Attendance at university can result in social support network disruption. This can have a negative impact on the mental health of young people. Demand for mental health support continues to increase in universities, making identification of factors associated with poorer outcomes a priority. Although social functioning has a bi-directional relationship with mental health, its association with effectiveness of psychological treatments has yet to be explored.

To explore whether students showing different trajectories of change in social function over the course of treatment differed in eventual treatment outcome.

Growth mixture models were estimated on a sample of 5221 students treated in routine mental health services. Different trajectories of change in self-rated impairment in social leisure activities and close relationships (Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) items 3 and 5) during the course of treatment were identified. Associations between trajectory classes and treatment outcomes were explored through multinomial regression.

Five trajectory classes were identified for social leisure activity impairment (Figure 1), and three classes were identified for close relationship impairment (Figure 2). For both measures the majority of students remained mildly impaired (Class 1). Other trajectories included severe impairment with limited improvement (Class 2), severe impairment with delayed improvement (Class 3), and, in social leisure activities only, rapid improvement (Class 4), and deterioration (Class 5). There was an association between trajectories of improvement in social functioning over time and positive treatment outcomes. Trajectories of worsening or stable severe impairment were associated with negative treatment outcomes.

Image:

Image 2:

Changes in social functioning impairment are associated with psychological treatment outcomes in students, suggesting that these changes may be associated with treatment effectiveness or recovery experiences. Future research should look to establish whether a causal link exists to understand if additional benefit for students can be gained through integrating social support within psychological treatment.

None Declared

In recent times, Health Professionals (HPs) people may feel a sense of discomfort and nervousness when disconnected from their smartphones, causing the emergence of the new phenomenon of “No Mobile Phone Phobia,” or Nomophobia.

We aim to study lifestyle-related factors that influence HPs’ Nomophobia.

From April- June 2023, a global cross-sectional study was conducted using the modified Nomophobia questionnaire (NMP-Q). The original 20 NMP-Q questions (Qs) were reduced to 14 to avoid repetitive Qs with similar meanings. The Qs were categorized into 4 sections, A- Not Being Able to Access Information; B- Losing Connectedness; C- Not Being Able to Communicate; and D- Giving Up Convenience. A new section, “E- Daily Habits”, and “F- Smartphone Type”, and “Hours Spent Daily” were added. Before the launch, it was internally and externally validated by trained psychiatrists as well as experienced researchers. We utilized social media, WhatsApp, text and emails to share it with HPs of different specialties worldwide. The survey was anonymous and IRB-exempt.

Total 105 countries’ HPs participation led to 12,253 responses. Total 47.3% of HPs agreed/strongly agreed (A/SA) that they prefer to use their smartphone before bedtime. Over half (57.8%) of HPs A/SA checked their notifications immediately after waking up in the morning. Only 19.4 % of HPs A/SA that woke up in the middle of the night to check notifications. Total 40.5% of HPs A/SA, 22% were neutral, and 37.3% of HPs disagreed /strongly disagreed (D/SD) with using smartphones while eating their meals. A total of 52.7% of HPs preferred smartphone usage over exercising as a break, while 454.9% of HPs A/SA that they chose smartphones over exploring other hobbies for relaxation. A total of 44.2% of respondents A/SA with smartphone usage in the restroom, 39.8% D/SD. 37.4% of participants D/SD with getting distracted by notifications and resisted the urge to answer any calls or texts while performing a focused task, whereas 39.6% A/SA and 23% were neutral. A total of 80% of respondents met the modified criteria for moderate-severe nomophobia.

In a large-scale survey-based study on Nomophobia, additional Qs in NMP-Q may help recognize that nomophobia can be a result of daily lifestyle decisions rather than an isolated issue.

None Declared

We aimed to assess risk of COVID-19 infection & seroprotection status in healthcare workers (HCWs) in both hospital and community settings following an intensive vaccination drive in India.

Tertiary Care Hospital

We surveyed COVID-19 exposure risk, personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance, vaccination status, mental health & COVID-19 infection rate across different HCW cadres. Elecsys® test for COVID-19 spike (Anti-SARS-CoV-2S; ACOVs) and nucleocapsid (Anti-SARS-CoV-2; ACOV) responses following vaccination and/or COVID-19 infection were measured in a stratified sample of 386 HCW.

We enrolled 945 HCWs (60.6% male, age 35.9 ± 9.8 years, 352 nurses, 211 doctors, 248 paramedics & 134 support staff). Hospital PPE compliance was 90.8%. Vaccination coverage was 891/945 (94.3%). ACOVs neutralizing antibody was reactive in 381/386 (98.7%). ACOVs titer (U/ml) was higher in the post-COVID-19 infection group (N =269; 242.1 ± 35.7 U/ml) than in the post-vaccine or never infected subgroup (N = 115, 204.1 ± 81.3 U/ml). RT PCR + COVID-19 infections were documented in 224/945 (23.7%) and 6 HCWs had disease of moderate severity, with no deaths. However, 232/386 (60.1%) of HCWs tested positive for nucleocapsid ACOV antibody, suggesting undocumented or subclinical COVID-19 infection. On multivariate logistic regression, only female gender [aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.07–3.0, P = .025] and COVID-19 family contact [aOR 5.1, 95% CI 3.84–9.5, P < .001] were predictors of risk of developing COVID-19 infection, independent of association with patient-related exposure.

Our HCWs were PPE compliant and vaccine motivated, with immunization coverage of 94.3% and seroprotection rate of 98.7%. There was no relationship between HCW COVID-19 infection to exposure characteristics in the hospital. Vaccination reduced disease severity and prevented death in HCW.