Background: Feedback reports summarizing clinician performance are effective tools to improve antibiotic stewardship in the ambulatory setting, but few studies have evaluated their effectiveness for pediatric inpatients. We developed and implemented feedback reports reflecting electronically-derived measures of appropriate antibiotic choice and duration for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and measured their impact on appropriate antibiotic use in children hospitalized for CAP. Methods: We performed a single center quasi-experimental study including children 6 months to 17 years hospitalized for CAP between 12/1/2021-11/30/2023. Children with chronic medical conditions, ICU stays >48 hours, and outside transfers were excluded. The intervention occurred in 11/2022 and included clinician education, a monthly group-level feedback report disseminated by email (Figure 1), and a monthly review of clinician performance during a virtual quality improvement meeting. Patient characteristics were compared using chi-square or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to measure the immediate change in the proportion of CAP encounters receiving both the appropriate antibiotic choice and duration, as well as the change in slope from the preintervention to the postintervention periods. Choice and duration were analyzed separately using ITSA as a secondary analysis. Results: There were 817 CAP encounters, including 420 preintervention and 397 postintervention. Patients admitted in the postintervention period were older (median age 2 years vs 3 years, P=0.03), but otherwise there were no differences in race, ethnicity, sex, ICU admission, or complicated pneumonia. Preintervention, 52% of encounters received both the appropriate antibiotic choice and duration; 96% of encounters received the appropriate antibiotic choice and 54% received the appropriate duration. The ITSA demonstrated an immediate 16% increase in the proportion of patients receiving both appropriate antibiotic choice and duration (95% confidence interval, 1-31%; P = 0.047) and no significant further increase over time following the intervention (P = 0.84) (Figure 2). When antibiotic choice was analyzed separately by ITSA, there was no immediate change or change over time in the proportion of patients receiving the appropriate antibiotic choice. In the ITSA of duration alone, there was an immediate 17% increase in the proportion receiving the appropriate duration (95% confidence interval, 2-33%; P = 0.03) and no change over time. Conclusion: Feedback reports generated from electronically-derived metrics of antibiotic choice and duration, combined with ongoing clinician education, increased the proportion of children with CAP treated with the appropriate antibiotic duration. Electronic feedback reports are a scalable and impactful intervention to improve antibiotic use in children hospitalized with CAP.

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitalized children and is a key target for pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Building upon prior work, we developed and refined an electronic algorithm to identify children hospitalized with CAP and to evaluate the appropriateness of initial antibiotic choice and duration. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study including children 6 months to 17 years hospitalized for CAP between January 1, 2019, and October 31, 2022, at a tertiary-care children’s hospital. CAP was defined electronically as an International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code for pneumonia, a chest radiograph or chest computed tomography scan (CT) performed within 48 hours of admission, and systemic antibiotics administered within the first 48 hours of hospitalization and continued for at least 2 days. We applied the following exclusion criteria: patients transferred from another healthcare setting, those who died within 48 hours of hospitalization, children with complex chronic conditions, and those with intensive care unit stays >48 hours. Criteria for appropriate antibiotic choice and duration were defined based on established guidelines. Two physicians performed independent medical record reviews of 80 randomly selected patients (10% sample) to evaluate the performance of the electronic algorithm in (1) identifying patients treated for clinician-diagnosed CAP and (2) classifying antibiotic choice and duration as appropriate. A third physician resolved discrepancies. The electronic algorithm was compared to this medical record review, which served as the reference standard. Results: Of 80 children identified by the electronic algorithm, 79 (99%) were diagnosed with CAP based on medical record review. Antibiotic use was classified as the appropriate choice in 75 (94%) of 80 cases, and appropriate duration in 16 (20%) of 80 cases. The sensitivity of the electronic algorithm for identifying appropriate initial antibiotic choice was 94%; specificity could not be calculated because no events of inappropriate antibiotic choice were identified based on chart review. The sensitivity and specificity for determining appropriate duration were 88% and 97%, respectively (Table 1).

Conclusions: The electronic algorithm accurately identified children hospitalized with CAP and demonstrated acceptable performance for identifying appropriate antibiotic choice and duration. Use of this electronic algorithm may improve the efficiency of stewardship activities and could facilitate alignment with updated accreditation standards. Future studies validating this algorithm at other centers are needed.

Disclosures: None

In total, 50 healthcare facilities completed a survey in 2021 to characterize changes in infection prevention and control and antibiotic stewardship practices. Notable findings include sustained surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms but decreased use of human resource-intensive interventions compared to previous surveys in 2013 and 2018 conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Tracheal aspirate bacterial cultures are routinely collected in mechanically ventilated children for the evaluation of ventilator-associated infections (VAIs). However, frequent bacterial colonization of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes contribute to the marginal performance characteristics of the test for diagnosing VAI. Published literature characterizing drivers of culture collection and the predictive value of positive cultures are limited. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit who were receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours and had 1 or more semiquantitative tracheal aspirate cultures collected between September 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020. Indications for culture collection were determined through medical record review and included fever, hypothermia, tracheal secretion changes, radiographic pneumonia, increased oxygen requirement, and/or increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). A positive culture was defined as moderate or heavy growth of a noncommensal bacterial organism. A purulent Gram stain was defined as detection of moderate or many white blood cells. Diagnosis of VAI was based on treating-clinician documentation and was ascertained through medical record review. Logistic regression accounting for clustering by patient was performed to estimate the association between indications for culture collection and (1) culture positivity, (2) purulent Gram stain, and (3) diagnosis of VAI. Results: In total, 625 tracheal aspirate cultures were performed in 261 unique patients. Common indications for culture collection included isolated fever or hypothermia (n = 124, 20%), fever with an increase in oxygen requirement or PEEP (n = 71, 11%), isolated increase in oxygen requirement or PEEP (n = 67, 11%), or isolated secretion change (n = 54, 9%) (Figure 1). Overall, 230 cultures (37%) were positive and 218 (35%) Gram stains were purulent. There were no associations between culture indications and a positive culture. Presence of isolated fever was negatively associated with a purulent Gram stain (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30–0.81; P = .005); otherwise, there were no associations between indication and purulent Gram stain. Finally, in a multivariable model, odds of VAI diagnosis increased with both the number of indications for culture collection and purulent Gram stain, but not with positive culture (Figure 2). Conclusions: Number and type of clinical signs were not associated with tracheal aspirate culture positivity or purulence on Gram stain, but they were associated with a clinical diagnosis of VAI. These findings suggest that positive tracheal aspirate cultures may not aid clinicians in the diagnosis of VAI, and they highlight the opportunity for improved diagnostic stewardship.

Funding: No

Disclosures: None

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the CDC recommended collection of a lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimen for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in addition to the routinely recommended upper respiratory tract (URT) testing in mechanically ventilated patients. Significant operational challenges were noted at our institution using this approach. In this report, we describe our experience with routine collection of paired URT and LRT sample testing. Our results revealed a high concordance between the 2 sources, and that all children tested for SARS-CoV-2 were appropriately diagnosed with URT testing alone. There was no added benefit to LRT testing. Based on these findings, our institutional approach was therefore adjusted to sample the URT alone for most patients, with LRT sampling reserved for patients with ongoing clinical suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 after a negative URT test.

This SHEA white paper identifies knowledge gaps and challenges in healthcare epidemiology research related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a focus on core principles of healthcare epidemiology. These gaps, revealed during the worst phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, are described in 10 sections: epidemiology, outbreak investigation, surveillance, isolation precaution practices, personal protective equipment (PPE), environmental contamination and disinfection, drug and supply shortages, antimicrobial stewardship, healthcare personnel (HCP) occupational safety, and return to work policies. Each section highlights three critical healthcare epidemiology research questions with detailed description provided in supplementary materials. This research agenda calls for translational studies from laboratory-based basic science research to well-designed, large-scale studies and health outcomes research. Research gaps and challenges related to nursing homes and social disparities are included. Collaborations across various disciplines, expertise and across diverse geographic locations will be critical.

Background: Healthcare exposure results in significant microbiome disruption, particularly in the setting of critical illness, which may contribute to risk for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Patients admitted to long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) have extensive prior healthcare exposure and critical illness; significant microbiome disruption has been previously documented among LTACH patients. We compared the predictive value of 3 respiratory tract microbiome disruption indices—bacterial community diversity, dominance, and absolute abundance—as they relate to risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and adverse ventilator-associated events (VAE), which commonly complicate LTACH care. Methods: We enrolled 83 subjects on admission to an academic LTACH for ventilator weaning and performed longitudinal sampling of endotracheal aspirates, followed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Illumina HiSeq), bacterial community profiling (QIIME2) for diversity, and 16S rRNA quantitative PCR (qPCR) for total bacterial abundance. Statistical analyses were performed with R and Stan software. Mixed-effects models were fit to relate the admission MDIs to subsequent clinically diagnosed VAP and VAE. Results: Of the 83 patients, 19 had been diagnosed with pneumonia during the 14 days prior to LTACH admission (ie, “recent past VAP”); 23 additional patients were receiving antibiotics consistent with empiric VAP therapy within 48 hours of admission (ie, “empiric VAP therapy”); and 41 patients had no evidence of VAP at admission (ie, “no suspected VAP”). We detected no statistically significant differences in admission Shannon diversity, maximum amplicon sequence variant (ASV)–level proportional abundance, or 16S qPCR across the variables of interest. In isolation, all 3 admission microbiome disruption indices showed poor predictive performance, though Shannon diversity performed better than maximum ASV abundance. Predictive models that combined (1) bacterial diversity or abundance with (2) recent prior VAP diagnosis and (3) concurrent antibiotic exposure best predicted 14-day VAP (type S error < 0.05) and 30-day VAP (type S error < 0.003). In this cohort, VAE risk was paradoxically associated with higher admission Shannon diversity and lower admission maximum ASV abundance. Conclusions: In isolation, respiratory tract microbiome disruption indices obtained at LTACH admission showed poor predictive performance for subsequent VAP and VAE. But diversity and abundance models incorporating recent VAP history and admission antibiotic exposure performed well predicting 14-day and 30-day VAP.

Disclosures: None

Funding: None

We used a survey to characterize contemporary infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship program practices across 64 healthcare facilities, and we compared these findings to those of a similar 2013 survey. Notable findings include decreased frequency of active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, frequent active surveillance for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and increased support for antibiotic stewardship programs.

Infections due to antibiotic-resistant organisms are increasing in prevalence and represent a major public health threat. Antibiotic overuse is a major driver of this epidemic, and antibiotic stewardship an important means of limiting antibiotic resistance. The intensive care unit (ICU) setting presents an intersection of opportunities and challenges for effective antibiotic stewardship, but limited data inform optimal stewardship interventions in this setting. In this review, we present unique considerations for stewardship interventions the ICU setting and summarize available data evaluating the impact of prospective audit and feedback, diagnostic test stewardship, rapid molecular diagnostic tests, and procalcitonin-guided algorithms for antibiotic discontinuation. The existing knowledge gaps ripe for future research are emphasized.