Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:06:30.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Magnetic Garnet Films for Magnetooptical Imaging of Magnetic Field Distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

H. Dötsch ,
C. Holthaus ,
A. Trifonov ,
M. Klank ,
O. Hagedorn ,
M. Shamonin  and
J. Schützmann
H. Dötsch
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrück, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany
C. Holthaus
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrück, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany
A. Trifonov
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrück, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany
M. Klank
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrück, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany
O. Hagedorn
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrück, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany
M. Shamonin
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences, D-93025 Regensburg, Germany
J. Schützmann
Affiliation:
Giesecke & Devrient GmbH, D-81607 Munich, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Rare-earth iron garnet films of high quality can be grown by liquid phase epitaxy on paramagnetic substrates of gadolinium galliumgarnet. Such films are currently used for imaging of the spatial distribution of magnetic fields. This application is based on the Faraday rotation which can strongly be enhanced by bismuth incorporation.

The physical properties of the films can be controlled by the chemical composition, the growth conditions and the crystallographic orientation. The sensor properties like sensitivity, dynamic range, signal linearity and unambiguity must be optimized according to the application desired. These properties, however, are not independent of each other. In addition, they strongly depend on the optical wavelength. Thus, it is necessary to find compromises.

The influence of Faraday rotation, Faraday ellipticity, optical absorption, magnetic anisotropies and film thickness on the performance of a magnetooptical indicator film is investigated. Based on the swing of the photoresponse, a new optimization process is introduced. The process is experimentally verified and application examples are demonstrated.

Furthermore, two methods are presented to enhance the sensitivity of magnetooptical sensors. Using specific crystallographic orientations, an easy plane of magnetization can be induced which is inclined with respect to the film plane. If the magnetization lies in this plane a very high sensitivity is achieved. The dependence of the geometrical orientation of the easy plane on the growth direction is calculated and the sensitivity and dynamic range are derived. Experimental results of a [112] oriented garnet film are in good agreement with calculations.

Garnet films which are magnetized along the film normal due to a strong induced uniaxial anisotropy support magnetic domains. If the collapse field perpendicular to the film plane is small, such films can be used as very sensitive indicator films. Such films are easier to prepare than sensitive in-plane films. However, the spatial resolution is limited by the size of the domains. This disadvantage can be avoided by applying a bias field in the film plane. Directly at the in-plane collapse field the sensor film is in-plane magnetized yielding high spatial resolution at still high sensitivity. The variation of magnetooptical images with in-plane induction is demonstrated. Experimental results are in agreement with calculations.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 834: Symposium J – Magneto-Optical Materials for Photonics and Recording , 2004 , J6.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Magneto-Optical Imaging, ed. Johansen, T. H. and Shantsev, D. V.. NATO Science Series, II. Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry 142, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004).Google Scholar
2. Shamonin, M., Beuker, T., Rosen, P., Klank, M., Hagedorn, O. and Dötsch, H., NDT & E International 33, 547 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Shamonin, M., Klank, M., Hagedorn, O. and Dötsch, H., Appl. Optics 40, 3182 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Fitzpatrick, G. L., Thome, D. K., Skaugset, R. L., Shih, E. Y. C., and Shih, W. C. L., Mater. Eval. 51, 1402 (1993):Google Scholar
5. Fratello, V. J., Slusky, S. E. G., Brandl, C. D. and Norelli, M. P., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2488 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Hansen, P., Clages, C. P. and Witter, K., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 721 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Syvorotka, I. M., Ubizskii, S. B., Kucera, M., Kuhn, M., and Vertesy, Z., J. Phys D, Appl. Phys. 34, 1178 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Klank, M., Hagedorn, O., Holthaus, C., Shamonin, M. and Dötsch, H., NDT & E International 36, 375 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Klank, M., Hagedorn, O., Shamonin, M. and Dötsch, H., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 6484 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Holthaus, C., Trifonov, A., Dötsch, H. and Schützmann, J., NDT & E International, in press.Google Scholar