Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:56:49.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

India Edible Oil Consumption: A Censored Incomplete Demand Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Suwen Pan ,
Samarendu Mohanty  and
Mark Welch
Suwen Pan
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines
Samarendu Mohanty
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines
Mark Welch
Affiliation:
Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Texas A&M University College Station, TX
Get access

Abstract

A Censored Incomplete Demand System is applied to household expenditures for edible oil in India. The results show that edible peanut oil is still a luxury good in India, whereas expenditure elasticities for other edible oils are relatively low. The food habit, location, education of household heads, and other demographic variables have significant effects on the choice of edible oils.

Keywords

Censored Incomplete Demand SystemIndia edible oilunit valueC21D1Q11
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 821 - 835
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulai, A., Jain, D.K., and Sharma, A.K. “Household Food Demand Analysis in India.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(1999):316-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, G.K. “LinQuad: An Incomplete Demand System Approach to Demand Estimation and Exact Welfare Measures.” Thesis. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, 1998.Google Scholar
Atella, V., Menon., M., and Perali, F. “Estimation of Unit Values in Cross-sections without Quantity Information and Implication for Demand and Welfare Analysis.” CEIS Tor Vergata, Research Paper Series, Volume 4, No. 12, March 2003. Internet site: ftp://www.ceistorvergata.it/repec/rpaper/No-12-Atella,Menon,Perali.pdf. (Accessed April 2007).Google Scholar
Banks, J., Blundell., R., and Lewbel, A. “Quadratic Engel Curves and Consumer Demand.” Review of Economics and Statistics 4(1997):527-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, T. “Unit Values.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, July 23 2006.Google Scholar
Brester, G. “Estimation of the U.S. Import Demand Elasticity for Beef: The Importance of Disaggregation.” Review of Agricultural Economics 18(1996):31–42.Google Scholar
Chen, K., and Chen, C. “Cross Product Censoring in a Demand System with Limited Dependent Variables: A Multivariate Probit Model Approach.” Working Paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 2002.Google Scholar
Crawford, L., Laisney., F., and Preston, I. “Estimation of Theoretically Consistent Household Demand Systems Using Unit Value Data.” Journal of Econometrics 114(2003):221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T.L., and Wohlgenant, M.K. “Prices and Quality Effects in Cross-sectional Demand Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(1986):908-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. “Quality, Quantity, and Spatial Variation of Price.” American Economic Review 78(1988):418-30.Google Scholar
Dhar, T., Chavas, J.P., and Gould, B.W. “An Empirical Assessment of Endogeneity Issues in Demand Analysis for Differentiated Products.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2003):605-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, S.G. “Inference Concerning the Number of Factors in a Multivariate Nonparametric Relationship.” Econometrica 65(1997):103-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, D., Gould, B.W., and Kaiser, H. “Food Demand in Mexico: An Application of the Amemiya-Tobin Approach to the Estimation of a Censored Food System.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2004): 1094–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, D., Shonkwiler., S., and Capps, O. “Estimation of Demand Functions Using Cross-sectional Household Data: The Problem Revisited.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1998):466-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, S., Wailes, E.J., and Cramer, G.L. “Household Demand in Rural China: A Two-Stage LESAIDS Model.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, C., and Beghin, J.C. “Urban Demand for Edible Oils and Fats in China: Evidence from Household Survey Data.” Journal of Comparative Economics 30(2000):732-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI). F APRI 2005 U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook. CARD Staff Report 1-05, Iowa State University, 2005.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.A., Newey, W.K., and Powell, J.L. “Nonlinear Errors in Variables: Estimation of Some Engel Curves,” Journal of Econometrics 65(1995):205-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, K. “Nutrient Elasticities in a Complete Food Demand System.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kao, C., Lee, L.-F., and Pitt, M.M. “Simulated Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Linear Expenditure System with Binding Non-negativity Constraints.” Annals of Economics and Finance 2(2001):203-23.Google Scholar
LaFrance, J.T. “Linear Demand Functions in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Economic Theory 37(1985): 147-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, J.T. “The LinQuad Incomplete Demand Model.” Working Paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, 1998.Google Scholar
LaFrance, J.T., Beatty, T.K.M., Pope, R.D., and Agnew, G.K. “The U.S. Distribution of Income and Gorman Engel Curves for Food.” Journal of Econometrics 107(2002):235-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, J.T., and Hanemann, W.M. “The Dual Structure of Incomplete Demand System.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989):262-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewbel, A. “Identification and Estimation of Equivalence Scales under Weak Separability. Review of Economic Studies 56(1989):311-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewbel, A. “The Rank of Demand Systems: Theory and Nonparametric Estimation.” Econometrica 59(1991):711-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyssiotou, P., and Pashardes, P. “Preference Heterogeneity and the Rank of Demand Systems.” Manuscript, University of Cyprus, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyssiotou, P., Pashardes., P., and Stengos, T. “Nesting Quadratic Logarithmic Demand Systems.” Economic Letters 76(2002):369-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murty, K.N. “Effects of Changes in Household Size, Consumer Taste & Preferences on Demand Pattern in India.” Centre for Developmental Economics, Working Paper, Delhi School of Economics, No. 72, 2000. Internet site: http://ideas.repec.Org/s/cde/cdewps.html (Accessed April 2007).Google Scholar
Nicol, C. “The Rank and Model Specification of Demand Systems: An Empirical Analysis Using United States Microdata.” Canadian Journal of Economics 34(2001):259-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perali, F., and Chavas, J. “Estimation of Censored Demand Equations from Large Cross-section Data.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2000): 1022-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinstrup-Andersen, P., de Londono, N., and Hoover, E. “The Impact of Increasing Food Supply on Human Nutrition: Implications for Commodity Priorities in Agricultural Research and Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1976):131-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, R., and Wales, T. “Estimation of Complete Demand Systems from Household Budget Data: The Linear and Quadratic Expenditure Systems.” American Economic Review 68(1978):348-59.Google Scholar
Schneeman, B. “Dietary Guidelines in Asian Countries: Towards a Food-Based Approach.” Paper presented at the Seminar and Workshop on National Dietary Guidelines Meeting Nutritional Needs of Asian Countries in the 21st Century, Singapore, 1997.Google Scholar
Shonkwiler, J.S., and Yen, S.T. “Two-Step Estimation of a Censored System of Equations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):972-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauchmann, H. “Efficiency of Two-Step Estimators for Censored Systems of Equations: Shonkwiler and Yen Reconsidered.” Applied Economics 37(2005):367-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS). “Indian Oilseeds and Products Annual 2005.” Gain Report No. IN 5052, May 2005. Internet site: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200506/146129885.pdf (Accessed April 2007).Google Scholar
Yen, S., Kan., K., and Su, S.J. “Household Demand for Fats and Oils: Two-Step Estimation of a Censored Demand System.” Applied Economics 14(2002):1799–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, S., and Lin, B.-H. “A Sample Selection Approach to Censored Demand Systems.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2006):742-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, S.T., Lin, B.H., and Smallwood, D.M. “Quasi-and Simulated-Likelihood Approaches to Censored Demand Systems: Food Consumption by Food Stamp Recipients in the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2003):458-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar