1. Introducing Jane Addams to the relational concept of the public

This study continues to clarify the significance of Jane Addams to the research of the public realm by reading Addams’ book, The Long Road of Woman's Memory (Reference Addams1916b), as a contribution to theorization about how the public forms. Previous research shows that Addams was involved in the intellectual work of creating concepts that help to define the individual's changed relationship to public political life in modern mass society. Compared to the concepts of the public crafted by Walter Lippmann ([1925] Reference Lippmann1927) and John Dewey (Reference Dewey1927), Addams’ (Reference Addams1902, Reference Addams1907) understanding was cosmopolitan, urban, and much more sensitive to social inequalities (Ripatti-Torniainen Reference Ripatti-Torniainen2022). In this study, I show that Addams in The Long Road again addresses a preeminent question in the theorizing of the public: How do marginalized people join the public from beyond political, socioeconomic, and socio-cultural barriers? Answering this question remains a methodological challenge in our time.

The Long Road is based upon a seemingly irrational incident. In the autumn of 1913, thousands of people in Chicago were convinced that a supernatural “devil baby” was sheltered in the Addams-led Hull-House. The assumed baby mobilized older immigrant women in an unforeseen manner in the city. Addams does not conceptualize the event in explicit public-related terms. To highlight the contribution of the book to the theorizing of the public, I situate Addams’ coverage within the sociological theorizing that was ongoing in her time, which revolved around the capacity of public interaction to overcome social divisions by raising awareness and encouraging reflection upon collective concerns. Thus, public interaction could contribute to the reorganization of social relations and, eventually, to social change. This perspective is known as a relational concept of the public (Starr Reference Starr2021), and its roots are evident in the works of Gabriel Tarde ([1901] Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Robert E. Park (Reference Park1904, Reference Park and Elsner1972). In this study, I propose that Addams folds her voice and the voices of women from the margins into the theorizing through the conceptual discussion about memory that she develops in The Long Road. Distinguishing between two functions of memory, Addams recognizes characteristic value in each but considers only one capable of transforming established social ties and identities. I ask, as the research question, what Addams sees as the decisive factor behind such transformation, and I argue that, through the answer, Addams conceptualizes the formation toward something like the public among marginalized people, despite many barriers.

I propose that the public-related vantage point is a new key to a book that faced early criticism for its lack of coherence (Brigham Reference Brigham1917) and at first sight puzzled and slightly disappointed even the Addams scholar Seigfried (Reference Seigfried2002, x). In what follows, I first locate The Long Road in the public-related theorizing that preceded the book. I then discuss previous research on The Long Road, after which I introduce my research design and analysis and proceed to the results and conclusions.

2. Theorizing the public: Tarde and Park

Theorization around the concept of the public is regarded as a significant area of analysis by several disciplines, such as communication science, sociology, and political science. By Addams’ era, the old philosophical assertion that the public realm carries unique value in human life (Arendt Reference Arendt1958; Weintraub Reference Weintraub, Weintraub and Kumar1997) had gained new momentum alongside the Enlightenment period's emphasis on civic life. The public was conceived to consist of citizens who used their reason for collective ends with awareness of their political power (Kant [1784] Reference Kant and Schmidt1996; Laursen Reference Laursen and Schmidt1996).

A century later, massive urbanization and the development of mass communication necessitated a reconceptualization of the public and its interactions. Sociological work at the turn of the twentieth century was foundational in conceptualizing the public, both socially and communicatively, in this new setting. Gabriel Tarde ([1901] Reference Tarde and Clark1969) articulated a critical premise by detaching the concept of the public from embodied gatherings and redefining the public as a distinctive structure of social relations and consciousness (Starr Reference Starr2021, 58). For Tarde, the public emerged when individuals became aware that they were facing a collective concern with unknown others and joined in interaction about the topic. Both awareness and interaction may arise in private encounters, even in solitude, as is the case when one reads a newspaper and reflects. For Tarde, the formation of the public often began in non-public situations (Starr Reference Starr2021, 68–69).

Robert E. Park, who began working in Chicago soon after the devil baby case, had significantly developed the conceptual definition of the public in his doctoral dissertation, which was published in German in 1904. Building on Tarde, Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972) separated the public from the crowd; in line with Tarde, Park stressed that the crowd and the public are psychological rather than spatial formations. The crowd and the public exist in reciprocal public influence, and their features distinguish them from each other.

According to Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972, 61, 80), the crowd comes into being whenever a reciprocal sentiment is recognized and interpreted in unison, leading to a collective drive without criticism. Instead, the public develops diverging standpoints and critical discussion about the topic. Using “prudence and rational reflection” (80), the public develops collectively valid stances out of participants’ individual standpoints and experiences (58). Whereas entering the crowd only requires “the ability to feel and empathize” (80), participation in the public presumes “the ability to think and reason with others” (80). Both the crowd and the public signaled social change for Park (78), who viewed them as “strikingly” departing from other social formations, such as political parties, social classes, and groups pursuing special purposes. The crowd and the public grow “out of and beyond” these and other groups, serving “to bring individuals out of old ties and into new ones” (78). These concepts illuminate how the weakening of established social ties and identities, and the development of new ones, reveal themselves in publicly mediated interaction (47–48, 79).

When I read The Long Road (Reference Addams1916b) alongside the work of Addams’ contemporaries Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972), my attention is drawn to Addams’ similar creation of a conceptual distinction between two psychological, publicly relevant phenomena: two functions of memory. In the first function, reinterpretative acts of memory relieve psychological pain by construing hard experiences as bearable ones. In contrast, the second function activates reinterpretation of the hardships on a socio-political level. Addams argued that, in the latter process, memory has the capacity to contribute to social change by uniting awareness between people who have no other basis for collaboration (Reference Addams1916b, xiii, 53). Addams stressed that she found the latter function to be “so aggressive and withal so modern, that it was quite impossible, living as I was in a Settlement with sociological tendencies, to ignore it” (xi).

Addams’ memory thus refers to acts of reinterpretation that may occur merely on an individual psychological level or may also include socio-political reflection. Both functions of memory resonate with theorizing related to the concept of the public in Addams’ time. The extent to which Addams knew Tarde's and Park's work at the time of writing The Long Road is unknown. The English translations of Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972) were only published several decades later. However, Park's arrival in the University of Chicago (Burgess and Bogue Reference Burgess, Bogue, Burgess and Bogue1964, 3) coincides with Addams’ (Reference Addams1914a, Reference Addams1914b) first, short accounts of the devil baby case. The analysis of the two functions of memory, which in my reading brings Addams in dialogue with Park, is a development Addams made for The Long Road (Reference Addams1916b), after her first publications of the devil baby.

It is not the goal of this research to reveal the flows of intellectual influence. What matters within the context of this study is that Addams, in The Long Road, seeks answers to same questions to which major sociologists of the same era were devoting their efforts. Addams provides a contribution that has so far been missing from the scholarly history of the public. She relates how marginalized people can and do move toward participation in public discourse through acts of reinterpretation and socio-political reflection, regardless of their lack of franchise and despite socioeconomic and cultural barriers. This insight is significant. According to feminist scholars (Siltanen and Stanworth Reference Siltanen, Stanworth, Siltanen and Stanworth1984; Landes Reference Landes1988; Fraser Reference Fraser1990; Ryan Reference Ryan and Calhoun1992), perspectives demonstrating public participation by subordinate groups remained largely absent from the public-related theoretical research throughout the twentieth century. Landes (Reference Landes1988, 7) even stated that “the exclusion of women from the bourgeois public was not incidental but central to its incarnation.” Landes (7) argued that marginalized feminist perspectives not only have important theoretical but also historically unique vantage points on the “modern public's emergence.” I argue that Addams is important because she incorporated marginalized women's voice in a conceptual discussion during a foundational era. In contrast to Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972), who produced conceptual analyses on an abstract level, Addams (Reference Addams1916b) presented an empirical case in The Long Road and emphasized the methodological challenge of analysis.

Before presenting the research design through which I constructed the public-related contribution found in Addams’ text, in the next section I provide context: previous research on The Long Road.

3. The intellectual and methodological contexts of The Long Road: previous research

Addams had a front-row seat to the spectacle around the devil baby. During a period of six weeks (Addams Reference Addams1916b, x), the circulating tales of the baby attracted a “stream of visitors” (Addams Reference Addams1914a; Reference Addams1916b, 3) to Hull-House, which served as a social and educational center in the West Side neighborhood of Chicago. The house was a commune and home to Addams and many other female intellectuals, whose work Deegan (Reference Deegan2013) captures under the notion of “the Hull-House School of Sociology.”

The Chicagoan devil baby narratives are short. The tales report destructive domestic situations and a supernatural newborn who changes the course of events. In the two versions documented by Addams (Reference Addams1914a, Reference Addams1914b, Reference Addams1916b, Reference Addams1930), the father of an unborn child commits insulting acts, either against his wife (in one version) or daughters (in another version), and suggests that the devil has more value to him than his wife or daughters. The devil indeed appears at the man's side, incarnated as his newborn son.

Devil babies are folkloristic figures. Stories of malformed but powerful infants endured well into the twentieth century, even in urbanized countries (Belanus and Langlois Reference Belanus, Langlois and Garry2015; Renzi Reference Renzi, Dawson and Goldsmith2018). In 1913 Chicago, the enthusiasm for this superstitious tale fit poorly with the progressive agenda of Addams and her pragmatist peers. Renzi (Reference Renzi, Dawson and Goldsmith2018) suggests that Addams hesitated about which stance to take and whether to address the incident publicly at all (Addams Reference Addams1914a, 371). That she nevertheless addressed the issue, not only once but repeatedly (Addams Reference Addams1914a, Reference Addams1914b, Reference Addams1916a, Reference Addams1916b, Reference Addams1930), and eventually developed an entire book (Reference Addams1916b) out of the event constitutes the motivation for my study.

At the time of the devil baby case, Addams had lived in the poor immigrant neighborhood for 25 years. Addams and her colleagues (Residents of Hull-House [1895] 2007; Deegan Reference Deegan2013, 253; McDonald Reference McDonald2013) pioneered multiple early empirical methods, including collecting “demographic information, information about nutrition, education, patterns of family life, information about working conditions, wages, and social behaviors, including domestic violence and sex slavery” (Rosiek and Pratt Reference Rosiek and Pratt2013, 583). In her first public account of the devil baby narrative, a speech at the convention of the General Federation of Women's Clubs in Chicago, Addams stressed the methodological aspect of the case. Understanding the implicit meanings of the tales, Addams explained, required intercultural analytical skills that American society generally lacked. “We do not set up any adequate method or communication with the immigrant women….it takes a sort of technique and a training with a determination to understand them before we can uncover these reserves of moral ability and the power of life, which these women have come to embody.” (1914a, 373).

Addams became particularly interested in the significance of the devil baby tales to the older women who arrived at Hull-House to see the baby and shared their life stories with her. The Hull-House neighborhood reflected the dramatic change in immigration around the turn of the twentieth century, when most immigrants were moving from pre-modern, rural areas of southern Italy, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and Russia (Knight Reference Knight2005, 179, 194). The Anglo-Saxon majority saw them as “representing distinct races” and being “intellectually inferior” (Fischer Reference Fischer2019, 104). Immigrant residents in Addams’ ward faced open discrimination in public discourse and by academics (Fischer Reference Fischer2019, 124–26). Addams (Reference Addams1916b) refers in The Long Road to the multiple layers of exclusion that they experienced, especially the older immigrant women. Their learned way of life, rooted in another world, clashed with the realities of an industrial metropolitan city. Addams highlights the loneliness and isolation experienced by the older women, whose younger family members often adapted more readily to their new society. As Addams analyzed the devil baby case, she discussed those whose marginalization had begun within their own families.

In her analysis, Addams utilized early versions of what are now referred to as qualitative cultural studies and media studies methods: participatory ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative and discourse analyses. Her primary resource was the legacy of American women writers, who had long used the genre of fiction to critically examine domestic issues (Pratt Reference Pratt2004). Fiction provided a way to write about the domestic realities behind the curtains of Victorian morality. As a participant in this tradition, Addams considered fiction a “strand of knowledge” (Rosiek and Pratt Reference Rosiek and Pratt2013, 583).

In The Long Road, Addams uses fiction (the devil baby tales) as the starting point from which she moves toward a revelation of and reflection upon psychological and social realities. She does this through reconstruction and analysis of women's stories and her own thoughts. Rosiek and Pratt (Reference Rosiek and Pratt2013, 585–86) write that The Long Road is the clearest example of Addams using a narrative method to produce knowledge from personal experience—that of her informants and her own. Addams (Reference Addams1916b, 29) first observes that the devil baby tales represent a genre of communication that has historically been one of women's only methods of preventing domestic tragedies. She locates the devil baby tales on this continuum and interprets the Chicagoan tales as a method of “family discipline” (29), a cautionary tale that disciplines husbands and sons and warns daughters. However, Addams (Reference Addams1916b, 9–10, 33, 40) also observes that hundreds of older women perceived much more in the tales. They perceived their own reality in the narratives (e.g., 12, 36). The devil baby tales narrate “fundamental experiences” (22) with which these women could identify.

Fischer (Reference Fischer and Hamington2010) shows that The Long Road builds extensively on the then-topical theory of race memory and on European classical period literature, in particular the Greek tragedy and its famous scholar, Murray. Fischer (Reference Fischer and Hamington2010, 82–93) argues that Addams used these intellectual sources because they were well known among her educated readers and enabled her to extend the discussion to wider socio-political contexts and world politics, from domestic cruelty to the cruelty suffered by women in the ongoing World War I.

Fischer's (Reference Fischer and Hamington2010) analysis informs my study in two ways. First, her finding that Addams theoretically understood memory in her book as race memory means that Fisher views Addams’ work as emphasizing collective memory. Race memory theory involves individuals subconsciously recognizing cultural archetypes (91). This would mean that Chicagoan immigrants recognized, in the devil baby tales, cultural archetypes, the interpretation of which was clear to them. Second, Fischer shows that Addams uses Greek tragedies as a medium through which she can channel communication of social realities from marginalized communities to dominant ones, and from enduring domestic issues to topical political ones. These two aspects are important premises for the public-related reading of The Long Road, but Fischer (Reference Fischer and Hamington2010) does not articulate them as the public-related themes.

Seigfried (Reference Seigfried2002) does not make an explicit case, either, but brings forth aspects that assist an informed reader in making connections between Addams, Tarde, and Park. First, Seigfried (Reference Seigfried2002, xxx) highlights Addams’ observation that “mutual reminiscences reveal the commonality of some significant experiences among people who are otherwise so disparate.” The revelation of the commonality of a significant experience is the factor that Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969, 277–78) and Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972, 43–50) view as the premise for the formation of the public. Second, Seigfried clarifies that memory, to Addams and to pragmatists, is not generally a “passive recall but a dynamic factor in making sense” of experiences (Seigfried Reference Seigfried2002, xiv). Memory is “a new, constituting act of consciousness” (xxx) that can bridge between individual experiences and social and political processes, changing one's beliefs “radically” (xiv). Socio-political sense-making and the resulting contextualized consciousness are factors that Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972, 50–62), building on Tarde's (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) idea of the public as consciousness, uses to distinguish the public from the crowd.

Thus, previous research on The Long Road suggests some leanings toward the theorizing of the public, but no prior research reveals the public-related pattern and contribution in the book. Next, I will introduce my own research design.

4. The research design: the public and hidden transcripts and the cultural discourse analysis

To show that Addams in The Long Road works with same questions as Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972), I use the concept of public and hidden transcripts (Scott Reference Scott1987, Reference Scott1990) and the method of cultural discourse analysis (Carbaugh Reference Carbaugh2007; Carbaugh and Cerulli Reference Carbaugh and Cerulli2013, Reference Carbaugh, Cerulli and Young2017). Based upon the currently available analytical tools, I locate my study under the poststructuralist approach of intellectual history (LaCapra Reference LaCapra1983, Reference LaCapra2009; Baring Reference Baring, Whatmore and Young2015), which activates in the analysis an “unfinalized notion of contextualization” (LaCapra Reference LaCapra2009, 27). This means that the understanding of historical texts and contexts is considered to develop cumulatively alongside emergent researcher generations, who engage in dialogical deconstructions and reconstructions of meanings with past authors.

The concept of public and hidden transcripts (Scott Reference Scott1987, Reference Scott1990) connects the nineteenth-century tradition of writing about domestic realities in the disguise of fiction to twentieth and twenty-first-century political analysis. In his ground-breaking works, Weapons of the Weak (Reference Scott1987) and Domination and the Arts of Resistance (1990), Scott distinguishes a double structure in the communication of subordinated groups: the public transcript that is communicated openly and the hidden transcript that is communicated offstage. Scott (Reference Scott1987, 36; Reference Scott1990, 44) observes that subordinated groups often communicate publicly in ways that cannot be used against them. More authentic experiences and opinions are revealed in hidden transcripts that can be found, for example, in privately displayed narratives, songs, and jokes. Therefore, investigating only public utterances would be misleading. However, the analysis of hidden utterances would not be enough, either. The hidden transcript constitutes a commentary on the public transcript and “must be seen not alone but as the reaction to domination in the public transcript” (Scott Reference Scott1990, 43–44). Research on public discourse thus requires analysis at both levels.

I regard the publicly circulated devil baby tales as the public transcript and the response that the tales evoked—the outpouring of personal narratives to Addams by the older women—as the hidden transcript. I use cultural discourse analysis (CuDA; Carbaugh Reference Carbaugh2007; Carbaugh and Cerulli Reference Carbaugh and Cerulli2013, Reference Carbaugh, Cerulli and Young2017) to analyze these two levels in Addams’ text. Cultural discourse analysis targets unarticulated axioms by addressing elements in communication that are “potent in meanings” (Carbaugh and Cerulli Reference Carbaugh, Cerulli and Young2017, 3). The elements are identified under the discursive hubs of action, identity, relations, feelings, and dwelling. Dwelling refers both to spatial places and to the interpretation by participants of “concrete and contingent circumstances which serve as the grounds of our existence, our experiences, and lives” (Carbaugh and Cerulli Reference Carbaugh and Cerulli2013, 6).

The discursive hubs often provide complementary information about each other. For example, when a woman explicated her regular day to Addams (the hub of action), she implicitly communicated about herself (the hub of identity) and her relations to others (the hub of relations). Carbaugh and Cerulli (Reference Carbaugh and Cerulli2013) call this complex “a meta-cultural commentary” that penetrates beyond “the surface of meanings” (10), addressing “the deeper significance and importance of the matters at hand” (10). In this way, CuDA resonates well with Scott's (Reference Scott1987, Reference Scott1990) aim of revealing the hidden transcript behind the public transcript.

In the following sections, I use the concept of public and hidden transcripts and the method of cultural discourse analysis to show that Addams first weaves from the explicit content of the devil baby tales a socio-politically important message that the narratives implicitly contain. Addams then analyzes the reflection evoked by the tales and constructs a conceptual discussion that aligns with Tarde's (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Park's (Reference Park and Elsner1972) notions of the formation of the public.

5. The interplay between the transcripts: women's responses to shifting forms of domination

According to Scott (Reference Scott1990), the hidden transcript is a reaction to domination in the public transcript. Scott (43–44) stresses that the hidden transcript “must be seen not alone” but in interplay with the public transcript. In this section, I analyze domination in the devil baby tales from Scott's perspective.

The public transcript of the devil baby tales articulates domination in terms of patriarchy, religion, and the institutions of modern society. The hidden transcript departs from the public transcript by instead describing matriarchal families. Most husbands and fathers have left the scene; breadwinning and parental judgment rest on women. The interplay between the transcripts thus not only refers to declining patriarchy but also highlights women's agency.

An even clearer pattern emerges regarding religion. Obedience to religious authorities is questioned throughout the public and hidden transcripts alike. In the public transcript, renunciation is embodied in the atheist husband who disparages his wife's faith and in the devil baby who refuses to join the church. Notably, criticism of religion is explicit in the hidden transcript as well, where it features in some of the women's own judgments. One woman describes herself to Addams as a “freethinker” (Addams Reference Addams1916b, 47), and another questions the maintenance of conventional attitudes on religious grounds (62).

At the same time, both the public and the hidden transcript present religious domination as intertwined with other forms of domination. The public transcript describes Hull-House residents bringing the devil baby for baptism to save his soul. The public transcript thus constructs a link between religious authority and reformers of society—indeed, heralds of progressivism. Religious domination here operates indirectly through voluntary adherence to the sacrament of baptism. Analogously, the hidden transcript describes the indirect influence of religiously motivated sexual norms. The interplay between the public and hidden transcripts can be understood as emphasizing the persistence and socially subtle nature of religious domination in women's lives.

Institutions of modern society are presented in the public and hidden transcripts as effective but removed from ordinary people. In the public transcript, the good intentions of the Hull-House intellectuals fail due to the resistance of the devil baby, whose soul they wish to save. Introducing a gamut of authorities of modern society, the hidden transcript suggests their power: The army, court system, labor unions, schools, and prisons all reach out to families. In spite of their determination to define the direction of society, modern institutions seem to fail to win the souls of subordinates. The hidden transcript mostly refers to women's lack of enthusiasm for and passive relationships with these institutions. Following Scott (Reference Scott1987, Reference Scott1990), the lack of enthusiasm can be interpreted as a form of taking a stand—precisely in the sense that Scott explored in his own studies. All in all, Scott's (Reference Scott1990) insight into the interplay between the public and the hidden transcript reveals women's active responses to shifting forms of domination by patriarchy, religion, and modern society.

6. From the devil baby tales toward an outline of a forming public

It is clear at this point that the devil baby tales had public value. Hundreds of women recognized the hardships addressed in the circulating tales, braved the streets, showed up at Hull-House, and used the tales to express in plain language their own subordination to men and the devils of daily survival. Scott's (Reference Scott1990) concept, according to which the public and the hidden transcripts complete each other as comments on domination, further clarifies that the devil baby tales not only communicated the experience of domination but also notions of agency and resistance by women. Together, the public and the hidden transcripts of the devil baby tales provide interpretations and developing judgments of social change by marginalized women.

However, Addams’ (Reference Addams1916b) report not only reveals the public value of the narratives but also theorizes the devil baby case in ways that align with three conceptual aspects of the formation of the public by her contemporaries Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972). First, The Long Road incorporates the aspect of consciousness, which, for Tarde and Park, is the point of departure for the formation of the public. Along with consciousness comes arousal of reciprocal feeling that enables strangers to recognize a uniting element and mutual empathy. Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972, 57), who in his conceptual distinction emphasizes reciprocal feelings particularly in the category of the crowd, argues that reciprocal feelings serve the important public function of perception-stage awareness-raising in large bodies of people, which is evident in the devil baby case. Addams (Reference Addams1916b, 84), referring to the public function of literature, writes that the devil baby tales redeemed “the mission of literature” by reducing the “crude pain in the isolated experience by bringing to the sufferer a realization that his is but the common lot.” Addams nods here to the first function of memory, the individual psychological reinterpretation of hard experiences.

Second, The Long Road incorporates the aspect of silent reflection and private exchanges that, according to Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969), characteristically follows the state of becoming conscious of an issue. The Long Road largely describes this second aligning aspect, which Tarde sees as an essential stage toward the formation of the public.

However, Addams does not conclude her analysis with the remarkable event of the older women perceiving public address of their struggles and giving voice to their personal suffering in private exchanges. Addams continues to inquire about what prevents most women from moving to the socio-political level of interpretation of devastating realities, which for Addams is the area of the second function of memory. This inquiry is the third aspect that aligns The Long Road with contemporary theorizing around the formation of the public. Along with her inquiry into what prevents most women from moving to socio-political interpretations, Addams approaches the area of Park's (Reference Park and Elsner1972) decisive definition of the public. For Park, the separation between the two valuable social categories of the crowd and the public lies in the public's critical search for explanations and the formation of collective will. Through critical discussion, the public serves as a preliminary stage for outlining new social norms to replace those that have become outdated (Park Reference Park and Elsner1972, 80). Addams (Reference Addams1916b, xi–xiii), writing within the rhetorical frame of memory, views the socio-politically important “second function of memory” as materializing in the search for new standards to replace old traditions and conventions. Addams asks why such reinterpretation was only occasionally present in the devil baby case.

Most devil baby visitors, Addams (Reference Addams1916b, 99) hypothesizes, “were merely continuing the traditional struggle against brutality, indifference, and neglect that helpless old people and little children might not be trampled in the dust.” For many, there seemed to be no other exit from their devastating circumstances other than making peace in their own minds—in memory, as Addams says—which many women indeed did, thereby illuminating the individual psychological reinterpretation that makes life bearable. According to Addams, these women utilized “well-seasoned faculties in contrast to the newly developed powers” (99) demonstrated by younger emancipated women. For these older women, it was “the conditions under which the struggle is waged which have changed, rather than the nature of the contest” (99).

What Addams (Reference Addams1916b, 76–83, 115, 136–40) suggests here is that the decisive step lies in an awareness that the activated interpretative frameworks are social constructions that can be changed. The above CuDA analyses show that such awareness was mostly absent from the narratives the older women told Addams. The women constructed their identities mainly as mothers of multi-problem families; their actions were tied to iron-hard realities, their most defining relationships were destructive domestic relations, and their feelings primarily dealt with coping with tragedy. Thus, the women located their lives mainly within an interpretative framework that itself gave rise to many domestic problems. That interpretative framework was, according to Addams, adherence to rigid social conventions that had lost relevance in a society that had grown too complex to be comprehended by simple social norms.

To make her case, Addams (Reference Addams1916b, 53–64, 68–75, 115–31) provides three long monologues that build into examples of critiques of established conventions. The three narratives once again display women in the middle of tragedies and complex family relations. The first narrator (53–64) had lost her husband in a shooting in Paris “under very disgraceful circumstances” (55) that included an extramarital affair. Raising their son alone, the narrator had tried to protect him from his father's traits. Her rigid efforts had faced a devastating end, as the son, involved in a pre-marital affair himself, had committed suicide for not fulfilling his mother's standards. The mother, surviving both her husband and her son, had become the sole guardian of the dead son's assumed baby.

The second narrator (Addams Reference Addams1916b, 68–75) had raised a family in a poor neighborhood with an unsupportive husband. Their son, who followed in his father's footsteps and became a circus performer, had sent his lover and unborn child to be cared for by his mother. His sisters, who had climbed the social ladder and were leading middle-class lives, considered their baby nephew a risk to their reputation. They invited the aging mother to live with them in a nice residential area but expected her first to abandon the illegitimate baby to an institute.

In a clear distinction from the previously discussed life stories in which marital and gendered conventions went unquestioned, Addams (Reference Addams1916b, 79) shows these narrators reflectively facing the consequences of conventional concepts condemning “fallen women” and their children. Introducing a third narrator, Addams (115–31) extends the discussion to conventions that legitimize war. The third narrator's scientist son had been required to use his expertise to advance killing during the World War I. After the son died on the front, the grieving mother denied her support for the war, and her criticism was now isolating her from patriotic family members. Addams takes the time to delicately unfold how the three narrators reflect upon their lives, consider which stance to take in the face of acute dilemmas, and gradually mature to criticize the conventions and moral codes that have previously ruled their lives and relations.

Here lies the answer to the research question. I asked what Addams (Reference Addams1916b) sees as the decisive factor in the transformation of established social ties and identities, which for her characterizes the second function of memory. The decisive factor Addams introduces is the stance taken on social conventions relevant to the issue at hand. The first function of memory (the individual psychological reinterpretation) retains established social conventions. In contrast, the second function of memory (the socio-political reinterpretation) submits social conventions to critical reflection, develops independent judgments on them, and eventually detaches from conventions and norms that are deemed illegitimate.

When a grandmother approves of her grandchild born outside of wedlock (Addams Reference Addams1916b, 68, 76, 78–79) and the mother of a soldier questions the justification for war (115–31), the setting of the transformation is an inward reconsideration of social conventions and social relations. Yet Addams (65) suggests that these women are on the verge of a significant shift that will reposition them both socially and politically. These “self-conscious” women are about to set aside the “iron fetters of convention” (78), and they are not alone. Their “analytical efforts are steadily supplemented by instinctive conduct on the part of many others” (65); memory begins to act “as a reproach, even as a social disturber” (53). Such a process inaugurates social change, Addams writes (xiii), but the process may be so slow that it appears to be a natural phenomenon.

7. The Long Road's contribution to the theorizing of the public

The above sections have shown that Addams’ coverage in The Long Road aligns with three aspects of the formation of the public, as conceived by Tarde (Reference Tarde and Clark1969) and Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972). First, Addams describes the awakening of consciousness about a collectively relevant concern; second, the emergence of non-public conversations about that topic. At this point, the premises for the formation of the public do exist, according to Tarde and Park. Addams goes on and, third, constructs a conceptual distinction between the two functions of memory, highlighting independent critical judgment as the divider between the two functions. This aligns her analysis with the decisive factor that Park (Reference Park and Elsner1972) argues distinguishes the public from the crowd.

Although Addams does not use a public-related vocabulary, it seems as if she first investigated the premises for the formation of something like the public in the devil baby case before eventually analyzing why the decisive stage of such formation materialized only occasionally. In any case, Addams’ coverage is well-tuned to the theorization of her day, yet distinguishable in that she presents an unusual perspective by discussing development toward transformative public interaction in a seemingly irrational devil baby case and among politically, socioeconomically, culturally, and gender-marginalized people. Instead of the performative and dramatic public debate that has been cherished in sociology, political science, and journalism from Park's days on (Starr Reference Starr2021, 65), Addams addresses discreet genres of communication and shows their public relevance. In The Long Road, the genres are, first, folkloristic tales that, through the disguise of religious motives, address devastating realities and social change; second, heart-searching in the solitude of mind; and third, monologues to a sole listener. The lengthy monologues in The Long Road can be read as an effort by Addams to give public form to the inner reflection that takes place within her informants and herself.

By making their reflection visible, Addams communicates the suffering of marginalized women to educated elites and the primarily Anglo-Saxon middle class, illuminating a cultural agency that elites had ignored, which is a contribution that Seigfried (Reference Seigfried2002) and Fischer (Reference Fischer and Hamington2010) perceive in The Long Road. Further, Addams conceptually includes representatives of a marginalized communicative culture, whom researchers still today tend to overlook, in public interaction capable of transforming established social relations and identities.

This aspect is significant. The notion that subordinated groups, such as women without a vote and marginalized minorities, are outside public life is, according to Fraser (Reference Fraser1990, 58–63), an ideological construction that prevents scholars from perceiving the diversity of public participation.

The reading of The Long Road as an outline of development toward the formation of the public emphasizes that our understanding of public interaction cannot be reduced to the concepts and genres suitable for dominant and privileged groups. Addams’ writing highlights that people in cosmopolitan cities were and still are not going to join the public on the basis of similar political rights or similar communication cultures. The Long Road reads as a legacy of the diverse and occasionally subtle forms that interaction with a changing society and resistance to domination can take in human experience. Addams speaks to us of a critically important issue: Identifying the discreetly forming public may require methodological competence from the researcher and journalist alike.