Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T00:32:50.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

442. Variations in composition of cows' milk during a period of 12 weeks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Extract

The milk from twelve individual cows in a mixed herd in Shropshire was sampled twice weekly over a period of 12 weeks, which covered the transition from winter to summer conditions of feeding. Detailed analytical results are tabulated, and certain figures presented in graphical form. In addition, bulk samples of both morning's and evening's milk were obtained and tested for fat and solids-not-fat.

On the whole the results show great individual consistency of composition, but an appreciable rise in the crude protein content of the milk from all cows took place in late April and in May, this effect being attributed to the change-over in feeding to an all-grass diet. From a consideration of the figures obtained, it is deduced that:

(1) The average composition of mid-lactation milk may differ markedly from cow to cow, but appears to be unchanged by minor alterations in the winter rations, provided these are reasonably satisfactory to begin with. There is, however, a marked increase in total protein resulting from the introduction of spring-grass feeding.

(2) The results show that a herd, although well-fed and efficiently managed, may produce milk in the late winter months, and even in the early spring, which is below the legal standard of 8·50% in s.n.f.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ministry of Agriculture Bulletin, no. 16. Variation in the composition of milk. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
(2)Tocher, J. F. (1927). Scott. J. Agric. 10, 204.Google Scholar
(3)Koestler, A. G. (1922). Landw. Jb. Schweiz. 36, 133.Google Scholar
(4)Vanlandingham, A. H., Weakley, C. E., Moore, E. N. & Henderson, H. O. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, (5), 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Riddet, W., Campbell, I. L., McDowall, F. H., & Cox, G. A. (1941). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 23, (2A), 80A–112A.Google Scholar
(6)Rowland, S. J., & Bartlett, S. (19461947). Rep. not. Inst. Dairy., Reading.Google Scholar
(7)Lutz, J. (1947). J. Ann. Agric. Suisse, 48, (8/9), 863.Google Scholar
(8)Bartlett, S., Foot, A. S., Huthnance, S. L. & Mackintosh, J. (1940). J. Dairy Res. 11, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Rowland, S. J. (1944). J. Dairy Res. 13, (3), 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Kay, H. D. (1947). Presidential Address. J. Roy. San. Inst. 67, 5.Google Scholar
(11)Kay, H. D. (1948). Sanitarian, 56, 322.Google Scholar
(12)Provan, A. L. & Jenkins, D. I. (1949). J. Soc. Dairy Tech., 2, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Provan, A. L. (1949). Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 217.Google Scholar
(14)Davies, R. O. & Provan, A. L. (1928). Welsh J. Agric. 4, 114.Google Scholar
(15)Ann. Rep. nat. Inst. Dairy., Reading, 1947 and 1948.Google Scholar
(16)Overman, O. R., Garrett, O. F., Wright, K. E. & Sanmann, F. P. (1939). Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 457.Google Scholar