Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:23:20.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letter to the Editor: Virtual reality in the treatment of eating and weight disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2017

G. Riva*
Affiliation:
Centro Studi e Ricerche di Psicologia della Comunicazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italia Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano, Italia
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor G. Riva, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milano, Italia. (Email: giuseppe.riva@unicatt.it)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017

I read with interest the recent paper by Freeman et al. exploring the potential of virtual reality (VR) in treating mental health issues (Freeman et al. Reference Freeman, Reeve, Robinson, Ehlers, Clark, Spanlang and Slater2017). I agree with the authors that ‘VR has the potential to transform the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health problems.’ (p. 1). However, I don't think the overall picture presented by the paper adequately reflects the level of evidence offered by the extant research in the field.

It is well known that the best evidence in healthcare is obtained by the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. In September 2016, a paper was published that assessed the 27 available reviews and meta-analyses exploring the efficacy of VR in behavioral health (Riva et al. Reference Riva, Baños, Botella, Mantovani and Gaggioli2016). In that paper, the authors’ findings supported the use of this technology for the treatment of anxiety disorders, stress-related disorders, pain management, and eating and weight disorders. This latter area, i.e. eating and weight disorders, is where the two papers provide different perspectives.

Freeman et al. (Reference Freeman, Reeve, Robinson, Ehlers, Clark, Spanlang and Slater2017) stated: ‘It has been recognized that the field has very few methodologically strong studies.’ This was true in the past, but the situation is quite different now: three different RCTs (Cesa et al. Reference Cesa, Manzoni, Bacchetta, Castelnuovo, Conti, Gaggioli, Mantovani, Molinari, Cardenas-Lopez and Riva2013; Marco et al. Reference Marco, Perpina and Botella2013; Manzoni et al. Reference Manzoni, Cesa, Bacchetta, Castelnuovo, Conti, Gaggioli, Mantovani, Molinari, Cardenas-Lopez and Riva2016) have shown at 1-year follow-up that VR had a higher efficacy than the gold standard in the field, i.e. cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT).

In fact, the clinical use of VR with these disturbances is based on theory-driven psychological treatment techniques (Ferrer-Garcia & Gutierrez-Maldonado, Reference Ferrer-Garcia and Gutierrez-Maldonado2012; Ferrer-Garcia et al. Reference Ferrer-Garcia, Gutiérrez-Maldonado and Riva2013; Koskina et al. Reference Koskina, Campbell and Schmidt2013). First, VR can reduce eating-related anxiety during and after exposure to virtual food, helping to disrupt the reconsolidation of adverse, food-related memories (Koskina et al. Reference Koskina, Campbell and Schmidt2013; Pla-Sanjuanelo et al. Reference Pla-Sanjuanelo, Ferrer-Garcia, Gutierrez-Maldonado, Riva, Andreu-Gracia, Dakanalis, Fernandez-Aranda, Forcano, Ribas-Sabate, Riesco, Rus-Calafell, Sanchez and Sanchez-Planell2015). Second, a recent neuroscientific model of body image disturbances – the Allocentric Lock Theory – suggested that eating disorders may be associated with impairment in the ability to update a stored, negative allocentric (offline) representation of one's body with real-time (online/egocentric), perception-driven inputs (Riva & Gaudio, Reference Riva and Gaudio2012; Riva, Reference Riva2014; Dakanalis et al. Reference Dakanalis, Gaudio, Serino, Clerici, Carrà and Riva2016). As demonstrated by two of the above RCTs (Cesa et al. Reference Cesa, Manzoni, Bacchetta, Castelnuovo, Conti, Gaggioli, Mantovani, Molinari, Cardenas-Lopez and Riva2013; Manzoni et al. Reference Manzoni, Cesa, Bacchetta, Castelnuovo, Conti, Gaggioli, Mantovani, Molinari, Cardenas-Lopez and Riva2016), the addition of VR sensory training to unlock the body memory (body image rescripting protocol) by increasing the contribution of new, egocentric/internal, somatosensory information directly related to the existing allocentric memory improved the efficacy of CBT at 1-year follow-up.

In their review, Freeman et al. (Reference Freeman, Reeve, Robinson, Ehlers, Clark, Spanlang and Slater2017) also suggested the use of the body-ownership illusion to enhance the effectiveness of the treatments for eating disorders. Even if I and other researchers (Dakanalis et al. Reference Dakanalis, Manzoni, Castelnuovo, Riva and Clerici2017; Serino and Dakanalis, Reference Serino and Dakanalis2016) agree that this approach has clinical potential, it is also true that bodily illusions have yet to be tested in an RCT against an active treatment. In addition, the real problem associated with the use of existing bodily illusions (i.e. illusions based on visuo-tactile synchrony) in mental health is the lack of long-term effects. As reported by Freeman et al. (Reference Freeman, Reeve, Robinson, Ehlers, Clark, Spanlang and Slater2017), the longest follow-up of subjects with eating disorders was just 2 h (Keizer et al. Reference Keizer, van Elburg, Helms and Dijkerman2016), but, in general, the effects of bodily illusions on higher cognitive processes are temporary, even with normal subjects. A possible reason the follow-up time of such subjects has been so short is that most of the existing research on bodily illusions has explored how external information from the body (e.g. vision and touch) is processed and integrated to develop our sense of self. Notwithstanding the success of such advances (Maister et al. Reference Maister, Slater, Sanchez-Vives and Tsakiris2015), we do not perceive our body only through external senses; we also have internal access to it through inner signals, i.e. interoceptive, proprioceptive, and vestibular signals (Blanke, Reference Blanke2012). Recent research has suggested that there is a clear link between mental health disorders and interoceptive/proprioceptive impairments (Tsakiris & Critchley, Reference Tsakiris and Critchley2016). In this view, future bodily illusions should bridge VR with bio/neuro-feedback and/or brain/body stimulation technologies to modulate the inner experience of the patient, too (Riva et al. Reference Riva, Serino, Di Lernia, Pavone and Dakanalis2017). A possible path is ‘Sonoception,’ (Riva et al. Reference Riva, Serino, Di Lernia, Pavone and Dakanalis2017) which is the use of sound and vibration synchronously with VR for the stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the chest (heart) and in the abdomen (stomach). In conclusion, VR already is a reality in mental health, but more can be done to transform the Latin dictum, ‘Mens Sana in Corpore Virtuale Sano’ (a healthy mind in a healthy virtual body), into reality.

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the Italian MIUR research project ‘Unlocking the memory of the body: Virtual Reality in Anorexia Nervosa’ (201597WTTM).

References

Blanke, O (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13, 556571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cesa, GL, Manzoni, GM, Bacchetta, M, Castelnuovo, G, Conti, S, Gaggioli, A, Mantovani, F, Molinari, E, Cardenas-Lopez, G, Riva, G (2013). Virtual reality for enhancing the cognitive behavioral treatment of obesity with binge eating disorder: randomized controlled study with one-year follow-up. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, e113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dakanalis, A, Gaudio, S, Serino, S, Clerici, M, Carrà, G, Riva, G (2016). Body-image distortion in anorexia nervosa. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2, 16026.Google Scholar
Dakanalis, A, Manzoni, GM, Castelnuovo, G, Riva, G, Clerici, M (2017). Towards novel paradigms for treating dysfunctional bodily experience in eating disorders. Eating and Weight Disorders – Studies on Anorexia, Bulmia and Obesity. doi: 10.1007/s40519-017-0361-5.Google Scholar
Ferrer-Garcia, M, Gutierrez-Maldonado, J (2012). The use of virtual reality in the study, assessment, and treatment of body image in eating disorders and nonclinical samples: a review of the literature. Body Image 9, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer-Garcia, M, Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J, Riva, G (2013). Virtual reality based treatments in eating disorders and obesity: a review. Journal of Contemporary Psychology 43, 207221.Google Scholar
Freeman, D, Reeve, S, Robinson, A, Ehlers, A, Clark, D, Spanlang, B, Slater, M (2017). Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychological Medicine 18. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700040X.Google Scholar
Keizer, A, van Elburg, A, Helms, R, Dijkerman, HC (2016). A virtual reality full body illusion improves body image disturbance in anorexia nervosa. PLoS ONE 11, e0163921.Google Scholar
Koskina, A, Campbell, IC, Schmidt, U (2013). Exposure therapy in eating disorders revisited. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 37, 193208.Google Scholar
Maister, L, Slater, M, Sanchez-Vives, MV, Tsakiris, M (2015). Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, 612.Google Scholar
Manzoni, GM, Cesa, GL, Bacchetta, M, Castelnuovo, G, Conti, S, Gaggioli, A, Mantovani, F, Molinari, E, Cardenas-Lopez, G, Riva, G (2016). Virtual reality-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for morbid obesity: a randomized controlled study with 1 year follow-up. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking 19, 134140.Google Scholar
Marco, JH, Perpina, C, Botella, C (2013). Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy supported by virtual reality in the treatment of body image in eating disorders: one year follow-up. Psychiatry Research 209, 619625.Google Scholar
Pla-Sanjuanelo, J, Ferrer-Garcia, M, Gutierrez-Maldonado, J, Riva, G, Andreu-Gracia, A, Dakanalis, A, Fernandez-Aranda, F, Forcano, L, Ribas-Sabate, J, Riesco, N, Rus-Calafell, M, Sanchez, I, Sanchez-Planell, L (2015). Identifying specific cues and contexts related to bingeing behavior for the development of effective virtual environments. Appetite 87, 8189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riva, G (2014). Out of my real body: cognitive neuroscience meets eating disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riva, G, Baños, RM, Botella, C, Mantovani, F, Gaggioli, A (2016). Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Frontiers in Psychiatry 7, 164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riva, G, Gaudio, S (2012). Allocentric lock in anorexia nervosa: new evidences from neuroimaging studies. Medical Hypotheses 79, 113117.Google Scholar
Riva, G, Serino, S, Di Lernia, D, Pavone, EF, Dakanalis, A (2017). Embodied medicine: Mens Sana in Corpore Virtuale Sano. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11, 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serino, S, Dakanalis, A (2016). Bodily illusions and weight-related disorders: clinical insights from experimental research. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 13. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.10.002.Google Scholar
Tsakiris, M, Critchley, H (2016). Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 371. pii: 20160002. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed