We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To study the presence of bacterial factors in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter species in order to identify markers of epidemic potential.
Design:
Case-control study.
Methods:
Forty-six isolates of Acinetobacter species, including 23 epidemic and 23 sporadic strains from different outbreaks in nine European countries, were compared for the presence of the following factors: hemagglutination, presence of capsules and fimbriae, binding to salivary mucins, resistance to drying, and antibiogram typing. Genotyping of all strains was performed by amplified fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP).
Results:
All outbreak strains except two (91%) were identified as Acinetobacter baumannii. Binding to salivary mucins and resistance to antibiotics were significantly associated with epidemic behavior. Antibiogram typing showed clustering of predominantly A baumannii strains within one group, and these strains were significantly more resistant to antibiotics than sporadic strains. AFLP genotyping revealed a great heterogeneity among the different European Acinetobacter strains. Cluster analysis of AFLP fingerprints showed several small clusters of different A baumannii outbreak strains. AFLP genotyping could not identify a common epidemic marker within the strains studied.
Conclusions:
Antibiogram typing can be used in routine clinical laboratories as a screening method to recognize potentially epidemic A baumannii strains. Several other factors were found, both in different outbreaks as well as in sporadic Acinetobacter isolates. These characteristics were unable to predict epidemic behavior and therefore cannot be used as discriminative epidemic markers. AFLP genotyping demonstrated no common clonal origin of European epidemic A baumannii strains. This indicates that any clinical A baumannii isolate with resistance to multiple antibiotics can be a potential nosocomial outbreak strain.
To determine the prevalence and determinants of fecal carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in intensive care unit (ICU), hematology-oncology, and hemodialysis patients in The Netherlands.
Design:
Descriptive, multicenter study, with yearly 1-week point-prevalence assessments between 1995 and 1998.
Population:
All patients hospitalized on the testing days in ICUs and hematology-oncology wards in nine hospitals in The Netherlands were included.
Methods:
Rectal swabs obtained from 1,112 patients were screened for enterococci in a selective broth and subcultured on selective media with and without 6 mg/L vancomycin. Resistance genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Further characterization of VRE strains was done by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). We studied possible determinants of VRE colonization with a logistic regression analysis model. Determinants analyzed included gender, age, and log-transformed length of prior hospital stay.
Results:
The results showed that 614 (55%) of 1,112 patients were colonized with vancomycin-sensitive enterococci, and 15 (1.4%) of 1,112 carried VRE. No increase in VRE colonization was observed from 1995 to 1998. Eleven strains were identified as Enterococcus faecium and four as Enterococcus faecalis. All E faecium and one E faecalis carried the vanA gene; the other E faecalis strains harbored the vanB gene. PFGE revealed that three vanB VRE isolated from patients hospitalized in one single ICU were related, suggesting nosocomial transmission. Though higher age seemed associated with VRE colonization, exclusion of patients with the nosocomial strain from the regression analysis decreased this relation to nonsignificant. Duration of hospital stay was not associated with VRE colonization.
Conclusion:
VRE colonization in Dutch hospitals is an infrequent phenomenon. Although nosocomial spread occurs, most observed cases were unrelated, which suggests the possibility of VRE acquisition from outside the hospital. Prolonged hospital stay, age, and gender proved unrelated to VRE colonization.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.