Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:02:22.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the Lawfulness of Nonmilitary Enforcement: The Case of Economic Sanctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

W. Michael Reisman*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Costs and Benefits of Economic Sanctions: The Bottom Line
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The “or else” may also be an "and": a promise of a reward as well as the threat of a deprivation.

2 For the sanctioner, the direct costs are incurred in mobilizing and pre-positioning the various assets to be used in the sanction program; opportunity costs, which are lost once those assets have been diverted to the sanctions, are also incurred.

3 See Reisman, W. M., The Raid on Baghdad: Some Reflections on its Lawfulness and Implications , 5:1 E.J.I.L. 120 (1994)Google Scholar.

4 W. Michael Reisman & Christos Antoniou, The Laws Of War: Basic Documents On The Law Of International Armed Conflicts (1994); Myres S. McDougal & Florentino P. Feliciano, Law And Minimum World Public Order: The Legal Regulation Of International Coercion (1961), reprinted with new introduction and title, The International Law Of War: Transnational Coercion And World Public Order (1994).

5 In fact, the then Soviet Union promptly agreed to become the major purchaser of Cuban sugar, rendering the U.S. action retorsive, whatever its original intention may have been.

6 29 ILM 1330 (1990).