American Sales Co. v. Warner Chilcott Co., No. 14-2071 (1st Cir. filed Oct. 14, 2014).Google Scholar

Asahi Glass Co. v. Pentech Pharm., Inc., 289 F. Supp. 2d 986, 994 (N.D. Ill. 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FTC v. AbbVie Inc., 2015 WL 2114380 (E.D. Pa. May 6, 2015).Google Scholar

FTC v. Actavis, 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013).Google Scholar

FTC v. Cephalon, 36 F. Supp. 3d 527, 537 (E.D. Pa. 2014).Google Scholar

FTC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, 677 F.3d 1298, 1312 (11th Cir. 2012).Google Scholar

In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litig., 2015 WL 1311352 (D. Conn. Mar. 23, 2015).Google Scholar

In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation, 332 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2003).Google Scholar

In re Cipro Cases I & II, 2015 WL 2125291 (Cal. May 7, 2015).Google Scholar

In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, 544 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2008).Google Scholar

In re Effexor XR Antitrust Litig., 2014 WL 4988410 (D.N.J. Oct. 6, 2014).Google Scholar

In re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation, 686 F.3d 197 (3d Cir. 2012), judgment vacated sub nom. Merck & Co. v. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., 133 S. Ct. 2849 (2013).Google Scholar

In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig., 46 F. Supp. 3d 523, 542 (D.N.J. 2014).Google Scholar

In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litig., 968 F. Supp. 2d 367 (D. Mass. 2013).Google Scholar

In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litig., 42 F. Supp. 3d 231, 272 (D. Mass. 2014).Google Scholar

In re Niaspan Antitrust Litig., 42 F. Supp. 3d 735 (E.D. Pa. 2014).Google Scholar

In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litigation, 466 F.3d 187 (2d Cir. 2006).Google Scholar

In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig., No. 08-cv-02431 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2014).Google Scholar

Jury Verdict in Favor of Defendants Against Plaintiffs Returned, In re Nexium Antitrust Litig., No. 12-md-02409 (D. Mass. Dec. 8, 2014), ECF No. 1374.Google Scholar

King Drug Company of Florence v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation (Lamictal), 791 F.3d 388 (3d Cir. 2015).Google Scholar

King Drug Co. of Florence v. Cephalon, Inc., 2015 WL 356913, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2015).Google Scholar

Loestrin, 45 F. Supp.3d 180, 189–91, 193 (D.R.I. 2014), appeal docketed, City of Providence, RI v. Warner Chilcott Co., No. 15-1250 (1st Cir. filed Feb. 25, 2015).Google Scholar

Mylan Pharms. v. FDA, 2005 WL 2411674 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2005).Google Scholar

Schering-Plough Corp. v. FTC, 402 F.3d 1056 (11th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar

Second Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief, FTC v. Watson Pharm., Inc., No. 1:09-cv-00955-TWT (N.D. Ga. May 28, 2009).Google Scholar

Statement of the Federal Trade Commission, FTC v. Cephalon, Inc., at 2 n. 7 (May 28, 2015).Google Scholar

Teva Pharm. Indus. v. Crawford, 410 F.3d 51, 55 (D.C. Cir. 2005).Google Scholar

Teva’s Memorandum in Support of Directed Verdict Motion on Threshold Issue of a Large and Unexplained Payment, In re: Nexium (Esomeprazole Magnesium) Antitrust Litig., Case 1:12-md-02409-WGY, at 12–13 (D. Mass. Nov. 10, 2014).Google Scholar

Time Ins. Co. v. AstraZeneca, 2014 WL 4933025 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2014).Google Scholar

United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA (Lidoderm), 2014 WL 6465235 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2014).Google Scholar

Alexiadis, Peter and Wood, David. 2012. Free Market 1: Copyright 0 – UK Premier League Loses Away from Home. Utilities Law Review, 18, 243–9.Google Scholar

Almunia, Joaquin. 2014. Statement on opening of investigation into Pay TV services. Brussels, January 13.Google Scholar

Anderman, Steven and Schmidt, Hedvig. 2011. EU Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights: The Regulation of Innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aplin, Tanya. 2005. Copyright in the Digital Society. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Batchelor, Bill and Jenkins, Tom. 2012. FA Premier League: The Broader Implications for Copyright Licensing. European Competition Law Review, 33, 157–64.Google Scholar

Batchelor, Bill and Montani, Luca. 2015. Exhaustion, Essential Subject Matter and Other CJEU Judicial Tools to Update Copyright for an Online Economy. Journal of Intellectual Property & Practice, 10, 591–600.Google Scholar

Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad. 2014. Intellectual Property Law. 4th edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Depreeuw, Sari and Hubin, Jean-Benoit. 2014a. Of Availability, Targeting and Accessibility: Online Copyright Infringements and Jurisdiction in the EU. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 9, 750–64.Google Scholar

Depreeuw, Sari and Hubin, Jean-Benoit. 2014b. Study on the Making Available Right and its Relationship with the Reproduction Right in Cross-Border Digital Transmissions. De Wolf & Partners (commissioned by DG Markt).Google Scholar

Doukas, Dimitrios. 2012. The Sky Is Not the (Only) Limit: Sports Broadcasting Without Frontiers and the Court of Justice: Comment on “Murphy”. European Law Review, 37, 605–26.Google Scholar

Drexl, Josef and Di Porto, Fabiana. 2015. Competition Law as Regulation? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Dunne, Niamh. 2014. Commitment Decisions in EU Competition Law. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 10, 399–444.Google Scholar

Dunne, Niamh. 2015. Competition Law and Economic Regulation: Making and Managing Markets. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2016. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market. COM(2016) 593 final. 2016/0280 (COD).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C. 2014. Where Does the Act of “Making Available” Occur? In Savin, Andrej and Trzaskowski, Jan (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Internet Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 191–210.Google Scholar

Graf, Thomas. 2011. The Court of Justice Speaks on Licensing of Satellite Broadcasting. Kluwer Competition Law Blog. Available at http://kluwercompetitionlawblog.com.Google Scholar

Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo. 2014. The Commission Investigation into Pay TV Services: Open Questions. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 5, 531–41.Google Scholar

Juncker, Jean-Claude. 2014. A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change: Political Guidelines for the next European Commission. Opening Statement in the European Parliament Plenary Session. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/docs/pg_en.pdf#page=7.Google Scholar

Keeling, David T. 2004. Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law. Volume 1 – Free Movement and Competition Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kjølbye, Lars, Aresu, Alessio, and Stephanou, Sophia. 2015. The Commission’s E-Commerce Sector Inquiry: Analysis of Legal Issues and Suggested Practical Approach. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 6, 465–76.Google Scholar

Langus, Gregor, Neven, Damien, and Poukens, Sophie. 2014. Economic Analysis of the Territoriality of the Making Available Right in the EU. Charles River Associates (commissioned by DG Markt).Google Scholar

Larouche, Pierre. 2000. Competition Law and Regulation in European Telecommunications. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Rosati, Eleonora. 2015. Online Copyright Exhaustion in a Post-Allposters World. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10, 673–81.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ted. 2011. Directive 2001/29/EC on Copyright in the Information Society. In Lindner, Brigitte and Shapiro, Ted (eds.), Copyright in the Information Society: A Guide to National Implementation of the European Directive. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar

Stothers, Christopher. 2007. Parallel Trade in Europe: Intellectual Property, Competition and Regulatory Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Triaille, Jean Paul et al. 2013. Study on the Application of Directive 2001/29/EC on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (The “InfoSoc Directive”). De Wolf & Partners and CRIDS (commissioned by DG Markt).Google Scholar

Vestager, Margrethe. 2015a. Competition Policy for the Digital Single Market: Focus on e-commerce. Berlin, March 26.Google Scholar

Vestager, Margrethe. 2015b. Intellectual Property and Competition. 19th IBA Competition Conference, Florence, September 11.Google Scholar

Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission OJ (1993) L 248/15.Google Scholar

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society OJ (2001) L 167/10.Google Scholar

Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights OJ (2004) L 195/16.Google Scholar

Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property OJ (2006) L 376/28.Google Scholar

Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs OJ (2009) L 111/16.Google Scholar

Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market OJ (2014) L 84/72.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2002. Report from the European Commission on the application of Council Directive 93/83/EEC on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission. COM(2002) 430 final.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2011. Green Paper on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union: opportunities and challenges towards a digital single market. COM(2011) 427 final.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2015a. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. COM(2015) 192 final.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2015b. EU seeks views on the Satellite and Cable Directive. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2015c. Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections on cross-border provision of pay-TV services.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2015d. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market. COM(2015) 627 final.Google Scholar