Arguments against the use of germline genome editing (GGE) frequently centre on deontological debates about ‘designer babies’ or human nature. While important, there is a more fundamental reason to be opposed to GGE, namely violations to the principle of health equality and distributive justice. Here, we will argue from a more consequentialist framework: 1. GGE does not meet the ethical requirements of clinical research and translation; 2. GGE will exacerbate existing disparities in access to research and health care; 3. GGE will exacerbate the stigmatisation and marginalisation of those living with health conditions; 4. GGE divert significant resources away from effective solutions to broader public health concerns;