Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T03:13:14.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

César Rodríguez-Garavito
Affiliation:
New York University

Summary

Type
Chapter
Information
Litigating the Climate Emergency
How Human Rights, Courts, and Legal Mobilization Can Bolster Climate Action
, pp. 396 - 407
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Index

accountability
carbon majors, 247248, 319320
attributing emissions, 248253
deforestation, 263
lack of damaging narratives, 297300
private parties, 246247
supply-side accountability gap, 321322, 334
common but differentiated responsibilities principle, 332333
Gloucester Resources case, 328
Gray case, 328
no-harm principle, 332
People v. Arctic Oil, 324327, 334
perfect substitution principle, 329331
visual evidence, importance of, 273, 284
adequacy of efforts to reduce emissions. See assessment of climate change policies; failure to adequately mitigate
administrative due process claims, 127
administrative law cases, 120, 122124
airport expansion, 124
climate litigation currents, 126127
coal power stations, development of, 124
precedents, 117129
Africa
balancing development and environmental rights, 377379
failures of legal systems, 379380
Indigenous peoples’ movements, 380381
inequalities and injustices, 376377
exacerbation through climate change, 377 See also Kenya; South Africa
air travel
balancing impact of emissions and rights of others, 179180
offset or compensation for emissions, 179, 358
tax credits, 32
airport expansion, 2, 124, 130
judicial deference, 309
Alaska Inter-Tribal Council (AITC)
global warming, impact on Indigenous peoples, 282
Alston, Philip, 267268
Amazon (corporation)
corporate liability for climate change, 139
Amazon rainforest
deforestation, 2, 1213, 99, 350
Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku case, 276280
assessment of climate change policies
“all appropriate measures”, 171
consistency, 173
due diligence obligation. See due diligence obligation
due process, 173
good faith, 173
“highest possible ambition”, 171
“maximum available resources”, 172
proportionality, 173
attribution research, 223224, 238
failure-to-adapt claims, 234238
failure-to-mitigate claims, 231234
individual versus collective rights, 224230
source attribution, 232234
Australia, 328329
administrative climate litigation
Bushfire Survivors case. See Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Incorporated v. Environment Protection Authority
Gloucester Resources Limited case, 328
Gray case, 328
Greenpeace Australia case, 124
National Environmental Policy Act, 124
Torres Strait. See Torres Strait islanders
wildfires, 227
visual evidence, importance of, 285287
balancing competing priorities, 32, 257, 340, 343
Africa, 377379
Amazon rainforest, 360
India, 364, 370375
Bangladesh
climate change inequalities, 134135, 144
baseline rights and duties
common ground doctrine, 2527
bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECSS), 185
Brazil
challenges to environmental policy, 359361
“direct” climate actions, 355
environmental and climate crisis
criminalization of environmental activism, 349
fires and deforestation, 349350
illegal logging, 350
weakening of institutional framework, 350352, 361362
human rights defenders, 350352
illegal drainage of mangrove forests, 357358
illegal use of fire, 358
“indirect” climate actions, 355, 357358
“isolated” court actions, 355
public civil actions, 358359
racial inequalities
disproportionate impacts of climate change, 352353, 363
release of carbon dioxide, 358
“structural” court actions, 355
Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Incorporated v. Environment Protection Authority, 285287
Canada
forced displacement as a result of climate change, 226
public interest standing, 316
wildfires, 227
carbon dioxide (CO2), 240241
oil and gas extraction, impact of, 241, 248, 320
sources, 241244, 242
carbon majors, 2
accountability, 319320
attribution, 250253, 251
supply-side accountability gap, 321322
advancements in climate science, 209
aims of litigation, 210
attributing source emissions, 250
attribution
accountability, 250253, 251
direct financial impacts of litigation
defendants, 215
direct regulatory impacts of litigation, 214
impacts of litigation, 207, 218219
financial impacts, 215218
regulatory impacts, 214215
indirect financial impacts of litigation
devaluation of shares, 216218
increasing capital costs, 216
investors, 216
liability insurance, 216
indirect regulatory impacts of litigation, 215
land lost to sea level rises, 251
negligence, 119, 211
number of cases, 209
private nuisance, 119, 211
production gap, 321
public nuisance, 211
responsibility for emissions, 239, 242, 247250
strategic litigation, 208
tort law, 211
causality and human rights–based climate litigation, 15, 36, 308
asbestos litigation, 314
attribution research, 224
failure-to-adapt claims, 234238
Fairchild principle, 339341
liability model of responsibility, 36
wildfire litigation, 227
Center for Climate Crime Analysis (CCCA), 256, 260
cooperation, 265
core principles, 261262
illegal logging and deforestation, 265
Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), 196, 201
children’s rights, 142, 224. See also Future Generations v. Colombia; Juliana v. United States; ICCPR complaint; UN Committee on the Rights of the Child; UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
civil law cases, 119120
claims against corporations, 16, 35, 120, 246247
Amazon (corporation), 139
corporate veil, 362
strategic litigation, 99
ClientEarth, 201202, 212
Climate Accountability Institute, 249
Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015 (Ireland), 305306
Climate Action Tracker (CAT), 341
Climate Change Act 2016 (Kenya), 382
Climate Change Act 2017 (Pakistan), 393394
Climate Change Advisory Council (Ireland), 305
climate change science, 240
sources of greenhouse gases, 241244
climate justice
disproportionate impacts of global warming, 132133
political inequalities, 137138, 374375
racial inequalities, 136137, 352353, 363
wealth versus poverty, 133135, 138140, 371372
women, 135136
ethics and moral responsibility, 140141
Climate Litigation Accelerator (CLX), 5
climate refugees. See Teitiota v. New Zealand
Climate Warrior Campaign (India), 374
coal mining, 2, 17, 164
India, 364, 371, 375
Urgenda case. See Urgenda v. the Netherlands see also oil and gas extraction
coal-fired power stations, 17, 22, 37
Australia, 328
Kenya, 381382
South Africa, 382383
collective rights, 226227
Indigenous communities, 226, 280, 379
self-determination, right to, 226227
Colombia
deforestation in the Amazon region, 350
incorporation of human rights arguments, 102. See also deforestation; Future Generations v. Colombia
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)
climate change as a human rights duty, 153154. See also women,
common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR) principle, 151, 245, 332, 337
ambiguity, 344
common ground as a baseline for human rights claims, 2527
community rights versus individual rights, 224230. See also collective rights; individual rights
construction of new airport runways. See airport expansion
corporate responsibility for emissions. See claims against corporations
corporate veil, 362
courts. See judicial proceedings
COVID-19 pandemic
impact of, 180, 219, 333, 352, 359, 376, 381
criminal and corporate liability law cases, 120
dam construction
Narmada Bachao Andolan case, 370
dam disasters, 236, 350351
deforestation, 13, 99
cattle ranching, impact of, 2
Center for Climate Crime Analysis, 265
foreign enforcement targeting illegal commodities, 263264
foreign enforcement, lack of information for, 264
illegal logging, 262, 350
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 262
link to other illegal activities, 263
local enforcement, lack of, 263. See also illegal logging,
delay enacting national climate change law, 12, 3738, 111, 186, 239, 247248, 334, 337, 394
democratic legitimacy
open standing, 315318
subsidiarity principle, 343
“direct” climate actions, 355
Brazil, 355, 360
disillusionment with multilateral processes, 101
diversity of legal actions
range of acts, policies, and practices, 98
range of legal principles, 98
range of parties, 98
drug dealer defense
market substitution assumption, 329330
Duarte Agostinho v. Portugal
minimum fair share norm, 31
due diligence obligation
climate change policies, 173175, 341
compliance, 175
consistency, 175176
methodology, 176
policy gaps, 176
policy implementation/effectiveness, 176
progression, 176
targets and monitoring, 175
timelines, 176
transparency, 176
Milieudefensie case, 212
no-harm principle, 332
Notre Affaire à Tous case, 213
due process, 34, 127, 173
duty of care
Milieudefensie case, 212
Notre Affaire à Tous case, 213
Urgenda case, 128, 142
duty to take precautionary measures, 127. See also precautionary principle
Earthlife Africa Johannesburg v. Minister of Environmental Affairs & Others, 382383
Ecuador
illegal mining operations, 274276. See also Kofan Indigenous People of Sinangoe v. Ecuador Ministry of Mining
illegal oil exploration, 277280. See also Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v. Ecuador
emissions reduction plans
assessment of state human rights obligations, 178
CESCR assessment of state human rights obligations
whether avoiding regression, 182183
whether climate plan appropriately ambitious, 181182
whether emissions reductions consistent with human rights, 185
whether progressive increase in ambition, 182183
whether state giving adequate priority to human rights, 181
whether state has taken/is taking all rights-respecting steps, 178180
whether state planning to reduce emissions in line with global target, 183185
challenges
mitigation targets, 18
rights-based challenges, 19
rulings, 2224
specific projects and policies, 19
challenges to corporations, 16
challenges to states, 16, 166170
Family Farmers and Greenpeace Germany case, 168
Juliana case, 166167
Neubauer case, 9
Norwegian Constitution, 167168
reasonable minimum obligation, 339340
Urgenda case, 9, 167
enforcement lawsuits, 193194
balancing competing priorities, 257
evidence, 257
inadequate enforcement, 257
lack of coordination, 257
legal competence of courts, 2728, 255256
technological advancements
information sharing, 258260
environmental impact assessments
licenses granted by local planning authorities, 123, 125, 355, 381
obligations of States, 165
omission of climate impacts, 29, 123, 193, 328, 382, 384
People v. Arctic Oil, 326327
strategic litigation, 374
equality-focused climate litigation, 140141
benefits, 141142
proliferation, 142144
Europe
human rights–based climate litigation, 911
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) claims, 305, 309311
prohibition on inhuman or degrading treatment, 336
respect for private and family life, 236, 336, 343
right to life, 236, 336. See also European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Budayeva and Others v. Russia, 236
common ground doctrine, 25
Duarte Agostinho v. Portugal, 3132
failure-to-adapt claims, 235236
Family Farmers and Greenpeace Germany v. Germany, 168
Kolyadenko v. Russia, 236
Öneryildiz v. Turkey, 236
Six Portuguese Youth v. 33 Governments of Europe, 335338, 347348
state’s positive obligations in respect of natural disasters, 236
Urgenda case. See Urgenda v. the Netherlands
European Court of Justice (CJEU)
duty to carry out environmental impact assessments, 326
European Union
mitigation targets, 29, 37
evidence
enforcement lawsuits, 257 See also visual evidence, importance of
Extinction Rebellion, 1. See also social justice movements
extraction and development projects
economic considerations, primacy of, 125See also balancing competing priorities
failure to adapt
attribution science, 223, 234238
causation analysis, 235
source attribution, 235
human rights–based climate litigation, lack of, 34
Sacchi case, 225
Shehla Zia case, 391
failure to adequately mitigate, 177
attribution science, 223, 231234
Sacchi case, 225
Shehla Zia case, 391
Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services, 339340
causation, 339341
Family Farmers and Greenpeace Germany v. Germany, 168
Ferrão Carvalho v. Europe, 29, 37
foreseeability of climate impacts, 232, 235, 237238
forest-dwelling communities
stewardship rights, 366367, 369, 372375
fossil fuel companies. See carbon majors
Framework for Implementation of Climate Change Policy 2014-2030 (Pakistan), 390
France
climate change inequalities, 140
failure to adequately mitigate, 226
fraud and misrepresentation
misleading public opinion and investors, 120, 208, 210212, 217
#FridaysforFuture, 1, 205. See also social justice movements
Friends of the Irish Environment v. Government of Ireland & Ors, 168, 305, 318
deference, 308312
judicial deference, 306
justiciability arguments, 307308
policy discretion, 306307
retrogressive steps, 314
right to a healthy environment, 305, 312315
right to bodily integrity, 305, 312
separation of powers, 306307
Future Generations v. Colombia, 191, 299
attribution science, 232, 237
government responsibility for adequate mitigation, 128
state and non-state collaboration, 148
Germany, 9
domestic climate litigation
incorporation of human rights arguments, 102
lawyer-activists, 200
standing, 37See also Neubauer v. Germany
Global South
common but differentiated responsibility principle, 151
constitutional and human rights arguments, 147148
development of climate litigation, 146, 189191
enforcement of existing laws, 193194
rights-based claims, prevalence of, 191193
stealthy climate litigation, 194195
implement mitigation projects, 155156
implementation of climate law frameworks, 146147
modes of legal action, 187189, 195205
remedies in climate cases, 148149
polluter pays principle, 151
reparations for climate-related harms, 149
restitutio in integrum, 150
Gloucester Resources Limited v. Minister for Planning
market substitution assumption, 330
Golder v. United Kingdom, 344
governmental responsibility for adequate mitigation, 128
source attribution, 232, 238See also states’ responsibilities to guarantee protection from climate change-related harms
grassroots activism, 197199
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
climate change science, 241244
Neubauer case
insufficient pledges, 9
Urgenda case
insufficient pledges, 9
Greenpeace Australia Ltd v. Redbank Power Co, 124
Greenpeace Germany v. Germany, 26, 32, 169
greenwashing, 208, 217, 239
violations of OECD guidelines, 212
Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility
indivisible injury, 338339
human rights–based climate change (HRCC) litigation, 12
baseline rights and duties. See baseline rights and duties
cases (2005–2021), 1112, 22, 4083
failure to adapt. See failure to adapt
failure to adequately mitigate. See failure to adequately mitigate
legal mobilization theory. See legal mobilization theory
limitations
geographic reach, 34
not an end in and of itself, 34
“new wave”/”next generation” cases, 99101
post-Paris Agreement, 1018
common ground doctrine, 2527
compatibility of government policies with climate rights and duties, 2933
establishing baseline rights and duties, 2527
justiciability of legal obligations, 2729
pre-Paris Agreement, 10
procedure, 2425
proliferation, 3, 1014
recent key legal challenges, 23
ICT. See technological advancements
illegal logging, 262264, 350
Center for Climate Crime Analysis, 265
import embargoes, 264, See also deforestation
illegal mining operations
Kofan Indigenous People of Sinangoe case, 274276
impacts of global warming
climate litigation, 145148
disproportionate nature, 132133
gender inequality, 135136
Global South, 155156
political inequality, 137138
poor and marginalized people, 133135, 371372
racial inequality, 136137See also climate justice
international cooperation, 152155
remedies, 148151
India
development policies
balancing environmental protection, 370371
emissions, 364
exclusionary conservation, 371373
international environmental law, 373
judicial proceedings, 365366
environmental jurisprudence, 366367
land acquisition, 365
non-implementation of environmental laws, 368
public trust doctrine, 365, 368, 373
standing, 364
strategic litigation
balancing development with environmental protection, 372375
Indigenous peoples’ movements, 1, 226
Baleni case, 385
constitutional obligation to manage shared natural resources, 280283
granting mining rights, 385
illegal mining operations, 274276
illegal oil exploration, 276280
land grabs, 375
public international law cases, 121
rights of forest-dwellers, 372
Torres Strait islanders, 158165
“indirect” climate actions, 355, 357358
Brazil, 355
individual rights, 227
insufficient pledges, 2, 32, 180
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
Neubauer case, 9
Urgenda case, 9
reducing deforestation, 12
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR)
Advisory Opinion on Human Rights and the Environment, 22, 88, 192
failure-to-adapt claims, 237
forms of evidence, 278
Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayakur case, 277280
Velasquez Rodriguez case, 150
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 12, 130, 244
common ground doctrine, 26
GHG emissions reduction targets, 10
impacts of global warming, 132, 320
international cooperation
international law as persuasive authority, 153
judicial and quasi-judicial bodies, 152155
teleological or purposive method of interpretation, 152
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
right to life, 143
rights of Indigenous peoples
Torres Strait islanders, 158165
Adaptation Claim, 162163
Australia’s human rights obligations, 164165
Mitigation Claim, 163164
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
adequacy of efforts to reduce emissions, 177
international cooperation, 153
international treaties, importance of, 131
Ireland
Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act, 305306
National Mitigation Plan, 305306See also Friends of the Irish Environment v. Government of Ireland & Ors
“isolated” court actions, 355, 362
Brazil, 355
Israel
climate change inequalities, 137138
judicial activism, 192, 307, 311, 393395
judicial and quasi-judicial bodies
international cooperation, 152155
judicial deference, 27, 32
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 306, 308310
judicial proceedings, 255
enforcement concerns, 255256
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 305307
deference, 308312
justiciability arguments, 306308
right to a healthy environment, 312315
standing, 315318
India, 365366
balancing development with environmental protection, 370371
environmental jurisprudence, 366367
right to a healthy environment, 312315
technological advancements, impact of, 256
Juliana v. United States, 84, 99, 143, 166167, 228, 299
justiciability
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 306308
justiciable right to government climate action, 2729
non-justiciability doctrine, 93, 194, 307
Kanuk v. State of Alaska
constitutional obligation to manage shared natural resources, 280283
Public Trust doctrine, 280
Kenya
coal-fired power stations, 381382
Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v. Ecuador, 276280
Kofan Indigenous People of Sinangoe v. Ecuador Ministry of Mining, 274276
Kyoto Protocol, 16, 164
India, 373
Netherlands, 346
land acquisition
India, 365, 375
lawyer-activists, 199201
legal certainty, 313314
legal challenges, nature of
coal mining, 2
fossil fuel companies, 2
high-emission economic activities, 2
insufficient government pledges, 2
Neubauer case, 9
Urgenda case, 9, 32
UN Committee on the Right of the Child, 3
young plaintiffs and future generations, 2, 12
legal mobilization theory, 8586, 9394
group dynamics and collective mobilization, 8992
institutional and structural incentives and disincentives, 8689
micro-politics of disputing behaviour, 9293
legal transplant litigation, 203204
Leghari v. Pakistan, 2, 11, 99, 191, 236
attribution science, 232
Climate Change Commission, 389391
continuing mandamus, 391
failure to implement climate change policy, 390
state and non-state collaboration, 148
links between human activity and climate impact, 1, 320322. See also attribution research
locus standi. See standing
low-profile climate litigation, 117
administrative law cases, 120121
civil law cases, 119120
criminal and corporate liability law cases, 120
public international law cases, 121
major fossil fuel companies. See carbon majors
Manushi Sangathan v. Government of Delhi, 367
margin of appreciation, 2829, 173
ECtHR, 310, 342344
emissions reductions
choice of means, 342343
Hatton case, 342344
respect for private and family life, 343344
Taşkin case, 342
Urgenda case, 346347
use of its resources and rights obligations, 179
margin of discretion, 155, 167, 173
market incentives
illegal deforestation, 264
renewable energy projects, 125, 130
market substitution assumption, 329330. See also perfect substitution argument
Massachusetts v. EPA, 189, 193
air pollutant, concept of, 128
minimum fair share norm, 3033, 37
nationally determined contributions, 170175
Urgenda case, 167, 175
modes of litigation, 205
“The Enforcer”, 197, 204205
“The Engineer”, 197, 203204
“The Farmer”, 197, 201203
“Grassroots Activist”, 197199
“Hero Litigators”, 197, 199201
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, 370371
narrative change strategies, 290293
climate litigation, 296297, 300301
negative/damaging narratives, 297300
Even it Up campaign, 294
human stories, use of, 295296
Ley Pulpin, Peru, 293294
National Climate Change Fund (Brazil), 356
National Climate Change Policy 2012 (Pakistan), 390
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (Australia), 124
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (USA), 124
National Green Tribunal (India), 365
National Policy on Climate Change (Brazil), 356
nationally determined contributions (NDC)
assessment of emissions reductions, See assessment of climate change policies; emissions reduction plans
Australia and Torres Strait, 163
Global South, 195
Paris Climate Agreement, 170175, 178, 245
negative emissions, 184185, 337
negligence
cases against carbon majors, 119, 211
Netherlands, 9
domestic climate litigation
incorporation of human rights arguments, 102See also Urgenda v. the Netherlands
Neubauer v. Germany, 2, 910
failure to mitigate, 18
justiciability, 27
material incentives, 33
standing, 37
temporal dimensions of climate change, 38
“new wave”/”next generation” cases, 99101
strategic litigation, 101103
New Zealand, 13. See also Teitiota v. New Zealand
no-harm principle, 175, 332
non-justiciability doctrine, 93, 194, 307
non-profit organization litigants, 188, 195, 201203, 205
Norway
carbon emissions, 323, 333
regulation of petroleum activities, 324See also People v. Arctic Oil
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 35, 212, 264
oil and gas extraction, 122125, 212213, 322
CO2 impact of, 241, 248, 320
enforcement concerns, 255
Norwegian Constitution, 167168, 324
People v. Arctic Oil, 324327See also carbon majors; coal mining; extraction and development projects
oil exploration, 2
Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku case, 276280
People v. Arctic Oil, 323, 324327See also coal mining; Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v. Ecuador; People v. Arctic Oil
open standing regime, 315318
Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change (2015), 125
“others do it too” defense, 234
Pakistan, 11, 387
environmental justice, 391
environmental protection provisions, 387, 393394
identity of polluters, 391
judicial activism, 393395
judicially enforceable rights, 387
public interest litigation, 388389
Palestine
climate change inequalities, 137138
Pandey v. Union of India, 193, 368, 373
Paris Climate Agreement (2015), 12, 1530, 373
adoption and implementation, 14, 245
Africa, 380
common but differentiated responsibilities, 332
common ground doctrine, 26
GHG emissions reduction targets, 10, 332
human rights impacts, recognition of, 2
international cooperation, 153, 333
People v. Arctic Oil, 333
People v. Arctic Oil, 320
oil drilling licenses, 324
Paris Agreement, 333
perfect substitution argument, 331
right to a healthy environment, 324325
Supreme Court judgment
supply-side accountability, 325327See also market substitution assumption
Philippi Horticultural Area v. MEC for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, 383384
Philippines’ Human Rights Commission
impact of climate change on human rights, 17, 35, 99, 101, 213, 298299
Planning Act (UK)
airport expansion, 309
environmental assessments, 326
policy discretion, 2729, 166, 168, 174, 179
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 306307
People v. Arctic Oil, 325327
Urgenda case, 346
political inequalities
disproportionate impacts of climate change, 137138
polluter pays principle, 151, 156, 368
Portillo Cáceres v. Paraguay, 149150, 171
Portugal, 31. See also Duarte Agostinho v. Portugal; Six Portuguese Youth v. 33 Governments of Europe
precautionary principle, 90, 125, 128, 165, 174
Kofan Indigenous People of Sinangoe case, 276
Pandey case, 368
Save Lamu case, 382
precedent and legal certainty, 313315
private nuisance
cases against carbon majors, 119, 211
prohibition on inhuman or degrading treatment, 336
prosecutor/enforcement authority initiated litigation, 204205
public activism, 110111
public interest litigation (Pakistan)
limitations
lack of substantive action, 392
reluctance to appoint climate change experts, 392
statutory appeals, 392
right to a clean and healthy environment, 389
right to life, 388
Shehla Zia case, 389
standing requirements, 388
public international law cases, 121
public nuisance
cases against carbon majors, 211
public trust doctrine, 284
India, 365, 368, 373
Kanuk case, 280283
Punjab Environmental Protection Act 1997 (Pakistan), 394
racial inequalities
disproportionate impacts of climate change, 136137, 143144
Brazil, 352353, 363
regulation-forcing litigation, 193194
remedies
balancing competing priorities, 32
duty to cooperate as a judicial remedy, 152155
Global South
polluter-pays principle, 150
Portillo Cáceres case, 149
reparations, 149
restitutio in integrum, 150
Teitiota case, 149
Velasquez Rodriguez case, 150
injunctive relief, 211
international law, 153155
strategic litigation, 111113
resource allocation
comparison to peer states, 181182
margin of appreciation, 179
emissions reduction, 178180
state subsidies, 181
respect for private and family life, 224
ECHR, 236, 336, 343
retrogressive steps, 182183
Friends of Irish Environment case, 314
right to a healthy environment, 27, 319, 378
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 305306, 312315, 318
IACtHR, 22
Norwegian Constitution, 324325
Pakistan, 389
People v. Arctic Oil, 324
right to bodily integrity, 305
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 305, 312
right to health, 224, 319
right to life, 38, 88, 165, 192, 224, 319
Africa, 378
ECHR, 236, 336
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 305, 312
IACtHR, 311
ICCPR, 143, 158
Portillo Cáceres case, 149
Shehla Zia case, 389
Subhash Kumar case, 369
Teitiota case, 149
Rio Declaration (1992), 2
risks associated with litigation, 113115
Sacchi v. Argentina
children’s rights, 225
failure to adapt, 225
failure to adequately mitigate, 225
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 225, 228229
Save Lamu & Five Others v. National Environmental Management Authority & Another, 381382
separation of powers doctrine, 28, 155, 168, 232, 307, 309, 317, 347
shared responsibility
causation, 340341
common but differentiated responsibilities, 337See also common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR) principle
ECHR obligations, 338341
fair share, 337338, 341
Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility, 338339
indivisible injury, 338339
reasonable minimum obligation, 339340
Urgenda case, 347
Shehla Zia and Others v. WAPDA, 389, 391
Six Portuguese Youth v. 33 Governments of Europe, 335336
ECHR claims, 336338, 347348
social inequalities. See climate justice
social justice movements, 1
India, 365
South Africa
coal-fired power stations, 383
development impacts on aquifers, 383384
international agreements, 381See also Earthlife Africa Johannesburg v. Minister of Environmental Affairs & Others; Philippi Horticultural Area v. MEC for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning
standing, 37
applicable standing rules, 315
Friends of the Irish Environment case, 315
India, 364
liberal approach
government decision-making, 317
rule of law, 315316
trend, 316
rule of law, relationship with, 315316
separation of powers argument, 317
traditional approach, 316
states’ responsibilities to guarantee protection from climate change-related harms, 149151, 156, 158160. See also shared responsibility
stealthy climate litigation
Global South, 194195
strategic ambitions of climate change litigation, 9798
climate change in human rights terms, 101103
Juliana case, 99
Leghari case, 99
targeting corporations, 99
Urgenda case, 99
young plaintiffs and future generations, 99See also Juliana v. United States; Leghari v. Pakistan; Urgenda v. the Netherlands
Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive (EU)
airport expansion, 309
environmental assessments, 326
strategic litigation, 115116, 386
balancing development with environmental protection, 372375
broader plan for change, 108110
carbon majors, 208
definition, 104105
history, 105106
impact assessment processes, 374
implementation challenges, 111113
legal context, 108
political context, 108
public activism, 110111
risk assessment, importance of, 113115
social change, relationship with, 105106
social context, 108, 353355
“structural” court actions, 355, 362
Brazil, 355, 360
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, 369
subsidiarity principle
margin of appreciation, 342
subsidies
clean enery suppliers, 19, 181, 185
fossil fuels, 181, 186, 248, 332
resource allocation, 181
supply-side accountability. See accountability:carbon majors
taxation and tax exemption measures, 181
air travel, 32
carbon taxes, 185
technological advancements
bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, 185
judicial proceedings, impact on, 256
law enforcement, 258260, 266
Teitiota v. New Zealand, 2, 13, 143, 149
temporal dimensions of climate change, 125
temporality of human rights law, 3739
Thunberg, Greta, 2, 13, 247
Torres Strait islanders, 158160
ICCPR complaint, 160165
Adaptation Claim, 162163
Australia’s human rights obligations, 164165
Mitigation Claim, 163164
loss of culture, 161162
tort law
cases against carbon majors, 211
trends in climate litigation
strategic cases, 99101
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR)
adequacy of efforts to reduce emissions, 186
whether a state has taken/is taking all rights-respecting steps, 178180
whether avoiding regression, 182183
whether climate plan appropriately ambitious, 181182
whether emissions reductions consistent with human rights, 185
whether progressive increase in ambition, 182183
whether state giving adequate priority to human rights, 181
whether state planning to reduce emissions in line with global target, 183185
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 3, 13, 228229, 234
climate change as a human rights duty, 153154
UN Convention on Biological Diversity’s (CBD), 380
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)
Sacchi v. Argentina, 225, 228229
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), 380
UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas (2018), 380
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC 1992), 30, 244245, 332
Africa, 380
Brazil, 356
good faith, 173
India, 373
international cooperation, 153
Kenya, 382
no-harm principle, 332
South Africa, 381
Torres Strait case, 163164
Urgenda case, 345
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 35, 213
UN Human Rights Committee
harmonization of international law, 149150
physical integrity and climate harms, 2, 13
Portillo Cáceres case, 149150
right to life, 311
Teitiota case, 2, 13, 143, 149
Torres Strait islanders, 160165
UNEP Emissions Gap Report, 321
United Nations Charter
international cooperation, 153
United States
administrative climate litigation
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 124
civil law cases, 119120
climate change inequalities, 133137, 143
climate forced displacement, 235
criminal and corporate liability law cases, 120
Juliana case. See Juliana v. United States
Kanuk case. See Kanuk v. State of Alaska
Urgenda v. the Netherlands, 2, 9, 84, 189, 191, 193, 203204, 207, 227
duty of care, 128, 142
ECHR claims, 311, 345347
emissions reduction plans, 9, 167
insufficient government pledges, 9, 32
margin of appreciation, 346
minimum fair share norm, 30, 167
separation of powers argument, 155
shared responsibility, 347
strategic ambitions of climate change, 99
temporal dimensions of climate change, 38
Velasquez Rodriguez v. Honduras, 150
visual evidence, importance of, 287288
Feather River Lumber Co. case, 273
Kanuk case, 280283
Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku case, 276280
Kofan Indigenous People of Sinangoe case, 274276
public opinion, impact on, 270273, 284285
Bushfire Survivors case, 285287
Volkswagen
Dieselgate scandal, 217
We the People v. Union of India, 368
WildEarth Guardians v. United States Forest Service et al.
perfect substitution argument, 330
wildfires
Australia, 227, 285287
Canada, 227
causality and human rights–based climate litigation, 227
visual evidence, importance of
Australia, 285287
Wildlife First and Others v. Ministry of Environment and Forests, 369
women
African patriarchy, 379
disproportionate impacts of climate change, 135136See also climate justice: disproportionate impacts of global warming; Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)
Youth Climate Movement, 299

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Index
  • Edited by César Rodríguez-Garavito, New York University
  • Book: Litigating the Climate Emergency
  • Online publication: 10 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106214.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Index
  • Edited by César Rodríguez-Garavito, New York University
  • Book: Litigating the Climate Emergency
  • Online publication: 10 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106214.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Index
  • Edited by César Rodríguez-Garavito, New York University
  • Book: Litigating the Climate Emergency
  • Online publication: 10 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106214.028
Available formats
×