Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:29:26.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments regarding Marco et al., 2015, ‘The two sides of border disease in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica): silent persistence and population collapse’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

María Cruz Arnal ,
Juan Herrero ,
Olatz Fernández ,
David Martínez ,
Carlos Prada ,
Alicia García-Serrano  and
Daniel Fernández de Luco
María Cruz Arnal*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Juan Herrero
Affiliation:
Área de Ecología, Departamento de Ciencias Agrarias y Medio Natural, Escuela Politécnica Superior de Huesca, Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
Olatz Fernández
Affiliation:
Ega Wildlife Consultants, Zaragoza, Spain
David Martínez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Carlos Prada
Affiliation:
Ega Wildlife Consultants, Zaragoza, Spain
Alicia García-Serrano
Affiliation:
Ega Wildlife Consultants, Zaragoza, Spain
Daniel Fernández de Luco
Affiliation:
Área de Ecología, Departamento de Ciencias Agrarias y Medio Natural, Escuela Politécnica Superior de Huesca, Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: maricruz@unizar.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Letter to editor
Information
Animal Health Research Reviews , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , December 2016 , pp. 77 - 78
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Dear Editor

The recent paper of Marco et al. (Reference Marco, Cabezón, Velarde, Fernández-Sirera, Colom-Cadena, Serrano, Rosell, Casas-Díaz and Lavín2015) requires clarification regarding the origin of the Aragon data. Secondarily, but no less important to us, rectification is needed regarding certain aspects of the Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica subspecies, its management and its distribution.

Pestivirus, Pyrenean chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica and Aragon. Pestivirus has affected Pyrenean chamois Rupicapra p. pyrenaica in the eastern Pyrenees (Principality of Andorra, Ariège and Catalonia regions) since 2001–2002 (Alzieu et al., Reference Alzieu, Deplanche, Moulignie, Letellier, Lacroux, Duquesnel, Baranowski, Meyers, Kerkhofs and Schelcher2004; Arnal et al., Reference Arnal, Fernández-de-Luco, Riba, Maley, Gilray, Willoughby, Vilcek and Nettleton2004; Hurtado et al., Reference Hurtado, Adúriz, Gómez, Oporto, Juste, Lavín, López-Olvera and Marco2004; Frölich et al., Reference Frölich, Jung, Ludwig, Lieckfeldt, Gibert, Gauthier and Hars2005). The disease agent is spreading to the western Pyrenees and was detected in Aragon in 2011, producing high mortalities (Arnal et al., Reference Arnal, Herrero, Martínez, Prada, Fernández-Arberas, Arteaga, García-Serrano and Fernández de Luco2013b).

Chamois pestivirus in Aragon. We detected border disease in Benasque Game Reserve (Arnal et al., Reference Arnal, Herrero, Martínez, Prada, Fernández-Arberas, Arteaga, García-Serrano and Fernández de Luco2013b), in the frame of a long term monitoring of the Pyrenean chamois in the Aragon region (Arnal et al., Reference Arnal, Herrero, de la Fe, Revilla, Prada, Martínez-Durán, Gómez-Martín, Fernández-Arberas, Amores, Contreras, García-Serrano and Fernández de Luco2013a). Although Marco et al., mentioned these unpublished data, they did not cite the source of information from the Spanish region of Aragon, Game Reserves 8 and 9, Benasque and Los Circos (Fig. 1 of Marco et al., Reference Marco, Cabezón, Velarde, Fernández-Sirera, Colom-Cadena, Serrano, Rosell, Casas-Díaz and Lavín2015), which was from our abstract in the II International Rupicapra Symposium (Arnal et al., Reference Arnal, Herrero, Martínez, Prada, Fernández-Arberas, Arteaga, García-Serrano and Fernández de Luco2013b).

Additional information about the Pyrenean chamois, R. p. pyrenaica. The subspecies affected is Pyrenean chamois R. p. pyrenaica, which is a commonly used name in English following the Caprinae Action Plan (Shackleton Reference Shackleton1997). Following the same Action Plan, R. pyrenaica is considered the Southern chamois, with three subspecies: Pyrenean chamois R. p. pyrenaica, Cantabrian chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica parva and Apennine chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata.

Pyrenean chamois are not only found along the border between France and Spain. They also occupy areas far away from the border, including isolated massifs (Herrero et al., Reference Herrero, Escudero, Fernández de Luco and García-González2013).

When considering the entire mountain range, Pyrenean chamois subspecies are managed mostly by local hunters, especially on the French side of the mountain chain, rather than mostly in game reserves and national parks. Such game reserves belong exclusively to Spain and Andorra (Pita et al., Reference Pita Fernández, Casas Bargueño, Herrero, Prada and García Post2012; Solà and Riba, Reference Solà, Riba, Herrero, Escudero, Fernández de Luco and García-González2013). There are no game reserves as such in France, where most chamois populations are hunted and the majority of them are managed by local hunter societies. In Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Escudero, Fernández de Luco and García-González2013), there is an update of the numbers and distribution of the subspecies in the whole Pyrenees.

There are important ecological barriers along the Pyrenees, and some massifs are not connected with the main mountain chain, which limits animal dispersal rather than annual seasonal migrations.

Figure 1 of Marco et al. (Reference Marco, Cabezón, Velarde, Fernández-Sirera, Colom-Cadena, Serrano, Rosell, Casas-Díaz and Lavín2015) showed only two Protected Areas: (1) Orlu Wildlife Reserve and (2) Aigües Tortes and Lake of Sant Maurici National Park. The former has the number 7, which was a mistake. The rest of the areas are game reserves, not protected areas.

We hope these clarifications will help the readers to better understand authorship and certain aspects of Pyrenean chamois biology and management.

Sincerely

M. C. Arnal et al.

References

Alzieu, JP, Deplanche, M, Moulignie, M, Letellier, C, Lacroux, C, Duquesnel, R, Baranowski, E, Meyers, G, Kerkhofs, P and Schelcher, F (2004). First description of pestivirus infection in Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica . Bulletin de l'Academie Veterinaire de France 157: 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnal, MC, Fernández-de-Luco, D, Riba, L, Maley, M, Gilray, J, Willoughby, K, Vilcek, S and Nettleton, PF (2004). A novel pestivirus associated with death in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica). Journal of General Virology 85: 3653–3657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnal, M, Herrero, J, de la Fe, C, Revilla, M, Prada, C, Martínez-Durán, D, Gómez-Martín, A, Fernández-Arberas, O, Amores, J, Contreras, A, García-Serrano, A and Fernández de Luco, D (2013a). Dynamics of an Infectious Keratoconjunctivitis Outbreak by Mycoplasma conjunctivae on Pyrenean Chamois Rupicapra p. pyrenaica . PLoS ONE 8: e61887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnal, M, Herrero, J, Martínez, D, Prada, C, Fernández-Arberas, O, Arteaga, Z, García-Serrano, A and Fernández de Luco, D (2013b). Pyrenean Western expansion of chamois pestivirus epidemia: Preliminary data. In Abstracts II International Rupicapra Symposium. Bellver de Cerdanya, Spain, 24–25 October 2013, pp. 65–66.Google Scholar
Frölich, K, Jung, S, Ludwig, A, Lieckfeldt, D, Gibert, P, Gauthier, D and Hars, J (2005). Detection of a newly described pestivirus of pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) in France. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 41: 606–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrero, J, Escudero, E, Fernández de Luco, D and García-González, R (2013). El sarrio pirenaico Rupicapra p. pyrenaica: biología, patología y gestión. Actas de las Primeras Jornadas Pirenaicas sobre el sarrio Rupicapra p.pyrenaica. Saragossa, Spain: Publicaciones del Consejo de Protección de la Naturaleza de Aragón y de la Fundación para el Estudio y Defensa de la Naturaleza y la Caza. Serie Investigación. In Spanish and French with English abstracts.Google Scholar
Hurtado, A, Adúriz, G, Gómez, N, Oporto, B, Juste, RA, Lavín, S, López-Olvera, JR and Marco, I (2004). Molecular identification of a new pestivirus associated with increased mortality in the Pyrenean Chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) in Spain. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 40: 796–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marco, I, Cabezón, O, Velarde, R, Fernández-Sirera, L, Colom-Cadena, A, Serrano, E, Rosell, R, Casas-Díaz, E and Lavín, S (2015). The two sides of border disease in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica): silent persistence and population collapse. Animal Health Research Reviews 16: 70–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pita Fernández, M, Casas Bargueño, S, Herrero, J, Prada, C and García Post, G (2012). Game Reserves in Spain: the public management of hunting. Forest Systems 21: 398–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, DM (1997). Wild Sheep and Goats and Their Relatives: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Caprinae. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN/SSC Caprinae Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Solà, J and Riba, L 2013. Pyrenean chamois in the Principality of Andorra. Population status, management and perspectives. In: Herrero, J, Escudero, E, Fernández de Luco, D and García-González, R. El sarrio pirenaico Rupicapra p. pyrenaica: biología, patología y gestión. Actas de las Primeras Jornadas Pirenaicas sobre el sarrio Rupicapra p.pyrenaica. Saragossa, Spain: Publicaciones del Consejo de Protección de la Naturaleza de Aragón y de la Fundación para el Estudio y Defensa de la Naturaleza y la Caza. Serie Investigación. In Spanish and French with English abstracts, pp. 13–22.Google Scholar