Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:48:09.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Extraction of The in-Plane Dielectric Constant of Fluorinated Polyimide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Alvin L.S. Loke
Affiliation:
center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University, CIS 017 MC 4070, Stanford, CA 94305, aloke @haydn.stanford.edu
Jeffrey T. Wetzel
Affiliation:
Materials Research and Strategic Technologies, Sector Technology Group, Motorola, Inc., 3501 Ed Bluestein Boulevard, Austin, TX 78721
John J. Stankus
Affiliation:
Materials Research and Strategic Technologies, Sector Technology Group, Motorola, Inc., 3501 Ed Bluestein Boulevard, Austin, TX 78721
S. Simon Wong
Affiliation:
center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University, CIS 017 MC 4070, Stanford, CA 94305, aloke @haydn.stanford.edu
Get access

Abstract

Fluorinated polyimide can potentially replace TEOS as an interlevel dielectric in future ULSI interconnect technologies because its lower dielectric constant offers reduced crosstalk, signal propagation delay, and dynamic power dissipation. One issue associated with polyimides is the anisotropy in dielectric constant, where the smaller out-of-plane dielectric constant, typically measured using parallel-plate capacitors, can misleadingly exaggerate the advantage in reducing crosstalk. In this paper, we present a novel electrical technique to estimate the in-plane dielectric constant of DuPont FPI-136M fluorinated polyimide without requiring dielectric gapfill.

A blanket FPI-136M film is deposited over interdigitated inlaid Al(0.5%Cu) structures and the crosstalk capacitance is measured. Identical inlaid structures with air and TEOS passivations are also measured for capacitance calibration. Differences in measured capacitances reflect electric fields fringing in the various passivation dielectrics above the inlaid metal. With the known dielectric constants of air and TEOS, the effective dielectric constant of FPI-136M is interpolated to be 2.8. Interconnect simulations confirm that the effective dielectric constant extraction technique is valid and accurate provided that the passivation layer is sufficiently thick to contain the fringing fields.

To estimate the in-plane dielectric constant, we use simulations to determine the combination of in-plane and out-of-plane dielectric constants that is equivalent to the extracted effective dielectric constant. With an out-of-plane dielectric constant of 2.6, the in-plane dielectric constant of FPI-136M is estimated to be 3.0. This technique is applicable to other dieletrics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Auman, B.C. in Low-Dielectric Constant Materials, edited by Lu, T.-M., Murarka, S.P., Kuan, T.-S., and Ting, C.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 381, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) pp. 1929.Google Scholar
[2] Oh, S.-Y. and Chang, K.-J., IEEE Circuits and Devices 11 (1), 1621 (1995).Google Scholar
[3] Saraswat, K.C. and Mohammadi, F., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED–29 (4), 645650 (1982).Google Scholar
[4] Ida, J., Yoshimaru, M., Usami, T., Ohtomo, A., Shimokawa, K., Kita, A., and Ino, M., Proc. 1994 VLSI Technology Symp., 5960 (1994).Google Scholar
[5] Application Note 1217–1, Hewlett-Packard Literature No. 5091–3300, 1992.Google Scholar
[6] Ip, F.S. and Ting, C. in Low-Dielectric Constant Materials, edited by Lu, T.-M., Murarka, S.P., Kuan, T.-S., and Ting, C.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 381, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) pp. 135139.Google Scholar
[7] Venkatraman, R., Marsh, R., Weitzman, E., Rogers, B., Fiordalice, R., Gall, M., Jawarani, D., Kawasaki, H., Herrick, M., Farkas, J., and Pintchovski, F., presented at Adv. Metallization and Interconnect Systems for ULSI Applications in 1996, Boston, MA, 1996.Google Scholar
[8] TMA MEDICI™ Two-Dimensional Device Simulation Program Version 2.2, Technology Modeling Associates, 1996.Google Scholar