Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:48:46.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The syntax of person

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Will Oxford  and
Jila Ghomeshi
Will Oxford*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
Jila Ghomeshi*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
*
will.oxford@umanitoba.ca
jila.ghomeshi@umanitoba.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 571 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackema, Peter, and Neeleman, Ad. 2013. Person features and syncretism. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(4): 901–950.Google Scholar
Adger, David, and Harbour, Daniel. 2007. Syntax and syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax 10(1): 2–37.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana, and Rezac, Milan. 2003. Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In Romance linguistics, ed. Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa and Roberge, Yves, 49–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana, and Rezac, Milan. 2009. Cyclic Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1): 35–73.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on Minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Kenstowicz, Michael, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2016. Impossible persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi, and Ritter, Elizabeth. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for Person-Case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2): 273–313.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 2010. What ‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person marking, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86(2): 332–365.Google Scholar