Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:11:19.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Lessons and Future Issues from the Fukushima Accident

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2019

Edited by
Teruyuki Nakajima ,
Toshimasa Ohara ,
Mitsuo Uematsu  and
Yuichi Onda
Teruyuki Nakajima
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo
Toshimasa Ohara
Affiliation:
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan
Mitsuo Uematsu
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo
Yuichi Onda
Affiliation:
University of Tsukuba, Japan
Get access

Summary

The things we learned from the responses to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS) accident are as follows. (1) If experts had been properly placed in the Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters and the Fukushima Prefectural Disaster Response Headquarters, the data calculated by SPEEDI or the results obtained from the airborne survey conducted by the US Department of Energy (DOE) might have been more effectively utilised, and people would likely not have been evacuated to areas with high dose rates. (2) If experts had been properly placed in the Fukushima Prefectural Disaster Response Headquarters, the distribution and administration of stable iodine preparations could have been performed in a similar manner by different local governments. (3) In the case of an emergency disaster, if special budgetary actions had been taken for the investigation of radioactive contamination, the collection of soil samples could have started earlier, and detailed maps could have also been created. These situations occurred because the government asked us to follow procedures to budget according to a normal situation. They requested a list including all items with unit prices and exact numbers of necessary items for soil sampling for about 11 000 samples from about 2200 locations. The list also had to include travel expenses for persons who took part in the soil sampling project, taxi fares for the transfer of persons from the headquarters to the sampling points, etc. This job took about one month because we had to get information from participants from 98 organisations. If we could have used the budget to pay for necessary items with receipts by drawing money from a special account, we could have started the soil sampling project one month earlier.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Contamination from the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
Dispersion, Monitoring, Mitigation and Lessons Learned
 , pp. 257 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

DOE (2011). Radiation monitoring data from Fukushima Area 04/04/2011. www.slideshare.net/energy/ams-data-april-4v1 (accessed 19 September 2018).Google Scholar
Hirayama, H., Matsumura, H., Namito, Y. and Sanami, T. (2015). Estimation of history of I-131 concentration in air using NaI(Tl) detector pulse height distribution at monitoring posts in Fukushima prefecture. Trans. At. Energy Soc. Jpn., 14, 1–11 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
IAEA (2015). The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Technical Volumes 1–5. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. http://bit.ly/2Vscu4r (accessed 19 September 2018).Google Scholar
Lebel, L. S., Dickson, R. S. and Glowa, G. A. (2016). Radioiodine in the atmosphere after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. J. Environ. Radioact., 151, 82–93.Google Scholar
Morino, Y., Ohara, T. and Nishizawa, M. (2011). Atmospheric behavior, deposition and budget of radioactive materials from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L00G11, doi:10.1029/2011GL048689.Google Scholar
Nakajima, T., Watanabe, A., Tsuruta, H., et al. (2011). Nuclear power plant accident: collaboration in the crisis and the role of scientists. Kagaku, 81, 934–7 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
NHK (2012). A Polluted Map of Radioactive Materials No.5 Made from Networks: Search for an Early Internal Radiation Exposure Unrevealed. NHK/ETV programme broadcast 12 March 2012.Google Scholar
NHK (2013). The Great East Japan Earthquake: A Blanked Early Radiation Exposure – Search for Atmospheric Radioiodines Disappeared. NHK special TV programme broadcast 12 January 2013.Google Scholar
Saito, K. and Onda, Y. (2015). Outline of the mapping project. J. Environ. Radioactiv., 139, 240–9.Google Scholar
Science Council of Japan (2014). A review of the model comparison of transportation and deposition of radioactive materials released to the environment as a result of the Tokyo Electric Power Company’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, Sectional Committee on Nuclear Accident. Report of Committee on Comprehensive Synthetic Engineering, Science Council of Japan. http://bit.ly/2VwjCNz (accessed 19 September 2018).Google Scholar
Takemura, T., Nakamura, H., Takigawa, M., et al. (2011). A numerical simulation of global transport of atmospheric particles emitted from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. SOLA. 7, 101–4, doi:10.2151/sola.2011-026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terasaka, Y, Yamazawa, H., Hirouchi, J., et al. (2016). Air concentration estimation of radionuclides discharged from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station using NaI(Tl) detector pulse height distribution measured in Ibaraki Prefecture. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 53, 1919–32.Google Scholar
Tsuruta, H. and Nakajima, T. (2012). Radioactive materials in the atmosphere released by the accident of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Chikyukagaku (Geochemistry), 46, 99–111 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Tsuruta, H., Arai, T., Shiba, K., et al. (2013). A study on the polluted air masses measured at east-coast of Ibaraki prefecture in an early phase after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Hoshakagaku, 28, 9–16 (in Japanese).Google Scholar

References

Girard, S., Korsakissok, I. and Mallet, V. (2014). Screening sensitivity analysis of a radionuclides atmospheric dispersion model applied to the Fukushima disaster. Atmos. Environ., 95, 490–500, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, S., Mallet, V., Korsakissok, I. and Mathieu, A. (2016). Emulation and Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of an atmospheric dispersion model applied to the Fukushima nuclear accident. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres, 121, 3484–96, doi:10.1002/2015JD023993.Google Scholar
Haywood, S. M., Bedwell, P. and Hort, M. C. (2010). Key factors in imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments using the NAME model. J. Radiol. Prot., 30, 23–36, doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/1/002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IRIX Steering Committee (2013). International Radiological Information Exchange (IRIX) Format: Version 1.0, Reference Description.Google Scholar
Mathieu, A., Kajino, M., Korsakissok, I., et al. (2018). Fukushima Daiichi-derived radionuclides in the atmosphere, transport and deposition in Japan: a review. Appl. Geochem., 91, 122–39, doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.01.002.Google Scholar
Onda, Y., Kato, H., Hoshi, M., Takahashi, Y. and Nguyen, M. -L. (2015). Soil sampling and analytical strategies for mapping fallout in nuclear emergencies based on the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. J. Environ. Radioact., 139, 300–7, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.06.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Périllat, R., Korsakissok, I., Mallet, V., et al. (2016). Using meteorological ensembles for atmospheric dispersion modeling of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Presented at the 17th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Saito, T., Makino, H. and Tanaka, S. (2014). Geochemical and grain-size distribution of radioactive and stable cesium in Fukushima soils: implications for their long-term behavior. J. Environ. Radioact., 138, 11–18, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.07.025.Google Scholar
Sørensen, J. H., Amstrup, B., Feddersen, H., et al. (2015). Fukushima Accident: UNcertainty of Atmospheric dispersion modelling (FAUNA). Nordic Nuclear Safety Research.Google Scholar
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., et al. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One, 6(6): e21101.Google Scholar
Vines, T. H., Albert, A. Y., Andrew, R. L., et al. (2014). The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Curr. Biol, 24(1), 94–7.Google Scholar
Yoshida, N. and Takahashi, Y. (2012). Land-surface contamination by radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. Elements, 8, 201–6, doi:10.2113/gselements.8.3.201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×