In Table 2, the incorrect figure of 38 (11.7) was given for the DSM-5, wave 1 reading, it should have read 36 (11.1).

On page 5, the paragraph entitled ‘Do ICD-11 and DSM-5 identify the same individuals?’ contains an incorrect figure for wave 2. The sentence that reads:

More than half (n = 15, 51.7%) of those who met the DSM-5 criteria did not meet the ICD-11 criteria, while three (17.0%) of those who met the proposed ICD-11 criteria did not meet the DSM-5 criteria. Values were similar for wave 2; 28 individuals (6.6% of the total sample) met the criteria for both diagnoses, while 16 met the criteria for only one. Cohen's κ was 0.62.

Should have read:

More than half (n = 15, 51.7%) of those who met the DSM-5 criteria did not meet the ICD-11 criteria, while three (17.0%) of those who met the proposed ICD-11 criteria did not meet the DSM-5 criteria. Values were similar for wave 2; 14 individuals (3.3% of the total sample) met the criteria for both diagnoses, while 16 met the criteria for only one. Cohen's κ was 0.62.

The authors would like to apologise for the errors.