Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T08:00:19.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The terms “Névé” and “Firn”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

F. Loewe*
Affiliation:
Department of Meteorology, University of Melbourne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1953

Sir,

I see that in Mr. M. M. Miller’s letter in the November 1952 issue of the Journal, page 150, the definition of firn suggested by the Committee on Snow Classification of the International Association of Scientific Hydrology is as follows:

“old snow which has outlasted one summer at least (transformed into a dense heavy material as a result of frequent melting and freezing).”

If the words in brackets are to be considered part of the definition this will be a mistake. It may be true that in the Alps and most mountain regions firn is formed from snow in this way, but the greater part of the firn of the world, i.e. in the interior of polar ice caps, has never been subject to melting and freezing but is transformed “into a dense heavy material” by pressure and recrystallization only. It seems to me, therefore, that the suggested definition will lead to confusion, I would either omit the words in brackets altogether, or say “old snow which has outlasted one summer at least and is transformed into a dense material.” Polar, as indeed all, fun is characterized by the fact that (a) the particles are to some extent cemented together, but that (b) the air interstices still communicate with each other. (a) distinguishes it from snow, (b) from ice.