra, V. (2004). UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Linguistic Ethnography Forum website: Scholar
Trammell, J. (2015). Jesus? There’s an App for That! Tablet Media in the “New” Electronic Church. In Ward, Mark (ed.), The Electronic Church in the Digital Age: Cultural Impacts of Evangelical Mass Media (pp. 219–37). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tusting, K., & Maybin, J. (2007). Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 575–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Noppen, J. P. (2006). From theolinguistics to critical theolinguistics: The case for communicative probity. ARC, The Journal of the Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill University, 34, 4765.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats