Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:04:38.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editor-in-Chief’s introduction to the issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2021

Gregg R. Murray
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , Fall 2021 , pp. 135 - 136
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, C., & Mehler, D. M. A. (2019). Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLoS Biology, 17(5), e3000246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansell, J., Harrell, A., Gidengil, E., & Stewart, P. A. (2021). Psychophysiology, Cognition, and Political Differences. Politics and the Life Sciences, 40(2), 137–141.Google Scholar
Murray, G. R., (2020). The new framework in action: Open science and pioneering funding. Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 127–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenson, D. (2021). Tie My Hands Loosely: Pre-analysis Plans in Political Science. Politics and the Life Sciences, 40(2), 142–151.Google Scholar
Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M. R. M. J., & Lakens, D. (2021). An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard psychology literature with Registered Reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar