Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:02:00.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Multi-competence in second language acquisition: inroads into the mainstream?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Vivian Cook
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Li Wei
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. 2009. ‘Age of L2 acquisition and degree of nativelikeness: listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny’, Language Learning 59, 249306.Google Scholar
Andringa, S. 2014. ‘The use of native speaker norms in critical period hypothesis research’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36 (3), 565596.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M. and Luk, G. 2012. ‘Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(4), 240250.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. 2014. ‘Dominance and age in bilingualism’, Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1093/applin/amu031Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. and Gertken, L. M. 2013. ‘In faint praise of folly: a critical review of native/non-native speaker comparisons, with examples from native and bilingual processing of French complex syntax’, Language, Interaction and Acquisition 4, 107133.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. 1983. ‘The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity’, Language Learning 33, 117.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Brown, A. and Gullberg, M. 2008. ‘Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1–L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, 225251.Google Scholar
Brown, A. and Gullberg, M. 2012. ‘Multi-competence and native speaker variation in clausal packaging in Japanese’, Second Language Research 28, 415442.Google Scholar
Brown, A. and Gullberg, M. 2013. ‘L1–L2 convergence in clausal packaging in Japanese and English’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 477494.Google Scholar
Bylund, E. and Athanasopoulos, P. 2014. ‘Linguistic relativity in SLA: towards a new research program’, Language Learning 64 (4), 952985.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2012. ‘Advanced language proficiency’, in Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (eds), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 506520. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B. and Jessner, U. 2001. Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1975. ‘Strategies in the comprehension of relative clauses’, Language and Speech 18, 204212.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1991. ‘The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence’, Second Language Research 7, 103117.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1993. ‘Wholistic multi-competence: jeu d’esprit or paradigm shift?’, in Kettemann, B. (ed.), Current Issues in European Second Language Acquisition Research, pp. 28. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1997. ‘Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34, 3549.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (ed.) 2003. Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2012. ‘Multi-competence and the native speaker’, in Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, pp. 37683774. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Core, C., Hoff, E., Rumiche, R. and Señor, M. 2013. ‘Total and conceptual vocabulary in Spanish–English bilinguals from 22 to 30 months: implications for assessment’, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56, 16371649.Google Scholar
De Angelis, G. and Dewaele, J.-M. (eds) 2011. New Trends in Crosslinguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. L. and Verspoor, M. 2013. ‘Dynamic Systems Theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development’, in del Pilar García Mayo, M., Gutierrez Mangado, M. J. and Martínez Adrián, M. (eds), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, pp. 199220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. 2009. Bilingual First Language Acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. 2015. ‘Harmonious bilingual development: young families’ well-being in language contact situations’, International Journal of Bilingualism 19, 169184.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Opitz, C. and Lubińska, D. (eds) 2013. The Dynamics of First Language Attrition across the Lifespan, special issue of International Journal of Bilingualism 17 (6).Google Scholar
De Zeeuw, M., Verhoeven, L. and Schreuder, R. 2012. ‘Morphological family size effects in young first and second language learners: evidence of cross-language semantic activation in visual word recognition’, Language Learning 62, 6892.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. and Munro, M. 2013. ‘The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: a seven-year study’, Language Learning 63, 163185.Google Scholar
Dinsmore, T. H. 2006. ‘Principles, parameters, and SLA: a retrospective meta-analytic investigation into adult L2 learners’ access to Universal Grammar’, in Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (eds), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 5390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Five Graces Group: Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., … Schoenemann, T. 2009. ‘Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper’, Language Learning 59 (supplement 1), 126.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1987. ‘The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification’, Journal of Phonetics 15, 4765.Google Scholar
Garcia, O. and Wei, Li 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. and Selinker, L. (eds) 1983. Language Transfer in Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. and Moawad, R. A. 2010. ‘Semantic interaction in early and late bilinguals: all words are not created equally’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13, 385408.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 1989. ‘Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person’, Brain and Language 36, 315.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 2008. Studying Bilinguals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lieberman, M. and Gualmini, A. 2010. ‘Acquiring the scope of disjunction and negation in L2: a bidirectional study of learners of Japanese and English’, Language Acquisition 17 (3), 127154.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H. and Cadierno, T. (eds) 2010. Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. 2003. ‘The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech’, Child Development 74, 13681878.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. 2006. ‘Native-speakerism’, ELT Journal 60, 385387.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. 2000. ‘Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon’, Language Learning 50, 245309.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. and Pavlenko, A. 2008. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Keck, C. and Ortega, L. 2013. Deficit views of language learners in applied linguistics discourse: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Paper presented at the 32nd Second Language Research Forum, October 31–November 2, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. and Sharwood Smith, M. (eds) 1986. Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Klein, W. 1998. ‘The contribution of second language acquisition research’, Language Learning 48, 527550.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bogulski, C. A. and McClain, R. 2012. ‘Psycholinguistic perspectives on second language learning and bilingualism: the course and consequence of cross-language competition’, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2, 124.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1969. ‘The logic of nonstandard English’, Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics 22 (1–22), 2631.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wei, Li (ed.) 2007. The Bilingualism Reader, second edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wei, Li (ed.) 2009. Bilingualism and Multilingualism: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, four-volume anthology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J. 2000. ‘The Threshold Hypothesis, semilingualism, and other contributions to a deficit view of linguistic minorities’, Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 22, 345.Google Scholar
May, S. (ed.) 2014. The Multilingual Turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and Bilingual Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Odlin, T. 1989. Language Transfer: Cross-linguistic Influence in Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2013. ‘SLA for the 21st century: disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn’, Language Learning 63 (S1), 124.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2014. ‘Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA’, in May, S. (ed.), The Multilingual Turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and Bilingual Education, pp. 3253. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. and Jarvis, S. 2002. ‘Bidirectional transfer’, Applied Linguistics 23, 190214.Google Scholar
Peal, E. and Lambert, W. E. 1962. ‘The relation of bilingualism to intelligence’, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 76 (27), 123.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C. and Oller, D. K. 1993. ‘Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: comparison to monolingual norms’, Language Learning 43, 93120.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. 2013. ‘How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17, 458470.Google Scholar
Ringbom, H. 1987. The Role of the First Language in Foreign Language Learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ringbom, H. 2007. Cross-linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. and Iverson, I. 2010. ‘Independent normative assessments for bi/multilingualism, where art thou?’, in Cruz-Ferreira, M. (ed.), Multilingual Norms: Language Norming in Multilingual Contexts, pp. 3351. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. and Treffers-Daller, J. 2014. ‘A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too!Applied Linguistics 35, 9398.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L., Raudenbush, S. W. and Goldin-Meadow, S. 2012. ‘The pace of vocabulary growth helps predict later vocabulary skill’, Child Development 83, 508525.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. 1974. ‘An error in error analysis’, Language Learning 24, 205214.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. 2014. ‘Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: what the research shows’, Language Learning 65, 913951.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. 2001. ‘Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 133158.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds), in press. Language Dominance in Bilinguals: Issues of Measurement and Operationalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. 2003. ‘Critical period or general age factor(s)?’, in del Pilar García Mayo, M. and García Lecumberri, M. L. (eds), Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language, pp. 322. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2013. ‘Adult second language acquisition: a selective overview with a focus on the learner linguistic system’, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13, 4872.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2011a. ‘Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism’, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1 (1), 133.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2011b. The bilingual native speaker. Paper presented at the Language Learning Roundtable on Is there a future for the native speaker in SLA research? at the 21st Annual Conference of the European Second Language Association (N. Abrahamsson and M. Bylund, conveners), Stockholm.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. M. 2011. ‘Where it all began: a tribute to Wallace E. Lambert’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30, 259263.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. 2004. Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition: A History. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J. 2011. ‘Operationalizing and measuring language dominance’, International Journal of Bilingualism 15, 147163.Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G. and Tanner, D. 2012. ‘Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation’, Language Learning 62, 148171.Google Scholar
White, L. 1985. ‘The “pro-drop” parameter in adult second language acquisition’, Language Learning 35, 4762.Google Scholar
Yu, L. and Odlin, T. (eds) 2015. New Developments in Transfer Research. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×