Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:10:51.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New research on the Late Pleistocene in the Lim Channel, Istria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

Ivor Janković*
Affiliation:
Institute for Anthropological Research, Ljudevita Gaja 32, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Avenue, Laramie WY 82071–3431, USA
Darko Komšo
Affiliation:
Archaeological Museum of Istria, Carrarina 3, 52100 Pula, Croatia
James C.M. Ahern
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Avenue, Laramie WY 82071–3431, USA
Rory Becker
Affiliation:
Anthropology/Sociology Department, Eastern Oregon University, 1 University Boulevard, La Grande, OR 97850, USA
Katarina Gerometta
Affiliation:
Juraj Dobrila University, Zagrebačka 30, 52100 Pula, Croatia
Jacobo Weinstock
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities, University of Southampton, Avenue Campus Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BF, UK
Antonela Barbir
Affiliation:
Croatian Conservation Institute, Nike Grškovića 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Nikola Vukosavljević
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Barbara Cvitkušić
Affiliation:
Institute for Anthropological Research, Ljudevita Gaja 32, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Krunoslav Zubčić
Affiliation:
Croatian Conservation Institute, Nike Grškovića 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Sanjin Mihelić
Affiliation:
Archaeological Museum in Zagreb, Trg N. Šubića Zrinskog 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Fred H. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Illinois State University, 100 N. University Street, Normal, IL 61761, USA
*
*Author for correspondence (Email: ivor.jankovic@inantro.hr)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As a part of the multidisciplinary project entitled ‘Archaeological Investigations into the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene of the Lim Channel, Istria’, archaeological research has been conducted at four sites: Romuald's Cave, Abri Kontija 002, Pećina at Rovinjsko Selo and Lim 001 (Figure 1). There is much debate on issues related to biological and behavioural continuity, to patterns of changes and adaptations during this crucial period, and to external factors (e.g. changes in ecology and climate). For example, a clearer insight is needed into how climatic change affects the ecology of specific regions, including changing sea levels. Additionally, there continues to be debate centring on who produced the earliest (Initial) Upper Palaeolithic industries in Europe. To achieve a more precise insight into long-term diachronic changes and cultural relations around the Adriatic, and to document the presence of Middle and Upper Palaeolithic humans in Istria, we concentrated on a single microregion (the Lim Channel in Istria, Croatia). Here we report work on the two sites that to date have yielded Pleistocene material: Romuald's Cave and Abri Kontija 002.

Type
Project Gallery
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017 

As a part of the multidisciplinary project entitled ‘Archaeological Investigations into the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene of the Lim Channel, Istria’, archaeological research has been conducted at four sites: Romuald's Cave, Abri Kontija 002, Pećina at Rovinjsko Selo and Lim 001 (Figure 1). There is much debate on issues related to biological and behavioural continuity, to patterns of changes and adaptations during this crucial period, and to external factors (e.g. changes in ecology and climate). For example, a clearer insight is needed into how climatic change affects the ecology of specific regions, including changing sea levels. Additionally, there continues to be debate centring on who produced the earliest (Initial) Upper Palaeolithic industries in Europe. To achieve a more precise insight into long-term diachronic changes and cultural relations around the Adriatic, and to document the presence of Middle and Upper Palaeolithic humans in Istria, we concentrated on a single microregion (the Lim Channel in Istria, Croatia). Here we report work on the two sites that to date have yielded Pleistocene material: Romuald's Cave and Abri Kontija 002.

Figure 1. Location of investigated sites.

Romuald's Cave is located on the eastern slopes overlooking the Lim Channel (Figures 1, 2, 3a). During previous excavations, extensive faunal remains were found (including cave and brown bear, cave lion, cave hyena, elk, red deer, alpine chamois, alpine ibex and other species; Malez Reference Malez1968, Reference Malez1981). Prehistoric pottery was found in the uppermost layers, while lower layers yielded stone tools collectively described as “younger Aurignacian and early Gravettian” (Malez 1981: 130). Two juvenile human teeth were also retrieved from the Palaeolithic layers (Malez Reference Malez1968) and are demonstrably modern human (Janković et al. Reference Janković, Ahern, Komšo, Barbir, Mihelić and Smith2017). D. Komšo (Reference Komšo2003, Reference Komšo2008) excavated two trenches in the first cave chamber (trenches 1 and 2; Figure 2a), in which he found faunal remains, Bronze Age pottery and several tools that, based on typology, could be assigned to the Middle Palaeolithic (Mousterian).

Figure 2. Position of trenches (a–b) (map by J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Our excavations started in 2014 (Janković et al. Reference Janković, Komšo, Ahern, Becker, Gerometta, Mihelić and Zubčić2016). During three seasons, we collected numerous archaeological and palaeontological finds. Initially, we cleaned a previously excavated trench (part of trench 2 on Figures 2a & 3b) and collected samples for radiometric dating. Alongside faunal remains of the aforementioned taxa, we found several Mousterian tools in layers dated to over 48 kya (Figure 3c). We also excavated a new trench (trench 3 on Figures 2a, 3d, 4), the upper layers of which yielded Bronze Age pottery fragments (Figure 5a) and the fragmented remains of at least two individuals dated to 3150±46 years cal BP (Janković et al. Reference Janković, Ahern, Mihelić and Premužić2015). The middle stratigraphic sequence yielded Pleistocene faunal remains but very few lithic finds (Figure 5b). In the lower sequence (layers 20–22, Figure 4), however, numerous Mousterian-type lithic finds were found (Figure 5c). This corresponds with radiometric results from trench 2. Faunal, lithic and geoarchaeological analyses are in progress, as is radiometric dating of samples.

Figure 3. a) Geophysical work in front of Romuald's Cave; b) excavations at trench 2; c) Mousterian lithics from trench 2; d) excavations at trench 3 (photographs by J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Figure 4. Stratigraphic (north-east) profile of trench 3 at Romuald's Cave (illustration by I. Krajcar/J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Figure 5. a) Bronze and Iron Age pottery from trench 3; b) Upper Palaeolithic blade; c) Middle Palaeolithic finds from trench 3 (illustrations and photographs by D. Maršanić/J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Abri Kontija 002 is located on the northern side of the Lim Channel (Figures 1 & 6a). In 2007, D. Komšo opened two small (0.4 × 0.4m, excavated to about 0.4m in depth) test trenches from which he collected 20 lithic artefacts. Our work began in 2014 and continued for three seasons. We opened a 1.5 × 1.5m trench (expanded 1.5m southwards in 2016) on the plateau in front of the small cave opening that is now filled with sediment (Figures 2b & 6b). The entire stratigraphic sequence was very rich in archaeological remains. Traces of fire and burnt bones, faunal remains, ochre and several thousand lithic finds (including tools and small chips) were recovered (Figure 6c–d). Consistent traces of burning throughout all layers, the quantity and technological properties of lithic finds, and preliminary archaeozoological analysis all suggest either continuous or frequent human presence at the site and in situ production of tools. Faunal remains are highly fragmented, with some displaying traces of cutting and burning. Horse and goat are the most frequently encountered taxa, but red deer, alpine marmot, hare and other species are also present. Radiometric dating of the site is in progress, but preliminary results, combined with the initial results of the lithic analysis, suggest a Late Upper Palaeolithic time frame for human presence at the site. The data suggest that this is potentially a crucial site for understanding various issues regarding Upper Palaeolithic human occupation of the region. Analyses of data and comparisons with other sites (e.g. Šandalja II near Pula in Istria) are ongoing.

Figure 6. a) Abri Kontija 002 site during excavations; b) site and selected finds; c–d) selected Upper Palaeolithic lithic tools (photographs by J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Results to date demonstrate the presence of both Mousterian and Upper Palaeolithic people in this microregion. At Romuald's Cave, differences are apparent between the Mousterian and Upper Palaeolithic occupations. Mousterian people exclusively used the first cave chamber and produced tools using local materials, while Upper Palaeolithic humans also used the central and rear cave areas and produced tools using non-local raw materials. Dating and certain faunal specimens suggest that Mousterian occupation occurred during a colder period (Marine Isotope Stage 3), when conditions severely limited occupation north of the Alps. The Abri Kontija Upper Palaeolithic occupation indicates a largely continuous use of the cave for human habitation. As excavations at these sites proceed, we expect to encounter older Pleistocene strata, which will allow for further examination of the project's goals.

Acknowledgements

Archaeological work was supported by the Croatian Science Foundation (grant 7789).

References

Janković, I., Ahern, J.C.M., Mihelić, S. & Premužić, Z.. 2015. Bronze and Iron Age finds from Romuald's Cave, Istria: 2014 excavation season. Collegium Antropologicum 39: 943–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Janković, I., Komšo, D., Ahern, J.C.M., Becker, R., Gerometta, K., Mihelić, S. & Zubčić, K.. 2016. Arheološka istraživanja u Limskom kanalu 2014 i 2015. Lokaliteti Romualdova pećina i Abri kontija 002, Pećina kod Rovinjskog sela, Lim 001 i podvodni pregled Limskog kanala. Histria Archaeologica 46: 523.Google Scholar
Janković, I., Ahern, J.C.M., Komšo, D., Barbir, A., Mihelić, S. & Smith, F.H.. 2017. Human remains and artifacts from Romuald's Cave, Istria, Croatia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology S64: 230–31.Google Scholar
Komšo, D. 2003. Pećine Istre—mjesta življenja od prapovijesti do srednjeg vijeka. Histria Antiqua 11: 4154.Google Scholar
Komšo, D. 2008. Limski kanal. Hrvatski arheološki godišnjak 4: 264–68.Google Scholar
Malez, M. 1968. Tragovi paleolita u Romualdovoj pećini kod Rovinja u Istri. Arheološki Radovi i Rasprave 6: 726.Google Scholar
Malez, M. 1981. Krško podzemlje Istre kao prostor za naseljavanje fosilnih ljudi. Liburnijske teme 4: 117–35.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of investigated sites.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Position of trenches (a–b) (map by J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Figure 2

Figure 3. a) Geophysical work in front of Romuald's Cave; b) excavations at trench 2; c) Mousterian lithics from trench 2; d) excavations at trench 3 (photographs by J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Stratigraphic (north-east) profile of trench 3 at Romuald's Cave (illustration by I. Krajcar/J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Figure 4

Figure 5. a) Bronze and Iron Age pottery from trench 3; b) Upper Palaeolithic blade; c) Middle Palaeolithic finds from trench 3 (illustrations and photographs by D. Maršanić/J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).

Figure 5

Figure 6. a) Abri Kontija 002 site during excavations; b) site and selected finds; c–d) selected Upper Palaeolithic lithic tools (photographs by J.C.M. Ahern/I. Janković).