AML, 2016. AML Oceanographic, 2071 Malaview Avenue, Sidney, B.C. V8L 5X6, CANADA. www.amloceanographic.com [accessed September 2016].Google Scholar

Bates, C. R., Whitehead, E. J., 2001. ECHOplus measurements in Hopavågen Bay, Norway. The Oceanography Society, Biennial Scientific Meeting, April 2001 [online]. Available at: www.st-andrews.ac.uk/rasse/library/pdfs/Miami_final.pdf [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Bellefleur, G., Duchesne, M. J., Hunter, H., Long, B. F., Lavoie, D., 2006. Comparison of single- and multichannel high-resolution seismic data for shallow stratigraphy mapping in the St. Lawrence River estuary, Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada [online]. Available at: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/M44-2006-D2E.pdf [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Bennell, J. D., 2001. Procedural Guideline No. 1–5 Mosaicing of sidescan sonar images to map seabed features. In: Davies, J. (ed.), Marine Monitoring Handbook, Peterborough, UK: Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 4–11 [online]. Available at: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/PDF/mmh_PG1-5.pdf [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Brekhovskikh, L., Lysanov, Y., 1982. Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics. Springer Series in Electronics and Photonics 8, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 240pp.Google Scholar

Brown, C. J., Hewer, A. J., Meadows, W. J., Limpenny, D. S., Cooper, K. M., Rees, H. L., Vivian, C. M. G., 2001. Mapping of gravel biotopes and an examination of the factors controlling the distribution, type and diversity of their biological communities. CEFAS Lowestoft Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep. 114 [online]. Available at: www.cefas.co.uk/publications/techrep/tech114.pdf [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Burns, D. R., Queen, C. B., Sisk, H., Mullarkey, W., Chivers, R. C., 1989. Rapid and convenient acoustic seabed discrimination. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics 11, 169–178.Google Scholar

Caughey, D. A., Kirlin, R. L., 1996. Blind deconvolution of echosounder envelopes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, May 7–10, 1996, Atlanta, GA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Signal Processing Society, Vol. 6, 3149–3152.Google Scholar

Caughey, D., Prager, B., Klymak, J., 1994. Sea Bottom Classification from Echo Sounding Data. Contractor’s Report 94–56 prepared for Defence Research Establishment Pacific, Canada. Document number SC93-019-FR-001, 120 Quester Tangent Corporation, Marine Technology Centre, 99–9865 West Saanich Road, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 3S1, Canada.Google Scholar

Chivers, R. C., Emerson, N., Burns, D. R., 1990. New acoustic processing for underway surveying. Hydrographic Journal 56, 9–17.Google Scholar

Clarke, P. A., Hamilton, L. J., 1999. Analysis of Echo Sounder Returns for Acoustic Bottom Classification. DSTO General Document DSTO-GD-0215 [online]. Available at: http://dspace.dsto.defence.gov.au/dspace/handle/1947/3739 [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Cloet, R. L., Edwards, C. R., 1986. The Bathymetric Swathe Sounding System. The Hydrographic Journal 40, 9–17.Google Scholar

Dobrin, M. B., Savit, C. H., 1988. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar

Dugelay, S., Pace, N. G., Heald, G. J., Brothers, R. J., 2000. Statistical analysis of high frequency acoustic scatter: What makes a statistical distribution? Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, 10–13 July 2000, Vol. 1, 269–274.Google Scholar

EPC Lab. Inc., 2016. EPC Labs Product Information Data Sheets [online]. Available at: www.eiva.com/Files/Billeder/RentalProductSheets/1086.pdf [Accessed March 20161].Google Scholar

Falmouth, , 2016. Dual frequency CHIRP sub-bottom profiler [online]. Available at: www.falmouth.com/images/HMS-622_Chirp_Subbotom_10april2015.pdf [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Foster-Smith, R., Brown, C., Meadows, W., White, W., Limpenny, D., 2001. Ensuring continuity in the development of broad-scale mapping methodology – direct comparison of RoxAnn and QTC View technologies. QTC technologies. SeaMap/CEFAS Report, 113pp.Google Scholar

Fox, D., Amend, M., Merems, A., Miller, B., Golden, J., 1998. Nearshore Rocky Reef Assessment. Newport, Oregon. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Marine Program.Google Scholar

Geo Marine Survey Systems BV, 2010. Geo Source 200–400 Marine Multi-Tip Sparker System – Technical Specification [online]. Available at: www.geomarinesurveysystems.com/products/seismic/geo-source/ [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Greenstreet, S. P. R., Tuck, I. D., Grewar, G. N., Armstrong, E., Reid, D. G., Wright, P. J., 1997. An assessment of the acoustic survey technique, RoxAnn, as a means of mapping seabed habitat. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54, 939–959.Google Scholar

Gutowski, M., Bull, J. M., Dix, J. K., Henstock, T. J., Hogarth, P., Hillier, T., Leighton, T. G., White, P. R., 2008. Three dimensional high-resolution acoustic imaging of the sub-seabed. Applied Acoustics 69, 412–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, L. J., 2001. Acoustic seabed classification systems. Report No. DSTO-TN-0401, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Aeronautical and Maritime Research Lab., Victoria, Australia [online]. Available at: http://dspace.dsto.defence.gov.au/dspace/bitstream/1947/3596/1/DSTO-TN-0401%20PR.pdf [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Hamilton, L. J., 2005. A bibliography of acoustic seabed classification. Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone and Waterway Management, Technical Report No. 27 [online]. Available at: www.ozcoasts.gov.au/pdf/CRC/27-Hamilton_Acoustic_Biblio.pdf [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Hamilton, L. J., Mulhearn, P. J., Poeckert, R., 1999. Comparison of RoxAnn and QTC View acoustic bottom classification system performance for the Cairns area, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Continental Shelf Research 19, 1577–1597.Google Scholar

Heald, G. J., Pace, N. G., 1996. An analysis of the 1st and 2nd backscatter for seabed classification. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, 24–28 June 1996, vol. II, 649–654.Google Scholar

Hiller, T., Hogarth, P. J., 2006. Application of phase measuring bathymetric sonars to nautical charting and environmental mapping. In: Evolutions in Hydrography, 6th–9th November 2006, Provincial House, Antwerp, Belgium: Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the International Federation of Hydrographic Societies. Special Publication (Hydrographic Society) 55, 83–86.Google Scholar

Hiller, T., Lewis, K., 2004. Getting the most out of high resolution wide swath sonar data. In: Diversity, 2nd–4th November 2004, Salthill, Galway, Ireland. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium of the International Federation of Hydrographic Societies. Special Publication (Hydrographic Society) 53, Paper 8.Google Scholar

IHO, 2008. International Hydrographic Organisation Standards for Hydrographic Surveys, Special Publication 44. www.iho.int/iho_pubs/standard/S-44_5E.pdf [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Jones, E. J. W., 1999. Marine Geophysics. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

Kearey, P., Brooks, M., Hill, I., 2002. An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration (3rd Edition). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. J., Cato, I., Desprez, M., Fader, G., Schüttenhelm, R. T. E., Side, J., 2003. An overview of seabed mapping technologies in the context of marine habitat classification. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60, 411–418.Google Scholar

Kloser, R. J., Sakov, P. V., Waring, J. R., Ryan, T. E., Gordon, S. R., 1998. Development of software for use in multi-frequency acoustic biomass assessments and ecological studies. CSIRO Report to FRDC, project T93/237.Google Scholar

Kongsberg, , 2016a. GeoSwath Plus - shallow water multibeam echosounder [online]. Available at: www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/AA3FAF5EEADC6020C125762B0050914C?OpenDocument [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Kongsberg, , 2016b. GeoPulse GeoAcoustics Pinger Sub-bottom Profiler [online]. Available at: www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/CBED70CC9CA43D2DC12574C8004A37AD?OpenDocument [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Kongsberg, , 2016c. GeoChirp 3D – high resolution sub-bottom profiler [online]. Available at: www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/E0788FD1BE34357FC1257C93004ABB49?OpenDocument [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Lavergne, M., 1989. Seismic methods (Méthodes sismiques) Institut Français du Pétrole Publications. Translated from the French by Nissim Marshall. Published in London by Graham and Trotman; Paris by Technip; Norwell, MA, USA, by Kluwer. Sold and distributed in the USA and Canada by Kluwer Inc.Google Scholar

Lekkerkerk, H.-J., Theijs, M.-J., 2011. Handbook of Offshore Surveying. Volumes 1–3, Voorschoten, The Netherlands: Skilltrade BV.Google Scholar

MacQueen, J. B., 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley: University of California Press, 281–297.Google Scholar

Mayne, W. H., 1962. Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques. Geophysics 27, 927–938.Google Scholar

McQuillin, R., Bacon, M., Barclay, W., 1984. An Introduction to Seismic Interpretation: Reflection Seismics in Petroleum Exploration. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Medwin, H., 1975. Speed of sound in water: A simple equation for realistic parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 58, 1318–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mosher, D. C., Simpkin, P. G., 1999. Status and trends on marine high-resolution seismic reflection profiling: data acquisition. Geoscience Canada 26, 174–188.Google Scholar

Public Health England, 2014. www.gov.uk/government/publications/laser-radiation-safety-advice/laser-radiation-safety-advice/ [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Public Health England, 2015. www.phe-protectionservices.org.uk/lpa/ [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Penrose, J. D., Siwabessy, P. J. W., Gavrilov, A., Parnum, I., Hamilton, L. J., Bickers, A., Brooke, B., Ryan, D. A., Kennedy, P., 2005. Acoustic techniques for seabed classification. Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone Estuary and Waterway Management, Technical Report 32.Google Scholar

Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS), 2010. PGS: Media Gallery and Ramform-W-Class [online]. Available at: http://www.pgs.com/ [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Rukavina, N. A., 1997. Substrate mapping in the Great Lakes nearshore zone with a RoxAnn acoustic sea-bed classification system. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Coastal Conference 1997, Guelph, Ontario, 338–349.Google Scholar

Schlagintweit, G. E. O., 1993. Real-time acoustic bottom classification: a field evaluation of RoxAnn. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference – Oceans ‘93, Engineering in Harmony with Ocean, 18–21 October, 1993, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 214–219.Google Scholar

Sheriff, R. E., Geldart, L. P., 1995. Exploration Seismology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simpkin, P. G., Davis, A., 1993. For seismic profiling in very shallow water, a novel receiver. Sea Technology 34, 21–28.Google Scholar

Siwabessy, P. J. W., 2001. An investigation of the relationship between seabed type and benthic and bentho-pelagic biota using acoustic techniques. PhD Thesis. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar

Snelgrove, P. V. R., Butman, C. A., 1994. Animal-sediment relationships revisited: cause versus effect. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 32, 111–177.Google Scholar

Sternlicht, D. D., 1999. High frequency acoustic remote sensing of seafloor characteristics. PhD Thesis, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, USA.Google Scholar

Swathe Services, 2005, Personal Communication. Internal Document – GeoSwath and GeoTexture. Swathe Services – UK Division, 1 Calenick House, Truro Technology Park, Heron Way, Newham, Truro, Cornwall TR1 2XN. http://swathe-services.com/.Google Scholar

Urick, R. J., 1983. Principles of Underwater Sound. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

USACE, 2002. Multiple transducer channel sweep systems for navigation projects. In: USACE Engineering Manuals: Engineering and Design – Hydrographic Surveying, EM 1110–2-1003, Chapter 10 [online]. Available at: www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACEPublications/EngineerManuals.aspx?udt_43544_param_page=4 [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

US Geological Survey, 2007. USGS Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, WHSC Seismic Profiling systems, Data Acquisition [online]. http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/operations/sfmapping/equipment.htm [Accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Valeport, 2016. Valeport Ltd, Totnes, TQ9 5EW, UK. www.valeport.co.uk [accessed September 2016].Google Scholar

Verbeek, N. H., McGee, T. M., 1995. Characteristics of high-resolution marine reflection profiling sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics 33, 251–269.Google Scholar

Versteeg, W., Verschuren, M., Henriet, J.-P., De Batist, M., 1992. High-resolution 3D and pseudo-3D seismic investigations in shallow water environments. In: Weydert, M. (ed.), European Conference on Underwater Acoustics. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 497–500.Google Scholar

Voulgaris, G., Collins, M. B., 1990. USP RoxAnn ground discrimination system: a preliminary evaluation. Admiralty Research Establishment, Portland, UK, UTH Tech. Memo. 36/90. RE005314. University of Southampton, Dept. of Oceanography, Marine Consultancy Services, Tech. Rep. No. SUDO/TEC/90/5C, 75pp.Google Scholar

Waring, J. R., Kloser, R. J., Pauly, T., 1994. ECHO – Managing fisheries acoustic data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Acoustics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, Dec. 1994, 22–24.Google Scholar

Williams, J., 2015. Personal Communication. Swathe Services, 1 Calenick House, Truro Technology Park, Heron Way, Newham, Truro, Cornwall TR1 2XN, UK. Email: james.williams@swathe-services.comGoogle Scholar

Willoughby, G., Macdonald, N., Darling, A., Hiller, T., 2012. Applying novel sub-bottom boomer technology to the submerged Wellington Fault, Applied Acoustics: Underwater Technology, Technical Paper, Shallow Survey Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 31pp. Available online [accessed March 2016]: www.conference.co.nz/files/docs/shallow%20survey/presentations/08.pdf.Google Scholar

Wirth, H., Brüggemann, T., 2011. The development of a multiple transducer multi-beam echo sounder system for very shallow waters, TS05J – Hydrography in Practice, Paper No. 5200, FIG Working Week 2011 – Bridging the Gap Between Cultures, Marrakech, Morocco, 18–22 May 2011 [online]. Available at: www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2011/papers/ts05j/ts05j_wirth_bruggemann_5200.pdf [accessed March 2016].Google Scholar

Ziebart, M., Iliffe, J., Turner, J., Oliveira, J., Adams, R., 2007. VORF – The UK Vertical Offshore Reference Frame: Enabling Real-time Hydrographic Surveying, In: Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2007), Fort Worth, TX, September 2007, 1943–1949.Google Scholar