Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

5 results

  • AALS Panel – Mexico v. U.S.A. (Avena) – Arguments of Mexico
  • Catherine M. Amirfar
  • Journal: German Law Journal / Volume 5 / Issue 4 / 01 March 2004
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019, pp. 375-383
  • Print publication: 01 March 2004
    • Article
    • Access
    • PDF
    • Export citation
  • View extract

    I have had the privilege of serving as part of the team from Debevoise & Plimpton LLP headed by Donald Francis Donovan.1 The Debevoise team worked in close collaboration with the Director of the Mexican Capital Legal Assistance Program, Sandra L. Babcock, and Mexican Ambassador Juan Manuel Gámez-Robledo and his foreign ministry staff to represent Mexico before the International Court of Justice.