Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-8r8mm Total loading time: 0.513 Render date: 2021-12-07T12:23:31.724Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

8 - Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Stephen Pihlaja
Newman University
Get access


Discusses the role of institutions in the development of religious belief and practice, discussing how power operates in different ways, and how governance models like elections mix both secular and religious politics, with broader social contexts influencing who comes to power within an individual institution.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Albertson, B. L. (2015). Dog-whistle politics: Multivocal communication and religious appeals. Political Behaviour, 37, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angry Anglicans. (2008). The Economist, 386 (8573).Google Scholar
Anthonissen, C. (2003). Interaction between visual and verbal communication: changing patterns in the printed media. In Weiss, G. & Wodak, R. (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 297311). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bailey, I. (2014). Q&A Rev. Melissa Skelton: A bishop with business sense. The Globe and Mail, January 2, 2014. Scholar
Bebbington, D. W. (1989). Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benson, I. (2000). Notes towards a (re)definition of the “secular”. University of British Columbia Law Review, 33(3), 519549.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research, 13, 144.Google Scholar
Breeze, R. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calfano, B. R., & Djupe, P. A. (2008). God talk: Religious cues and electoral support. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 329339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopherson, R. W. (1994). Calling and career in Christian ministry. Review of Religious Research, 35(3), 219237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. (2017). Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Scholar
Ehrman, B. D. (2003). Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faith We Never Knew. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. (2015). Gender and sexual diversity in provincial election campaigns. Canadian Political Science Review, 9(1), 177192.Google Scholar
Fehige, Y. (2013). Sexual diversity and divine creation: A tightrope walk between Christianity and science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 48(1), 3559. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01314.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, P. E. (2011). Spirits of Protestantism: Medicine, healing, and liberal Christianity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotwal, A., & Power, K. (2015). Eating words: A discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 21013 National Food Security Act. On the Horizon, 23(3), 174189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1999). Grace: The logogenesis of freedom. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 2956. doi:10.1177/1461445699001001003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obeng, S. G. (1997). Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(1), 4983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, K. (2015). Religion, power and public self-representation. In Jule, A. (ed.), Shifting Visions: Gender and Discourses (pp. 4968). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
A Profile of the Anglican Diocese of New Westminster. (2013). Vancouver.–2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Sibley, R. (2008, September 27). One Nation under God. Ottawa Citizen.Google Scholar
ter Borg, M. B. (2018). Religion and power. In Clarke, P. B. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion (pp. 194209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
The General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada. (2019). Five Marks of Mission. Scholar
Todd, D. (2017, March 26). B.C. breaks records when it comes to religion and the lack thereof. Vancouver Sun. Scholar
UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2020). Religious Institutions. Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Contextual knowledge management in discourse production: A CDA perspective. In Wodak, R. & Chilton, P. (eds.), A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 71100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, I., & Wodak, R. (2006). Performing success: Identifying strategies of self-presentation in women’s biographical narratives. Discourse and Society, 17(3), 385411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C., & Thornton, M. (2012). Courting Christians: How political candidates prime religious considerations in campaign ads. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 40013. doi:10.1017/s0022381611001617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 6394). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2007). What Is Critical Discourse Analysis? Conversation with Gavin Kendall. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8 (2). Scholar
Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (eds.). (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats