Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:36:38.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating Gender Into the Political Science Curriculum: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Christine Di Stefano
Christine Di Stefano*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 204 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1997

References

Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy. 1995. Feminist Contentions: A Philosphical Exchange. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1988. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subverison of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On The Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. and Zerilli, Linda M. G. 1993. “Feminist Challenges to Political Science.” In The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, Ada, 55–76. Washington, DC: APSA.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell. 1995. Gender is Not a Synonym for Women. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christine, Di Stefano. 1991. Configurations of Masculinity: A Feminist Perspective on Modern Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. 1992. Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing and Cultural Anxiety. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gadol, Joan Kelly. 1984. “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” In Women, History, and Theory, ed. Kelley, Joan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1992. Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquette, Jane S. 1992. “Political Science—Whose Common Good?” In Knowledge Explosion: Generations of Feminist Scholarship, eds. Kramarae, Cheris and Spender, Dale. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Jones, Kathleen. 1990. “Citizenship in a Woman-Friendly Polity.” Signs 15:781–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1981. “Toward the Emasculation of Political Science: The Impact of Feminism.” In Men's Studies Modified: The Impact of Feminism on the Academic Disciplines, ed. Spender, Dale. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Tony. ed. Race-ing Justice, Engendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks, ed. 1984. Women's Views of the Political World of Men. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. 1994. Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar