Adams, J. N. and Swain, S. 2002. ‘Introduction’, in Adams, J. N., Janse, M. and Swain, S. (eds), Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Word, pp. 1–20. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aronin, L. and Singleton, D. 2012. Multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Arviso, D., Cuervo, C. M., Flynn, S., Jacobs, K., Lai, K. and Schulz, M. 2005. MEG evidence that age of second language learning does not matter: MEG results isolate ELAN for both L1 and advanced L2 speakers of English. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar

Auer, P. and Wei, Li. 2007. ‘Introduction: Multilingualism as a problem? Monolingualism as a problem?’, in Auer, P. and Wei, Li (eds), Handbook of Multilingualism and Multilingual Communication, pp. 1–14. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Berkes, É. and Flynn, S. 2012a, ‘Further evidence in support of the Cumulative-Enhancement Model: CP structure development’, in Amaro, J. Cabrelli, Flynn, S. and Rothman, J. (eds), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood, pp. 143–164. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Berkes, É. and Flynn, S. 2012b. ‘Enhanced L3…Ln acquisition and its implications for language teaching’, in Gabrys-Barker, D. (ed.), Cross-linguistic Influences in Multilingual Language Acquisition, pp. 1–22. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Berkes, É. and Flynn, S. 2013a. ‘Multilingualism: new perspectives on syntactic development’, in Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds), pp. 137–167.Google Scholar

Berkes, É. and Flynn, S. 2013b. ‘Economical’ English L2 acquisition by L1 German and L1 Hungarian learners: mapping of grammatical functions in free relatives provides for structure dependent learning. Paper presented at ISB9, Singapore.Google Scholar

Berkes, É. and Flynn, S. 2015. ‘Multilingual acquisition of English: development of grammar through study of null anaphora’, in Jordà, M. P. S. and Falomir, L. P. (eds), Learning and Using Multiple Languages: Current Findings from Research on Multilingualism, pp. 112–133. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds) 2013. The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, second edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Caponigro, I. 2000. ‘Free relatives as DPs with a silent D and a CP complement’, in Samiian, V. (ed.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, vol. 12, pp. 140–150. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University.Google Scholar

Cheng, L. L. S. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-Questions. PhD dissertation, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language : Its Nature, Origins, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2006. The Architecture of Language. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chung, D. 2000. ‘On the representation and operation of WH-questions’, The Korean Generative Grammar Circle: Studies in Generative Grammar 10, 357–387.Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. (ed.) 2002a. Portraits of the L2 User. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. 2002b. ‘Background to the L2 user’, in Cook, V. J. (ed.), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. 2012. ‘Multi-competence’, in Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, pp. 3768–3774. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. and Newson, M. 2007. Chomsky’s Universal Grammar: An Introduction, third edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. 2007. Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

De Bot, K., Lowie, W. and Verspoor, M. 2007. ‘A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10, 7–21.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., Mehler, J., Cohen, L., Paulesu, E., Perani, D., van de Moortele, P.-P., Lehéricy, S. and Le Bihan, D. 1997. ‘Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second languages’, Neuroreport 8, 3809–3815.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G. 1996. ‘Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 677–758.Google Scholar

Felix, S. W. 1984. Two Problems of Language Acquisition: On the Interaction of Universal Grammar and Language Growth. Passau: Universität Passau.Google Scholar

Flynn, S. 1983. A Study of the Effects of Principal Branching Direction in Second Language Acquisition: The Generalization of a Parameter of Universal Grammar from First to Second Language Acquisition. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Flynn, S. 1989. ‘Spanish, Japanese and Chinese speakers’ acquisition of English relative clauses: new evidence for the head-direction parameter’, in Hyltenstam, K. and Obler, L. K. (eds), Bilingualism across the Lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity, and Loss, pp. 116–131. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, F., Gair, J. and Lust, B. 2005. Developmental primacy of free relatives in first, second and third language acquisition: implications for their syntax and semantics. Paper presented at Linguistic Association of Great Britain, Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C. and Vinnitskaya, I. 2004. ‘The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development’, International Journal of Multilingualism 1 (1), 3–17.Google Scholar

Flynn, S. and Lust, B. 1980. ‘Acquisition of relative clauses in English: developmental changes in their heads’, in Harbert, W. and Herschensohn, J. (eds), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 33–42. Ithaca, NY: Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Flynn, S. and Lust, B. 2002. ‘A minimalist approach to L2 solves a dilemma of UG’, in Cook, V. J. (ed.), pp. 95–120.Google Scholar

Foley, C. 1996. Knowledge of the Syntax of Operators in the Initial State: The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in French and English. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Gass, S. M. 1979. ‘Language transfer and universal grammatical relations’, Language Learning 29, 327–344.Google Scholar

Gleitman, L. 1981. ‘Maturational determinants of language learning’, Cognition 10 (1), 103–114.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. 2004. ‘Studying bilinguals: methodological and conceptual issues’, in Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds), The Handbook of Bilingualism, pp. 32–63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hahne, A. 2001. ‘What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30, 251–266.Google Scholar

Hamburger, H. 1980. ‘A deletion ahead of its time’, Cognition 8, 389–416.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (ed.) 2009. Processes in Third Language Acquisition. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, E. L. and Comrie, B.. 1977. ‘Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 8 (1), 63–99.Google Scholar

Kessler, K., Martohardjono, G. and Shafer, V. 2004. ‘ERP Correlates of age and proficiency in L2 processing of syntactic and inflectional information’, in Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. and Smith, E. C. (eds), Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, vol. 28, pp. 294–305. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. 2007. ‘Object relatives made easy: a cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’s processing of relative clauses’, Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (6), 860–897.Google Scholar

Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K.-M. and Hirsch, J. 1997. ‘Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages’, Nature 388, 171–174.Google Scholar

Klein, E. C. and Martohardjono, G. 1999. The Development of Second Language Grammars: A Generative Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ko, H., Perovic, A., Ionin, T. and Wexler, K. 2008. ‘Semantic universals and variation in L2 article choice’, in Slabakova, R., Rothman, J. and Gavruseva, E. (eds), Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007), pp. 118–129. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Lee, K.-O. 1991. On the First Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Korean: The Universal Structure of COMP. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Lee, K.-O., Lust, B. and Whitman, J. 1990. ‘On functional categories in Korean: a study of the first language acquisition of Korean relative clauses’, in Baek, E.-J. (ed.), Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics, pp. 312–333. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, E. H. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Leung, Y.-K. I. (ed.) 2009. Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Levy, Y. 1983. ‘It’s frogs all the way down’, Cognition 15, 75–93.Google Scholar

Li, C. N. (ed.) 1976. Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Li, P. and Zhao, X. 2013. ‘Connectionist models of second language acquisition’, in del Pilar Garcia Mayo, M., Junkal, M., Mangado, G. and Adrian, M. M. (eds), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, pp. 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lust, B. 2006. Child Language: Acquisition and Growth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lust, B. et al. 1986. ‘A comparison of null and pronoun anaphora in first language acquisition’, in Lust, B. (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, vol. I: Defining the Constraints, pp. 245–277. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

MacSwan, J. 1999. A Minimalist Approach to Intrasentential Code Switching. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

MacSwan, J. 2000. ‘The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: evidence from intrasentential code switching’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3, 37–54.Google Scholar

MacSwan, J. 2013. ‘Code-switching and grammatical theory’, in Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds), pp. 323–350.Google Scholar

Martohardjono, G., Epstein, S. D. and Flynn, S. 1998. ‘Universal Grammar: hypothesis space or grammar selection procedures? Is UG affected by critical periods?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 612–614.Google Scholar

Mróz, M. 2010. Bilingual Language acquisition: Focus on Relative Clauses in Polish and English. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar

Murasugi, K. 1991. Noun Phrases in Japanese and English: A Study in Syntax, Learnability and Acquisition. Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar

Packard, J. L. 1988. ‘The first language acquisition of prenominal modification with de in Mandarin’, Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16 (1), 31–53.Google Scholar

Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E. and Genesee, F. 2000. ‘Early emergence of structural constraints on code-mixing: evidence from French–English bilingual children’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3, 245–261.Google Scholar

Pavesi, M. G. 1986. A Study of Markedness in Second Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Penfield, W. and Roberts, L. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Perani, D., Paulesu, E., Sebastian-Galles, N., Dupoux, E., Dehaene, S., Bettinardi, V., Cappa, S. F., Fazio, F. and Mehler, J. 1998. ‘The bilingual brain: proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language’, Brain 121, 1841–1852.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center 2013. Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/social-networking-sites/Findings.aspxGoogle Scholar

Pietroski, P. and Crain, S. 2012. ‘The language faculty’, in Margolis, E., Samuels, R. and Stich, S. P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, pp. 361–381. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. and Lengyel, Z. (eds) 1995. The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. and Ryan, L. (eds) 2004. Language Acquisition: The Age Factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Somashekar, S. 1999. Developmental Trends in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Cross-linguistic Experimental Study of Tulu. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Tarallo, F. and Myhill, J. 1983. ‘Interference and natural language processing in second language acquisition’, Language Learning 33, 55–76.Google Scholar

Wunderlich, D. 2007. ‘Why assume UG?’, in Penke, M. and Rosenbach, A. (eds), What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics: The Case of Innateness, special issue of Studies in Language, 615–647.Google Scholar