In awareness of recent developments and upcoming future changes in the conceptualization of obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCDs), a group of 14 experts with specific experience in this area decided that a consensus statement on the present and future of OCD is timely. The group, with their long-term interest and productivity in the area of OCD, met with the specific aim of providing a global perspective. Ten countries from four continents were represented in this 2-day consensus meeting.

The meeting took place in Cape Town on February 27–28, 2006. The participants were asked to prepare and submit a relevant presentation before the meeting in order to enrich the discussion. Six presentations reviewed the following aspects of OCD: diagnosis, epidemiology, neurobiology, treatment, special populations, and pediatric OCD. A draft consensus was prepared, based on the presentations, recent consensus statements, evidence-based guidelines, and the ensuing discussions.

Although obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is classified as an anxiety disorder in the DSM-IV, recent considerations for a reclassification into an obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders (OCSDs) cluster are gaining prominence. Similarities in symptomatology, course of illness, patient population, and neurocircuitry of OCD and OCSD are supported by comorbidity, family, and neurological studies, which also offer a critical re-evaluation of the relationship between OCD and anxiety disorders. This review examines potential classifications of OCD among the wider spectrum of affective disorders and at the interface between affective disorders and addiction. In addition, it has been suggested that the categorical diagnostic approach would be enhanced by an additional dimensional approach, including parameters such as stability of mood and ability to sustain attention. With further studies, it is ultimately the goal to define OCD and related disorders based on endophenotypes.

Despite efforts in this field, there are several fundamental unresolved issues, including the question of which disorders should be grouped together in this category and which characteristics to include as their shared common features. A reclassification of OCD among the OCSDs would allow for better scrutiny of distinct obsessive-compulsive symptoms, as currently this disorder often goes undetected in patients who complain of a broad symptom of anxiety. Advantages and disadvantages of establishing OCSDs and its implications for diagnosis, treatment, and research are discussed.

In awareness of recent developments and upcoming future changes in the conceptualization of obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCDs), a group of 14 experts with specific experience in this area decided that a consensus statement on the present and future of OCD is timely. The group, with their long-term interest and productivity in the area of OCD, met with the specific aim of providing a global perspective.Ten countries from four continents were represented in this 2-day consensus meeting.

The meeting took place in Cape Town on February 27–28, 2006. The participants were asked to prepare and submit a relevant presentation before the meeting in order to enrich the discussion. Six presentations reviewed the following aspects of OCD: diagnosis, epidemiology, neurobiology, treatment, special populations, and pediatric OCD. A draft consensus was prepared, based on the presentations, recent consensus statements, evidence-based guidelines, and the ensuing discussions. On the second day the consensus was subjected to review and comments from all the participants. Further work progressed via E-mail and a subsequent follow-up meeting in Toronto in May 2006. The enclosed supplement represents the outcome of this joint effort.

The evidence for the involvement of the serotonergic system in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is circumstantial at best, despite being the focus for most pathophysiological research over the last 2 decades. This hypothesis was initially motivated by the observed differential efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in alleviating OCD symptoms. Direct evidence that serotonergic perturbations are implicated in the pathophysiology of OCD is still sparse. There is growing evidence, from both preclinical and clinical studies, that the dopamine system may also be involved in the pathogenesis of OCD, and that dopaminergic and serotonergic pathways play a role in the genesis and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The complex interactions between both systems, the phenotypic heterogeneity of the disorder, and the limitations of the available tests to probe both systems, make it as yet impossible to draw firm conclusions as to how these systems are implicated. Further studies with more selective pharmacologic agents and neurocognitive probes in humans, studies using deep brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging, and the development of better animal models for OCD may further our understanding of this disabling condition.

Background: Many randomized controlled trials of the pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been undertaken. Several meta-analyses of these trials, and a number of expert consensus guidelines, have been published. This article summarizes these works, and suggests future research directions.

Methods: Meta-analyses of OCD were assessed with the QUORUM statement and the Oxman and Guyatt rating scale, and consensus guidelines on the treatment of OCD were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Current principles in the treatment of OCD, and gaps in our knowledge, were reviewed.

Results: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive-behavioral therapy are currently viewed as the first-line treatments of choice for adult and pediatric OCD.There is also good evidence for the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics in the augmentation of patients refractory to SSRIs. Important questions remain for the field.

Conclusions: There have been significant advances in both the pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy of OCD. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of longer-term trials, data on symptom remission and functional improvement, and data on treatment effectiveness in wider clinical practice. It is hoped that improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying OCD will lead to future advances.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a formidable public health problem, rated by the World Health Organization as one of the top 20 most disabling diseases.The shame and secrecy associated with OCD, as well as the lack of recognition of its characteristic symptoms, particularly by primary care physicians, hinders appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Most adults with OCD report a late adolescent or early adulthood onset, yet OCD can occur throughout the life span. Pre-school children have been known to develop the disorder, as have elderly persons. OCD can cause considerable distress and disability; for example, children may fall behind in their education, and adults can become housebound. Comorbid psychiatric disorders have become an area of intense interest. Comorbid depression for example, is frequently the symptom that leads the individual to seek treatment. Patients with schizophrenia frequently develop obsessions and compulsions, and these symptoms are associated with a poorer outcome. The role of second-generation antipsychotics merits further study in the treatment of this subset of patients. An important step toward delineating specific subgroups within the OCD-schizophrenia axis may be the use of endophenotypic markers. Unfortunately, many patients with OCD will have a less than optimal treatment response. Poor treatment response is associated with serious social disability, but there are few clues to guide clinicians in predicting treatment response in patients with OCD, in terms of specific demographic variables, clinical symptoms, or the presence of comorbid psychiatric disorders.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) experienced in childhood or adolescence is often a chronic disorder with high subjective distress and impairment of family and social functioning. An early comprehensive intervention schedule can have a profound effect on outcome in later years. The clinical manifestations of OCD among children and adolescents do not seem to be inherently different from those of adult patients. In younger subjects, the clinical picture tends to be dominated by compulsions, and insight can be poor, with little recognition of the symptoms as a problem.There is often a shift in symptoms over time, with some symptoms being replaced by others, while in adults, the core obsessions and compulsions tend to be more stable. In addition to depression and anxiety disorders, the spectrum of comorbid psychopathology seen in pediatric OCD patients includes tic, disruptive behavior, and specific developmental disorders. The treatment of childhood and adolescent OCD relies on cognitive-behavioral techniques of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapeutic interventions similar to those recommended in adults. The efficacy of exposure and response prevention in pediatric OCD has been shown in numerous open studies, and four controlled trials. Pharmacotherapy relies on serotonergic medication, and all have been demonstrated to be significantly superior to placebo, as reported in a recently published meta-analysis. Current concerns with the use of SSRIs in children and adolescents were explored as regards OCD and anxiety disorders, and there is no evidence for an increase in suicide or related behaviors.

Over the last 25 years, the perception of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has changed; where once it was seen as a rare refractory disorder, it is now viewed as a fairly prevalent, but treatable, medical condition responding to two main therapeutic strategies—serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Given the emergence of new results with SRIs, more data on the role of augmentation strategies with second-generation antipsychotics, and recent genetic and neuroimaging findings with potential for advancing the understanding of the pathogenesis of OCD, it was thought appropriate to revisit OCD in order to identify key developments in this field and examine how they might be translated into the clinical arena.This consensus statement is the product of the International Anxiety Disorders Conference that took place in Cape Town in February 2006, and is referred to as the Cape Town Consensus (CTC).

Over the last 25 years, the perception of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has changed; where once it was seen as a rare refractory disorder, it is now viewed as a fairly prevalent, but treatable, medical condition responding to two main therapeutic strategies–serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Given the emergence of new results with SRIs, more data on the role of augmentation strategies with second-generation antipsychotics, and recent genetic and neuroimaging findings with potential for advancing the understanding of the pathogenesis of OCD, it was thought appropriate to revisit OCD in order to identify key developments in this field and examine how they might be translated into the clinical arena. This consensus statement is the product of the International Anxiety Disorders Conference that took place in Cape Town in February 2006, and is referred to as the Cape Town Consensus (CTC).

In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) system, OCD has been classified as an anxiety disorder. However, in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system, OCD is separated from these conditions. This is consistent with several findings. OCD can begin before puberty, whereas other anxiety disorders, particularly generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), have a later age of onset. OCD is similarly prevalent in men and women, as opposed to depressive and anxiety disorders, which are more common in women. Pharmacologic challenges in some (but not all) studies show exacerbation of symptoms to 5-HT receptor agonists (eg, mCPP, sumatriptan), but not to other anxiogenic challenges such as yohimbine, sodium lactate, caffeine, CO2, cholecystokinin, and pentagastrin, which are known to elicit anxiety symptoms in anxiety disorders.