Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:41:19.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rorschach Tests, Pluralism, and Hopes for the Future: A Response to the Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kitty Calavita
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this essay, I address some of the concerns raised by contributors to the Symposium on Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. I argue that law and society scholarship focusing on race increasingly offers some of our field's best empirical analyses of the interpenetration of law and society; I emphasize the importance of the methodological and theoretical diversity that characterizes our fragmented field, arguing that our pluralism is one of our greatest strengths; I clarify my intended meaning of the term “real law” as I use it in the book's subtitle, as a way to underscore the socially constituted quality of all law; I attempt to rescue the reputation of dialectics from charges of “relativism”; and I reiterate my appreciation for our field's engagement with questions of social justice that has characterized it since its inception. In the second half of the essay, I briefly describe my current prison research and offer some thoughts for the future of our field.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Winter 2014 , pp. 234 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. 1995. Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle Against Apartheid, 1980–1994. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bridgman, Percy 1950. Reflections of a Physicist. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin 1988. The Civil Rights Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty 2002. Engaged Research, “Goose Bumps”, and the Role of the Public Intellectual. Law & Society Review 36:5–20.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty 2010. Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 1998. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 2007. Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1979. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9:95–160.Google Scholar
Gomez, Laura 2007. Manifest Destinies: The Making of the Mexican American Race. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, John 2010. Who Are the Criminals? The Politics of Crime Policy from the Age of Roosevelt to the Age of Reagan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haney Lopez, Ian F. 1996. White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford 2002. To All Persons Interested in Law and the Performing Arts. http://www.utexas.edu/law/colloquium/lawandarts/about.html.Google Scholar
Loury, Glenn C. 2007. Why Are So Many Americans in Prison? Race and the Transformation of Criminal Justice. Boston Review July/August:7–10.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart 1984. Law and the Behavioral Sciences: Is There a There There? Law & Policy 6:149–187.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth 1988. The Uses of History: Language, Ideology, and Law in the United States and South Africa. Law & Society Review 22:661–685.Google Scholar
Morrill, Calvin, Edelman, Lauren B., Tyson, Karolyn, and Arum, Richard 2010. Legal Mobilization in Schools: The Paradox of Rights and Race Among Youths. Law & Society Review 44:651–694.Google Scholar
Murakawa, Naomi 2006. The Racial Antecedents to Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Roger Williams University Law Review 11:473–494.Google Scholar
Provine, Doris Marie 2007. Unequal Under Law: Race in the War on Drugs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salyer, Lucy E. 1995. Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, Vesla M. 2007. Frontlash: Race and the Development of Punitive Crime Policy. Studies in American Political Development 21:230–265.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar