Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:05:17.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Domain Mode in Ferroelectric Liquid Crystals a Novel Electrooptical Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

L. A. Beresnev
Affiliation:
Institut für physikalische Chemie, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Petersenstraβe 20, W-6100 Darmstadt, FRG.
M. Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
Institut für physikalische Chemie, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Petersenstraβe 20, W-6100 Darmstadt, FRG.
S. A. Ptkin
Affiliation:
Institut für physikalische Chemie, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Petersenstraβe 20, W-6100 Darmstadt, FRG.
W. Haase
Affiliation:
Institut für physikalische Chemie, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Petersenstraβe 20, W-6100 Darmstadt, FRG.
Get access

Abstract

Novel electrooptical effects in ferroelectric liquid crystals with high spontaneous polarization (Ps ) are observed. They are connected with the formation of a modulated distribution of the macroscopic dipole moments of smectic layers if going along the layer normal. The period (D) of this modulation (ferroelectric domains) near the electrode surfaces (DS) and in the bulk (DB) of a FLC-specimen can differ appreciably, depending on an applied external voltage. The main role of the value of the effective spontaneous polarization is established. A variuos number of domain structures and corresponding diffraction patterns are observed under variation of frequency and amplitude of the external electric field. A simple explanation of the new electrooptical responses is proposed on the basis of interference and incommensurability of bulk and surface domains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Meyer, R. B., Liebert, L., Strzelecki, L. and Keller, P., J. Phys. Lett. (Paris), 36, L69 (1975).Google Scholar
2. Clark, N. A. and Lagerwall, S. T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 36, 899 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Ostrovski, B. I., Rabinovich, A. Z. and Chigrinov, V. G. in “Advances in Liquid Crystal Research and Applications” edited by Bata, L., Budapest, 1980, p. 469.Google Scholar
4. Beresnev, L. A., Chigrinov, V. G., Dergachev, D. I., Pozhidayev, E. P., Fünfschilling, J. and Schadt, M., Liq. Cryst., 5, 1171 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Beresnev, L. A., Loseva, M. V., Chernova, N. I., Kononov, S. G., Adomenas, P. V. and Pozhidayev, E. P., Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 51, 457 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Beresnev, L. A., Pfeiffer, M., Haase, W., Loseva, M. V., Chernova, N. I. and Adomenas, P. V., Pism'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 53, 170 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Beresnev, L. A., Pfeiffer, M., Pikin, S. A., Haase, W. and Blinov, L. M., Ferroelectrics, (1992), submitted, presented at 3rd Int. Conf. on Ferroelectric Liquid Crystals, Boulder, USA, 1991.Google Scholar