Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:50:05.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Tai-Heng Cheng

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Tai-Heng Cheng
Tai-Heng Cheng*
Affiliation:
New York Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
New Voices: Peace and Security Norms and Institutions in Historical Context
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 102 , 2008 , pp. 430 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harold D. Lasswell & Myres S. Mcdougal, Jurisprudence for A Free Society 32-34 (1992).

2 Reisman, Michael & Armstrong, Andrea, The Past and Future of the Claim of Preemptive Self-defense, 100 Am. J. Int’l. L. 525 (2006)Google Scholar.

3 Tai-Heng Cheng & Eduardas Valaitis, Would Righter Authorization to Use Force Make the United States Safer? (forthcoming).

4 National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, The 9/11 Commission Report 14-18 (2004) (“On the morning of 9/11, the existing protocol was unsuited in every respect for what was about to happen.”).

5 The White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America 18 (2006).